OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v3.0

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 review: 196 specs compared

Avg. price:~£1,300RAM capacity:12 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:7.6 inchesMain camera megapixels:?

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Review: Compare 196 technical specifications, 139 expert and video reviews and 12 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
8.4/10

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components

35%

8.0

Technical score

30%

8.2

List score

25%

8.5

Reviews score

10%

10

Sentiment score

★Better than 95% of smartphones
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

3.6

Price

▼Worse than 96%
8.0

Technical score

Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Score components

25%

7.9

Performance

18%

8.0

Camera

15%

8.2

Display

15%

7.8

Battery

10%

8.8

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Audio

3%

8.1

Design

▲Better than 85%
8.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 87% of models

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

9.8

Popularity

Grades by review (139)
52 reviews: 35 with a printed score, 17 estimated from the review. 87 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 87%
8.2

List score

List score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (12)
List score: in 12 of 228 lists (5%)
★Better than 97%
  • samsung-galaxy-z-fold8
samsung-galaxy-z-fold8
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

Based on 52 · 97

Reviewers love the slim design, long battery and big inner screen, but criticise the weak zoom, average cameras and high price.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

Technical score
Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Score components:

25%

7.9

Performance

18%

8.0

Camera

15%

8.2

Display

15%

7.8

Battery

10%

8.8

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Audio

3%

8.1

Design

8.0
Reviews score
8.5
List score
8.2
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

3.6

Price

6.9
Processor model
?
Storage type
?
RAM capacity
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 12 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 59.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 24.3% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This smartphone runs Android, which is more mainstream than the system in 4.8% of smartphones and the same as in 95.2% of smartphones.
Android version
?
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not support direct OS updates. 20.1% of smartphones offer this.
Promised software updates
?
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone runs an open-source operating system. 5.2% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
?
Main camera aperture
?
Main camera sensor area
?
Main camera pixel size
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.7% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.2% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
eSIM support
yes
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 has eSIM support. 80.2% of smartphones offer this.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.6% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Show more
Screen size
7.6 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 7.6 inches which is larger than the screens of 97.7% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.3% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
?
Display type
?
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.6% of smartphones.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
?
Charging speed
?
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.2% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.1% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
What reviewers say
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.3% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not have a headphone jack. 45.1% of smartphones offer this.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not have an FM radio. 34.3% of smartphones offer this.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless Bluetooth audio. 12.5% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Height
?
Width
?
Thickness
?
Weight
?
Device volume
?
Show more
What reviewers say

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformanceSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.1% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.4% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 0.93 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (7.6 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    7.6 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 6x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,536 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,536 vs 256
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.4% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.4% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • 16.4% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 87% of models

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    9.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (139)
    52 reviews: 35 with a printed score, 17 estimated from the review. 87 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.3
  • 28.2% higher sentiment score
    10.0 vs 7.8
  • 6.5% higher list score
    List score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (12)
    List score: in 12 of 228 lists (5%)
    8.2 vs 7.7
  • 50% smaller process node
    This smartphone uses a smaller process node than the average smartphone (3 nm vs 6 nm). The average process node size is 6 nm.
    3 nm vs 6 nm
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 6x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (1,536 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    1,536 vs 256
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • Supports desktop mode
    This smartphone includes desktop mode, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones support desktop functionality.
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.4% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.3% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.7% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Supports eSIM
    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 supports eSIM, while the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones support eSIM.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.7% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • 0.93 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (7.6 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    7.6 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.4% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.6% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.1% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.1% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.4% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • Is foldable
    This smartphone is foldable, the average smartphone is not. 4% of smartphones are foldable devices.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.7% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 61.5% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 5x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is more expensive than the average smartphone (£1,300 vs £260).
    £1,300 vs £260
  • 10.2% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.95 vs 7.7).
    6.95 vs 7.66
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • 5x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is more expensive than the average smartphone (£1,300 vs £260).
    £1,300 vs £260
  • 10.2% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.95 vs 7.7).
    6.95 vs 7.66
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.7% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 61.5% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
This is Tech Today
≈ estimated
25/10/2026
Pros and cons review · comparison with iPhone Duo
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 trails the iPhone Duo overall, but it is still one of the best foldables for Android users.
8.0
TechBar
≈ estimated
21/10/2026
Long-term review · 40 days of use and drop tests
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is worth considering for its wide, comfortable screen and battery, though heavy tasks warm it and split-screen is limited.
8.0
Matt Tries Tech
≈ estimated
15/10/2026
Long-term test · 30 days of daily use after switching from iPhone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is not perfect, but its inner screen is useful enough for the reviewer to keep it.
8.0
SoulOfTech
≈ estimated
08/10/2026
Long-term review · two months of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a great passport-style phone for those who want that shape, but not just for a change.
9.0
Josh Quiñonez
≈ estimated
02/10/2026
Long-term review · over 2 months of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 still pleases the reviewer after two months, with few drawbacks beyond missing zoom and S Pen.
9.0
Melih Gungor - MTG
≈ estimated
27/09/2026
Long-term review · 2 months of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is best for newcomers to foldables; it is great for the form factor but not for serious photography.
7.0
Mr Neon Tech
≈ estimated
08/09/2026
Long-term review · one month as primary phone
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a wonderful device, but its price is too high for an experimental foldable.
7.0
Dom Esposito
≈ estimated
06/09/2026
Long-term review · one month of use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is an enjoyable passport-style foldable, though this generation is probably not worth buying yet.
9.0
Matthew Moniz
≈ estimated
05/09/2026
Long-term review · 45 days of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is not perfect, but its compact design is hard to put down, and most buyers should enjoy it.
6.0
Mobiscrub Hindi
≈ estimated
04/09/2026
Real-use review · daily use and problems encountered
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is good for content and reading, but for productivity and personal use the taller model fits better.
5.0
Hardware Canucks
≈ estimated
01/09/2026
Long-term test · several weeks of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a novel form factor worth applauding, but too expensive for what it delivers and not a daily driver yet.
8.0
Jon Valiagas
≈ estimated
27/08/2026
Long-term test · 45 days of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is worth it if you are the target buyer, as its form is loved despite battery and speaker limits.
More graded video reviews (19)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
29/07/2026
Hands-on test · Short-and-wide foldable
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a light, wide foldable that is easy to use all day, though it trails rivals on dust resistance and graphics speed.
8.0
gsmarena.com
≈ estimated
Not Dated
Lab-tested review · Passport-style foldable
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a compact, pocketable foldable with a useful wide cover screen, but its main camera and missing telephoto lens are real compromises.
9.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
29/07/2026
Week-long review · Everyday foldable
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a lighter, more practical everyday foldable, but its dual 50MP cameras and weak zoom hold it back.
8.0
digitaltrends.com
✓ explicit
11/08/2026
Three-week test · Book-style foldable
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a refined, pocketable foldable with bright screens and long software support, but it lacks a zoom camera and throttles under sustained load.
8.8
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
09/09/2026
Lab-tested review · Wide foldable
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a versatile everyday foldable with a slim design and an excellent display, though it lacks a telephoto camera and a stylus.
10
popsugar.com
✓ explicit
28/09/2026
Hands-on test · Camera focus
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold8 suits anyone who wants a strong camera and a big screen for TV and multitasking, though it moves data only to Samsung phones.
8.0
wired.com
✓ explicit
16/08/2026
Long-term review · Shape and camera
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold8 is the wider, lighter foldable you'll reach for more often, though it has no zoom camera and rocks on tables.
9.5
shortlist.com
≈ estimated
07/09/2026
Month-long review · Foldable features
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold8 is a slim, durable foldable whose wide inner screen suits films and games, though it has fewer cameras than the Ultra.
8.0
asiaone.com
≈ estimated
06/10/2026
Hands-on review · 4:3 screen
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold8 is a light, palm-sized mini tablet whose 4:3 screen suits reading and retro games, though its zoom beyond 2x is digital.
10
whathifi.com
✓ explicit
18/08/2026
Lab test · Display and picture
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a charming, well-built folding phone with a bright 4:3 screen for movies, though it's best avoided on a strict budget.
8.9
engadget.com
✓ explicit
28/07/2026
Hands-on review · Movies and gaming
Verdict
The base Galaxy Z Fold 8 is the better pick for video and games, with the Ultra's performance but no zoom camera.
10
t3.com
✓ explicit
28/07/2026
Hands-on review · Passport-format foldable
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a fresh, practical passport-format foldable, but its high asking price and limited camera setup remain the main hurdles.
8.0
au.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
05/08/2026
Full review · Media-friendly foldable
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a light, sturdy foldable whose 4:3 inner screen suits video well, but its average cameras and dust sensitivity hold it back.
9.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
03/08/2026
Hands-on review · Compact foldable
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a compact foldable whose 4:3 screen suits movies and games, but it has no telephoto camera and needs some software tweaks.
8.0
howtogeek.com
✓ explicit
20/08/2026
Hands-on review · Book-style foldable
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 fits a pocket when closed and opens into a tablet-like screen, but its price and lack of magnetic charging hold it back.
9.0
telegraph.co.uk
✓ explicit
06/08/2026
Week-long test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 suits people who want a pocket tablet for video and reading, but its missing zoom camera and weak speakers hold it back.
9.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
03/08/2026
Month-long test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a light, pocketable foldable that works well as a small tablet, but its high price and hard-to-read screen in sunlight hold it back.
8.0
zdnet.com
✓ explicit
07/08/2026
Ten-day test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is a pocketable foldable that feels like a mini tablet, best for reading and casual multitasking, but it lacks a zoom lens.
9.0
gizmodo.com
✓ explicit
06/08/2026
Two-week test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is best for video, games and reading, with an all-day battery, but it runs warm and lacks Flex Mode.
9.2
chip.de
✓ explicit
06/08/2026
Lab test · Passport-format foldable
Verdict
The Galaxy Z Fold8 is a handy foldable with excellent screens, top performance and long battery life, held back mainly by its lack of a telephoto lens.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

  • The 7.6 inch screen opens to a tablet-sized view.
  • The chip is built on a 3 nm process.
  • The 120 Hz refresh rate keeps scrolling and video smooth.
  • 15 W wireless charging means no cable on the desk.
  • Reverse wireless charging can top up earbuds and other gadgets.
  • eSIM support means no physical SIM card to swap.

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

  • It does not get direct OS updates.
  • There is no optical zoom, so long shots rely on digital zoom.
  • There is no 3D facial recognition for unlocking.
  • The hinge is one more moving part than a normal phone has.

Verdict

The 7.6 inch inner screen is the reason to look at the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, a foldable for people who want one device for reading, video and work on the move. The chip is built on a 3 nm process, and the 120 Hz refresh rate keeps scrolling smooth. With 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage, several apps and large files fit without fuss. It charges wirelessly at 15 W, and it can also charge other wireless gadgets when you place them on it. A desktop mode gives you a computer-style view when you connect a bigger screen. The trade-off is software, since it does not get direct OS updates. It suits a buyer who wants a large screen in a folding body and is happy with premium hardware.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 and other smartphones

No results found