Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Motorola Moto G 2026 (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£150RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:6.7 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 2 MP

Motorola Moto G 2026 (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.4

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 61% of smartphones
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

▲Better than 51%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

25%

5.6

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.2

Camera

15%

5.4

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

8.9

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.9

Audio

3%

5.9

Design

▼Worse than 57%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Motorola Moto G 2026 (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

25%

5.6

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.2

Camera

15%

5.4

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

8.9

Software

10%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

7.9

Audio

3%

5.9

Design

6.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Motorola Moto G 2026 (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.4
Brand name
Motorola
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 processor model which is slower than processors in 59.6% of smartphones and equal to processors in 4.3% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.4 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.4 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 36.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 13.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 16
Android version
Android 16
This smartphone runs Android version Android 16 which is newer than that found in 95.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 4.4% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
yes
This smartphone receives direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 2 MP
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 2 MP which is lower than that of 57.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 12.9% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 57.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 12.6% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
18.6 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 18.6 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 91.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.4% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.61 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.61 µm which is smaller than in 93.8% of smartphones and equal to the size in 2.3% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
? (?)
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.7 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.7 inches which is larger than the screens of 52.2% of smartphones and equal to those of 10.1% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
720x 1604 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 720x1604 px which is lower than that of 85.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.5% of smartphones.
Pixel density
262 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 262 ppi which is lower than that of 91.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.4% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,200 mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,200 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 64.2% of smartphones and equal to those in 2.3% of smartphones.
Charging speed
30 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 30 W which is slower than in 61.1% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 4.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
30W for both phones
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
yes
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
167.2 mm
This smartphone has a height of 167.2 mm which is taller than 79.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Width
76.4 mm
This smartphone has a width of 76.4 mm which is wider than 60.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.2% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.5 mm which is thicker than 60.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.3% of smartphones.
Weight
202 g
This smartphone weighs 202 g which is heavier than 61.3% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 1.2% of smartphones.
Device volume
101,536 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 101,536 cm³ which is larger than 70.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Show more

Motorola Moto G 2026 (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • 4% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Supports motion tracking
    This smartphone supports motion tracking, the average smartphone does not. 22% of smartphones offer motion tracking capabilities.
  • 12.8% faster GPU clock
    This smartphone has a higher GPU frequency than the average smartphone (1,072 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone GPU frequency is 950 MHz.
    1,072 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • Newer Android version
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 16 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 16 vs Android 14
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • 73.3% cheaper
    Motorola Moto G 2026 (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£150 vs £260).
    £150 vs £260
  • 12.8% faster GPU clock
    This smartphone has a higher GPU frequency than the average smartphone (1,072 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone GPU frequency is 950 MHz.
    1,072 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2.4 GHz & 6x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2.4 GHz & 6x2.0 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • Newer Android version
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 16 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 16 vs Android 14
  • Supports fast boot
    This smartphone supports fast boot, the average smartphone does not. 22.6% of smartphones include fast boot capabilities.
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    2.4
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports motion tracking
    This smartphone supports motion tracking, the average smartphone does not. 22% of smartphones offer motion tracking capabilities.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This smartphone supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.4 vs 5.2). The average version is Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.4 vs 5.2
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • 0.03 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 4% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1 year/s newer release date
    This smartphone has a newer release date than the average smartphone (2025 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones are released annually.
    December 2025
    2025 vs 2024
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 6,300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 41.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (18.6 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    18.6 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 33.7% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (262 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    262 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 5.44x less popular
    Motorola Moto G 2026 (4GB + 64GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 6,300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 51.2% less L3 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2000 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4,096 KB.
    2,000 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 75% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (64 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    64 vs 256
  • 14.3% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 14 GB
  • 33.3% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (17.1 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    17.07 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 16.1% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (790 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    790 vs 942
  • 20% lower PassMark single-core benchmark
    This smartphone has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (790 vs 988). The average smartphone scores 988 for single-core performance.
    790 vs 988
  • 17.2% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (2098 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    2,098 vs 2,533
  • 41.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (18.6 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    18.6 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 0.19 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.6 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    0.61 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (50 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    50 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 33.7% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (262 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    262 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (720x1604 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    720x1604 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 9.1% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (30 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    30 W vs 33 W
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP52 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP52 vs IP67
  • 3.6 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (167.2 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    167.2 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 3% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (202 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    202 g vs 196.2 g
  • 0.2 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (8.5 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    8.5 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 0.4 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (76.4 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    76.4 mm vs 76 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

pcmag.com
11/12/2025
Lab test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Moto G (2026) is a dependable budget phone with long battery life, but its low-resolution screen and short update promise leave it behind the Galaxy A16.
cnet.com
11/12/2025
Hands-on test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Moto G (2026) is a good-looking budget phone with a decent camera, but its low-resolution screen and choppy performance hold it back.
androidheadlines.com
12/12/2025
Two-week test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Moto G (2026) is a solid budget phone that doesn't lag and lasts about two days, though its chunky bezels and slow charging are drawbacks.
cgmagonline.com
11/12/2025
Benchmark review · Budget phone
Verdict
The Moto G (2026) is a basic budget phone for casual users, with good photos and two-day battery life, but it isn't built for serious gaming or video.
P
phonearena.com
17/12/2025
Summary of the review
me.pcmag.com
11/12/2025
Lab test · Budget phone
Verdict
The Motorola Moto G (2026) is an inexpensive phone with long battery life, but its 720p screen, hollow sound and two Android upgrades make the Galaxy A16 the better buy.
T
techprincess.it
29/01/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Motorola Moto G 2026 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Excellent, class-leading battery life, often lasting up to two days with regular use and over 19 hours in formal tests.
  • Affordable price point (around $200 MSRP), offering a good value for a 5G-enabled phone.
  • Stylish and premium-feeling design with a soft, textured vegan leather back that resists fingerprints.
  • Clean, near-stock Android 16 software experience with useful Motorola gestures (e.g., chop for flashlight).
  • Display features a smooth 120Hz refresh rate and good peak brightness (up to 1,000 nits), making it easy to see in various lighting conditions.
  • Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable storage via a microSD card slot, features often missing in modern phones.
  • Features loud stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support for a good audio experience with videos and podcasts.
  • Reliable and fast side-mounted fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button.
  • Main 50MP rear camera takes decent, shareable photos in good light, with improved color balance over its predecessor.

What customers don't like about Motorola Moto G 2026 (4GB + 64GB)

  • The 6.7-inch display has a low 720p (HD+) resolution, which results in text and videos appearing jagged or pixelated.
  • Performance is considered sluggish and just basic for everyday tasks, struggling with demanding apps or intense gaming due to the entry-level MediaTek Dimensity 6300 processor and only 4GB of physical RAM.
  • Limited software support, with only two major OS upgrades and three years of bimonthly security updates, significantly less than competitors like Samsung.
  • Mediocre camera system overall; the 2MP macro lens is largely considered a gimmick and video quality lacks optical stabilization.
  • Audio quality is described as hollow and lacking in bass, and call quality can sound muffled in noisy environments.
  • The phone has noticeable, chunky screen bezels, especially a large chin at the bottom, making the design look dated.
  • Haptics (vibrations) are weak and mushy.
  • Does not support Wi-Fi 6 or wireless charging, which some similarly priced or slightly more expensive alternatives offer.
  • The display struggles with outdoor visibility in direct sunlight, despite its high peak brightness rating.

Verdict

The Motorola Moto G (2026) is a budget-friendly 5G smartphone featuring a 6.7-inch HD+ (1604 x 720) 120Hz LCD display and a large 5,200mAh battery with 30W charging support, running on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 processor and Android 16 with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of UFS 2.2 internal storage, expandable up to 1TB via microSD. Key features include a stylish vegan leather design that is IP52 water-repellent, a 50MP main rear camera alongside a 32MP selfie camera, stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, and a fast side-mounted fingerprint sensor. Primary pros are its exceptionally long, multi-day battery life, modern design and build quality, and smooth 120Hz screen refresh rate for an affordable price. Cons often cited in reviews include the low display resolution (720p), performance that can lag with demanding tasks, a basic and mostly unusable 2MP macro camera, hollow audio quality, and a shorter software support window compared to some competitors.

Compare Motorola Moto G 2026 (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Motorola Moto G 2026 (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found