OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Amazfit Bip S review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£55Screen size:1.28 inchBattery life:15 daysDisplay type:Transflective LCD

Amazfit Bip S Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 52 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Amazfit Bip S
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components

35%

5.5

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.5

Reviews score

10%

8.8

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 57% of smartwatches
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 60%
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

24%

4.4

Health

21%

8.2

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

4.2

Smart features

12%

4.6

Connectivity

9%

7.5

Display & Design

4%

1.0

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 71%
8.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models

80%

8.3

Average grade

20%

9.0

Popularity

Grades by review (52)
21 reviews + 31 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 86%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • amazfit-bip-s
  • amazfit-bip-s
  • amazfit-bip-s
  • amazfit-bip-s
  • amazfit-bip-s
  • amazfit-bip-s
  • amazfit-bip-s
  • amazfit-bip-s
  • amazfit-bip-s
amazfit-bip-s
amazfit-bip-s
amazfit-bip-s
amazfit-bip-s
amazfit-bip-s
amazfit-bip-s
amazfit-bip-s
amazfit-bip-s
amazfit-bip-s
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Amazfit Bip S

Based on 10 · 12

Reviewers praise the long battery, light comfortable fit and reliable GPS, but notifications are limited and sleep tracking and screen resolution disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Amazfit Bip S

Based on 193 owners sharing their experience in online comments

41%positive19%mixed40%negative

Owners praise the long battery life and readable screen, but often report tracking, display and app problems.

What owners dislike

  • Some owners report battery life far shorter than advertised, lasting about a week with heart rate tracking on, and some report sudden drain or erratic charging.16
  • Owners say the screen looks dim, tinted, or hard to read in low light and at night, and small notification text is hard to see.13
  • Owners say the watch often disconnects from the phone and fails to sync cycling activities to Zepp, Mi Fit, or Strava.13
  • Owners say GPS signal loss during outdoor activity restarts the watch and deletes the workout data.11
  • Some owners report the screen flickers in always-on mode, and the screen can detach from the case after a knock or glue failure.9
  • Owners say phone notifications from WhatsApp, SMS, and calls often fail to arrive or arrive late after pairing.9
  • Owners say heart rate readings are unreliable during intense exercise, often reading well below actual effort and sometimes reading without skin contact.6
  • Some owners report itching or allergic skin reactions from the rubber strap, and some switch to a different strap to fix it.5
  • Owners say the step counter adds false steps during vehicle rides, bumps, or sudden hand gestures.5
  • Owners say the advertised workout modes are missing, with only six sport modes shown instead of the listed ten.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit Bip S

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

24%

4.4

Health

21%

8.2

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

4.2

Smart features

12%

4.6

Connectivity

9%

7.5

Display & Design

4%

1.0

Hardware

5.5
Reviews score
8.5
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.0
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 71.3% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 67.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
15 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 15 days on a charge, which is longer than 83% of Smartwatches and the same as 3.9% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
22 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 22 h on a charge, which is longer than 54.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.1% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
22 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 22 h with GPS on, which is longer than 52.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.9% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
200 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 200 mAh battery, which is smaller than 88.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.2% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
150 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 150 min, which is slower than 88.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 7.4% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS, which is more advanced than the system in 58.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 7.1% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 69.3% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.28 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.28 inch screen, which is smaller than 78% of Smartwatches and the same as 4.9% of Smartwatches.
Display type
Transflective LCD
This smartwatch uses Transflective LCD, which is less advanced than the screen in 68.3% of Smartwatches and equal to 2.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
176x 176
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 176x176 which is lower than that of 93.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
194 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 194 ppi, which is lower than 94.7% of Smartwatches and equal to 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 0 GB of internal storage, which is less than 76.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 23.5% of Smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit Bip S vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 8 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (15 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    15 days vs 7 days
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.2% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • 21.4% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 86% of models

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    9.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (52)
    21 reviews + 31 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.0
  • 26 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (19 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    19 g vs 45 g
  • 21.4% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 86% of models

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    9.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (52)
    21 reviews + 31 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.0
  • 17.3% higher sentiment score
    8.8 vs 7.5
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
  • 8 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (15 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    15 days vs 7 days
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 41.2% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 26 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (19 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    19 g vs 45 g
  • 2 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    20 mm vs 22 mm
  • 7.2 mm narrower case
    This smartwatch has a narrower case than the average smartwatch (35.3 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    35.3 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No gyroscope
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 71.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • 1 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    February 2020
    2020 vs 2021
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No gyroscope
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 71.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No route support
    This smartwatch does not support route support, the average smartwatch does. 54.4% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 80 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (10 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    10 vs 90
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 105 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (200 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    200 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • 30 min slower charging
    This smartwatch charges more slowly than the average smartwatch (150 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    150 min vs 120 min
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (Transflective LCD vs AMOLED).
    Transflective LCD vs AMOLED
  • No ambient light sensor
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • Lower resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 176x176, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    176x176 vs 360x360
  • 0.12 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.28 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 132 ppi less sharp screen
    This smartwatch has a less sharp screen than the average smartwatch (194 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    194 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Less practical form
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • Basic band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, tpu for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, tpu vs silicone
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
TechMishka
≈ estimated
04/09/2020
Hands-on review · two months of use, sports and software
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S is not a huge upgrade, but a good pick as a basic smartwatch or light GPS fitness tracker.
9.0
Chigz Tech Reviews
≈ estimated
11/07/2020
Hands-on review · heart rate and screen tests
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S is a budget watch with strong fitness tracking and long battery life, worth buying despite its basic look.
9.0
Andrew Tsai
≈ estimated
01/07/2020
Unboxing and hands-on review · battery and iPhone notifications
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S is a great-value budget smartwatch with excellent battery life, especially for iPhone users.
9.0
Dan's Gadgets
≈ estimated
18/06/2020
Full review · daily wear, tracking accuracy and app
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S is cheap, cheerful and comfortable: a simple fitness smartwatch with a screen that is not the most advanced.
6.0
Too Many Gadgets
≈ estimated
07/06/2020
Hands-on review · two weeks of daily use
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S was a pleasant surprise in some ways but disappointing in others, mainly the connection drops.
8.0
TFellas
≈ estimated
09/05/2020
Detailed review · music control, GPS and connection tests
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S is a clear upgrade for older Bip owners and a simple pick, though connection and vibration are weak.
7.0
Maaz Mansoor
≈ estimated
24/04/2021
Short review · wear, app and running features
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S is good for a basic, budget running watch, but limited as a full smartwatch.
8.0
Chris Panton
≈ estimated
01/09/2020
First look · unboxing, setup and early impressions
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S seems quite nice so far, though very familiar to the previous Bip model.
8.0
PinoyMetroGeek
≈ estimated
27/07/2020
Unboxing and setup · first impressions and first use
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S is a promising watch with a great design; the full verdict is saved for a later test.
9.0
NotoriousTechClub
≈ estimated
20/06/2020
Full review and unboxing · battery and heart rate tests
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S feels premium, with strong battery life and accurate heart rate readings.
9.0
TekNixHaX
≈ estimated
13/06/2020
Full review · several days of use
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S has a dated design and display, but it is responsive, long-lasting and worth buying.
8.0
Donavon Hornbeck
≈ estimated
03/06/2020
First look · unboxing and first run with GPS check
Verdict
Amazfit Bip S delivers impressive GPS and heart rate for the money, making it worth considering as a cheap running watch.
More graded video reviews (1)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
androidauthority.com
≈ estimated
04/06/2020
One-week test · Fitness tracker
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a light, long-lasting fitness tracker with accurate GPS, but unreliable app syncing makes it hard to recommend.
8.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
07/10/2020
Long-term test · Fitness tracker
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a light, long-lasting tracker with solid sports features, but its screen is basic and its heart rate readings fall short of a chest strap.
7.5
techradar.com
✓ explicit
10/02/2021
Full review · GPS fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is strong on battery life, GPS and outdoor visibility, but limited watch faces, a modest screen and weak notifications keep it basic.
8.0
sypnotix.com
≈ estimated
19/08/2020
Hands-on review · Everyday use
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a simple watch that lasts about 12 days, but its dim screen and workouts started by hand suit everyday users more than athletes.
9.0
pinoymetrogeek.com
≈ estimated
02/08/2020
Two-week test · Activity tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a dependable tracker for steps, heart rate and sleep, with long battery life and notifications, but not a full smartwatch.
9.0
omracerreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
24/05/2020
Long-term test · Budget GPS watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a light, comfortable GPS watch whose bright screen works outdoors, but its straps came loose twice.
7.0
au.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
01/07/2020
Hands-on test · Budget fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a light, long-lasting fitness watch that tracks runs well, but its heart rate reading can drop during hard strength workouts.
9.0
chinamobilemag.de
✓ explicit
05/05/2020
Month-long test · Lightweight fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a light fitness watch with an always-on screen that stays readable in sunlight, though its low resolution and washed-out colors are obvious.
7.0
smartzone.de
≈ estimated
08/07/2020
Practical test · Fitness tracker
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a light, comfortable fitness tracker with GPS and a screen that is easy to read outdoors, though it is not a conventional watch.
9.0
nerdsheaven.de
≈ estimated
16/07/2020
Hands-on test · Upgrade from Bip
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a comfortable, easy-to-read tracker with GPS and a smartwatch-style look, but first-generation Bip owners gain little by upgrading.
8.0
heise.de
✓ explicit
14/09/2021
Hands-on test · Apple Watch look-alike
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a light tracker with GPS and long battery life, but its dull screen and lack of apps make it more a tracker than a smartwatch.
8.0
global.techradar.com
≈ estimated
13/01/2020
Hands-on test · GPS fitness tracker
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a light fitness tracker with long battery life and GPS, though its washed-out screen and slightly slow menus count against it.
9.0
tomshw.it
≈ estimated
23/09/2020
Hands-on test · Battery and fitness
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a light tracker with GPS and over 20 days of battery life, but serious athletes should look at Garmin or Polar.
8.0
andreagaleazzi.com
≈ estimated
27/06/2020
Personal review · Lightweight fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a light, stylish sports watch with very long battery life, but its small text and imprecise touch make notifications hard to read.
9.0
robadainformatici.it
✓ explicit
07/07/2022
Full review · GPS fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit Bip S is a light sports watch with built-in GPS and long battery life, though its basic screen and occasionally sluggish touch are its weak points.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Amazfit Bip S

  • Exceptional battery life, lasting between 15 to 40 days depending on usage.
  • Transflective always-on display offers excellent visibility in direct sunlight.
  • Highly affordable price point for a device with built-in GPS.
  • Lightweight and comfortable design, making it suitable for 24/7 wear and sleep tracking.
  • Built-in GPS is generally reported as accurate for outdoor route tracking.
  • 5ATM water resistance allows for swimming and showering.

What customers don't like about Amazfit Bip S

  • Heart rate monitoring can be inconsistent or inaccurate during high-intensity workouts.
  • Companion app (Zepp) and firmware updates can be finicky or slow to sync.
  • Low-resolution display appears dull and pixelated when used indoors.
  • Limited smartwatch functionality; lacks a microphone, speaker, and the ability to reply to notifications.
  • Sleep tracking may miss awake periods or lack detailed REM stage data.
  • Physical build uses plastic materials that some users feel look and feel cheap.

Verdict

The Amazfit Bip S is an ultra-lightweight 31g smartwatch featuring a 1.28-inch transflective always-on color display (176 x 176 resolution) protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3. Its primary strengths are an exceptional battery life that can last up to 40 days on a single charge and its highly visible outdoor display that becomes clearer in direct sunlight. Key specifications include built-in GPS and GLONASS, 5ATM water resistance suitable for swimming, a BioTracker PPG heart rate sensor, and support for 10 sports modes. However, common drawbacks include a low-resolution screen that appears dull indoors, a plastic build that some users find cheap, and reports of finicky app connectivity or sluggish interface responsiveness.

Compare Amazfit Bip S with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit Bip S and other Smartwatches

No results found