OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Puma Smartwatch review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£250Screen size:1.19 inchBattery life:1.5 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Puma Smartwatch Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 15 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Puma Smartwatch
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

35%

5.8

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.8

Reviews score

10%

5.8

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 76% of smartwatches
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 85%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

24%

3.6

Health

21%

7.9

Fitness

16%

4.6

Battery

14%

6.5

Smart features

12%

7.3

Connectivity

9%

7.5

Display & Design

4%

2.8

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 63%
5.8

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models

5.8

Mark 7.0 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

6.8

Average grade

20%

7.8

Popularity

Grades by review (15)
10 reviews + 5 videos, average 6.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 74%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • puma-smartwatch
  • puma-smartwatch
  • puma-smartwatch
  • puma-smartwatch
  • puma-smartwatch
  • puma-smartwatch
  • puma-smartwatch
puma-smartwatch
puma-smartwatch
puma-smartwatch
puma-smartwatch
puma-smartwatch
puma-smartwatch
puma-smartwatch
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Puma Smartwatch

Based on 9 · 5

Reviewers like the stylish, lightweight design and clear display, but short battery life and sluggish performance disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Puma Smartwatch

Based on 36 owners sharing their experience in online comments

36%positive3%mixed61%negative

Owners like the stylish design and battery life, while connection problems, limited notifications, and battery failures drive frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say the watch disconnects when they walk into another room, so notifications stop; one owner says a SIM PIN setting blocked pairing until disabled.7
  • Owners say the battery runs low quickly after workouts, and some report it not charging or restarting while charging.5
  • Owners say notifications only work for a few apps, such as basic Google apps and Facebook Messenger, and the notification text is small.4
  • Owners say the screen looks dull and washed out, with weak backlight and colours that look less sharp than expected.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Puma Smartwatch

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components:

24%

3.6

Health

21%

7.9

Fitness

16%

4.6

Battery

14%

6.5

Smart features

12%

7.3

Connectivity

9%

7.5

Display & Design

4%

2.8

Hardware

5.8
Reviews score
5.8
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
1.5 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 1.5 days on a charge, which is shorter than 86.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.2% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
8 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 8 h on a charge, which is shorter than 75.5% of Smartwatches and the same as 3.6% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
24 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 24 h with GPS on, which is longer than 56.7% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.9% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
350 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 350 mAh battery, which is larger than 60.7% of Smartwatches and the same as 2% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
Screen size
1.19 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.19 inch screen, which is smaller than 92.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
390x 390
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 390x390 which is higher than that of 56.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
463 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 463 ppi, which is higher than 96.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 1.1% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 3100
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor model.
RAM
0.5 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 0.5 GB of RAM, which is less than 71.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 22.7% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
4 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 25.5% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Puma Smartwatch vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • 137 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (463 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    463 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 17 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (28 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    Weight includes strap/bracelet.
    28 g vs 45 g
  • 6 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (16 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    16 mm vs 22 mm
  • More advanced processor model
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon Wear 3,100 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • 3 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (24 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    24 h vs 21 h
  • Maps support
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 34.4% of smartwatches support maps.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • 137 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (463 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    463 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 17 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (28 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    Weight includes strap/bracelet.
    28 g vs 45 g
  • 6 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (16 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    16 mm vs 22 mm
  • 0.7 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (11 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    11 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • More advanced processor model
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 3100 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon Wear 3,100 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No automatic activity detection
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 81.8% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 5.5 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1.5 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1.5 days vs 7 days
  • 17.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models

    5.8

    Mark 7.0 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.8

    Average grade

    20%

    7.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (15)
    10 reviews + 5 videos, average 6.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.8 vs 7.0
  • 22.7% lower sentiment score
    5.8 vs 7.5
  • 8.1% worse value for money
    Puma Smartwatch has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.18 vs 7.8).
    7.18 vs 7.76
  • 2.27x more expensive
    Puma Smartwatch is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£250 vs £110).
    £250 vs £110
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 2 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2019 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    November 2019
    2019 vs 2021
  • No automatic activity detection
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 81.8% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No live tracking
    This smartwatch does not support live tracking, the average smartwatch does. 89.5% of smartwatches support live tracking.
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 5.5 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1.5 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1.5 days vs 7 days
  • 12 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (8 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    8 h vs 20 h
  • Less current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a less current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4.2 vs 5).
    4.2 vs 5
  • 0.21 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.19 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 20 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (30 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    30 m vs 50 m
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 50% less RAM
    This smartwatch has less RAM than the average smartwatch (0.5 GB vs 1 GB). The average smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM.
    0.5 GB vs 1 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Tech Zilla
≈ estimated
14/11/2019
Hands-on review · battery, fitness and smart features
Verdict
Puma Smartwatch is a comfortable, well-rounded debut for athletes and everyday users.
5.0
The Run Testers
≈ estimated
12/12/2019
Running test · training and marathon race use
Verdict
Puma Smartwatch is fine as an everyday watch but hard to recommend for serious running or marathon training.
7.0
TechTheLead
≈ estimated
07/10/2019
First look · design and technical overview
Verdict
Puma Smartwatch is for die-hard Puma fans only, since few buyers will pick it over other smartwatches.
Not graded
Brand video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Overview video
Brand video
Not graded
Overview video
Brand video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

5.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
15/11/2019
Hands-on test · Sports smartwatch
Verdict
The Puma Smartwatch is a light, sporty debut, but GPS and Google Fit sync problems undermine its workouts.
5.0
androidpolice.com
✓ explicit
05/12/2019
Two-week test · Sports watch
Verdict
The Puma Smartwatch is a light, eye-catching running watch, but 512MB of memory and about 16 hours of battery hold it back.
6.0
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
17/12/2019
Hands-on review · Sport styling
Verdict
The Puma Smartwatch is a light, sporty Wear OS watch that looks good on a run, but its 512MB of memory makes it slow and unstable.
6.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
19/12/2019
Hands-on review · Sports smartwatch
Verdict
The Puma Smartwatch is a light, simple sports watch with an accurate heart rate monitor, but its slow GPS and flimsy strap let it down.
6.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
23/12/2019
Hands-on review · Wear OS fitness
Verdict
The Puma Smartwatch has a sporty look and bright screen, but laggy performance and basic fitness tracking will disappoint runners.
5.0
pcworld.com
✓ explicit
21/01/2020
Two-week test · Wear OS
Verdict
The Puma Smartwatch looks sporty and light, but it lags badly in daily use, so it works best as a plain watch with the smart features off.
5.0
techadvisor.com
≈ estimated
22/01/2020
Hands-on test · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Puma Smartwatch is light, compact and attractive, but laggy performance and a GPS that takes minutes to lock make it weak for runners.
7.5
phandroid.com
✓ explicit
11/04/2020
Daily-use test · Wear OS
Verdict
The Puma Smartwatch is a comfortable, sporty Wear OS watch, but its broken auto brightness and about one waking day of battery hold it back.
9.0
tecnorecensioni.com
✓ explicit
09/12/2019
Two-week test · Battery and fitness
Verdict
The Puma Smartwatch is a well-made, bright watch with accurate steps and GPS, but it lacks always-on mode and workouts drain its battery fast.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Puma Smartwatch

  • Lightweight and slim 44mm design (only 28g), making it comfortable for sports
  • Vibrant 1.19-inch AMOLED display with strong brightness and a sunlight boost feature
  • Accurate heart rate monitoring according to several tests
  • Rapid charging capability, reaching 80% battery in about 50-60 minutes
  • Water-resistant up to 5ATM (50 metres), suitable for swimming
  • Rotating crown for easier navigation through Wear OS menus

What customers don't like about Puma Smartwatch

  • Laggy performance due to limited 512MB of RAM, causing apps to open slowly or crash
  • Mediocre battery life, typically requiring daily charging and lasting barely a full day with active use
  • Slow GPS signal acquisition, sometimes taking several minutes to lock on
  • Cheap-feeling build quality with materials often described as 'plasticky' or 'flimsy'
  • No built-in speaker, preventing users from taking calls or hearing voice assistant responses
  • Lack of native sleep tracking features

Verdict

The Puma Smartwatch is a sport-focused wearable featuring a 44mm aluminum and nylon case that is exceptionally lightweight at approximately 28g and water-resistant up to 5ATM. Powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 3100 chipset and Google’s Wear OS, it includes a 1.19-inch AMOLED display with a 328ppi pixel density, built-in GPS, heart rate monitoring, and NFC for Google Pay. Its main advantages include a slim 11mm profile, a breathable textured silicone strap designed for high-intensity training, and dedicated fitness features like the PUMATRAC app. However, users may encounter significant performance lag due to its limited 512MB of RAM, a standard battery life of only 24 hours, and the absence of a built-in speaker for calls or music playback.

Compare Puma Smartwatch with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Puma Smartwatch and other Smartwatches

No results found