OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Smartphones Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v3.0

CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB) review: 196 specs compared

Avg. price:~£90RAM capacity:6 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:7.2 inchesMain camera megapixels:48 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP

CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 196 technical specifications and 5 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB)
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

35%

6.1

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.1

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 82% of smartphones
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 61%
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

25%

4.8

Performance

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

5.8

Display

15%

6.7

Battery

10%

8.4

Software

10%

6.3

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Audio

3%

5.6

Design

â–¼Worse than 73%
6.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

6.1

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.0

Average grade

20%

6.6

Popularity

Grades by review (5)
2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 82%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • cubot-note-60-6gb-128gb
cubot-note-60-6gb-128gb
Where to buy
    N/A~ £90
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB)

Based on 2 · 3

The few reviewers mostly like the battery and performance, though not everyone is convinced, and little else stands out.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

25%

4.8

Performance

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

5.8

Display

15%

6.7

Battery

10%

8.4

Software

10%

6.3

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Audio

3%

5.6

Design

6.1
Reviews score
6.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.6
Processor model
Unisoc T615
This smartphone uses the Unisoc T615 processor model which is slower than processors in 84.1% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.4% of smartphones.
Storage type
?
RAM capacity
6 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 6 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 71.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 10.8% of smartphones.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is smaller than the storage of 61.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 28.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
1.6 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 1.6 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 95% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.5% of smartphones.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This smartphone runs Android, which is more mainstream than the system in 4.8% of smartphones and the same as in 95.2% of smartphones.
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
This smartphone runs Android version Android 15 which is newer than that found in 70.5% of smartphones and equal to that in 25% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not support direct OS updates. 20.1% of smartphones offer this.
Promised software updates
?
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone runs an open-source operating system. 5.2% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
48 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 48 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP which is lower than that of 80.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
?
Main camera sensor area
?
Main camera pixel size
?
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.7% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.2% of smartphones.
2 SIM (Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM, Hybrid Slot)
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
eSIM support
?
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not have 5G connectivity. 66.7% of smartphones offer this.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Show more
Screen size
7.2 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 7.2 inches which is larger than the screens of 97.4% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.3% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
720x 1560 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 720x1560 px which is lower than that of 97% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Pixel density
239 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 239 ppi which is lower than that of 99% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.6% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 7,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 86% of smartphones and equal to those in 4.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 18 W which is slower than in 76% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 11.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.2% of smartphones support fast charging.
some sources indicate "yes", but it is a very slow 18 W, taking around three hours for a full charge, which isn't generally considered fast charging
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.1% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
What reviewers say
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.3% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.1% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not have an FM radio. 34.3% of smartphones offer this.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless Bluetooth audio. 12.5% of smartphones offer this.
Show more
Height
177.4 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 177.4 mm which is taller than 96.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Width
84.3 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 84.3 mm which is wider than 96.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Thickness
9.8 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 9.8 mm which is thicker than 87.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Weight
254 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 254 g which is heavier than 89.9% of smartphones.
Device volume
147 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 147 cm³ which is larger than 90.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Show more

CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformanceSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 40% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 0.53 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (7.2 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    7.2 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.4% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 2x more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    info not disclosed by manufacturer in KB
    2,048 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • Supports 360° panorama
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 24.8% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.1% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    2.45
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 2.89x cheaper
    CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£90 vs £260).
    £90 vs £260
  • 2.89x cheaper
    CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£90 vs £260).
    £90 vs £260
  • 2x more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    info not disclosed by manufacturer in KB
    2,048 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 2x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (64 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    64 KB vs 32 KB
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • 1 year/s newer release date
    This smartphone has a newer release date than the average smartphone (2025 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones are released annually.
    November 2025
    2025 vs 2024
  • Newer Android version
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 15 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 15 vs Android 14
  • Supports 360° panorama
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 24.8% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    2.45
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 0.53 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (7.2 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    7.2 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 40% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5,000 mAh.
    7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.4% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.1% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc T615 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc T615 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.6% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 66.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (10 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    10 W vs 6 W
  • 39.5% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (239 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    239 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 16.4% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

    6.1

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    6.6

    Popularity

    Grades by review (5)
    2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.1 vs 7.3
  • 0.7% worse value for money
    CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (7.61 vs 7.7).
    7.61 vs 7.66
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc T615 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc T615 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 66.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (10 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    10 W vs 6 W
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 53.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (437 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    437 vs 942
  • 33.3% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 75% less L3 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (1,024 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4,096 KB.
    1,024 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (6 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 8 GB
  • 32.1% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1,866 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    1,866 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 10.5% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (850 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    850 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 42.3% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,461 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,461 vs 2,533
  • 87.5% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (32 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    32 vs 256
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x1.8 GHz & 6x1.6 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x1.8 GHz & 6x1.6 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 1 fewer memory channels
    This smartphone supports fewer memory channels than the average smartphone (1 vs 2). The average smartphone supports 2 channels.
    1 vs 2
  • No offline voice commands
    This smartphone does not support offline voice commands, the average smartphone does. 90.7% of smartphones offer offline voice control.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (48 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    48 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    This smartphone lacks an HDR mode, the average smartphone has one. 97.2% of smartphones support HDR photography.
    0
  • No slow-motion recording
    This smartphone does not support slow-motion recording, the average smartphone does. 90.4% of smartphones offer slow-mo features.
  • No manual focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a manual focus mode, the average smartphone does. 91.5% of smartphones offer manual focus.
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.6% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5 vs 5.2
  • No gyroscope
    This smartphone does not have a gyroscope, the average smartphone does. 84.4% of smartphones feature a gyroscope.
  • No compass
    This smartphone does not have a compass, the average smartphone does. 93.2% of smartphones include a built-in compass.
  • No fingerprint scanner
    This smartphone does not have a fingerprint scanner, the average smartphone does. 96.6% of smartphones include a fingerprint scanner.
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 39.5% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (239 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    239 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (720x1560 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    720x1560 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a lower contrast ratio than the average smartphone (2506:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone has a contrast ratio of 1000000:1.
    2,506:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • 45.5% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (18 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    18 W vs 33 W
  • No ultra power-saving mode
    This smartphone does not have an ultra power-saving mode, the average smartphone does. 94% of smartphones include ultra power-saving.
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.2% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 29.5% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (254 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    254 g vs 196.2 g
  • 8.3 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (84.3 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    84.3 mm vs 76 mm
  • 13.8 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (177.4 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    177.4 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 44.1% larger volume
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (147 cm³ vs 102 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 102 cm³.
    147 cm³ vs 102 cm³
  • 1.5 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (9.8 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    9.8 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP65 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP65 vs IP67

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Tecnofr3aks!
≈ estimated
28/03/2026
First look · unboxing · gaming and camera tests
Verdict
CUBOT Note 60 is a very good budget option, though this verdict rests on first impressions.
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.5
de.root-nation.com
✓ explicit
30/10/2025
Hands-on test · Large-screen budget
Verdict
The Cubot Note 60 suits buyers wanting a large screen and two days of battery, though its HD+ resolution could be sharper.
7.0
fr.root-nation.com
≈ estimated
30/10/2025
Hands-on test · Budget smartphone
Verdict
The Cubot Note 60 is a no-frills budget phone whose 7000 mAh battery lasts two days, but its average screen and camera hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB)

  • Massive 7000mAh battery providing up to 3 days of light use
  • Large 7.2-inch display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate
  • Clean user experience with near-stock Android 15 and no bloatware
  • IP65 rating offers decent water splash and dust resistance
  • Premium-feeling design and solid build quality for a budget device
  • Includes essential features like NFC and dual stereo speakers

What customers don't like about CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB)

  • Slow charging speeds, taking approximately 3 hours to full
  • Lacks a physical fingerprint scanner, relying solely on Face Unlock
  • Cameras perform poorly in low light and the app can lag when saving high-res shots
  • Large size and weight (254g) can be unwieldy for some users
  • Average performance; not suitable for high-end gaming (T615 chipset)
  • Lower pixel density (HD+ resolution) on such a large screen

Verdict

The CUBOT Note 60 is a practical budget smartphone running Android 15 that features a large 7.2-inch HD+ IPS LCD display with a 120Hz refresh rate, a Unisoc T615 octa-core processor, 6GB of RAM (expandable with virtual RAM), and 128GB of internal storage (expandable up to 1TB via microSDXC). A main characteristic is its substantial 7000mAh battery capacity, which provides excellent endurance, with some reports suggesting up to three days of moderate use, and it is built with IP65 dust and water resistance for everyday durability. Additional pros include a 48MP triple rear camera system, a 16MP front camera, dual stereo speakers, Face ID, NFC, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. Cons for the device include a relatively low 720p display resolution, limited camera performance in non-ideal conditions, and a lack of fast charging support, meaning full charging can take around three hours.

Compare CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of CUBOT Note 60 (6GB + 128GB) and other smartphones

No results found