Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB) review. Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among smartphones and if it's worth buying.
Overall score
What it is: An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score components:
90.0%
Technical Score
10.0%
User score
Technical Score
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
User score
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.
#69 in Best Samsung Phones
#92 in Best Foldable Smartphones
#569 in Best Camera Smartphones
#844 in Best Android Smartphones
#855 in Best Large-Screen Smartphones
#891 in Best NFC Smartphones
#919 in Best 5G Smartphones
#940 in Best AI Smartphones
#941 in Best Smartphones
#2455 in Best Battery Life Smartphones
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
What it is: An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters: When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score components:
60.0%
Overall score
40.0%
Price
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >256 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3.2 GHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >1500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >4000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 8+
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >950 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >700
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >2500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >6000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >8000
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >5000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1800
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3200 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 5
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: > 50 GB/s
Importance: LOW
Good value: 4
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >16 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <6 nm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >9 W
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >8192 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >2048 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >512 KB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >100000 million
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.3
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.2
Importance: LOW
Good value: 2.0/3.0
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >50 MP
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >60
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥1.2 µm
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2.5x
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >16 MP
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >130
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >120
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >5.2
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.1/3.2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥6.6 inches
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >400 ppi
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: ≥120 Hz
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >300 Hz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1300 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1000 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >60 W
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <45 min
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >40 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >10 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥3
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: <162 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <75 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <8 mm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <190 g
Importance: LOW
Good value: <98cm³
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥1.5 m
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >8
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥6.6 inches
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2.5x
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: ≥120 Hz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >950 MHz
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >50 MP
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1000 nits
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <190 g
After six months, the Samsung Galaxy Fold is described as a durable, "content consumption powerhouse" with an immersive 7.3-inch display and impressive 4,380 mAh battery life. While it excels in multitasking, the device carries a high $2,000 price tag, weighs 276g, and suffers from poor, unoptimized app scaling on platforms like Instagram. Ultimately, it is deemed a successful, pioneering device for the foldable market despite some awkwardness in camera usage and a cramped three-app view. Forbes
In its October 2019 review, Engadget describes the redesigned Samsung Galaxy Fold as a "stunning technical achievement" that remains a prototype-like experiment rather than a practical consumer device. While addressing initial flaws—extending the protective layer and capping the hinge—the $1,980 device still feels fragile, with the review positioning it as a tool for early adopters. EngadgetKey pros include a high-quality triple-lens camera system on par with 2019 flagships, excellent battery life lasting over 18 hours, and effective software features like App Continuity. However, the 7.3-inch screen remains susceptible to scratches and permanent "divots" from minor, everyday use, and the device lacks water or dust resistance. EngadgetSignificant cons include the narrow 4.6-inch cover display, a noticeable screen crease, and a bulky, "chunky" design. Ultimately, the review concludes the, high price and, durability concerns make it a difficult device to recommend for most consumers. Engadget
The Tom's Guide review describes the original Samsung Galaxy Fold as a "refined prototype" for early adopters, highlighting the 7.3-inch Infinity Flex display as a major pro for multitasking and seamless app continuity. While performance is solid with 12GB of RAM, the device faces significant cons, including a $1,980 price tag, a bulky, heavy design, and continued durability concerns for the delicate screen. Ultimately, the review finds the Fold to be a successful, albeit flawed, proof-of-concept, advising most users to wait for more durable, refined future iterations.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a pioneering "technical marvel" featuring a 7.3-inch inner display, a versatile six-camera system, and a narrow design that makes it surprisingly usable for one-handed operation. Key advantages include its unmatched "wow" factor, exceptional multitasking capabilities with up to three apps, and high-quality photography, according to TechRadar. However, the $1,980 price tag, the noticeable middle crease, and the device's overall vulnerability are significant drawbacks. The review also notes the lack of S Pen support, an uneven refresh rate that causes awkward scrolling, and a battery that drains quickly under heavy use. Powered by a Snapdragon 855 and 12GB of RAM, the device provides solid performance but is considered an unpolished first-generation product. TechRadar suggests most users should wait for future, more durable iterations.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is described as an ambitious, first-generation device that, despite solid performance and excellent battery life, is hindered by high fragility and a $1,980 price tag. While praised for its 7.3-inch foldable display and innovative multitasking features like App Continuity, the device is considered a premature, bulky choice for most users. Key drawbacks, however, include a noticeable screen crease, a fragile display that developed a divot during testing, and a cramped, large-bezeled front screen.
Wired's review of the Samsung Galaxy Fold describes it as a "technological marvel" but also a deeply flawed first-generation product, ultimately awarding it a 5/10 rating. The review highlights impressive multitasking and a seamless "App Continuity" feature as pros, along with solid battery life and camera quality comparable to other high-end Samsung phones. Significant cons include the device's fragility, lack of water/dust resistance, awkward ergonomics due to its thickness and small cover screen, and a high $1,980 price.
Wired reviewed the original Samsung Galaxy Fold as a "magical" but flawed luxury device rather than a daily necessity, citing its large, luscious internal display ideal for multitasking but its bulky size making it awkward for calls and pocket storage. The device features a powerful Snapdragon 855 processor, "impressive" battery life, seamless "App Continuity" between screens, and a capable six-camera system. Significant drawbacks include its $1,980 price, perceived fragility, a narrow outer display with large bezels, lack of water/dust resistance, a visible screen crease, and a notch impacting video viewing.
CNET reviewed the Samsung Galaxy Fold as a flawed but groundbreaking "proof of concept" for foldable technology. Pros include its large 7.3-inch internal display, "App Continuity" feature, and multitasking capabilities, while cons center on its fragile screen, lack of durability against water or dust, a distracting notch, a small outer screen, and shorter battery life. Despite a premium exterior, CNET found the $1,980 price difficult to justify due to "baked-in" problems and advised consumers to wait for future generations.
According to PCMag, the original Samsung Galaxy Fold was considered a revolutionary but flawed first-generation device with a high price tag, significant bulk, a visible screen crease, and fragility issues like the lack of an IP rating and susceptibility to minor screen damage. Pros included solid performance, excellent battery life, image quality comparable to the Galaxy S10, 512GB storage, and included Galaxy Buds, while cons included the lack of a headphone jack and microSD slot, carrier bloatware, and a poorly visible outer screen in sunlight.
Samsung's Galaxy Fold is described as an ambitious but flawed first attempt at foldable technology, offering both a compact smartphone experience and a large 7.3-inch tablet screen. The device features 12GB of RAM, a powerful processor, and battery life that can last for two days on a single charge. However, the $1,980 price is hard to justify due to design compromises and durability concerns. A visible crease on the interior plastic display, a small 4.6-inch exterior screen making typing difficult, a thick feel when folded, a large notch, and lack of water resistance are significant drawbacks. The device is seen as a luxury item for early adopters, not a practical daily driver, due to design issues and reports of screen failures in review units, despite its "magical" folding mechanism and multi-tasking capabilities.
The Android Authority review characterizes the original Samsung Galaxy Fold as an impressive, albeit non-essential, technological showpiece, featuring a stunning 7.3-inch main display and a robust, "over-engineered" hinge. Key advantages include seamless App Continuity, effective multi-window multitasking, and a 4:3 aspect ratio well-suited for productivity. However, the device is hindered by a cramped, 4.6-inch exterior cover display, significant bulk, occasional software stutters, and a lack of IP-rated water or dust resistance. Despite adequate battery life, the high $1,980 price point and slow 15W charging make it a product primarily for early adopters rather than a practical daily driver.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold's launch was postponed after initial units experienced critical display failures within days, including a notable bulge and broken OLED panels, according to The Verge. Despite the device's innovative, pocketable, large-screen design being hailed as a major engineering feat, severe durability issues and a $1,980 price point made it difficult to recommend. The review concluded that software scaling issues and extreme, fragile, and debris-sensitive hardware rendered the first-generation product an unfinished product.
Consumer Reports describes the Samsung Galaxy Fold as a $1,980 "one-of-a-kind" device with a 7.3-inch foldable screen designed for multitasking. Key advantages include its innovative form factor, excellent 12MP camera, and 31-hour battery life. However, the device is considered fragile, failing a 100-drop test, with a scratch-prone screen and a narrow, hard-to-use outer display.
The original Samsung Galaxy Fold is highlighted as an ambitious, innovative device that transforms from a phone into a tablet, boasting powerful specs like a Snapdragon 855 processor, 12GB of RAM, and solid battery life. Key pros include this "wow factor" design, a capable triple-lens camera system, and the inclusion of Galaxy Buds, offering a glimpse into the future of mobile technology. However, the device is heavily criticized for its extreme fragility, particularly the delicate main plastic display that is prone to damage, and a prohibitively high price point. Significant cons include a bulky design, a cramped 4.6-inch outer screen that makes texting difficult, and a 7.3-inch inner display with a noticeable hinge and notch. Ultimately deemed a "technical marvel" rather than a practical daily driver, the Fold is seen as limiting due to its awkward form factor and lack of water resistance. While impressive to witness, the review advises against purchasing this first-generation device, characterizing it as too fragile for mainstream adoption.
The Blick review of the Samsung Galaxy Fold highlights its impressive 7.3-inch foldable display and exceptional multitasking capabilities, allowing for up to three simultaneous apps with smooth transitions. However, the device is criticized for being bulky, heavy, and fragile, with a plastic inner screen susceptible to damage from dust and debris. Furthermore, the small 4.6-inch outer display proves too cramped for daily use, and the high 2,100 Swiss franc price point renders it a fragile, first-generation luxury item rather than a durable daily driver.
A 2019 review characterizes the original Samsung Galaxy Fold as a fascinating, pioneering foldable that is ultimately a deeply flawed, experimental device. While the 7.3-inch inner display provides a "magical" tablet-like experience for multitasking and media, the phone is considered heavy and awkwardly shaped when closed. Key drawbacks include a noticeable display notch, a narrow 4.6-inch front screen that makes typing difficult, and a lack of dust or water resistance. Retailing for nearly $2,000, the device is positioned as a fragile luxury showpiece for early adopters rather than a practical daily driver.
The Handelsblatt review presents the original Samsung Galaxy Fold as a pioneering, albeit delicate, fusion of smartphone and tablet featuring a 7.3-inch display. While successfully delivering a novel, large-screen experience, the device demands careful handling due to high sensitivity to dust and pressure. Pros include excellent multitasking with up to three simultaneous apps, seamless app continuity, and a premium hinge design. Conversely, the 4.6-inch outer screen is cramped, the internal plastic display is fragile, and the lack of water/dust resistance, along with a roughly $2,000 price point, makes it a high-risk investment.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a pioneering, high-end foldable device featuring a 7.3-inch inner display and a robust, specialized hinge mechanism. While offering premium specifications like 12GB of RAM, 512GB storage, and six cameras, the device faced significant delays due to durability concerns regarding the plastic-polymer screen. A major strength lies in its multitasking capabilities, enabling users to run up to three apps simultaneously on the expansive, foldable screen. However, the device has notable drawbacks, including a narrow 4.6-inch external display, a visible crease on the main panel, and a thick, heavy design. Priced around $1,980, the Galaxy Fold launched in September 2019 as a premium luxury item. Despite its high cost, lack of a headphone jack, and average battery life, it serves as a unique, innovative tool for enthusiasts seeking cutting-edge mobile technology.
Pierre Le Goupil's Clubic review characterizes the Samsung Galaxy Fold as a "technological laboratory" that offers a promising future for mobile devices, highlighting its unique dual-screen design featuring a 7.3-inch internal display and a 4.6-inch cover display with seamless "App Continuity". Pros include top-tier performance from the Snapdragon 855 processor, 12GB of RAM for fluid multitasking, a versatile six-camera system, and solid battery life. However, the device is held back by significant cons, including a fragile inner screen, lack of water/dust resistance, a cramped external display, and a heavy, "chunky" design. With a price tag near $2,000, it is framed as a luxury device for early adopters despite its visible screen crease and first-generation limitations.
The Journal du Geek review describes the Samsung Galaxy Fold as a groundbreaking but experimental device, praised for its 7.3-inch inner display that transforms from a 4.6-inch phone, offering unique, immersive productivity and media consumption. Key pros include high-end performance via the Snapdragon 855 and 12GB of RAM, enabling efficient multitasking. However, significant cons include a heavy, bulky form factor when folded, a small exterior screen, and a noticeable crease on the inner plastic display. Ultimately deemed a "luxury beta" product, the device faces criticism for its fragility, lack of water/dust resistance, and a high price point, making it suitable mainly for early adopters. While it serves as a convincing proof of concept for the future of foldable technology, it represents a first-generation product with notable design compromises.
The Labo Fnac review characterizes the original Samsung Galaxy Fold as a pioneering device, featuring a 7.3-inch Dynamic AMOLED internal display and "App Continuity" for seamless multitasking. Performance is driven by a Snapdragon 855 processor and 12GB of RAM, allowing for robust operation, though it is primarily aimed at early adopters. Key cons focus on the device's experimental nature, specifically its high fragility, the restrictive care required for the screen, and a lack of water or dust resistance. Additionally, the phone is considered very heavy and thick when folded, while the 4.6-inch external display is described as narrow and difficult to use. Ultimately, the review highlights that despite a six-camera system and innovative, foldable design, the high $1,980 price point makes it more of a "technical marvel" than a practical daily driver for the average user. The device is positioned as a successful, yet limited, proof of concept for the future of mobile technology.
The NextPit review characterizes the original Samsung Galaxy Fold as a revolutionary yet deeply flawed pioneer with a superb 7.3-inch inner display, yet notes a significant 17mm thickness, a large notch, and extreme screen fragility. While performance is top-tier with a Snapdragon 855 processor, the 4.6-inch external screen is criticized for being too narrow, despite excellent software features like app continuity. The device offers solid battery life and good cameras but is hampered by slow 10W charging, high fragility, and a prohibitive price, making it a niche device.
Frandroid describes the original Samsung Galaxy Fold as a "Doctor Jekyll and Mister Hyde" device, blending innovative, immersive 7.3-inch display technology with significant, first-generation compromises. Key advantages include high-performance specs, impressive multitasking, and a "wow" factor, though these are hampered by a fragile plastic screen, a small 4.6-inch cover display, and a heavy, bulky form factor. Ultimately positioned as a premium "proof of concept" for early adopters rather than a practical daily driver, the device excels in performance but faces durability concerns.
The Journal du Geek review characterizes the Samsung Galaxy Fold as an ambitious but fragile, early-generation prototype, highlighting the transformative 7.3-inch internal AMOLED display and "App Continuity" as major pros, alongside top-tier Snapdragon 855 performance. Key cons include extreme fragility of the plastic screen, a narrow and awkward 4.6-inch external display, a visible hinge crease, and a lack of water/dust resistance. While deemed a functional, high-end, early-adopter device, the review suggests waiting for further refinements due to these durability and design concerns.
Phonandroid’s review highlights the Samsung Galaxy Fold as a pioneering device, featuring a 7.3-inch internal display and a 4.6-inch cover screen with impressive App Continuity for seamless multitasking. Powered by a Snapdragon 855 chipset and 12GB of RAM, the device excels in performance but is hindered by its heavy, thick design and a fragile, plastic-covered inner screen. While the camera system matches the Galaxy S10, the device suffers from mediocre battery life when using the main display and carries a steep $2,000 price tag. The foldable is ultimately positioned as a fragile, first-generation prototype aimed at early adopters, rather than a device for the general public.
The original Samsung Galaxy Fold is highlighted by Les Numériques as a pioneer that transforms from a narrow, thick phone into an impressive 7.3-inch, 85% screen-to-body ratio tablet. Key pros include the exceptional versatility of the dual-screen form factor, vivid OLED displays, and a capable triple-camera system. However, significant cons involve a delicate inner plastic screen, a lack of IP rating for durability, and a small 4.6-inch cover screen that limits usability, making it a premium device intended for early adopters. Les Numé
Presse-Citron describes the original Samsung Galaxy Fold as a transformative "geek's dream" featuring a 7.3-inch Infinity Flex display that redefines media consumption and app continuity. Key advantages include a powerful multitasking environment for three simultaneous apps and a high-quality six-camera array. However, the device is criticized for its fragile plastic screen, susceptibility to dust, and heavy, thick, and awkward ergonomics. Ultimately, while deemed an impressive, "visceral" piece of engineering, the Fold is seen as a first-generation product unsuitable for most users due to its high price, narrow outer screen, and lack of durability.
Pascal Forget’s review of the original Samsung Galaxy Fold highlights a high-tech, foldable 7.3-inch inner display that excels for media consumption and navigation but is paired with a delicate, "tender" plastic screen prone to damage. While the external build quality and six-camera system are praised, the device features a narrow 4.6-inch exterior screen that is difficult to use, alongside a large, intrusive notch on the main display. Key drawbacks include a lack of water/dust resistance, a gap for debris when folded, and a "jelly scrolling" effect on the screen. Performance-wise, App Continuity enables smooth transitions between screens and robust multitasking capabilities, though many third-party apps lack optimization for the unique aspect ratio. The $1,980 device is considered a "Version 1.0" product, boasting good battery life but ultimately acting as a fragile, luxury proof of concept for early adopters.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is characterized in the 01net review as a pioneering yet polarizing device that attempts to bridge the gap between a smartphone and a tablet, featuring an innovative 7.3-inch Dynamic AMOLED Infinity Flex Display. It boasts high-end performance with a Snapdragon 855 processor, 12 GB of RAM, and 512 GB of storage, though the 4.6-inch cover display is criticized for being too narrow. Despite improvements, the plastic screen remains fragile, and with a nearly $2,000 price tag and no IP rating, it is considered a luxury proof-of-concept rather than a device for the average consumer. For the full technical details
The Tom’s Guide review of the Samsung Galaxy Fold highlights its role as a pioneering device, featuring a 7.3-inch foldable Dynamic AMOLED display that seamlessly transitions to a tablet format using "App Continuity". Powered by a Snapdragon 855 processor and 12GB of RAM, it offers robust multitasking capabilities and a versatile six-camera system capable of high-quality imaging. While recognized for its innovation and premium extras like included Galaxy Buds, the device is criticized for being a "refined prototype" due to its high price, fragile plastic screen, a prominent crease, and a small, restrictive outer display. For more details, visit Tom's Guide.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a pioneering device that transforms from a 4.6-inch external smartphone to a 7.3-inch foldable tablet, featuring "App Continuity" for a seamless experience. It is powered by a Snapdragon 855 processor with 12GB of RAM, 512GB of storage, and a 4,380 mAh dual-cell battery. Pros include the innovative form factor allowing for unique multitasking, a six-camera system for versatile photography, and premium, fast performance. The device provides a truly futuristic, high-end experience, says DDay.it. Cons focus on the fragile, plastic, and creased inner display, alongside a very narrow, bezel-heavy front screen. The high price point, coupled with a lack of water or dust resistance, makes it a vulnerable first-generation product.
Paolo Ottolino's review for Corriere della Sera frames the original Samsung Galaxy Fold as a pioneering luxury device featuring a 4.6-inch external cover screen and a 7.3-inch internal display, boasting 12GB of RAM and six cameras. The primary advantages include its book-like form factor, high-end specifications, and the immersive experience provided by the large internal OLED display. However, the preview notes significant drawbacks, specifically the high €2,050 price point and a current lack of software optimization for the unique screen format.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is recognized as a pioneering, albeit flawed, foldable device featuring a 7.3-inch Dynamic AMOLED screen, a precise hinge mechanism, and a powerful, multi-tasking capable processor. While the device excels in app continuity and performance, the review highlights significant drawbacks, including a bulky design, a cramped 4.6-inch cover display, and a highly visible screen crease. Due to concerns over the fragility of the folding, plastic screen and a premium price point, it is positioned as a luxury, first-generation device for enthusiasts.
The DDay.it review highlights the original Samsung Galaxy Fold as a "miracle of engineering," praised for its robust hinge, seamless "App Continuity," and impressive multitasking capabilities on the 7.3-inch screen. However, the device features significant design limitations, including a 4.6-inch external screen that is far too narrow for practical use, alongside a very fragile inner screen prone to damage. The review concludes that despite its high performance, the combination of a distracting, large notch, a "jelly scrolling" effect, and a high price makes this first-generation foldable more of a luxury showpiece than a daily, reliable device.
FWD.nl describes the Samsung Galaxy Fold as a "cool gadget with many catches," highlighting its successful blending of a smartphone and tablet with smooth performance from a Snapdragon 855 processor and 12 GB of RAM. The 4,380 mAh battery offers surprisingly strong, long-lasting, and reliable performance. Key cons include a, vulnerable design lacking an IP rating, a highly visible screen crease, and limited app optimization for the unique aspect ratio. While the triple-rear camera delivers high-quality photos, the 4.6-inch cover screen is too small, and the device feels heavy and thick. Ultimately, the high €2,000 price point is hard to justify for what is considered a first-generation device, according to the FWD.nl review.
The original Samsung Galaxy Fold is a pioneering hybrid device featuring a 7.3-inch Infinity Flex Display and seamless app continuity, allowing a smooth transition from the small outer screen to the large inner display. It delivers high-end performance with 12GB of RAM and a versatile six-camera system, though it serves more as an expensive, fragile "proof of concept" for early adopters. Key drawbacks include its bulky, "brick-like" design when folded, an excessively small 4.6-inch cover display with large bezels, and the lack of dust or water resistance, making it a high-maintenance, premium device.
Compare
