OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:6.6 inchesMain camera megapixels:64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP

Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

90%

5.8

Technical score

10%

8.6

User score

▼Worse than 75% of smartphones
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

▼Worse than 78%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

25%

4.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

6.1

Display

15%

6.1

Battery

10%

7.2

Software

10%

6.7

Connectivity

4%

5.3

Audio

3%

6.0

Design

▼Worse than 80%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

8.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 82%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £260
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
8GB + 128GBCheck price8GB + 256GBCheck price
Other versions:
4GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

25%

4.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

6.1

Display

15%

6.1

Battery

10%

7.2

Software

10%

6.7

Connectivity

4%

5.3

Audio

3%

6.0

Design

5.8
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

8.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 79% of models
Popularity:
Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB) has a popularity of 8.3 points, which is higher than 78.7% of smartphones.
8.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.0
Brand name
Poco
Processor model
MediaTek Helio G95
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Helio G95 processor model which is slower than processors in 81.5% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.4% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is smaller than the storage of 61.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 28.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.05 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.05 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 83.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.1% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
This smartphone runs Android version Android 12 which is older than that found in 67.1% of smartphones and equal to that in 13.2% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP which is higher than that of 80.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.6% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.89 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.89 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 79.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
41 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 41 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 54.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.6 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.6 inches which is smaller than the screens of 62.9% of smartphones and equal to those of 4.9% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2460 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2460 px which is higher than that of 65.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
407 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 407 ppi which is higher than that of 66.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz which is higher than in 89.9% of smartphones and equal to that in 8.5% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
33 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 33 W which is faster than in 38.9% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 12% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
yes
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
163.6 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm which is shorter than 48.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.3% of smartphones.
Width
74.3 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 74.3 mm which is narrower than 79% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.4% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.9 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.9 mm which is thicker than 75.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.3% of smartphones.
Weight
200 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 200 g which is heavier than 58.6% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 1.5% of smartphones.
Device volume
96,496 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 96,496 cm³ which is smaller than 55.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.4% of smartphones.
Show more

Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 20% higher refresh rate
    This smartphone has a higher refresh rate than the average smartphone (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone refresh rate is 120 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 87.6% higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (5,845 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    5,845 vs 3,115
  • Higher GSMArena battery life endurance score
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena battery life endurance score than the average smartphone (112 vs 99.5). The average endurance score is 99.5.
    112 vs 99.5
  • 28.1% larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (41 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    41 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2460 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2460 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • 7.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Poco X4 GT
    the average smartphone
    Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.6 vs 8).
    8.6 vs 8
  • 52.8% more popular
    Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (8.31 vs 5.4).
    8.31 vs 5.44
  • 87.6% higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (5,845 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    5,845 vs 3,115
  • 33.2% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (3,374 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    3,374 vs 2,533
  • 51.7% higher 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (5,801 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    5,801 vs 3,825
  • 8.5% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (11,695 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    11,695 vs 10,783
  • 13.8% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (1,072 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    1,072 vs 942
  • 23.8% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (1,518 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    1,518 vs 1,226
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 28.1% larger main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (41 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    41 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 20% higher refresh rate
    This smartphone has a higher refresh rate than the average smartphone (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone refresh rate is 120 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2460 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2460 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 3% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (407 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    407 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 12.5% higher touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (270 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    270 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Higher GSMArena battery life endurance score
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena battery life endurance score than the average smartphone (112 vs 99.5). The average endurance score is 99.5.
    112 vs 99.5
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • 1.7 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (74.3 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    74.3 mm vs 76 mm
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.89 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.89 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 4.6% worse value for money
    Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (7.01 vs 7.3).
    7.01 vs 7.34
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 14.6% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.05 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 16.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (5 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    5 W vs 6 W
  • 60.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (10 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    10 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 28.6% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (10 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    10 GB vs 14 GB
  • Lacks NX Bit security
    This smartphone does not support NX Bit, the average smartphone does. 94.6% of smartphones support NX Bit.
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 5.3% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (900 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    900 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 62.5% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (96 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    96 vs 256
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2.05 GHz & 6x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2.05 GHz & 6x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 12 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 12 vs Android 14
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.89 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.89 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (13 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    13 MP vs 16 MP
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 28.8% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (470 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    470 nits vs 660 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a lower contrast ratio than the average smartphone (1200:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone has a contrast ratio of 1000000:1.
    1,200:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • 0.07 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • No LDAC support
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP53 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP53 vs IP67
  • 2 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2022 vs 2024). 2.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    June 2022
    2022 vs 2024
  • 0.6 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (8.9 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    8.9 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 1.9% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (200 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    200 g vs 196.2 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Renzo Claros - Tech & Cameras
≈ estimated
15/08/2023
Long-term review · a year of gaming, heat and battery use
Verdict
Poco X4 GT is still a bang-for-the-buck gaming phone, though the display and cameras have aged.
8.0
Renzo Claros - Tech & Cameras
≈ estimated
17/02/2023
Software update review · weeks of use and problem report
Verdict
Poco X4 GT's update improves performance and battery, though camera weaknesses and a few glitches remain.
8.0
GSMDome
≈ estimated
01/12/2022
Hands-on review · gaming, camera and software tests
Verdict
Poco X4 GT is a solid all-around midranger, good for gaming, with ads and weaker brightness and cameras.
9.0
Mary Bautista
≈ estimated
09/11/2022
Long-term review · 3 months of daily use
Verdict
Poco X4 GT is still one of the best phones to recommend for 2022, especially for performance and gaming.
9.5
Next Day Grind
≈ estimated
08/07/2022
Extended use review · performance, camera and battery
Verdict
Poco X4 GT offers flagship-level performance and battery life at a fraction of flagship prices, making it a clear value pick.
8.0
GSMArena Official
≈ estimated
07/07/2022
Full review · performance, battery and camera tests
Verdict
Poco X4 GT offers strong performance and battery life, held back by an LCD screen and soft cameras.
7.0
TechTablets
≈ estimated
23/06/2022
Hands-on review · week of use, camera and gaming tests
Verdict
Poco X4 GT has a strong chip and fast charging, but the camera setup and low-light shots let it down.
8.0
Frankie Tech
≈ estimated
23/06/2022
First impressions · launch-day use and sample shots
Verdict
Poco X4 GT is a solid release rather than a standout, mainly held back by its LCD screen.
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techadvisor.com
19/07/2022
Expert review · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Poco X4 GT is great value for speed-focused buyers, with near-flagship performance and fast charging, but it lacks water resistance and has an LCD screen.
stuff.tv
23/06/2022
Full review · Budget phone
Verdict
The Poco X4 GT puts performance and battery life first, which suits budget buyers, but its LCD screen and weak extra cameras show where costs were cut.
M
mmorpg.com
05/07/2022
Summary of the review
POCO X4 GT Review - MMORPG.com
androidcentral.com
11/01/2023
Hands-on review · Budget gaming phone
Verdict
The Poco X4 GT is a budget phone for gamers with a fast chip and long battery life, though it looks identical to the Redmi Note 11T Pro.
trustedreviews.com
18/08/2022
Hands-on review · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Poco X4 GT outperforms most phones at its price, with long battery life, but its cameras are only average and availability is patchy.
tomshw.it
18/07/2022
Lab test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Poco X4 GT pairs flagship-level performance and long battery life with a bargain price, though its LCD screen is the main compromise.
techradar.com
13/07/2022
Hands-on review · Budget phone
Verdict
The Poco X4 GT is a good value phone with a fast chip and long battery life, but it is heavy and hard to read in direct sun at times.
today.it
22/07/2022
Hands-on review · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Poco X4 GT is a fast mid-range phone with a full day of battery and good daytime photos, though its 4K video is unsteady and it is heavy.
techprincess.it
30/08/2022
Hands-on review · Budget phone
Verdict
The Poco X4 GT is a fast, long-lasting phone with a smooth screen and quick charging, though its interface takes getting used to and its camera is limited.
andreagaleazzi.com
12/07/2022
Hands-on review · Everyday phone
Verdict
The Poco X4 GT is a fast, long-lasting phone with capable cameras, good for everyday use, though it has small software glitches and lacks a zoom lens.
thegeekerz.it
13/08/2022
Hands-on review · Gaming phone
Verdict
The Poco X4 GT is a good mid-range phone for gamers, with a lasting battery and smooth performance, but it looks plain and is slippery without its case.
T
tuttoandroid.net
01/07/2022
Summary of the review
POCO X4 GT: Price, Specs, Release Date, and News in Italy
(Translated)Show original
laurentwillen.nl
23/06/2022
In-depth test · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Poco X4 GT is a mid-range phone that stays cool and runs PUBG Mobile smoothly at top graphics, but its design is generic and its screen is LCD.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB)

  • Exceptional raw performance for the price, powered by the [MediaTek Dimensity 8100](Use code with caution.jsonhttps://www.trustedreviews.com/reviews/poco-x4-gtUse code with caution.json) chipset
  • Smooth 144Hz high refresh rate IPS display with good color accuracy for an LCD
  • Excellent battery life, often lasting a full day of heavy use or up to two days with light use
  • Fast 67W wired charging that can fully charge the device in approximately 45–55 minutes
  • Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, a rare feature in modern performance-oriented phones
  • Solid stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support
  • Competitive pricing offering one of the best price-to-performance ratios in its category

What customers don't like about Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB)

  • LCD screen lacks the deep blacks, high contrast, and peak brightness of AMOLED competitors
  • Lack of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) leads to shaky 4K videos and mediocre low-light photography
  • Secondary cameras (8MP ultra-wide and 2MP macro) are significantly weaker than the main sensor
  • No official IP rating for water or dust resistance
  • Plastic build quality can feel less premium compared to glass-backed rivals
  • MIUI for POCO contains significant bloatware and pre-installed apps
  • No support for wireless charging or expandable storage via microSD

Verdict

The POCO X4 GT is a performance-focused smartphone powered by the 5nm MediaTek Dimensity 8100 chipset, featuring 4GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 128GB of high-speed UFS 3.1 storage. It centers around a 6.6-inch "DynamicSwitch" IPS LCD with a flagship-level 144Hz refresh rate, 270Hz touch sampling, and support for Dolby Vision and HDR10. The device is equipped with a 5,080mAh battery supporting 67W turbo charging, a triple rear camera system led by a 64MP main sensor (f/1.89) capable of 4K video, and dual stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos. Its primary strengths lie in its sustained gaming performance, exceptional battery endurance, and the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and IR blaster. However, notable drawbacks include the lack of an AMOLED panel—resulting in lower peak brightness (650 nits) and less vibrant colors compared to rivals—the absence of an official IP rating for water resistance, and the lack of a microSD slot for storage expansion.

Compare Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Poco X4 GT (4GB + 128GB) and other smartphones

No results found