OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Agptek Smart Watch LW11 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Screen size:1.30 inchBattery life:9.5 daysDisplay type:IPS LCD

Agptek Smart Watch LW11 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 8 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

5.3

Technical score

30%

7.8

Review score ( 0 · 8)

Review score 30% · 7.8 · based on 8 videos
8 videos count as 3.8 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 71% of smartwatches
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

24%

6.2

Health

21%

6.1

Fitness

16%

6.2

Battery

14%

3.6

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

6.0

Display & Design

4%

4.1

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 77% of smartwatches
7.8

Review score

Review score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Grades by review (8)
Video reviews 4

10%

9.0

Family Pop TV

10%

9.0

AMTR

10%

8.0

The Product Reviewer

10%

6.0

Smart Review and Setup

estimated from the review
8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 55% of smartwatches
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw11
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw11
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw11
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw11
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw11
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw11
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw11
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw11
  • agptek-smart-watch-lw11
agptek-smart-watch-lw11
agptek-smart-watch-lw11
agptek-smart-watch-lw11
agptek-smart-watch-lw11
agptek-smart-watch-lw11
agptek-smart-watch-lw11
agptek-smart-watch-lw11
agptek-smart-watch-lw11
agptek-smart-watch-lw11

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Agptek Smart Watch LW11

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components:

24%

6.2

Health

21%

6.1

Fitness

16%

6.2

Battery

14%

3.6

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

6.0

Display & Design

4%

4.1

Hardware

5.3
Review score
Review score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Grades by review (8)
Video reviews 4

10%

9.0

Family Pop TV

10%

9.0

AMTR

10%

8.0

The Product Reviewer

10%

6.0

Smart Review and Setup

estimated from the review
8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

60%

6.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.2
Brand name
Agptek
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Distance tracking may depend on phone GPS/app on some models.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
9.5 days
Battery life
9.5 days
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 9.5 days which is longer than that of 63% of smartwatches.
Average of the reported 7-12 day range.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
270 mAh
Battery power
270 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 270 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 64.6% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.7% of smartwatches.
Battery capacity varies by case size/model variant.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 67.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.3 inch
Screen size
1.3 inch
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.3 inch which is smaller than the screens of 66.8% of smartwatches and equal to those of 11.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartwatch uses a IPS LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 67.4% of smartwatches and the same as that of 6.6% of smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 240
Resolution
240x 240
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240 which is lower than that of 73.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.2% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
261 ppi
Pixel density
261 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 261 ppi which is lower than that of 74% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.4% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
Realtek RTL8762
Processor model
Realtek RTL8762
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
This smartwatch uses the Realtek RTL8762 processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
0.064 GB
Internal storage
0.064 GB
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0.064 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 70.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
64 MB internal storage.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Agptek Smart Watch LW11 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 2.5 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    9.5 days
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 9.5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Average of the reported 7-12 day range.
    9.5 days vs 7 days
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 11 g lighter weight
    Weight
    34.0 g
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (34 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    34.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Agptek Smart Watch LW11 is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • 63.4% more popular
    Agptek Smart Watch LW11 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • 5.2x cheaper
    Agptek Smart Watch LW11 is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£25 vs £130).
    £25 vs £130
  • 63.4% more popular
    Agptek Smart Watch LW11 has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (10 vs 6.1).
    10 vs 6.12
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 2.5 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    9.5 days
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 9.5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Average of the reported 7-12 day range.
    9.5 days vs 7 days
  • 11 g lighter weight
    Weight
    34.0 g
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (34 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight refers to watch case without strap/band.
    34.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • 4.1% worse value for money
    Agptek Smart Watch LW11 has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.22 vs 7.5).
    7.22 vs 7.52
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • 72 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    8
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (8 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    Reported as at least 8 exercise modes.
    8 vs 80
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 30 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    270 mAh days
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (270 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Average of the reported 7-12 day range.
    270 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch uses IPS LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    IPS LCD vs AMOLED
  • 0.1 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.30 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.30 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    240 x 240
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    240x240 vs 352x430
  • 65 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    261 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (261 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    261 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 4 mm wider watch width
    Width
    46.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (46 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    46.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 0.4 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    12 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No widget support
    Widget support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 83.1% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    Number of microphones
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch includes 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 3.94 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0.064 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0.1 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    64 MB internal storage.
    0.064 GB vs 4 GB
  • 1 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2020
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    August 2020
    2020 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
Smart Review and Setup
≈ estimated
19/08/2021
Hands-on review · features, tests and accuracy checks
Verdict
Agptek Smart Watch LW11 counts steps accurately and passed a 30-minute submersion test, but its alarm vibration is weak and health readings are unreliable.
8.0
The Product Reviewer
≈ estimated
26/06/2021
Hands-on review · two days of wear testing
Verdict
Agptek Smart Watch LW11 is a pretty good watch for the price, though it feels cheap, lags when scrolling, and counts steps loosely.
9.0
Family Pop TV
≈ estimated
23/06/2021
Real-life review · battery, waterproofing and feature tests
Verdict
Agptek Smart Watch LW11 is a good pick for basic fitness tracking, with long battery life and a low price.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 0 · 9

Reviewers like the strap, water resistance and battery, but find smart features and fitness tracking weak; build quality divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Agptek Smart Watch LW11

  • Excellent value for money given the low price point.
  • Long battery life, typically lasting 7 to 12 days on a single charge.
  • Bright and clear 1.3-inch high-resolution display that is readable outdoors.
  • Lightweight and comfortable design (34g) suitable for all-day wear.
  • Extensive customisation with over 200 DIY watch faces available via the app.
  • IP68/5ATM water resistance allows for hand washing and swimming.

What we don't like about Agptek Smart Watch LW11

  • Cannot answer calls or reply to text messages directly from the watch.
  • Some users report the step counter and sleep tracking are not perfectly accurate.
  • The user interface can be slightly laggy when scrolling or swiping.
  • Durability concerns regarding the silicone strap and long-term screen functionality.
  • Initial assembly of the strap can be difficult due to short pins.
  • Not suitable for hot water, saunas, or salty water despite its waterproof rating.

Verdict

The Agptek LW11 is an ultra-lightweight 34g smartwatch featuring a 1.3-inch round TFT or IPS high-resolution (360x360 pixels) full-touch display and an IP68/5ATM waterproof rating suitable for swimming. Key characteristics include 24-hour health monitoring for heart rate, blood oxygen, and sleep, alongside 100+ sports modes and over 200 customizable watch faces. Its primary pros are an impressive battery life of 7–12 days on a single 2-hour charge and its comfortable, skin-friendly silicone strap. However, notable cons include the inability to make or answer calls directly from the watch, no built-in GPS, and some user-reported lag during interface navigation.

Compare Agptek Smart Watch LW11 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Agptek Smart Watch LW11 and other Smartwatches

No results found