Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£2,750RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:1 TBScreen size:10 inchesMain camera megapixels:200 MP & 12 MP & 10 MP

Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

8.4/10

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.4

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 94% of smartphones
6.2

Value for money

Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

▼Worse than 98%
8.4

Technical score

Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

9.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.7

Camera

15%

7.7

Display

15%

7.4

Battery

10%

9.6

Software

10%

8.3

Connectivity

4%

7.5

Audio

3%

6.6

Design

★Better than 94%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £2,750
Other versions:
16GB + 1TB16GB + 512GB
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Smartphones model ranking

Ranked #1251 of 2,002 models in Smartphones (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

9.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

8.7

Camera

15%

7.7

Display

15%

7.4

Battery

10%

9.6

Software

10%

8.3

Connectivity

4%

7.5

Audio

3%

6.6

Design

8.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

6.2
Brand name
Samsung
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite processor which is faster than processors in 95.2% of smartphones and equal to processors in 2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 83.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12% of smartphones.
Internal storage
1 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 1 TB which is larger than the storage of 94.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.6% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
4.47 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 4.47 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 98.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 16
Android version
Android 16
This smartphone runs Android version Android 16 which is newer than that found in 95.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 4.4% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
yes
This smartphone receives direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
200 MP & 12 MP & 10 MP
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 200 MP & 12 MP & 10 MP which is higher than that of 97.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 83.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
72 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 72 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 90.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.5% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.6 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.6 µm which is smaller than in 96.2% of smartphones and equal to the size in 1.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
2 SIMs or 1 SIM, 1 eSIM (region dependent)
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
10 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 10 inches which is larger than the screens of 99.9% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1584x 2160 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1584x2160 px which is higher than that of 80.7% of smartphones.
Pixel density
269 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 269 ppi which is lower than that of 80.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.4% of smartphones.
Display type
?
Refresh rate
120 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,600 mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,600 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 71.1% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.4% of smartphones.
Charging speed
45 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 57.1% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 6.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
80 min
This smartphone reaches a full wired charge in 80 min which is slower than 69.4% of smartphones and equal to the time of 1.2% of smartphones.
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
159.2 mm
This smartphone has a height of 159.2 mm which is shorter than 82.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Width
?
Thickness
12.9 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 12.9 mm which is thicker than 91.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Weight
309 g
This smartphone weighs 309 g which is heavier than 93.2% of smartphones.
Device volume
?
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 3 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (3 x vs 0 x).
    3 x vs 0 x
  • 2.25x larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (72 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    72 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 4x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (1 TB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    1 TB vs 256 GB
  • 86.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (4.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    4.47 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 8 GB
  • 4x more storage
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (1 TB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    1 TB vs 256 GB
  • 86.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (4.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    4.47 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 3.2x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (3,018 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    3,018 vs 942
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x4.32 GHz & 6x3.53 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x4.32 GHz & 6x3.53 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Better processor
    This smartphone features a better processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 3.32x higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (85.1 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    85.1 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 6x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,536 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,536 vs 256
  • 3.83x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (9,710 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    9,710 vs 2,533
  • 3.05x higher PassMark single-core benchmark
    This smartphone has a better PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (3,018 vs 988). The average single-core score is 988.
    3,018 vs 988
  • 6x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (192 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    192 KB vs 32 KB
  • 92.7% faster memory speed
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (5,300 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2,750 MHz memory speed.
    5,300 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    LPDDR5
    5 vs 4
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports newer OpenCL version
    This smartphone supports a newer OpenCL version than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average version is 2.
    3 vs 2
  • 95.3% more L3 cache
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (8,000 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4,096 KB.
    8,000 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the agentic AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Galaxy AI, Multi-modal AI Agents, Now Brief, Now Bar, Circle to Search, Live Translate, Interpreter, Writing Assist, Photo Assist, ProVisual Engine
    agentic vs fundamental
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • Newer Android version
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 16 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 16 vs Android 14
  • Supports desktop mode
    This smartphone includes desktop mode, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones support desktop functionality.
  • 3 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (3 x vs 0 x).
    3 x vs 0 x
  • 2.25x larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (72 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    72 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (200 MP & 12 MP & 10 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    200 MP & 12 MP & 10 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 44.20x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    4320x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Supports 360° panorama
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Supports 3D photo/video
    This smartphone supports 3D photo and video capture, the average smartphone does not. 1.3% of smartphones offer 3D imaging capabilities.
  • Has a pro camera setup
    This smartphone features a pro camera setup, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones include professional-grade camera hardware.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.2 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.2 vs 2
  • Supports satellite SOS
    This smartphone supports satellite SOS functionality, the average smartphone does not. 8.1% of smartphones offer satellite emergency services.
  • Supports motion tracking
    This smartphone supports motion tracking, the average smartphone does not. 22% of smartphones offer motion tracking capabilities.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • Has HDMI output
    This smartphone supports HDMI output, the average smartphone does not. 4.1% of smartphones offer direct HDMI connectivity.
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • 3.33 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (10 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    10 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1584x2160 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1584x2160 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • 51.5% higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (1,000 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    1,000 nits vs 660 nits
  • 523.5 nits higher GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (1,417 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average max brightness is 893.5 nits.
    1,417 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Has a secondary display
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • 600 nits higher peak brightness
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (1,600 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    1,600 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 12% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    5,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 36.4% faster charging speed
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (45 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    45 W vs 33 W
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This smartphone supports aptX Adaptive, the average smartphone does not. 34.5% of smartphones include aptX Adaptive support.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • Is foldable
    This smartphone is foldable, the average smartphone is not. 3.9% of smartphones are foldable devices.
  • 4.4 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (159.2 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    159.2 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 1 year/s newer release date
    This smartphone has a newer release date than the average smartphone (2025 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones are released annually.
    December 2025
    2025 vs 2024
  • 31.9% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (269 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    269 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP48 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP48 vs IP67
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 0.2 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.6 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    0.6 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 57.5% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (309 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    309 g vs 196.2 g
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 10.58x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£2,750 vs £260).
    £2,750 vs £260
  • 10.58x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£2,750 vs £260).
    £2,750 vs £260
  • 18.6% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.18 vs 7.3).
    6.18 vs 7.34
  • 5.44x less popular
    Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • Lacks instant markup
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • 0.2 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.6 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    0.6 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (10 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    10 MP vs 16 MP
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 31.9% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (269 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    269 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 18 min slower full wired charge time
    This smartphone has a slower full wired charge time than the average smartphone (80 min vs 62 min). The average smartphone takes 62 min to charge.
    80 min vs 62 min
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • 10% slower reverse wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower reverse wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (4.5 W vs 5 W). The average smartphone speed is 5 W.
    4.5 W vs 5 W
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP48 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP48 vs IP67
  • 57.5% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (309 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    309 g vs 196.2 g
  • 4.6 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (12.9 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    12.9 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Parker Burton
≈ estimated
28/01/2026
Long-term test · 2 weeks of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a very good foldable with a strong battery and screen, though it is thick, heavy and expensive.
9.0
Tech Burner
≈ estimated
26/12/2025
Hands-on review · gaming and everyday use impressions
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a significant step beyond regular foldables, though its price feels inflated.
8.0
CNET
≈ estimated
05/01/2026
Hands-on first look · multitasking, folding and thickness
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold feels like a phone-tablet hybrid, comfortable to hold, though it is still thick and shows visible creases.
8.0
HotHardware
≈ estimated
11/01/2026
Hands-on first look · size, weight and hardware
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is an impressive folding device, with the full review still to come.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

tomsguide.com
07/01/2026
Hands-on preview · Tri-fold phone
Verdict
The Galaxy Z TriFold is a 10-inch tablet that fits in a pocket with strong multitasking, but it is thick, heavy and expensive.
techradar.com
05/01/2026
Hands-on preview · Tri-fold phone
Verdict
The Galaxy Z TriFold is an impressive piece of engineering that unfolds into a 10-inch tablet, but it may cost as much as a decent laptop.
cnet.com
12/01/2026
Hands-on test · Phone-tablet hybrid
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a phone-tablet hybrid that is very thin when open and handy for multitasking, but bulky when folded.
mashable.com
13/01/2026
Hands-on test · Early impressions
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a tablet-phone for early adopters who can live with software quirks and limited availability.
wired.com
05/01/2026
Video first look · Tablet-size phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold gives you a real tablet screen in a folding phone, but it's niche and premium-priced, aimed at early adopters.
pcmag.com
20/03/2026
Extended test · Tri-fold phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold works as phone, tablet and makeshift laptop, but Samsung stopped selling it within three months, so the Z Fold 7 is more practical.
cnet.com
19/02/2026
Two-week review · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a niche device with a big screen and strong DeX multitasking, but its closed bulk and app support need work.
sammobile.com
18/02/2026
Full review · Foldable showpiece
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a foldable that stays pocketable when shut, but it is no smart buy and suits only early adopters.
the-independent.com
20/02/2026
Early review · Tri-fold phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a well-built foldable whose 10-inch screen beats a regular phone for movies, but its price will put off some.
journaldugeek.com
19/12/2025
Hands-on test · Tablet or phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a tablet and phone in one that is light for a tablet, but thick when folded and only sold in Korea for now.
presse-citron.net
19/12/2025
Hands-on test · Triple-fold concept
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a Z Fold 7 with an extra panel, thin and solid when open, but thick when closed and hard to buy outside Korea.
lesnumeriques.com
19/12/2025
First impressions · Triple-fold phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is very thin when open and feels solid, with a big 10-inch screen, but its fixed folding order and limited release hold it back.
global.techradar.com
05/01/2026
Hands-on review · Big-screen productivity
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold packs a 10-inch screen into a pocket-sized body, though its high price suits only enthusiasts.
I
igen.fr
24/12/2025
Summary of the review
P
phonandroid.com
14/01/2026
Summary of the review
cnews.fr
16/02/2026
Field test · Multitasking phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is aimed at mobile professionals who multitask heavily, but it is not for the average user.
xataka.com.mx
15/12/2025
Hands-on test · Pocket PC
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold comes close to a tablet and PC in your pocket, with strong multitasking, though its battery is a concern.
movilzona.es
07/01/2026
Hands-on test · Triple foldable
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a productivity tool for a small group of users, while many will find its price hard to justify.
A
andro4all.com
07/01/2026
Summary of the review
wired.it
07/01/2026
Hands-on test · Niche phablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a 10-inch phablet that feels like an Android tablet, but its niche status suits only enthusiasts.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB)

  • Massive 10-inch AMOLED main display offers a tablet-like experience that fits in a pocket.
  • Exceptional multitasking capabilities with support for up to five simultaneous apps and Samsung DeX mode.
  • High-end 200MP main camera sensor provides vibrant colors and good dynamic range.
  • Innovative dual-hinge design that feels premium and includes haptic warnings to prevent incorrect folding.
  • Impressive peak brightness of up to 2600 nits on the cover screen, ensuring visibility in direct sunlight.
  • Durable build with IP48 water resistance and reinforced carbon panels for added strength.

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB)

  • Extremely high price point, starting at approximately $2,899, making it a niche luxury product.
  • Noticeable double creases on the inner display that are visible from most viewing angles.
  • Bulky and heavy form factor, weighing 309g and measuring nearly 13mm thick when folded.
  • Lack of S Pen stylus support, which many users find limiting for a screen of this size.
  • The 5,600mAh battery can struggle to power the large 10-inch display for a full day of heavy use.
  • Inner screen's soft polymer top layer is highly prone to fingerprint smudges and requires careful handling.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (16GB + 1TB variant) is a cutting-edge, first-generation tri-folding smartphone that transforms into an expansive 10-inch QXGA+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X tablet display (120Hz refresh rate, 1600 nits peak brightness) from a pocketable 6.5-inch FHD+ cover screen (120Hz, 2600 nits) when folded. It offers flagship performance with the customized Snapdragon 8 Elite Mobile Platform for Galaxy, 16GB of RAM, and a versatile pro-grade camera system featuring a 200MP main sensor, 12MP ultra-wide, and 10MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom. Major pros include its stunning engineering, remarkably thin unfolded profile (as low as 3.9 mm), massive screen real estate ideal for seamless multitasking with Galaxy AI, and the largest battery yet in a Samsung foldable at 5,600mAh with 45W super-fast charging. However, some notable cons are its substantial folded thickness (12.9 mm), very high price (around $2,500-$3,000 for other variants), a less-than-stellar telephoto camera compared to non-folding flagships, and a battery life that can be strained by heavy use of the large display, potentially requiring midday top-ups.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Trifold (16GB + 1TB) and other smartphones

No results found