OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Amazfit GTR 2E Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Screen size:1.39 inchBattery life:24 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

Amazfit GTR 2E Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 23 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

7.4

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Technical score

30%

8.1

Review score ( 11 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.1 · based on 23 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 13 more reviews are not scored yet.
â–²Better than 72% of smartwatches
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components

24%

7.0

Health

21%

9.3

Fitness

16%

7.5

Battery

14%

5.9

Smart features

12%

4.7

Connectivity

9%

7.3

Display & Design

4%

4.9

Hardware

â–²Better than 69% of smartwatches
8.1

Review score

Review score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Grades by review (23)
11 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
2

6%

8.0

whatsthebest.co.uk

6%

8.0

phandroid.com

≈ estimated
3

6%

9.0

wonderfullytech.com

6%

8.0

treksumo.com

6%

8.0

telecomtalk.info

Video reviews 4

3%

9.0

More Nick Ackerman

3%

9.0

Subhamclick

3%

9.0

J. Williams

3%

9.0

Vimal Chintapatla

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 72% of smartwatches
  • amazfit-gtr-2e
  • amazfit-gtr-2e
  • amazfit-gtr-2e
  • amazfit-gtr-2e
  • amazfit-gtr-2e
  • amazfit-gtr-2e
  • amazfit-gtr-2e
  • amazfit-gtr-2e
amazfit-gtr-2e
amazfit-gtr-2e
amazfit-gtr-2e
amazfit-gtr-2e
amazfit-gtr-2e
amazfit-gtr-2e
amazfit-gtr-2e
amazfit-gtr-2e

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Amazfit GTR 2E

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components:

24%

7.0

Health

21%

9.3

Fitness

16%

7.5

Battery

14%

5.9

Smart features

12%

4.7

Connectivity

9%

7.3

Display & Design

4%

4.9

Hardware

7.1
Review score
Review score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Grades by review (23)
11 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
2

6%

8.0

whatsthebest.co.uk

6%

8.0

phandroid.com

≈ estimated
3

6%

9.0

wonderfullytech.com

6%

8.0

treksumo.com

6%

8.0

telecomtalk.info

Video reviews 4

3%

9.0

More Nick Ackerman

3%

9.0

Subhamclick

3%

9.0

J. Williams

3%

9.0

Vimal Chintapatla

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
9.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
Amazfit GTR 2E has a popularity of 9.9 points, which is higher than 92.5% of smartwatches.
9.9
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components:

60%

7.4

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

8.2
Brand name
Amazfit
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
24 days
Battery life
24 days
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 24 days which is longer than that of 94% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
43 h
Battery life with GPS on
43 h
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 43 h with GPS on which is longer than 89.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.3% of smartwatches.
Battery power
471 mAh
Battery power
471 mAh
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 471 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 89.2% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.3% of smartwatches.
Charge time
150 min
Charge time
150 min
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 150 min which is slower than 88.7% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 7.2% of smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 150 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Zepp OS
Operating system
Zepp OS
â–² Better than 60% of models
This smartwatch runs Zepp OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 60.2% of smartwatches and the same as that in 6.5% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.39 inch
Screen size
1.39 inch
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.39 inch which is smaller than the screens of 51.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 9.5% of smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
â–² Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a AMOLED display type which is more advanced than that of 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that of 50.1% of smartwatches.
Resolution
454x 454
Resolution
454x 454
â–² Better than 80% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454 which is higher than that of 79.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
462 ppi
Pixel density
462 ppi
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 462 ppi which is higher than that of 91.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 5% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
450 nits
Display brightness
450 nits
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 450 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 86.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Internal storage
0 GB
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 73.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.4% of smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Amazfit GTR 2E vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 17 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    24 days
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 24 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    24 days vs 7 days
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Temperature readings may be skin/ambient trends, not core-body medical values.
  • 23 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    43 h
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (43 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    43 h vs 20 h
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 62.5% more popular
    Amazfit GTR 2E has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (9.95 vs 6.1).
    9.95 vs 6.12
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Temperature readings may be skin/ambient trends, not core-body medical values.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
    Food logging may require a companion or third-party app.
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Tracked through the companion app or smart-scale sync.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 17 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    24 days
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 24 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    24 days vs 7 days
  • 23 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    43 h
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (43 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    43 h vs 20 h
  • 171 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    471 mAh days
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (471 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    471 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 136 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    462 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (462 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    462 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 13 g lighter weight
    Weight
    32.0 g
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (32 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    32.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Higher resolution
    Display type
    454 x 454
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 454x454, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    454x454 vs 352x430
  • 0.8 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    10.80 mm
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (10.8 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    10.80 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Zepp OS
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Zepp OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 150 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    450 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (450 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    450 nits vs 600 nits
  • 30 min longer charge time
    Charge time
    150 min
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges slower than the average smartwatch (150 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 150 minutes.
    150 min vs 120 min
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 4 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    No local user storage for apps/media
    0 GB vs 4 GB
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 30 min longer charge time
    Charge time
    150 min
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges slower than the average smartwatch (150 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 150 minutes.
    150 min vs 120 min
  • 150 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    450 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (450 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    450 nits vs 600 nits
  • 4.5 mm wider watch width
    Width
    46.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (46.5 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    46.5 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 4 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    No local user storage for apps/media
    0 GB vs 4 GB
  • 1 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2020
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    December 2020
    2020 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
More Nick Ackerman
≈ estimated
10/02/2021
Hands-on review · 12 days of battery testing
Verdict
Amazfit GTR 2E is a strong budget smartwatch with long battery life, best for buyers who do not need calls.
9.0
Subhamclick
≈ estimated
30/01/2021
Hands-on review · 48 hours of use
Verdict
Amazfit GTR 2E is the best middle-ground smartwatch for the price, with good battery life, though calling needs the pricier GTR 2.
9.0
J. Williams
≈ estimated
24/01/2021
Full review · daily use, fitness tracking and battery
Verdict
Amazfit GTR 2E is strongly recommended for notifications and fitness, though its battery falls short of the claims.
9.0
Vimal Chintapatla
≈ estimated
18/01/2021
Unboxing and review · display, heart rate and battery
Verdict
Amazfit GTR 2E is a budget watch with features close to flagship models, ideal if you do not need calling or a speaker.
8.0
J. Williams
≈ estimated
18/01/2021
First look · unboxing and first use
Verdict
Amazfit GTR 2E is a good watch overall, with a heart rate monitor and always-on display that work well.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 11 · 13

Reviewers rave about the long battery life and sleek design, but miss call support and find notifications too basic.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

androidauthority.com
06/02/2021
Not graded yet
techadvisor.com
12/03/2021
Not graded yet
neowin.net
18/02/2021
Not graded yet
wareable.com
27/01/2021
Not graded yet
9.0
wonderfullytech.com
≈ estimated
14/06/2021
Hands-on review · Design and battery
Verdict
The Amazfit GTR 2e is a light, premium-looking watch with a sharp screen and long battery life, but it is not built for rugged outdoor use.
gadgetmatch.com
10/04/2021
Not graded yet
wareable.com
26/03/2021
Not graded yet
stuff.tv
17/03/2021
Not graded yet
8.0
phandroid.com
✓ explicit
16/05/2021
Hands-on test · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit GTR 2e is a slim, light watch with strong fitness tracking, suited to people who want notifications on the wrist but not replies.
8.0
whatsthebest.co.uk
✓ explicit
01/03/2024
Hands-on test · Everyday health tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit GTR 2e suits a first smartwatch or a fitness-focused buyer who does not need tight phone integration, though it has no speaker.
gizbot.com
16/01/2021
Not graded yet
thedailystruggle.co.uk
01/01/2021
Not graded yet
7.0
connect-living.de
≈ estimated
12/05/2021
Month-long test · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Amazfit GTR 2e is a light, easy-to-read fitness watch with GPS and long battery life, but it cannot reply to messages or make calls.
8.0
stadt-bremerhaven.de
≈ estimated
17/04/2021
Hands-on test · Sleep and sport
Verdict
The Amazfit GTR 2e is not a full smartwatch, but its light body, GPS and long battery suit sport and sleep tracking.
9.0
elespanol.com
≈ estimated
01/06/2021
Review · Sport and battery
Verdict
The Amazfit GTR 2e is an elegant, light sport watch with about 24 days of battery life, though its temperature sensor is weak.
xiaomiadictos.com
25/01/2021
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit GTR 2E

  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting 1-2 weeks or more on a single charge
  • Vibrant and bright 1.39-inch AMOLED display that remains readable in sunlight
  • Sleek, lightweight, and attractive design that resembles a classic watch
  • Excellent value for money compared to high-end competitors
  • Wide variety of sports modes (90+) and reliable core fitness tracking features
  • Accurate sleep tracking and heart rate monitoring for most users

What we don't like about Amazfit GTR 2E

  • No built-in speaker, preventing users from taking phone calls directly on the watch
  • Software limitations in the Zepp app, including occasional syncing issues with third-party apps like Google Fit
  • The temperature sensor is frequently described as inaccurate or unhelpful
  • Silicone strap can feel cheap and is not breathable during intense workouts
  • GPS can sometimes be slow to lock or slightly inconsistent in accuracy compared to specialized sports watches
  • Notifications are non-actionable and lack support for emojis or images

Verdict

The Amazfit GTR 2e is a budget-oriented smartwatch featuring a 1.39-inch AMOLED display (454x454 resolution, 326 ppi) housed in a lightweight 32g aluminium alloy body. It is equipped with the BioTracker 2 PPG sensor for 24-hour heart rate monitoring, SpO2 blood-oxygen saturation measurement, and a unique temperature sensor, while also supporting 90+ sports modes, built-in GPS, and 5 ATM water resistance. Its primary advantages include an exceptional battery life of up to 24 days in typical use (extending to 45 days in basic mode), a vibrant and sharp screen, and a comfortable, slim design. However, it lacks a built-in speaker and local music storage, which prevents taking Bluetooth calls directly, and users have noted that its GPS accuracy and temperature readings can sometimes be inconsistent.

Compare Amazfit GTR 2E with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit GTR 2E and other Smartwatches

No results found