Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:6.67 inchesMain camera megapixels:48 MP & 13 MP

Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7/10

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.4

Technical score

10%

8.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 89% of smartphones
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 84%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

4.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.7

Camera

15%

4.5

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

4.1

Software

10%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Audio

3%

5.5

Design

â–¼Worse than 90%
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 70%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Smartphones model ranking

Ranked #1010 of 2,002 models in Smartphones (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of smartphone Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

4.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.7

Camera

15%

4.5

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

4.1

Software

10%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Audio

3%

5.5

Design

5.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

8.0
Popularity
Popularity
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 7.6 points, which is higher than 70.5% of smartphones.
7.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

6.9
Brand name
Nokia
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 processor model which is slower than processors in 83.6% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 84.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.3% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 11
Android version
Android 11
This smartphone runs Android version Android 11 which is older than that found in 80.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 8.5% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
48 MP & 13 MP
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 48 MP & 13 MP which is lower than that of 77.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 57.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 12.6% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
30.7 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 30.7 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 63.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 6.3% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.67 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches which is larger than the screens of 38.3% of smartphones and equal to those of 13.4% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2400 px which is higher than that of 36.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 20.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
395 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi which is higher than that of 41.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.9% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,630 mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,630 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 76.4% of smartphones.
Charging speed
18 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 18 W which is slower than in 76% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 11.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
171.6 mm
This smartphone has a height of 171.6 mm which is taller than 90.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Width
81.5 mm
This smartphone has a width of 81.5 mm which is wider than 91.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Thickness
10.6 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 10.6 mm which is thicker than 90.1% of smartphones.
Weight
248 g
This smartphone weighs 248 g which is heavier than 89.6% of smartphones.
Device volume
138,510 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 138,510 cm³ which is larger than 90.5% of smartphones.
Show more

Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This smartphone supports aptX Adaptive, the average smartphone does not. 34.5% of smartphones include aptX Adaptive support.
  • Has a front LED flash
    This smartphone features a front-facing LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 7.8% of smartphones include a front flash.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3 vs 2
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 44.4% cheaper
    Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£180 vs £260).
    £180 vs £260
  • 40.3% more popular
    Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (7.63 vs 5.4).
    7.63 vs 5.44
  • Has a front LED flash
    This smartphone features a front-facing LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 7.8% of smartphones include a front flash.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.
    3 vs 2
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This smartphone supports aptX Adaptive, the average smartphone does not. 34.5% of smartphones include aptX Adaptive support.
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 87.4% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (120 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    120 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 7% worse value for money
    Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.86 vs 7.3).
    6.86 vs 7.34
  • 0.3% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Nokia XR20
    the average smartphone
    Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.97 vs 8).
    7.97 vs 8
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 87.4% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (120 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    120 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 57.1% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (6 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 14 GB
  • 68.5% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (981 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    981 vs 3,115
  • 16.7% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 33.3% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (8 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    8 nm vs 6 nm
  • 30.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (654 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    654 vs 942
  • 74.5% lower 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (977 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    977 vs 3,825
  • 76.2% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (292 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    292 vs 1,226
  • 33% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,696 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,696 vs 2,533
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 33.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (17 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    17 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No location privacy controls
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Lacks focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 11 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 11 vs Android 14
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • Lacks instant markup
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • No theme customization
    This smartphone does not support theme customization, the average smartphone does. 91% of smartphones allow theme customization.
  • No offline voice commands
    This smartphone does not support offline voice commands, the average smartphone does. 90.4% of smartphones offer offline voice control.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (48 MP & 13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    48 MP & 13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    8 MP vs 16 MP
  • 4.1% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (30.7 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    30.7 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • No burst mode
    This smartphone does not have a burst mode, the average smartphone does. 98.1% of smartphones support burst shooting.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.1 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.1 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 450 nits lower peak brightness
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (550 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    550 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 16.7% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (550 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    550 nits vs 660 nits
  • 45.5% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (18 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    18 W vs 33 W
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 7.4% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,630 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,630 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 22.5% lower French repairability index
    This smartphone has a lower French repairability index than the average smartphone (6.2 vs 8). The average smartphone scores 8.
    6.2 vs 8
  • 26.4% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (248 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    248 g vs 196.2 g
  • 2.3 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (10.6 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    10.6 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 5.5 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (81.5 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    81.5 mm vs 76 mm
  • 3 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2021 vs 2024). 3.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    July 2021
    2021 vs 2024
  • 8 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (171.6 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    171.6 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 41.6% larger volume
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (138,510 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97,800 cm³.
    138,510 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
TheMrNokia I Abdulla Zaki
≈ estimated
18/04/2022
Long-term review · six months of daily use
Verdict
Nokia XR20 is still a rugged, practical daily phone and an easy recommendation for buyers who put durability first.
9.0
Nokiapoweruser
≈ estimated
01/02/2022
Detailed review · durability, camera, audio and battery tests
Verdict
Nokia XR20 is a solid, durable package with loud audio and long battery life, though it is somewhat pricey.
8.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
17/08/2021
Hands-on review · one week of daily use and camera tests
Verdict
Nokia XR20 is very durable and worth a look for rough use, but rivals beat it on camera and performance.
8.0
Mr Mx Tech -English
≈ estimated
19/01/2022
Durability test · drop tests and review
Verdict
Nokia XR20 is very durable but not the best performer for its price range.
9.0
Nokiapoweruser
≈ estimated
18/12/2021
Unboxing and first impressions · bend and soak tests
Verdict
Nokia XR20 is very rugged yet attractive, and usable every day without any hitch.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Hands-on video, no verdict
Shop video
Overview video
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

heise.de
20/08/2021
Hands-on test · Outdoor phone
Verdict
The Nokia XR20 is a tough, water-resistant phone with a bright screen, though it is pricey next to the X20 and short on RAM.
connect.de
28/09/2021
Check · Outdoor phone
Verdict
The Nokia XR20 is one of the best rugged phones, with a solid, pleasant design and long software support, though its screen, chip and camera feel dated for the price.
navigation-professionell.de
14/01/2022
Test · Outdoor phone
Verdict
The Nokia XR20 is a bright outdoor phone with accurate GPS that suits bike rides and hikes, though it is big and heavy to carry.
clubic.com
24/08/2021
Hands-on test · Rugged phone
Verdict
The Nokia XR20 is very tough with long battery life and wireless charging, but its heavy body, dull screen and average camera hold it back.
expansion.mx
06/12/2021
Hands-on test · Rugged phone
Verdict
The Nokia XR20 is a tough phone with several years of updates, suited to rough use, though its high price is hard to justify.
pisapapeles.net
10/05/2022
Review · Rugged phone
Verdict
The Nokia XR20 is a tough phone that shrugs off rain and falls, takes good daylight photos, but its night mode trails rivals.
id.nl
16/09/2021
Three-week test · Rugged phone
Verdict
The Nokia XR20 is a tough phone with four years of updates, but its heavy body and dated LCD screen make it best for buyers who put durability first.
T
techpulse.be
03/11/2021
Summary of the review
xgn.nl
12/12/2021
Hands-on review · Rugged phone
Verdict
The Nokia XR20 is a sturdy phone that survives drops, coffee and rain, but its weight and modest hardware make it feel like an expensive budget phone.
M
maisonslash.be
20/08/2021
Summary of the review
C
consumentenbond.nl
20/08/2021
Summary of the review
global.techradar.com
28/07/2021
Lab-tested review · Rugged 5G phone
Verdict
The Nokia XR20 suits buyers who want a rugged phone with long support and clean Android, but those needing extra features should look elsewhere.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Military-grade durability (MIL-STD-810H) and IP68 water/dust resistance allow it to survive extreme conditions, drops, and even being washed with soap.
  • Comes with long-term software support, including three years of OS upgrades and four years of security updates.
  • Features a clean 'Android One' interface with virtually no bloatware, providing a smooth user experience for basic tasks.
  • Includes physical utility features like a 3.5mm headphone jack, a dedicated emergency programmable button, and a microSD slot.
  • Supports 15W wireless charging, which is a rare feature for rugged smartphones in its category.
  • The 6.67-inch FHD+ display is bright and remains legible even in direct sunlight.
  • Good overall battery life, often lasting a full day or more under normal usage.

What customers don't like about Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Equipped with a low-to-midrange Snapdragon 480 chipset, which can feel sluggish during multitasking or heavy gaming.
  • Camera performance is mediocre; users report inconsistent color balance, poor low-light shots, and laggy shutter speeds.
  • The display is limited to a 60Hz refresh rate, lacking the smoothness of higher refresh rate screens found on competitors.
  • Some users report software-related hardware glitches, such as intermittent charging issues or unresponsive gesture controls after updates.
  • Does not support 5G on certain carriers like Verizon, and some users have noted issues with WiFi 6 connectivity speeds.
  • Considered poor value for the price by some, as similarly priced non-rugged phones offer significantly better specs and performance.
  • The device is notably heavy and bulky compared to standard smartphones, making it less comfortable for some users.

Verdict

The Nokia XR20 (4GB RAM, 64GB storage variant) is a highly durable, mid-range 5G smartphone primarily designed for harsh environments, featuring a robust MIL-STD-810H military standard certified build and IP68 water/dust resistance, along with a 6.67-inch FHD+ (1080 x 2400) IPS LCD display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus. Key internal specifications include a Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G processor, a 4,630mAh battery with 18W wired and 15W wireless charging support, and a dual-rear camera setup (48MP main + 13MP ultrawide) with ZEISS Optics. Main pros are its exceptional durability, guaranteed 3 years of OS upgrades and 4 years of monthly security updates, a bright screen usable with wet hands or gloves, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and a programmable physical button. Cons include an underwhelming CPU performance for its price point, resulting in occasional sluggishness, mediocre camera quality, a relatively bulky and heavy design, and the fact that the charger is often not included in the box.

Compare Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Nokia XR20 (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found