OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,760RAM capacity:12 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:7.3 inchesMain camera megapixels:16 MP & 12 MP & 12 MP

Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components

90%

7.1

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 62% of smartphones
5.3

Value for money

Value for money
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

1.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 99%
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

25%

6.8

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.9

Camera

15%

6.8

Display

15%

6.6

Battery

10%

7.1

Software

10%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

6.9

Audio

3%

6.0

Design

â–²Better than 64%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £1,760
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components:

25%

6.8

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.9

Camera

15%

6.8

Display

15%

6.6

Battery

10%

7.1

Software

10%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

6.9

Audio

3%

6.0

Design

7.1
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

1.2

Price

5.3
Brand name
Samsung
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 processor which is faster than processors in 55.2% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.8% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 12 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 59% of smartphones and equal to that of 24.3% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.84 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.84 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 68.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 9 Pie
Android version
Android 9 Pie
This smartphone runs Android version Android 9 Pie which is older than that found in 93.9% of smartphones and equal to that in 2.6% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
16 MP & 12 MP & 12 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 16 MP & 12 MP & 12 MP which is lower than that of 86.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.5/2.4 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.5/2.4 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 96.6% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
31.4 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 31.4 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 57.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.8% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.4 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.4 µm which is larger than in 92.7% of smartphones and equal to the size in 4% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
7.3 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 7.3 inches which is larger than the screens of 97.7% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1536x 2152 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1536x2152 px which is higher than that of 77.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
362 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 362 ppi which is lower than that of 76.5% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,380 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,380 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 86.2% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.1% of smartphones.
Charging speed
15 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 87.7% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.9% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
160.9 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 160.9 mm which is shorter than 76.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Width
117.9 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 117.9 mm which is wider than 98.2% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.6 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.6 mm which is thinner than 86% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.5% of smartphones.
Weight
276 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 276 g which is heavier than 91.1% of smartphones.
Device volume
131,040 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 131,040 cm³ which is larger than 89.2% of smartphones.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 66.7% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (10 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    10 W vs 6 W
  • 0.63 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (7.3 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    7.3 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 66.7% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (10 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    10 W vs 6 W
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 18.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.84 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x2.84 GHz & 3x2.41 GHz & 4x1.78 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x2.84 GHz & 3x2.41 GHz & 4x1.78 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • 2x more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (512 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    512 vs 256
  • 45.6% higher 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (5,569 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    5,569 vs 3,825
  • 24.2% higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (31.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    31.79 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Circle to Search, Live Translate, Generative Edit, Chat Assist, Note Assist
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.5/2.4 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.5/2.4 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.9 & f/2.2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.9 & f/2.2 vs f/2.2
  • Has a multi-lens front camera
    This smartphone features a multi-lens front camera, the average smartphone does not. 18% of smartphones have multiple front lenses.
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 22.60x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    2160x60 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.1 vs 2.0
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartphone supports ANT+ technology, the average smartphone does not. 6% of smartphones are ANT+ compatible.
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • 1 more external displays supported
    This smartphone supports more external displays than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone supports 1 external displays.
    2 vs 1
  • 0.63 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (7.3 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    7.3 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1536x2152 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1536x2152 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Has a secondary display
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • Has a curved display
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 0.7 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.6 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.6 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Is foldable
    This smartphone is foldable, the average smartphone is not. 3.9% of smartphones are foldable devices.
  • 2.7 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (160.9 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    160.9 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 72.9% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (257 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    257 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (16 MP & 12 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    16 MP & 12 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 48.3% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (341 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    341 nits vs 660 nits
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 12.4% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,380 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,380 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 9 Pie vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 9 Pie vs Android 14
  • 6.77x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£1,760 vs £260).
    £1,760 vs £260
  • 37.8% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (5.32 vs 7.3).
    5.32 vs 7.34
  • 5.44x less popular
    Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 72.9% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (257 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    257 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 16.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (7 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    7 nm vs 6 nm
  • 35% fewer transistors
    This smartphone contains fewer transistors than the average smartphone (6,700 million vs 10,300 million). The average smartphone has 10,300 million transistors.
    6,700 million vs 10,300 million
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 4.4% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (901 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    901 vs 942
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 9 Pie vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 9 Pie vs Android 14
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (16 MP & 12 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    16 MP & 12 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • No manual focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a manual focus mode, the average smartphone does. 91.2% of smartphones offer manual focus.
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (10 MP & 8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    10 MP & 8 MP vs 16 MP
  • 1.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 48.3% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (341 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    341 nits vs 660 nits
  • 336.5 nits lower GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (557 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average smartphone scores 893.5 nits.
    557 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • 8.4% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (362 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    362 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 12.4% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,380 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,380 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 54.5% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    15 W vs 33 W
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • 40.7% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (276 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    276 g vs 196.2 g
  • 41.9 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (117.9 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    117.9 mm vs 76 mm
  • 5 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2019 vs 2024). 5.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    September 2019
    2019 vs 2024
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China
  • 34% larger volume
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (131,040 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97,800 cm³.
    131,040 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Tim Schofield
≈ estimated
14/11/2019
Long-term test · one month of daily use
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Fold wins on battery life and multitasking, but durability and price must improve before it suits mainstream buyers.
7.0
Digital Trends
≈ estimated
16/04/2019
First look · hands-on impressions and durability notes
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Fold feels well built so far, but the hinge needs care and it lacks water resistance.
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

businessinsider.com
25/04/2019
Early hands-on · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a first-generation foldable whose big tablet screen and two-day battery stand out, though its folded screen is small and it is thick.
pcmag.com
01/10/2019
Lab test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold looks futuristic and lasts over 12 hours, but its bulky body and fragile screen make it hard to justify.
C
cnet.com
03/10/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Fold review: The device that piqued our interest in a foldable phone future - CNET
wired.com
24/10/2019
Month-long test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold works well as a tablet and survived a month of rough handling, but its thick body and high cost make it a hard buy.
wired.com
16/11/2019
Two-week test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is enjoyable as a small tablet, but its thick, heavy closed body and awkward calls make it a poor everyday phone.
uk.pcmag.com
01/10/2019
Lab test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a solid foldable with an excellent battery, but questionable durability and a steep price make it one to skip for now.
techradar.com
18/11/2019
Hands-on review · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a striking foldable with a big 7.3-inch screen, but its high price and fragile plastic display make it one for early adopters.
tomsguide.com
26/02/2020
Hands-on test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a novel foldable with a sharp 7.3-inch screen, but its high price and first-generation rough edges suit only well-off early adopters.
engadget.com
14/10/2019
Long-term review · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold held up through three weeks after Samsung's fixes, but stuck-green pixels and its fragility make it a risky buy.
F
forbes.com
07/04/2020
Summary of the review
A Review: Six Months With The Samsung Galaxy Fold - Forbes
techadvisor.com
18/02/2020
Three-week test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is ambitious engineering, but its bulk, fragility and cramped outer screen mean most people should skip it.
consumerreports.org
28/10/2019
Durability lab test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold impresses once opened, but its fragile plastic screen and limited appeal mean most people should wait for a refined version.
T
theverge.com
24/04/2019
Summary of the review
The Verge: Samsung Galaxy Fold: the latest on the beleaguered foldable phone
androidauthority.com
27/09/2021
Week-long test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a solid first foldable with good battery life, but it is awkward to use and too expensive for most buyers.
lesnumeriques.com
19/12/2014
Full review · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a small phone and a tablet in one, with excellent battery life, but its front screen is awkward and low-light photos disappoint.
phonandroid.com
19/09/2018
Full review · Foldable tablet
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is best as a tablet you fold into a pocket, with a sturdy hinge and over a day of battery, aimed only at early adopters.
journaldugeek.com
19/09/2018
Updated test · Foldable phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold suits early adopters, with a sturdier hinge and about a full intense day of battery, but it is no everyday phone.
frandroid.com
19/09/2023
Hands-on test · Dual-screen design
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a comfortable, well-made tablet, but as a phone its tiny front screen makes it a poor choice.
N
nextpit.fr
19/10/2029
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Fold review: a complicated love
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
19/11/2022
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Fold Lab Test: The future of the smartphone starts here
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB)

  • Expansive 7.6-inch to 8-inch inner display provides a tablet-like experience for media and reading
  • Superior multitasking capabilities, including running up to three apps simultaneously
  • Innovative and futuristic form factor that stands out from standard smartphones
  • High-performance hardware with smooth, snappy operation across apps and games
  • Vibrant AMOLED display quality with high refresh rates for fluid visuals
  • Improved hinge durability and reduced screen crease in newer iterations
  • Useful Flex Mode for hands-free video calls and content viewing

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB)

  • Exorbitantly high price point compared to flagship slab phones
  • Fragility concerns regarding the internal flexible screen and hinge over time
  • Bulky, thick, and heavy design makes it less pocket-friendly than traditional phones
  • Narrow cover display can be difficult to type on comfortably
  • Battery life is often just average and may not last through a full day of heavy dual-screen use
  • Cameras, while good, often lag behind the top-tier S-series Ultra models
  • Software scaling issues where some apps do not display correctly on the unique aspect ratios
  • Removal of S Pen support in the latest Fold 7 model is a significant loss for power users

Verdict

The original Samsung Galaxy Fold launched as a groundbreaking device with a revolutionary 7.3-inch foldable Dynamic AMOLED display that collapses into a more portable form using the smaller 4.6-inch Super AMOLED cover screen. This early foldable is powered by the Snapdragon 855 processor, supported by a robust 12GB of RAM and a spacious 256GB of internal storage, making it a high-performance multitasking machine. Key advantages include its innovative form factor, premium build quality, and versatile six-camera system. However, initial reviews pointed out notable drawbacks, such as its exceptionally high price point, significant thickness when folded, a prominent crease visible on the main screen, and concerns regarding screen durability and the lack of official water resistance.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Fold (12GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found