OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.7 inchesMain camera megapixels:64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP

Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

90%

6.6

Technical score

10%

8.4

User score

â–²Better than 55% of smartphones
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components

25%

6.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.0

Camera

15%

7.2

Display

15%

6.8

Battery

10%

7.6

Software

10%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

2.7

Audio

3%

7.1

Design

â–²Better than 52% of smartphones
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on 576 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 77% of smartphones
  • oppo-reno11-f
  • oppo-reno11-f
  • oppo-reno11-f
  • oppo-reno11-f
  • oppo-reno11-f
  • oppo-reno11-f
  • oppo-reno11-f
  • oppo-reno11-f
oppo-reno11-f
oppo-reno11-f
oppo-reno11-f
oppo-reno11-f
oppo-reno11-f
oppo-reno11-f
oppo-reno11-f
oppo-reno11-f

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components:

25%

6.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.0

Camera

15%

7.2

Display

15%

6.8

Battery

10%

7.6

Software

10%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

2.7

Audio

3%

7.1

Design

6.6
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on 576 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Popularity:
Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 7.4 points, which is higher than 68.4% of smartphones.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components:

60%

6.8

Overall score

40%

9.4

Price

7.6
Brand name
Oppo
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 processor model which is slower than processors in 54.3% of smartphones and equal to processors in 1.3% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
RAM capacity
8 GB
â–¼ Worse than 41% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Internal storage
256 GB
â–² Better than 39% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.6 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
2.6 GHz
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.6 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 56.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
â–² Better than 71% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 15 which is newer than that found in 70.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 25.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
Main camera megapixels
64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP which is higher than that of 78.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.8% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
â–² Better than 84% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 83.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
31.4 mm²
Main camera sensor area
31.4 mm²
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 31.4 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 57.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.8% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.7 µm
Main camera pixel size
0.7 µm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.7 µm which is smaller than in 64.6% of smartphones and equal to the size in 10.4% of smartphones.
1.4 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
5G connectivity
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.7 inches
Screen size
6.7 inches
â–² Better than 52% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.7 inches which is larger than the screens of 52.2% of smartphones and equal to those of 10.1% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2412 px
Screen resolution
1080x 2412 px
â–² Better than 61% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2412 px which is higher than that of 61.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.8% of smartphones.
Pixel density
394 ppi
Pixel density
394 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 394 ppi which is lower than that of 58.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.8% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
â–² Better than 41% of models
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Refresh rate
120 Hz
â–² Better than 35% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
67 W
Charging speed
67 W
â–² Better than 73% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 67 W which is faster than in 72.8% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 4.1% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
Stereo speakers
no
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 34% of models
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
161.1 mm
Height
161.1 mm
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 161.1 mm which is shorter than 74.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1% of smartphones.
Width
74.7 mm
Width
74.7 mm
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 74.7 mm which is narrower than 74.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.4% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.5 mm
Thickness
7.5 mm
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.5 mm which is thinner than 90.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.2% of smartphones.
Weight
177 g
Weight
177 g
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 177 g which is lighter than 88.9% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.7% of smartphones.
Device volume
83,398 cm³
Device volume
83,398 cm³
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 83,398 cm³ which is smaller than 88% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.1% of smartphones.
Show more

Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 2.03x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    67 W
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (67 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    67 W vs 33 W
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    5
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Higher GSMArena battery life endurance score
    GSMArena battery life endurance score
    116
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <74 – >125
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena battery life endurance score than the average smartphone (116 vs 99.5). The average endurance score is 99.5.
    116 vs 99.5
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    AI Eraser, Smart Image Matting, Smart Touch, AI Portrait Retouching, LinkBoost, Trinity Engine
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 2 more memory channels
    Memory channels
    4
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <2 – >4
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • Has an always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 5% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Oppo Reno11 F 5G
    the average smartphone
    Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.40 vs 8.000).
    8.4 vs 8
  • 35.4% more popular
    Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (7.37 vs 5.4).
    7.37 vs 5.44
  • 3.4% better value for money
    Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB) has better value for money than the average smartphone (7.59 vs 7.3).
    7.59 vs 7.34
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    5
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 2 more memory channels
    Memory channels
    4
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <2 – >4
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    2 x 2.6 GHz & 6 x 2 GHz
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2.6 GHz & 6x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2.6 GHz & 6x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 8.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    2.6 GHz
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    Maximum RAM
    16 GB
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • 2x more L1
    L1 cache
    64 KB
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    Market range: <32 KB – >192 KB
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (64 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    64 KB vs 32 KB
  • 16.4% faster memory speed
    Memory speed
    3,200 MHz
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (3200 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2750 MHz memory speed.
    3,200 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    AI Eraser, Smart Image Matting, Smart Touch, AI Portrait Retouching, LinkBoost, Trinity Engine
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Newer Android version
    Android version
    Android 15
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 15 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 15 vs Android 14
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    32 MP
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Has an infrared sensor
    Infrared sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This smartphone includes an infrared sensor, the average smartphone does not. 33.3% of smartphones feature an IR blaster.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 36.4% higher screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    900 nits
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (900 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    900 nits vs 660 nits
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1080 x 2412 px
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2412 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2412 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 0.03 inches inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    6.7 inches
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 100 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    1,100 nits
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    Market range: <480 nits – >3.6k nits
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (1100 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    1,100 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 2.03x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    67 W
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (67 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    67 W vs 33 W
  • Higher GSMArena battery life endurance score
    GSMArena battery life endurance score
    116
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <74 – >125
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena battery life endurance score than the average smartphone (116 vs 99.5). The average endurance score is 99.5.
    116 vs 99.5
  • Supports aptX
    aptX
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 9.8% lighter
    Weight
    177 g
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (177 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    177 g vs 196.2 g
  • 0.8 mm thinner
    Thickness
    7.5 mm
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.5 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.5 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 1.3 mm narrower
    Width
    74.7 mm
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (74.7 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    74.7 mm vs 76 mm
  • 2.5 mm shorter
    Height
    161.1 mm
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (161.1 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    161.1 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Dimensity 7050
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 7,050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    LDAC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • Lacks focus mode
    Focus mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    Wi-Fi password sharing
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • 16.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    5 W
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (5 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    5 W vs 6 W
  • 50% less L3 cache
    L3 cache
    2048 KB
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • Lacks instant markup
    Instant markup
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Dimensity 7050
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 7,050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 16.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    5 W
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (5 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    5 W vs 6 W
  • 50% less L3 cache
    L3 cache
    2048 KB
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 50% fewer shader units
    N. of shading units
    128
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (128 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    128 vs 256
  • 4.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    899
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <392 – >2.2k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (899 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    899 vs 942
  • 8.1% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    2,329
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >6.7k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (2,329 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    Average score, range is 2,328 to 2,536 according to Nanoreview
    2,329 vs 2,533
  • Lacks focus mode
    Focus mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    Wi-Fi password sharing
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • Lacks instant markup
    Instant markup
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • 0.1 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    Main camera pixel size
    0.7 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.7 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    1.4 binned
    0.7 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 1.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    31.4 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    31.4 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 0.3% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    394 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (394 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    394 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    LDAC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP65
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP65 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP65 vs IP67

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techweez.com
30/04/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno11 F 5G Review: Best Value Midranger
T
techguide.com.au
29/04/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11F 5G smartphone review - mid-tier device with premium looks and features
G
gadgetpilipinas.net
04/03/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno11 F 5G Review: F for Formidable Camera Smartphone
D
digitalcitizen.life
12/10/2025
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno11 F review: Reasonable performance, appealing design
T
technobaboy.com
13/03/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno11 F 5G review: Function over form - Technobaboy
C
cybershack.com.au
05/05/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno11 F 5G 2024 – a class-leading mid-range (smartphone review)
S
stuff.tv
23/06/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G review: excelling at the entry-level - Stuff
Y
yugatech.com
04/03/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno11 F 5G Review: F for Fun and Functionality? - YugaTech
E
eftm.com
03/05/2024
Summary of the review
Review: OPPO Reno 11 F 5G, mid-range smartphone? Could have fooled me
T
techadvisor.com
24/04/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G Review - Tech Advisor
T
trustedreviews.com
08/04/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11F 5G Review
O
oppo.com.en2de.search.translate.goog
03/02/2026
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno11 F 5G – The Portrait Expert Smartphone
(Translated)Show original
I
inside-digital.de
08/02/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno11 F 5G Specs Sheet | All Technical Specifications
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.accio.com
19/09/2025
Summary of the review
Market Analysis: The OPPO Reno11 F 5G is positioned as an affordable model
(Translated)Show original
S
sudinfo.be
30/04/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11F Review: A Mid-Range Smartphone Marking Oppo's Comeback
(Translated)Show original
G
geeko.lesoir.be
26/04/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11F 5G – The New Mid-Range King
(Translated)Show original
E
elespanol.com
09/04/2024
Summary of the review
I tested the OPPO Reno11 F 5G: a uniquely designed phone built to last for years
(Translated)Show original
I
igizmo.it
07/10/2024
Summary of the review
Experience Oppo Reno 11 F 5G: long-lasting battery - iGizmo
(Translated)Show original
T
tech.everyeye.it
19/04/2026
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno11 F 5G: The affordable all-rounder smartphone
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
03/05/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno 11 F Review: Battery Guaranteed for 4 Years
(Translated)Show original
T
techzilla.it
21/05/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno11 F 5G Review: Uncompromising reliability in the mid-range
(Translated)Show original
W
wired.it
13/04/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11F 5G: The Mont Blanc Glacier Test - Wired Italy
(Translated)Show original
A
andreagaleazzi.com
09/04/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11F 5G Review - Andrea Galeazzi
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
Geen datum
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno 11 F 5G - Ocean Blue - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original
D
dutchcowboys.nl
07/08/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11F review: affordable mid-ranger with premium features
(Translated)Show original
I
itdaily.be
12/07/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11F 5G review: overenthusiastic AI
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
04/05/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno 11 F: Mid-range, high-priced
(Translated)Show original
I
id.nl
05/05/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11 F Review – Not bad, but nothing more than that
(Translated)Show original
S
smartzine.nl
28/07/2024
Summary of the review
OPPO Reno11 F review: the dream mid-ranger or not?
(Translated)Show original
T
tomstech.nl
12/06/2024
Summary of the review
Review: Oppo Reno11 F 5G - A lot of phone for a little less
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
19/04/2024
Summary of the review
Oppo Reno 11F review: a mid-ranger with an attitude
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 576 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB)

  • Outstanding battery life, often lasting up to two days with light use and a day and a half with heavy use.
  • Very fast 67W wired charging, which can charge the phone to 100% in under an hour.
  • Large, bright, and vibrant 6.7-inch AMOLED display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate and thin bezels.
  • Appealing, slim, and lightweight design that feels good in hand and doesn't easily gather fingerprints.
  • Solid everyday performance for general tasks like browsing, social media, and calls.
  • Good quality main (64MP) and selfie (32MP) cameras in favorable lighting conditions.
  • Generous 256GB of storage, which is expandable via a microSD card slot.
  • IP65 rating for dust and splash resistance, a notable feature for its price range.
  • ColorOS software is well-optimized and offers useful features like Smart Image Matting.

What we don't like about Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB)

  • Performance can stutter or lag during hardware-demanding tasks or intensive gaming.
  • The single, bottom-firing speaker is described as 'tinny' and poor quality, a potential deal-breaker for some.
  • Ultrawide and macro cameras are generally disappointing and lack detail.
  • Comes with a significant amount of pre-installed bloatware that needs to be manually removed.
  • The phone does not include a charger in the box in some regions.
  • The display glass and pre-fitted screen protector are prone to surface scratches.
  • Only promises two to three major OS updates and three to four years of security patches, which is less than some competitors.
  • Lack of wireless charging support.

Verdict

The Oppo Reno 11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB) is a mid-range smartphone featuring a 6.7-inch 120Hz AMOLED display with 1.07 billion colors and is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 processor. It boasts a versatile camera setup with a 64MP main, 8MP ultrawide, and 2MP macro rear lenses, plus a 32MP selfie camera capable of 4K video recording. A key strength is its impressive battery life from a 5000mAh capacity and rapid 67W SuperVOOC wired fast charging support (though the charger may not be included in all regions). The device also offers a sleek and lightweight (177g) design with an IP65 rating for splash resistance and expandable storage via microSD. However, potential drawbacks include a mono speaker, disappointing performance from the auxiliary ultrawide and macro lenses, and the presence of pre-installed bloatware.

Compare Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oppo Reno11 F 5G (8GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found