OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Amazfit GTS review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£110Screen size:1.65 inchBattery life:14 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit GTS Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 96 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Amazfit GTS
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

35%

5.9

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.5

Reviews score

10%

5.9

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 53% of smartwatches
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–²Better than 56%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

24%

4.5

Health

21%

7.5

Fitness

16%

6.4

Battery

14%

5.6

Smart features

12%

4.6

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

4.5

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 60%
8.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

9.7

Popularity

Grades by review (96)
31 reviews + 65 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 86%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • amazfit-gts
  • amazfit-gts
  • amazfit-gts
  • amazfit-gts
  • amazfit-gts
  • amazfit-gts
  • amazfit-gts
amazfit-gts
amazfit-gts
amazfit-gts
amazfit-gts
amazfit-gts
amazfit-gts
amazfit-gts
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Amazfit GTS

Based on 10 · 12

Reviewers like the long battery life and light, comfortable fit, but notifications and app data disappoint, and the screen divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Amazfit GTS

Based on 189 owners sharing their experience in online comments

21%positive30%mixed49%negative

Owners like the long battery and bright screen, but many are frustrated by unreliable tracking, notifications, and software.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report WhatsApp and messenger alerts stop appearing on the watch, most often with an iPhone, even after resetting, unpairing and reinstalling the apps.15
  • Owners say GPS can take several minutes to lock on, often fails indoors or on cloudy days, and sometimes records a strange or incomplete route.13
  • Owners report emoji and icon support is unreliable: some emoji appear only in grey, others do not show, and the icon font install fails for some users.13
  • Battery drains quickly or degrades over time12
  • Owners say Google Maps navigation on the watch does not start or sync, even after buying the Pro version of the companion app and following the setup steps.10
  • Owners say WhatsApp photos do not show on the watch, and some needed the paid Pro app to get image alerts, which still did not work for them.9
  • Owners report the wrist heart rate reading keeps running while the watch is on a table, and sleep tracking misses daytime sleep, especially for night-shift workers.8
  • Wrist raise wake is unreliable or intrusive8
  • Owners say the Amazfit companion app is complicated, slow to sync, and sometimes fails to open or sync at all, and support does not respond.8
  • Owners say step counts are inaccurate, adding steps while asleep, while sitting in a car or while doing arm movements, and sometimes update slowly or miss steps.7

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit GTS

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components:

24%

4.5

Health

21%

7.5

Fitness

16%

6.4

Battery

14%

5.6

Smart features

12%

4.6

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

4.5

Hardware

5.9
Reviews score
8.5
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.9
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 71.3% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 67.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
14 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 14 days on a charge, which is longer than 73.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 9% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
25 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 25 h on a charge, which is longer than 61.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.8% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
25 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 25 h with GPS on, which is longer than 60.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.6% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
220 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 220 mAh battery, which is smaller than 81.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.5% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 120 min, which is quicker than 13.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 44.6% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS, which is more advanced than the system in 58.8% of Smartwatches and equal to 7.1% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 69.3% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.65 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.65 inch screen, which is larger than 78.6% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.3% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
348x 442
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 348x442 which is lower than that of 53.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.8% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
341 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 341 ppi, which is higher than 59.7% of Smartwatches and equal to 1% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
450 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch has a screen brightness of 450 nits, which is lower than 87.4% of Smartwatches and equal to 5.6% of Smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit GTS vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 23% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • 7 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (14 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • 21.4% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 86% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    9.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (96)
    31 reviews + 65 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.0
  • 20.2 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (24.8 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    24.8 g vs 45 g
  • 21.4% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 86% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    9.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (96)
    31 reviews + 65 videos, average 8.3/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.0
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • 7 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (14 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • 5 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (25 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    25 h vs 20 h
  • 4 h longer GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (25 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    25 h vs 21 h
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs mineral glass
  • 20.2 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (24.8 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    24.8 g vs 45 g
  • 2.3 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (9.4 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    9.4 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 0.25 inch larger display
    This smartwatch has a larger screen than the average smartwatch (1.7 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.65 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses aluminum, stainless steel, plastic for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    aluminum, stainless steel, plastic vs polycarbonate
  • 2 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    20 mm vs 22 mm
  • 6.3 mm narrower case
    This smartwatch has a narrower case than the average smartwatch (36.2 mm vs 42.5 mm). The average smartwatch measures 42.5 mm across.
    36.2 mm vs 42.5 mm
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 23% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No automatic activity detection
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 81.8% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No gyroscope
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 71.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • 21.3% lower sentiment score
    5.9 vs 7.5
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 2 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2019 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    October 2019
    2019 vs 2021
  • No automatic activity detection
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 81.8% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No gyroscope
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 71.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No route support
    This smartwatch does not support route support, the average smartwatch does. 54.4% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 78 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (12 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    12 vs 90
  • No achievement tracking
    This smartwatch does not support achievements, the average smartwatch does. 87% of smartwatches support achievements.
  • No exercise tagging
    This smartwatch does not support exercise tagging, the average smartwatch does. 94.2% of smartwatches support exercise tagging.
  • 85 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (220 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    220 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • 300 nits dimmer screen
    This smartwatch has a dimmer screen than the average smartwatch (450 nits vs 750 nits). The average smartwatch peaks at 750 nits.
    450 nits vs 750 nits
  • Less practical form
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No passcode
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 70.4% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No camera remote
    This smartwatch does not include built-in camera remote control, the average smartwatch does. 85.5% of smartwatches that are equipped with a camera include built-in camera remote control.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
CJ Ying
≈ estimated
30/01/2021
Hands-on review · battery, interface and daily use
Verdict
Amazfit GTS is a solid budget smartwatch that handles the basics well, with a dated interface and missing newer features.
9.0
Naresh Lal
≈ estimated
02/05/2020
First-days review · app and feature walkthrough
Verdict
Amazfit GTS is recommended for the price so far, though calls and replies are not possible on the watch.
8.0
The D Show
≈ estimated
19/02/2020
Hands-on review · display, battery and music control tests
Verdict
Amazfit GTS feels premium and has a great screen, but it is not the best value on the market.
9.0
Chigz Tech Reviews
≈ estimated
11/02/2020
Hands-on review · screen, heart rate and build tests
Verdict
Amazfit GTS is a great fitness smartwatch with a bright display and accurate heart rate, with only slow watch face switching as a complaint.
8.0
Chase the Summit
≈ estimated
07/02/2020
Runner's review · running, treadmill and data export tests
Verdict
Amazfit GTS is good value as an everyday fitness watch, but serious runners will miss navigation, VO2 max and data export.
9.5
Copper vs Glass
≈ estimated
05/02/2020
Hands-on review · battery, design, screen and app
Verdict
Amazfit GTS is a strong all-round smartwatch for the price, with great battery life and a vibrant screen; the app could be faster.
8.0
Mac's Tech Toy Box
≈ estimated
13/01/2020
Consumer review · a couple of weeks of use
Verdict
Amazfit GTS is a very good smartwatch for its market, though it is more a fitness tracker than a smartwatch, lacking several features.
8.0
Peacock Inside Tech
≈ estimated
06/01/2020
Hands-on review · battery, sport modes and app
Verdict
Amazfit GTS is worth considering as a budget smartwatch that covers the essentials, mainly thanks to its excellent battery life.
5.0
GT English
≈ estimated
06/01/2020
Hands-on review · two weeks of use and price comparison
Verdict
Amazfit GTS leaves mixed feelings: great battery and light weight, but overpriced versus rival watches with more features.
9.0
Lim Reviews
≈ estimated
06/01/2020
Long-term review · three months of daily use
Verdict
Amazfit GTS's early heart rate and sleep tracking problems were fixed by updates; a strong recommendation for anyone.
9.0
Tech Brothers
≈ estimated
10/12/2019
Hands-on review · widgets, display and app tests
Verdict
Amazfit GTS is a good smartwatch for the money, suitable for men and women, with widgets to customise.
9.0
Dan's Gadgets
≈ estimated
03/12/2019
Multi-week review · daily wear, tracking and app
Verdict
Amazfit GTS is great value for the price, comfortable and good-looking, though heart rate accuracy and battery claims fall short.
More graded video reviews (9)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
tomsguide.com
✓ explicit
27/02/2020
Hands-on review · Fitness tracker
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS looks premium and still had 25% battery after eight days, but its step counting and sleep tracking are too inconsistent for daily use.
9.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
02/10/2019
Hands-on review · Smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is a premium-looking, well-built smartwatch with up to a month of battery, though its slow software and missing LTE or ECG hold it back.
8.8
review-hub.co.uk
✓ explicit
19/07/2020
Hands-on review · Apple Watch look-alike
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS looks like an Apple Watch and tracks heart rate around the clock, but it cannot take calls and runs no third-party apps.
7.9
en.techreviewer.de
✓ explicit
25/11/2019
Hands-on test · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS suits buyers who want a stylish watch and solid sports features, but it is tied to the Amazfit app and has no phone calls or payments.
9.0
bestwatchesreviews.org
≈ estimated
14/11/2025
Hands-on test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is a fitness watch with a bright screen and 7 to 8 days of battery life, though third-party app support is limited.
8.0
heise.de
✓ explicit
31/10/2019
Hands-on test · Sports watch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is a good-looking Apple Watch lookalike with weeks of battery, but its cluttered app and inaccurate sleep tracking let it down.
5.0
navigation-professionell.de
≈ estimated
16/06/2020
Full review · Fitness and GPS
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS has a clear AMOLED screen and an easy menu, but its GPS is slow to lock and imprecise, so it is hard to recommend without caveats.
9.1
patricksalm.de
✓ explicit
13/01/2020
Practical test · Sports watch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is more an everyday watch than a sports one, with useful sports modes but a confusing water rating and limited music control.
9.0
moschuss.de
≈ estimated
28/12/2019
Review overview · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is a light, sporty-looking watch with a sharp display and 20mm strap, but it lacks NFC and can't handle snorkelling or cold showers.
5.2
chip.de
✓ explicit
03/07/2020
Lab test · Beginner sports watch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is an average beginner watch with a sharp screen and a 14-day battery in watch mode, but its training features are limited.
4.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
27/02/2020
Comparison test · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is an Apple Watch lookalike with five days of battery and accurate steady-pace heart rate, but it struggles with interval training.
9.5
laurentwillen.be
≈ estimated
16/05/2020
Full review · GPS sport tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is a bright watch with built-in GPS that tracks outdoor activities without a phone, but its sleep results and altitude readings are inaccurate.
9.0
ugeek.fr
≈ estimated
08/05/2020
Hands-on test · Everyday fitness
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is a simple everyday watch with a sharp screen and up to two weeks of battery, but it cannot install apps or work without a phone.
7.9
fr.techreviewer.de
✓ explicit
25/11/2025
Hands-on test · Sport tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS looks stylish with a bright, sharp display, but its heart rate readings are only partly reliable and it cannot take calls or mobile payments.
7.0
clubic.com
✓ explicit
07/06/2021
Full review · Activity tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is a light tracker with a bright AMOLED screen and simple software, but its connected features are minimal.
9.0
andreagaleazzi.com
≈ estimated
23/09/2019
Hands-on review · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is the best Amazfit to buy: light, with a strong display and two weeks of battery, but a weak strap and limited notifications.
7.9
smartworld.it
✓ explicit
26/09/2019
Hands-on review · Fitness watch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is a light, good-looking watch with a bright screen and two-week battery, but it can't reply to notifications.
9.0
robadainformatici.it
✓ explicit
06/07/2021
Full review · Fitness-first watch
Verdict
The Amazfit GTS is a fitness-first watch with a bright, sharp AMOLED screen, but its rubber strap makes the skin sweat and it cannot answer calls.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Amazfit GTS

  • Vibrant and sharp 1.65-inch AMOLED display with high pixel density (341 PPI)
  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting 7 to 14 days depending on usage
  • Slim, lightweight, and comfortable design inspired by the Apple Watch
  • Extensive health and fitness tracking options, including 12+ sports modes and 24/7 heart rate monitoring
  • Great value for money compared to premium competitors
  • 5 ATM water resistance suitable for swimming

What customers don't like about Amazfit GTS

  • Limited smartwatch functionality; cannot reply to notifications or make/receive calls
  • Inconsistent tracking accuracy for heart rate and steps during intense workouts
  • Slow and sometimes unreliable GPS signal lock-on
  • Lack of third-party app support and a limited proprietary ecosystem
  • Clunky or unintuitive Zepp companion app experience
  • Always-on display mode significantly drains battery life

Verdict

The Amazfit GTS is a lightweight smartwatch featuring a square 1.65-inch AMOLED display with a high pixel density of 341 PPI and a durable aircraft-grade aluminium alloy body. It is equipped with built-in GPS, 5 ATM water resistance, and a BioTracker PPG sensor for 24/7 heart rate and sleep monitoring across 12 different sport modes. Main pros include its premium design, exceptionally bright and sharp screen, and a long-lasting battery life that typically reaches 14 days on a single charge. However, notable cons include a lack of third-party app support, no dedicated microphone or speaker for calls, and occasionally inconsistent step and sleep tracking accuracy.

Compare Amazfit GTS with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit GTS and other Smartwatches

No results found