OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Fossil Gen 6 42mm review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260Screen size:1.28 inchBattery life:1 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Fossil Gen 6 42mm Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 19 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Fossil Gen 6 42mm
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

35%

6.5

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.5

Reviews score

10%

6.5

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 58% of smartwatches
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 69%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

24%

5.8

Health

21%

7.9

Fitness

16%

4.8

Battery

14%

7.5

Smart features

12%

6.3

Connectivity

9%

6.7

Display & Design

4%

6.4

Hardware

â–²Better than 53%
6.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models

6.5

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.8

Average grade

20%

8.0

Popularity

Grades by review (19)
11 reviews + 8 videos, average 7.7/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 63%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • fossil-gen-6-42-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-42-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-42-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-42-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-42-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-42-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-42-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-42-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-42-mm
  • fossil-gen-6-42-mm
fossil-gen-6-42-mm
fossil-gen-6-42-mm
fossil-gen-6-42-mm
fossil-gen-6-42-mm
fossil-gen-6-42-mm
fossil-gen-6-42-mm
fossil-gen-6-42-mm
fossil-gen-6-42-mm
fossil-gen-6-42-mm
fossil-gen-6-42-mm
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Fossil Gen 6 42mm

Based on 10 · 9

Reviewers praise the smooth performance, fast charging and sharp display, but battery life is short and fitness apps disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Fossil Gen 6 42mm

Based on 50 owners sharing their experience in online comments

20%positive6%mixed74%negative

Owners praise its polished design and quick charging, but short battery life and unreliable software overshadow the experience.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say battery life is short: many need charging daily, and one lasted only about a day or under four hours; turning off Wi-Fi helped one owner.14
  • Owners say phone notifications such as WhatsApp, texts and emails don't reach the watch on iPhone, while calls still come through; a reset helped only briefly.4
  • Wear OS pairing and update problems4
  • Watch freezes, shuts down, or reboots4
  • Owners say charging is slow and unreliable: it can take about two hours, and if not seated correctly it overheats, drains the battery and stops charging.4
  • Owners say they can read texts and WhatsApp messages but cannot reply, with the only option on tapping a message being to block notifications.3
  • Owners say Google Assistant won't start from 'OK Google' or answer by voice, and shows that it is unavailable for the OS version.3
  • Owners say calorie tracking shows only basal metabolic calories rather than the full daily total, even for someone on their feet all day.3
  • Owners find setup confusing: Wear OS and the Fossil app both must be installed, and after using Wear OS, texts and calls stopped arriving until the Fossil app was used.3
  • Owners report the watch keeps disconnecting from the phone and health data fails to sync with the Fossil app, though the watch was up to date.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Fossil Gen 6 42mm

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

24%

5.8

Health

21%

7.9

Fitness

16%

4.8

Battery

14%

7.5

Smart features

12%

6.3

Connectivity

9%

6.7

Display & Design

4%

6.4

Hardware

6.5
Reviews score
6.5
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.5
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 30.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
1 day
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 1 day on a charge, which is shorter than 88.1% of Smartwatches and the same as 8.1% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
1 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 1 h on a charge, which is shorter than 99.6% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.5% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
30.5 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 30.5 h with GPS on, which is longer than 74.4% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
300 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 300 mAh battery, which is smaller than 51.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 6.3% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
60 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 60 min, which is quicker than 83.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 12% of Smartwatches.
Normalized from hour-based sources to 60 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Wear OS
This smartwatch runs Wear OS, which is more advanced than the system in 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 15.8% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
Screen size
1.28 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.28 inch screen, which is smaller than 78% of Smartwatches and the same as 4.9% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
416x 416
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416 which is higher than that of 70.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.5% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
460 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 460 ppi, which is higher than 80.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 4.8% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
600 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 600 nits, which is lower than 52.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 13.1% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
1.7 GHz
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 1.7 GHz which is faster than that in 66.4% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Snapdragon Wear 4100
This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor model.
RAM
1 GB
Market range: <0.5 GB – >2 GB
This smartwatch has 1 GB of RAM, which is more than 34.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 41.8% of Smartwatches.
Internal storage
8 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 8 GB of internal storage, which is more than 65.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 11.3% of Smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Fossil Gen 6 42mm vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 60 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    Normalized from hour-based sources to 60 minutes.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
    Supports external monitors over Bluetooth/BLE.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 9.5 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (30.5 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    30.5 h vs 21 h
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44.1% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
    Supports external monitors over Bluetooth/BLE.
  • 60 min quicker charging
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch takes 120 min to charge from empty.
    Normalized from hour-based sources to 60 minutes.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • 9.5 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (30.5 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    30.5 h vs 21 h
  • NFC functionality
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass vs mineral glass
  • 134 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (460 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    460 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather, stainless steel for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather, stainless steel vs silicone
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • Higher resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 416x416, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    416x416 vs 360x360
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Wear OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Wear OS vs Proprietary OS
  • More advanced processor model
    This smartwatch uses the Snapdragon Wear 4100 processor model, while the average smartwatch uses Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko.
    Snapdragon Wear 4,100 vs Silicon Labs EFM32 Giant Gecko
  • 2x more internal storage
    This smartwatch has more internal storage than the average smartwatch (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch has 4 GB of internal storage.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No automatic activity detection
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 81.8% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • 19 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (1 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    1 h vs 20 h
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 68 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (113 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    Weight includes strap/bracelet.
    113 g vs 45 g
  • 7.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models

    6.5

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.8

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (19)
    11 reviews + 8 videos, average 7.7/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.5 vs 7.0
  • 2.36x more expensive
    Fossil Gen 6 42mm is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£260 vs £110).
    £260 vs £110
  • 13.3% lower sentiment score
    6.5 vs 7.5
  • 3.6% worse value for money
    Fossil Gen 6 42mm has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.49 vs 7.8).
    7.49 vs 7.76
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No inactivity alerts
    This smartwatch does not support inactivity alerts, the average smartwatch does. 92.6% of smartwatches support inactivity alerts.
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No automatic activity detection
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 81.8% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • 19 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (1 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    1 h vs 20 h
  • 6 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (1 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    1 days vs 7 days
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 68 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (113 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    Weight includes strap/bracelet.
    113 g vs 45 g
  • 20 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (30 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    3 ATM class (ISO 22,810 shallow-water rating, not diving certification).
    30 m vs 50 m
  • 0.12 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.28 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • 150 nits dimmer screen
    This smartwatch has a dimmer screen than the average smartwatch (600 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    600 nits vs 750 nits
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.8
AbbyBReviewing
✓ explicit
24/01/2023
Long-term test · 30 days of daily use
Verdict
Fossil Gen 6 42mm is a good everyday smartwatch, held back by short battery life and limited health and swim tracking.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
whatsthebest.co.uk
✓ explicit
01/03/2024
Hands-on test · Standalone smartwatch
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is a fast, stylish watch that works well without your phone, but its poor battery and stray button presses hurt workouts.
8.0
yours.co.uk
≈ estimated
07/01/2022
Everyday use · Style and health
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is a stylish watch for everyday wear and calls without your phone, but it's a poor match for heavy daily training.
7.4
techgearlab.com
✓ explicit
24/01/2023
Lab test · Battery and health
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 mainly suits buyers who want a classic-looking watch, since its battery life is one of the worst we tested.
8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
28/10/2021
Hands-on review · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is a fast, good-looking Wear OS watch that works with iOS and Android, but its battery lasts about a day.
7.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
04/11/2021
Hands-on test · Wear OS 2 watch
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 has a quick chip and fast GPS, but without Wear OS 3 at launch it is hard to recommend over the Galaxy Watch 4.
6.2
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
26/01/2023
Hands-on test · Fitness apps
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 brings Wear OS 3 and useful Google apps, but its basic fitness app and short battery keep it behind rivals.
8.8
chip.de
✓ explicit
17/12/2021
Hands-on test · Design and charging
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 suits buyers who want a premium steel look and very fast charging, but its low-resolution screen looks blurry.
8.5
umihito.de
✓ explicit
01/03/2022
Hands-on test · Design and straps
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 has a premium stainless steel case and a bright, sharp AMOLED screen, but its battery is the main weak point.
8.0
global.techradar.com
✓ explicit
09/11/2021
Hands-on test · Wear OS watch
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is a fast, clean-looking Wear OS watch for iPhone owners who want an alternative to the Apple Watch, though battery life is short.
8.0
techprincess.it
≈ estimated
18/10/2021
Hands-on test · Design and battery
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is a striking, well-fitting Wear OS watch with a bright screen and fast performance, but the battery doesn't last the day.
8.0
androidplanet.nl
≈ estimated
15/06/2022
Extended test · Wear OS software
Verdict
The Fossil Gen 6 is a good-looking, well-equipped watch with an old version of Wear OS and a battery that needs charging every morning.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Fossil Gen 6 42mm

  • Elegant and stylish design that resembles a traditional timepiece
  • Rapid charging capability, reaching 80% in approximately 30 minutes
  • Vibrant and clear 1.28-inch AMOLED display with good visibility
  • Fast performance and smooth menu transitions powered by the Snapdragon Wear 4100+ chipset
  • Broad compatibility with both Android and iOS smartphones
  • Lightweight and comfortable build suitable for all-day wear

What customers don't like about Fossil Gen 6 42mm

  • Poor battery life, often requiring daily charging or failing to last a full 24 hours
  • Frequent Bluetooth connectivity issues and random disconnections from the phone
  • Inaccurate or basic health and fitness tracking, particularly for sleep and heart rate during intense workouts
  • Confusing setup process requiring multiple apps like Wear OS and Google Fit
  • Physical buttons can be inadvertently pressed during certain exercises like push-ups
  • Low water resistance rating (3 ATM) compared to many competitors

Verdict

The Fossil Gen 6 42mm is a sophisticated Wear OS smartwatch featuring a 1.28-inch AMOLED display with a 416x416 resolution (326 ppi) and a durable 3ATM water-resistant stainless steel case. Powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100+ chipset with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of storage, it offers smooth performance and a comprehensive suite of sensors, including SpO2 for blood oxygen tracking, an improved PPG heart rate monitor, and built-in GPS. Its primary advantages include exceptionally fast charging—reaching 80% in approximately 30 minutes—a sleek, traditional timepiece aesthetic, and compatibility with both Android and iOS. However, it is hindered by a relatively short battery life that typically lasts only 24 hours, occasional Bluetooth connectivity issues, and the fact that Fossil has discontinued its smartwatch line, potentially impacting long-term support.

Compare Fossil Gen 6 42mm with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fossil Gen 6 42mm and other Smartwatches

No results found