OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£640RAM capacity:12 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.67 inchesMain camera megapixels:64 MP & 13 MP & 5 MP

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

90%

6.4

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 64% of smartphones
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

7.1

Price

â–¼Worse than 93%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

25%

6.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.7

Camera

15%

6.7

Display

15%

6.5

Battery

10%

4.2

Software

10%

6.8

Connectivity

4%

8.1

Audio

3%

5.7

Design

â–¼Worse than 59%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £640
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

25%

6.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.7

Camera

15%

6.7

Display

15%

6.5

Battery

10%

4.2

Software

10%

6.8

Connectivity

4%

8.1

Audio

3%

5.7

Design

6.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

7.1

Price

6.6
Brand name
Xiaomi
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 processor which is faster than processors in 70.4% of smartphones and equal to processors in 1.8% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 12 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 59% of smartphones and equal to that of 24.3% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.84 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.84 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 68.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 10
Android version
Android 10
This smartphone runs Android version Android 10 which is older than that found in 88.8% of smartphones and equal to that in 5.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
64 MP & 13 MP & 5 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 64 MP & 13 MP & 5 MP which is higher than that of 83.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.3
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.3 which is wider than that of 64% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
41 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 41 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 54.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.67 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches which is larger than the screens of 38.3% of smartphones and equal to those of 13.4% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2400 px which is higher than that of 36.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 20.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
395 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi which is higher than that of 41.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.9% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,720 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,720 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 74.6% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.1% of smartphones.
Charging speed
65 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 65 W which is faster than in 65.2% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 2.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
168.7 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 168.7 mm which is taller than 85.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
77.3 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 77.3 mm which is wider than 77.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Thickness
10.4 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 10.4 mm which is thicker than 89.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Weight
222 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 222 g which is heavier than 82.8% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.3% of smartphones.
Device volume
129,360 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 129,360 cm³ which is larger than 89.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Show more

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 13 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 13 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 2 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (3 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    3 vs 1
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • 97% faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (65 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    65 W vs 33 W
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 18.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.84 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x2.84 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x2.84 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • 19.2% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (12,855 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    12,855 vs 10,783
  • 75.8% more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (1,800 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    1,800 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 26.9% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (1,195 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    1,195 vs 942
  • 60.1% higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (41 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    40.98 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • Better processor
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 22.9% higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (3,827 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    3,827 vs 3,115
  • Supports desktop mode
    This smartphone includes desktop mode, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones support desktop functionality.
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 13 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 13 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 2 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (3 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    3 vs 1
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Supports 360° panorama
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 22.60x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    2160x60 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • 28.1% larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (41 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    41 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (20 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    20 MP vs 16 MP
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • 1 more external displays supported
    This smartphone supports more external displays than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone supports 1 external displays.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 12.5% higher touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (270 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    270 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • 97% faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (65 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    65 W vs 33 W
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This smartphone supports aptX Adaptive, the average smartphone does not. 34.5% of smartphones include aptX Adaptive support.
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 38.2% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (587 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    587 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No NFC
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 37.9% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (410 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    410 nits vs 660 nits
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • 11.2% worse value for money
    Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.6 vs 7.3).
    6.6 vs 7.34
  • 2.46x more expensive
    Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£640 vs £260).
    £640 vs £260
  • 5.44x less popular
    Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 38.2% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (587 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    587 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 52.8% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,195 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,195 vs 2,533
  • 16.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (5 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    5 W vs 6 W
  • 16.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (7 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    7 nm vs 6 nm
  • 58.6% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (507 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    507 vs 1,226
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No location privacy controls
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 10 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 10 vs Android 14
  • Lacks focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • Lacks instant markup
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • No theme customization
    This smartphone does not support theme customization, the average smartphone does. 91% of smartphones allow theme customization.
  • No offline voice commands
    This smartphone does not support offline voice commands, the average smartphone does. 90.4% of smartphones offer offline voice control.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • No manual focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a manual focus mode, the average smartphone does. 91.2% of smartphones offer manual focus.
  • No continuous autofocus in video
    This smartphone does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average smartphone does. 94.2% of smartphones have continuous AF.
  • No manual exposure control
    This smartphone does not offer manual exposure control, the average smartphone does. 94% of smartphones have manual exposure.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.3 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.3 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • No NFC
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5 vs 5.2
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 37.9% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (410 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    410 nits vs 660 nits
  • 5.6% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,720 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,720 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 13.1% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (222 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    222 g vs 196.2 g
  • 4 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2020 vs 2024). 4.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    March 2020
    2020 vs 2024
  • 2.1 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (10.4 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    10.4 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 5.1 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (168.7 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    168.7 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 1.3 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (77.3 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    77.3 mm vs 76 mm
  • 32.3% larger volume
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (129,360 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97,800 cm³.
    129,360 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Chigz Tech Reviews
≈ estimated
17/05/2020
Hands-on review · battery, benchmarks, Wi-Fi and camera tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is one of the best flagship gaming phones, if you can live without wireless charging and NFC.
9.0
ProductNation
≈ estimated
15/05/2020
Hands-on review · gaming tests, cameras and cooling accessory
Verdict
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a strong pick for gamers, with a fast 90 Hz screen, good cameras and an effective cooling accessory.
8.0
TechTablets
≈ estimated
03/05/2020
Hands-on review · battery, 90 Hz, cameras and audio tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a good gaming phone with strong battery life and build, but the cameras need work.
9.0
Techy Ric
≈ estimated
10/03/2020
Hands-on review · gaming, battery and display tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is the best gaming phone in its class, though it lacks dedicated gaming triggers.
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techradar.com
10/07/2020
Hands-on test · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a strong gaming phone with surprisingly good photos, but it is big and heavy, and its 90Hz screen trails the 144Hz Red Magic 5G.
trustedreviews.com
20/05/2020
Hands-on review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a gaming phone with a solid 90Hz screen and powerful parts, but its camera and Android skin trail similarly priced rivals.
pocket-lint.com
12/07/2020
Full review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a big, fast gaming phone with very quick charging and long battery life, suiting buyers who want performance without a flagship price.
techadvisor.com
03/02/2021
Expert review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is far from flawless, but strong cameras and very fast wired charging make it worth a look for gamers who can live with its bulk.
t3.com
30/03/2021
Hands-on review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a great gaming phone with a big screen and extra cooling, but its hit-and-miss skin and missing features keep it from being an all-rounder.
gadgetbytenepal.com
13/11/2020
Hands-on review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a powerful gaming phone with a sturdy, comfortable grip and long battery life, but its camera is only upper mid-range.
smartzone.de
15/06/2020
Hands-on review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a fast gaming phone with a 90Hz screen and a 4720mAh battery, though its display trails the OnePlus 8 Pro.
C
china-gadgets.de
08/05/2020
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 & 3 Pro Review: The Best Gaming Smartphone?
(Translated)Show original
mobiflip.de
02/07/2020
Hands-on test · Gaming performance
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a gaming phone that stays smooth and cool in long sessions, though its cameras trail top phones and its software looks playful.
stadt-bremerhaven.de
24/05/2020
Hands-on review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 offers strong gaming and a smooth screen, but its dated design, average cameras and high price keep it from being an easy recommendation.
clubic.com
06/06/2020
Hands-on test · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a strong gaming phone with an excellent screen and solid value, but it is very heavy and its buttons are awkwardly placed.
phonandroid.com
26/05/2020
Hands-on test · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a solid gaming phone with a fine screen and good value, though it is massive and heavy, and its accessories add up quickly.
sotactile.fr
09/02/2021
Hands-on test · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a gaming phone with a bright 90Hz screen and loud speakers, but its fingerprint sensor is slow and its reception trails the OnePlus 7T.
profesionalreview.com
30/05/2020
Hands-on review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a gaming phone with very strong internals and a huge battery, but its considerable weight is hard to get used to.
computerhoy.20minutos.es
13/06/2020
Hands-on test · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a heavy, bold gaming phone whose vapor chamber keeps it cool in long sessions, but its size and awkward buttons get in the way.
elespanol.com
07/06/2020
Hands-on test · Gaming accessories
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 is a strong gaming phone with a useful controller and magnetic charger, but its fan needs a cable and its camera trails flagships.
global.techradar.com
23/07/2020
Hands-on test · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Black Shark 3 suits serious mobile gamers, and its camera impresses for a gaming phone, though its design and 90Hz screen are its limits.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB)

  • Extremely powerful performance for gaming due to the Snapdragon 865 CPU, ample RAM (8GB/12GB), and UFS 3.0 storage.
  • Staggeringly fast 65W wired charging, which can achieve a full charge in under 40 minutes.
  • Effective 'sandwich' liquid cooling system keeps the phone from overheating and throttling during intense use.
  • High touch sampling rate (270Hz) makes the screen feel very responsive and smooth for gaming.
  • Good overall camera quality in well-lit conditions, better than expected for a gaming phone, with useful portrait and ultrawide modes.
  • The 90Hz AMOLED display provides a smooth visual experience for both gaming and general use.
  • A clean, non-intrusive JoyUI software experience (based on Android 10/MIUI) with minimal bloatware.
  • Features a 3.5mm headphone jack, dual SIM support (both 5G compatible), and Wi-Fi 6 connectivity.
  • The unique, angular gaming design with customizable rear LED lights is appealing to the target audience.
  • Magnetic charging pins on the back offer a convenient charging option that doesn't interfere with the user's grip while gaming.
  • Solid build quality and durable feel.

What customers don't like about Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB)

  • The phone is physically large, thick, and heavy, making it cumbersome for one-handed use or carrying in small pockets.
  • Lack of timely software and security updates is a major concern for users.
  • Camera performance suffers in low-light conditions, with image noise and a lack of sharpness.
  • Absence of expected features in a flagship-priced phone, such as NFC for mobile payments, wireless charging, and an official IP water resistance rating.
  • The standard Black Shark 3 lacks the physical shoulder trigger buttons found on the Pro model.
  • Display brightness can be insufficient for comfortable outdoor viewing in direct sunlight.
  • The magnetic charging port on the back is significantly slower (18W) than the main 65W USB-C port.
  • Audio output from the stereo speakers could be better, particularly with richer bass.
  • Some users reported issues with battery degradation or bloating over time.

Verdict

The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB RAM + 256GB storage variant) is a dedicated gaming smartphone featuring a powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 processor and a 90Hz AMOLED display for smooth visuals. Its standout features include a massive 4,720mAh battery with rapid 65W fast charging, an innovative magnetic charging port, and physical shoulder triggers (Master Triggers) for an enhanced gaming experience. The liquid cooling system ensures sustained performance during intense sessions. Potential drawbacks include a somewhat bulky design and a slightly lower display refresh rate compared to some competitors at launch, such as those offering 120Hz or 144Hz screens.

Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (12GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found