OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£240RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:6.6 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP

Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components

90%

6.0

Technical score

10%

9.2

User score

▼Worse than 66% of smartphones
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

▼Worse than 64%
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

25%

5.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

5.9

Display

15%

6.0

Battery

10%

7.8

Software

10%

7.0

Connectivity

4%

3.6

Audio

3%

6.4

Design

▼Worse than 73%
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 97%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £240
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
6GB + 128GBCheck price8GB + 256GBCheck price
Other versions:
8GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

25%

5.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

5.9

Display

15%

6.0

Battery

10%

7.8

Software

10%

7.0

Connectivity

4%

3.6

Audio

3%

6.4

Design

6.0
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.2
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) has a popularity of 10 points, which is higher than 94.1% of smartphones.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

7.2
Brand name
Samsung
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G processor model which is slower than processors in 69.9% of smartphones and equal to processors in 2.4% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is smaller than the storage of 61.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 28.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.2 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.2 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 68.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 14.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
This smartphone runs Android version Android 12 which is older than that found in 67.1% of smartphones and equal to that in 13.2% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP which is lower than that of 53.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 53.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 10.7% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
20.5 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 20.5 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 76.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 12.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.64 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.64 µm which is smaller than in 75.1% of smartphones and equal to the size in 18.6% of smartphones.
1.28 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.6 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.6 inches which is smaller than the screens of 62.9% of smartphones and equal to those of 4.9% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2408 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2408 px which is higher than that of 56.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.2% of smartphones.
Pixel density
400 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 400 ppi which is higher than that of 56.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.4% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
25 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 25 W which is slower than in 66.9% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.3% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
164.5 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 164.5 mm which is taller than 64.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Width
76.9 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 76.9 mm which is wider than 70.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.6% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.4 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.4 mm which is thicker than 55.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.6% of smartphones.
Weight
197 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 197 g which is heavier than 50.2% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 2% of smartphones.
Device volume
99,712 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 99,712 cm³ which is larger than 61.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.2% of smartphones.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • 41.1% higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (931 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    931 nits vs 660 nits
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • 14.8% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (9.18 vs 8).
    9.18 vs 8
  • 83.9% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (10 vs 5.4).
    10 vs 5.44
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 1.3% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (400 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    400 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 14.8% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (9.18 vs 8).
    9.18 vs 8
  • 83.9% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (10 vs 5.4).
    10 vs 5.44
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • 41.1% higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (931 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    931 nits vs 660 nits
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 1.3% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (400 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    400 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 35.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • 2% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (7.19 vs 7.3).
    7.19 vs 7.34
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 33.3% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (4 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    4 W vs 6 W
  • 42.9% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (8 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 14 GB
  • 50% less L3 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4,096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 8.3% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 33.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (17 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    17 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 24.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1913 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,913 vs 2,533
  • 47.6% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (643 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    643 vs 1,226
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.7 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.7 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 12 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 12 vs Android 14
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 35.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    8 MP vs 16 MP
  • 0.16 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.6 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    1.28 binned
    0.64 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • No NFC
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.1 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.1 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 0.07 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 24.2% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (25 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    25 W vs 33 W
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 0.9 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (76.9 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    76.9 mm vs 76 mm
  • 1 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2023 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    December 2023
    2023 vs 2024
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China
  • 0.9 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (164.5 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    164.5 mm vs 163.6 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gsmarena.com
25/01/2024
Summary of the review
GSMArena - Samsung Galaxy A25 review
uk.pcmag.com
06/04/2024
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A25 5G is a bright, long-lasting budget phone with four years of updates, though it has no water protection and no wireless charging.
techadvisor.com
20/02/2024
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A25 5G is a reliable budget phone with a bright 120Hz screen and long software support, though its divisive rear pattern and camera limits hold it back.
P
phonearena.com
12/12/2024
Summary of the review
PhoneArena - Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Review: Mr. Average
androidauthority.com
03/02/2025
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A25 5G is a good budget buy with long software support and a bright screen, held back by weak zoom and a troublesome fingerprint reader.
consumerreports.org
01/02/2024
Lab test · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A25 5G is a solid all-rounder whose screen and main camera impress, though performance is not among the best and it has no water protection.
pcmag.com
06/04/2024
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A25 5G suits everyday use with its comfortable feel, but it gets warm in demanding games and only supports Wi-Fi 5.
cnet.com
12/07/2024
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A25 is a practical budget phone with long software support and loud speakers, but its drab design keeps it from standing out.
techlekh.com
25/04/2024
Hands-on test · Budget 5G phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A25 5G is little more than a 5G Galaxy A24, so it only makes sense if you want its 120Hz screen and 4K video enough to pay extra.
walastech.com
30/06/2024
Full review · Budget phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A25 5G is a sensible everyday phone with a vivid screen and full-day battery, but weak low-light photos and a thin speaker hold it back.
gadgetbytenepal.com
30/01/2024
Full review · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A25 5G is a dependable all-rounder with a vivid screen and steady battery, but its aging chip leaves it slow in games and heavy use.
lesnumeriques.com
09/05/2024
Hands-on test · Entry-level phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A25 5G is a comfortable entry-level phone with a bright AMOLED screen and full connectivity, held back by slow charging and overly smoothed photos.
frandroid.com
27/01/2026
Hands-on test · Entry-level phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A25 5G is a bright 120Hz AMOLED phone with four years of major updates, but its dated U-shaped notch and slow charging hold it back.
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
09/02/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Lab Test: Stunning screen but slightly lagging behind
(Translated)Show original
tomsguide.fr
20/05/2024
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Galaxy A25 5G is a decent, smooth phone with good battery life, but its nearly useless zoom and slow charging let rivals like the Nothing Phone 2a pull ahead.
laurentwillen.be
24/04/2024
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A25 is a recognizable, decent everyday phone, but its old-looking front and visible bezels are its weak spots.
Q
quechoisir.org
01/03/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G Review - Smartphone - UFC-Que Choisir
(Translated)Show original
geekit.fr
13/05/2024
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A25 is a dependable budget phone with a bright 120Hz screen, but weak battery life, gaming and low-light photos hold it back.
itdaily.be
22/01/2024
Short review · Budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a good OLED screen and long update support, but weak battery life and mediocre cameras hold it back.
laurentwillen.nl
24/04/2024
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A25 is a decent everyday phone with good stereo sound, but its weaker mobile signal and oversized front notch hold it back.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB)

  • Vibrant 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate is a major highlight for a budget phone.
  • Long-lasting 5,000mAh battery often provides one to two days of use on a single charge.
  • Commendable software support with a promise of four major OS upgrades and five years of security updates.
  • The 50MP main camera performs well in good lighting conditions, capturing good detail and color.
  • Inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable microSD storage is appreciated by many users.
  • Generally considered a good value for the price, offering 5G connectivity and decent performance for everyday tasks.

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB)

  • Frequent and significant issues with network connectivity, including dropped calls and lost data service, are a primary concern for many users.
  • Performance can be sluggish and laggy at times, especially when multitasking or gaming, due to the mid-range Exynos 1280 processor.
  • The phone has an all-plastic build and large bezels, which many reviewers note feel less premium compared to some rivals.
  • Lack of wireless charging support, and the charger brick is not included in the box, adding extra cost.
  • Secondary cameras (ultrawide and macro) are considered mediocre, particularly in low-light conditions.
  • Some users reported issues with the phone overheating and randomly shutting down.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) is a budget-friendly smartphone featuring a vibrant 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 1,000 nits, powered by a capable Exynos 1280 processor. Key pros include a versatile 50MP main camera with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), a large 5,000mAh battery offering up to two days of use, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and an exceptional software support policy of four OS upgrades and five years of security updates. Potential cons are a plastic build, noticeable screen bezels, the absence of an official IP water resistance rating, no charger included in the box, and performance that can lag slightly during demanding tasks compared to pricier alternatives.

Compare Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy A25 5G (8GB + 128GB) and other smartphones

No results found