OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v3.0

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra review: 196 specs compared

Avg. price:~£1,650RAM capacity:12 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:8 inchesMain camera megapixels:?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Review: Compare 196 technical specifications, 90 expert and video reviews and 8 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
8.4/10

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

35%

8.2

Technical score

30%

8.1

List score

25%

8.4

Reviews score

10%

10

Sentiment score

★Better than 96% of smartphones
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

1.8

Price

▼Worse than 99%
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components

25%

7.9

Performance

18%

8.7

Camera

15%

8.5

Display

15%

7.7

Battery

10%

8.8

Software

10%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

6.4

Audio

3%

8.7

Design

★Better than 90%
8.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

9.4

Popularity

Grades by review (90)
41 reviews: 24 with a printed score, 17 estimated from the review. 49 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 82%
8.1

List score

List score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (8)
List score: in 8 of 228 lists (4%)
★Better than 96%
  • samsung-galaxy-z-fold8-ultra
samsung-galaxy-z-fold8-ultra
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Based on 41 · 50

Reviewers praise the battery life, manageable size and great multitasking, but dislike the high price, weak zoom and missing S Pen support.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components:

25%

7.9

Performance

18%

8.7

Camera

15%

8.5

Display

15%

7.7

Battery

10%

8.8

Software

10%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

6.4

Audio

3%

8.7

Design

8.2
Reviews score
8.4
List score
8.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

1.8

Price

6.4
Processor model
?
Storage type
?
RAM capacity
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 12 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 59.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 24.3% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This smartphone runs Android, which is more mainstream than the system in 4.8% of smartphones and the same as in 95.2% of smartphones.
Android version
?
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not support direct OS updates. 20.1% of smartphones offer this.
Promised software updates
?
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone runs an open-source operating system. 5.2% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
?
Main camera aperture
?
Main camera sensor area
?
Main camera pixel size
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.7% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.2% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
eSIM support
yes
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has eSIM support. 80.2% of smartphones offer this.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.6% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Show more
Screen size
8 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 8 inches which is larger than the screens of 98.8% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.7% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
?
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.4% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.6% of smartphones.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
?
Charging speed
?
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.2% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.1% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
What reviewers say
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.3% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not have a headphone jack. 45.1% of smartphones offer this.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not have an FM radio. 34.3% of smartphones offer this.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless Bluetooth audio. 12.5% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Height
158.5 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 158.5 mm which is shorter than 84.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Width
?
Thickness
4.1 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 4.1 mm which is thinner than 100% of smartphones.
Weight
?
Device volume
?
Show more
What reviewers say

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformanceSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 3 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers stronger optical zoom than the average smartphone (3 x vs 0 x). The average smartphone's optical zoom is 0 x.
    3 x vs 0 x
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.1% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.4% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 1.33 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    8 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 6x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,536 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,536 vs 256
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.4% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 15.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 82% of models

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    9.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (90)
    41 reviews: 24 with a printed score, 17 estimated from the review. 49 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.4 vs 7.3
  • 28.2% higher sentiment score
    10.0 vs 7.8
  • 5.2% higher list score
    List score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (8)
    List score: in 8 of 228 lists (4%)
    8.1 vs 7.7
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 6x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,536 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,536 vs 256
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • Supports desktop mode
    This smartphone includes desktop mode, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones support desktop functionality.
  • 3 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers stronger optical zoom than the average smartphone (3 x vs 0 x). The average smartphone's optical zoom is 0 x.
    3 x vs 0 x
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.4% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.3% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.7% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 40.8% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.2 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3.2 vs 2
  • Supports eSIM
    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra supports eSIM, while the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones support eSIM.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (6 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    6 vs 5.2
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.7% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • 1.33 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    8 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.4% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.6% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (3000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    3,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.1% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.1% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.4% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 4.2 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (4.1 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    4.1 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 5.1 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (158.5 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    158.5 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Is foldable
    This smartphone is foldable, the average smartphone is not. 4% of smartphones are foldable devices.
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.7% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 61.5% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 6.35x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is more expensive than the average smartphone (£1,650 vs £260).
    £1,650 vs £260
  • 19.5% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.41 vs 7.7).
    6.41 vs 7.66
  • 10% slower reverse wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower reverse wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (4.5 W vs 5 W). The average smartphone speed is 5 W.
    4.5 W vs 5 W
  • 6.35x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is more expensive than the average smartphone (£1,650 vs £260).
    £1,650 vs £260
  • 19.5% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.41 vs 7.7).
    6.41 vs 7.66
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.7% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 61.5% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 10% slower reverse wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower reverse wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (4.5 W vs 5 W). The average smartphone speed is 5 W.
    4.5 W vs 5 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
We Do Tech
≈ estimated
30/10/2026
Hands-on review · daily use and multitasking tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is not perfect, but it is a very pleasant experience once you use the big screen.
9.0
Josh Quiñonez
≈ estimated
23/10/2026
Long-term test · 3 months of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is an excellent foldable for daily use, with a great screen and multitasking, though it lacks S Pen support.
5.0
Michael's Tech Talk
≈ estimated
10/10/2026
Return decision · weeks of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra was returned: strong hardware, but not worth the extra cost for most people.
7.0
ZenTheGeek
≈ estimated
26/09/2026
Full review · battery, camera and gaming tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a good phone, but at this price the standard Fold 8 is the stronger pick.
9.0
Jon Imperial
≈ estimated
05/09/2026
Hands-on review · everyday use and camera test
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a great phone that doubles as a small tablet, worth the extra cost for some buyers but not all.
8.0
Melih Gungor - MTG
≈ estimated
04/09/2026
One-month review · battery, camera and design impressions
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a good foldable and the best Samsung pick for those wanting one, though its cameras trail the S26 Ultra.
6.0
JSyntax
≈ estimated
03/09/2026
First foldable impressions · daily use and price review
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra was kept despite doubts, but it is too expensive to recommend an upgrade at full price.
8.0
Shane Starnes
≈ estimated
03/09/2026
Long-term review · daily use and charging test
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the best display on any foldable, but its weight and price make the standard model better for most people.
6.0
JerryRigEverything
≈ estimated
26/08/2026
Durability test · teardown and internal component check
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is sturdy for its thinness, but its cooling looks minimal for a phone called Ultra.
8.0
Built 4 Tech
≈ estimated
22/08/2026
Hands-on review · inner display, cases and daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is worth buying only if you already know you want the inner display for daily use.
8.0
CEONTHEMAKING
≈ estimated
22/08/2026
Hands-on review · two weeks of use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is great for entertainment and mobile work, though sunlight visibility, S Pen support and zoom are weak points.
9.0
Alex EZ Tech Tips
≈ estimated
19/08/2026
One-month review · multitasking, camera and battery tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is highly recommended for heavy multitaskers, but those who need an S Pen should expect less.
More graded video reviews (18)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.2
gsmarena.com
✓ explicit
28/10/2026
Full review · Foldable phone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra improves on the Z Fold 7 with a bigger battery, faster charging and 3x zoom, though the exterior looks much the same.
8.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
31/07/2026
Full review · Foldable phone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a very good, well-rounded folding phone with strong performance and all-day battery, though it struggles to justify its Ultra name.
8.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
06/08/2026
Full review · Foldable phone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the fastest foldable tested here and handles multitasking well, but its high price and camera bump hold it back.
9.0
canoe.com
≈ estimated
07/08/2026
Hands-on test · Foldable phone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a thin, light foldable with a nearly undetectable crease, best for Samsung users who want a large screen and strong cameras.
8.8
engadget.com
✓ explicit
03/08/2026
Hands-on test · Foldable upgrade
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a solid refinement of last year's foldable, best for heavy multitaskers and zoom fans rather than Fold 7 owners.
8.0
moneycontrol.com
≈ estimated
Not Dated
Long-term review · Foldable phone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a slim, light foldable with a brighter screen outdoors, but its upgrades are refinements rather than a leap forward.
9.0
theguardian.com
≈ estimated
13/08/2026
Real-use test · Two-day battery
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the best folding phone available, with two-day battery life, but it is not a big upgrade on the Z Fold 7.
9.0
howtogeek.com
✓ explicit
15/08/2026
Hands-on review · Thin foldable
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a thin, fast foldable with a flat-lying inner screen, held back by a wobbly camera bump and no magnetic charging.
7.0
cnn.com
≈ estimated
10/08/2026
Hands-on test · Zoom and selfies
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra suits people who zoom and crop a lot thanks to its 3x telephoto, though the regular Z Fold 8 is easier to live with.
9.0
consumerreports.org
≈ estimated
12/09/2026
Lab test · Durability and battery
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a durable foldable with excellent outdoor readability and a main camera among the best for still photos, but heavier than most phones.
8.0
sammobile.com
≈ estimated
06/08/2026
Hands-on review · Flat foldable
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the flattest Fold screen yet and a longer-lasting battery, but its cover screen lacks the anti-reflective coating and it is fairly heavy.
8.5
androidpolice.com
✓ explicit
15/08/2026
Hands-on review · Productivity foldable
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a refined, powerful foldable with a nearly flat inside screen, but its tall, thin shape feels awkward next to the Z Fold 8.
9.0
maxim.com
≈ estimated
06/08/2026
Hands-on test · Everyday foldable
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a slim, capable foldable for everyday use, while serious photographers may find its pictures over-processed.
8.0
wired.com
✓ explicit
16/08/2026
Hands-on test · Ultra vs Fold8
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the better camera, but its taller shape feels clumsy next to the wider Fold8, which is easier to use every day.
8.0
whathifi.com
✓ explicit
18/08/2026
Lab test · Film and audio
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a capable phone for work and video, but black bars and thin speakers hold back its unfolded screen.
8.8
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
07/09/2026
Lab test · Foldable phone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra suits fans of square foldables, with longer battery life than the Fold 7, but it is very expensive and weak on bass.
7.5
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
22/08/2026
Full review · Foldable phone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra looks like the Fold 7 but adds a bigger battery and flatter hinge, though its weak telephoto and wobbly camera bump hold it back.
9.4
chip.de
✓ explicit
06/08/2026
Lab test · Foldable phone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a powerful foldable with a big inner screen and all-day battery, but its 10MP telephoto camera lags behind rivals.
8.4
netzwelt.de
✓ explicit
22/07/2026
Hands-on test · Foldable phone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a sharp, long-lasting foldable with a nearly invisible crease, but it lacks the Privacy Display of the S26 Ultra.
8.8
connect.de
✓ explicit
06/08/2026
Lab test · Foldable phone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a strong work foldable thanks to nearly 18 hours of battery, but its dust protection and telephoto camera fall short.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • The 8 inch OLED screen gives a big view for video and reading.
  • 3 x optical zoom brings distant subjects closer.
  • A contrast ratio of 3000000:1 gives deep blacks.
  • Three microphones help voice notes and calls come through clearly.
  • 20 W wireless charging is quick for a phone.
  • HDR10+ support brings richer colour to compatible video.

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • Reverse wireless charging is slow at 4.5 W.
  • It does not get direct OS updates.
  • An 8 inch screen is large for one-hand use.
  • The foldable hinge is one more moving part than a normal phone has.

Verdict

Eight inches of OLED screen is the first thing you notice on the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, a foldable for people who want a big display and a proper zoom camera. The 3 x optical zoom gets you closer to distant subjects, and the optical stabilization keeps those shots steady. The contrast ratio of 3000000:1 gives deep blacks and punchy video, and three microphones pick up sound from more than one direction. It charges wirelessly at 20 W, but reverse wireless charging is slow at 4.5 W, so topping up another device takes a while. The trade-offs are software and size: no direct OS updates, and an 8 inch screen is large for one-hand use. It suits a buyer who shoots lots of photos and video on the move.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and other smartphones

No results found