OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Amazfit GTS 2E Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Screen size:1.65 inchBattery life:14 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit GTS 2E Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 20 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.3

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 68% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Technical score

30%

8.2

Review score ( 8 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.2 · based on 20 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 13 more reviews are not scored yet.
▲Better than 68% of smartwatches
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models
Score components

24%

6.0

Health

21%

9.4

Fitness

16%

6.9

Battery

14%

5.9

Smart features

12%

5.2

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

4.5

Hardware

▲Better than 65% of smartwatches
8.2

Review score

Review score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 79% of models
Grades by review (20)
8 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
3

8.9%

8.0

t3.com

7.1%

10

whatsgoodtodo.com

7.1%

8.0

fitandwell.com

≈ estimated
2

7.1%

9.0

felixreview.com

7.1%

6.0

firstpost.com

Video reviews 3

3.6%

8.0

TechMishka

3.6%

8.0

Tech Spurt

3.6%

6.0

DesFit

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
▲Better than 79% of smartwatches
  • amazfit-gts-2e
  • amazfit-gts-2e
  • amazfit-gts-2e
  • amazfit-gts-2e
  • amazfit-gts-2e
  • amazfit-gts-2e
  • amazfit-gts-2e
  • amazfit-gts-2e
  • amazfit-gts-2e
amazfit-gts-2e
amazfit-gts-2e
amazfit-gts-2e
amazfit-gts-2e
amazfit-gts-2e
amazfit-gts-2e
amazfit-gts-2e
amazfit-gts-2e
amazfit-gts-2e

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit GTS 2E

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models
Score components:

24%

6.0

Health

21%

9.4

Fitness

16%

6.9

Battery

14%

5.9

Smart features

12%

5.2

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

4.5

Hardware

6.8
Review score
Review score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 79% of models
Grades by review (20)
8 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
3

8.9%

8.0

t3.com

7.1%

10

whatsgoodtodo.com

7.1%

8.0

fitandwell.com

≈ estimated
2

7.1%

9.0

felixreview.com

7.1%

6.0

firstpost.com

Video reviews 3

3.6%

8.0

TechMishka

3.6%

8.0

Tech Spurt

3.6%

6.0

DesFit

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Popularity:
Amazfit GTS 2E has a popularity of 10 points, which is higher than 93.2% of smartwatches.
10
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 74% of models
Score components:

60%

7.3

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

8.1
Brand name
Amazfit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
▲ Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
▲ Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
▼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
▲ Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
▲ Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
▲ Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
▲ Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
14 days
Battery life
14 days
▲ Better than 77% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 14 days which is longer than that of 76.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 9.2% of smartwatches.
Up to 24 days in basic watch mode.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
25 h
Battery life with GPS on
25 h
▲ Better than 64% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 25 h with GPS on which is longer than 64% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.2% of smartwatches.
Battery power
246 mAh
Battery power
246 mAh
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 246 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 72.2% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.2% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
▼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
Operating system
Zepp OS
▲ Better than 60% of models
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 60.2% of smartwatches and the same as that in 6.5% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
▲ Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
▼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
▲ Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
▲ Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.65 inch
Screen size
1.65 inch
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.65 inch which is larger than the screens of 78% of smartwatches and equal to those of 1.5% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
▲ Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
348x 442
Resolution
348x 442
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 348x442 which is lower than that of 50.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
341 ppi
Pixel density
341 ppi
▲ Better than 60% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 341 ppi which is higher than that of 59.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
450 nits
Display brightness
450 nits
▼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 450 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 86.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
0.1 GHz
CPU speed
0.1 GHz
▼ Worse than 87% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.1 GHz which is slower than that in 87.2% of smartwatches and equal to that in 2.4% of smartwatches.
Processor model
STM32L4R9
Processor model
STM32L4R9
▼ Worse than 97% of models
This smartwatch uses the STM32L4R9 processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
0.25 GB
Internal storage
0.25 GB
▼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0.25 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 65.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.8% of smartwatches.
256 MB internal storage; no onboard music storage.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more
What reviewers say

Amazfit GTS 2E vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 24 days in basic watch mode.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • 63.4% more popular
    Amazfit GTS 2E has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 24 days in basic watch mode.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • 5 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    25 h
    ▲ Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (25 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    25 h vs 20 h
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • 20 g lighter weight
    Weight
    25.0 g
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (25 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    25.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 0.25 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.65 inch
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.65 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 1.8 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    9.80 mm
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (9.8 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    9.80 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 6.4 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    35.6 mm
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (35.6 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    35.6 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 150 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    450 nits
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (450 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    450 nits vs 600 nits
  • Slower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    0.1 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.1 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    0.1 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 54 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    246 mAh days
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (246 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 24 days in basic watch mode.
    246 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 54 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    246 mAh days
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (246 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 24 days in basic watch mode.
    246 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 150 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    450 nits
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (450 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    450 nits vs 600 nits
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • Slower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    0.1 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.1 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    0.1 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • 3.75 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0.25 GB
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0.3 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    256 MB internal storage; no onboard music storage.
    0.25 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
DesFit
≈ estimated
16/04/2021
Hands-on review · running, cycling and strength tests
Verdict
Amazfit GTS 2E offers good value for the money, but heart rate tracking and GPS are its weak points for sport.
8.0
TechMishka
≈ estimated
26/03/2021
Hands-on review · two weeks of testing
Verdict
Amazfit GTS 2E has a great battery, design and build, but its GPS, calls and notifications have clear limits.
8.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
04/02/2021
Full review · two weeks of use, battery and features
Verdict
Amazfit GTS 2E is a good, light budget smartwatch with strong battery life, though its notifications could be better.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 10 · 12

Good battery life and a well-built, attractive design win praise, but calls and notifications are a clear weak spot.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

neowin.net
06/02/2021
Not graded yet
pocket-lint.com
10/03/2021
Not graded yet
techradar.com
19/03/2021
Not graded yet
trustedreviews.com
23/04/2021
Not graded yet
10
whatsgoodtodo.com
✓ explicit
06/12/2021
Personal review · Swimming and fitness
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS 2e is a fun, easy-to-learn watch that suits swimmers and fitness beginners, with heart-rate monitoring and up to 14 days of battery.
8.0
t3.com
✓ explicit
26/04/2022
Hands-on test · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS 2e looks like a Fitbit Versa 3 and tracks everyday workouts and sleep well, but it is not precise enough for serious running.
8.0
fitandwell.com
✓ explicit
27/06/2022
Hands-on test · Apple Watch alternative
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS 2e looks like an Apple Watch and covers most fitness needs, but it has no contactless payments and no Wi-Fi.
newatlas.com
12/01/2021
Not graded yet
navigation-professionell.de
01/02/2021
Not graded yet
8.2
bikepacking-adventures.com
✓ explicit
10/02/2024
Practical test · Display and battery
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS 2e is a fitness watch with a brilliant AMOLED screen and long battery life, but it is not quite as well made as an Apple Watch.
notebookcheck.com
07/05/2021
Not graded yet
global.techradar.com
04/02/2021
Not graded yet
7.0
quechoisir.org
≈ estimated
n/a
Consumer test · Screen and battery
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS 2e is a good-looking watch with a large edge-to-edge screen and long battery life, but it has no app store and its heart-rate readings could be better.
iphoneitalia.com
05/02/2021
Not graded yet
letemsvetemapplem.eu
26/06/2021
Not graded yet
9.0
techprincess.it
≈ estimated
18/09/2021
Hands-on review · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS 2e is a stylish fitness watch with a sharp AMOLED screen and about a week of battery, but it cannot answer calls or messages.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit GTS 2E

  • Excellent value for money with a premium, Apple Watch-like aesthetic
  • Vibrant and sharp 1.65-inch AMOLED always-on display
  • Strong battery life, often lasting 7–14 days depending on usage
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for all-day wear and sleep
  • Extensive fitness tracking with over 90 sports modes and built-in GPS
  • Responsive offline voice assistant for hands-free control

What we don't like about Amazfit GTS 2E

  • Lacks NFC for contactless payments and a speaker for Bluetooth calls
  • No internal storage for local music playback; only controls phone music
  • The new temperature sensor is often reported as inaccurate or a 'gimmick'
  • Proprietary Zepp software can be buggy, unintuitive, or have sync issues
  • Basic notification support with no ability to reply or interact
  • Heart rate and SpO2 accuracy may not meet the needs of serious athletes

Verdict

The Amazfit GTS 2e is a lightweight smartwatch featuring a 1.65-inch AMOLED HD display with 341 PPI and 5 ATM water resistance, making it suitable for swimming. It provides comprehensive health monitoring, including 24-hour heart rate tracking, SpO2 blood oxygen saturation measurement, sleep quality analysis, and a unique PAI health assessment system. For fitness, it supports 90 built-in sports modes with intelligent recognition for 6 common activities, integrated GPS for route tracking, and a built-in temperature sensor. Main pros include its impressive battery life of up to 14 days under typical use, vibrant always-on display, and comfortable aluminium alloy design. However, notable cons include the lack of a built-in speaker for Bluetooth calls, no local music storage, and the absence of NFC for contactless payments.

Compare Amazfit GTS 2E with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit GTS 2E and other Smartwatches

No results found