OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£2,770VRAM:32 GBMemory bus width:512 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):575 W

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

9.0

Overall score

Score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Score components

90%

9.3

Technical Score

10%

6.1

User score

▲Better than 85% of graphics-cards
9.3

Technical Score

Technical score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

44%

9.6

Performance

24%

9.9

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

7.2

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 96% of graphics-cards
6.1

User score

User score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

3.1

Number of reviews

Based on 7 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 99% of graphics-cards
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-5090-arcticstorm-aio

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 5090 ARCTICSTORM AIO is an ultra-enthusiast graphics card powered by the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture, featuring 21,760 CUDA cores, 32GB of cutting-edge GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, and a factory-overclocked boost clock of 2437 MHz. Its standout feature is a pre-integrated 360mm all-in-one liquid cooling system with a full-coverage copper cold plate that directly cools the GPU, VRM, and memory, delivering up to 30% lower temperatures and 55% quieter operation compared to air-cooled models. The card also includes a dual BIOS switch, a high-RPM triple 120mm fan array on the radiator, and a striking infinity mirror design with SPECTRA 2.0 ARGB lighting. Main pros include exceptional thermal management that prevents throttling even under heavy 4K/8K workloads, a relatively compact 2.5-slot card design, and the convenience of a maintenance-free liquid loop. However, its significant 575W TDP requires a high-end 1000W+ power supply, and the massive 360mm radiator necessitates a large PC case with specific mounting support.

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO

Technical Score
Technical score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components:

44%

9.6

Performance

24%

9.9

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

7.2

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.3
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO has a technical score of 9.3 points, which is higher than that of 95.7% of products in this category.
User score
User score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

3.1

Number of reviews

Based on 7 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.1
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO has a user score of 6.1 points, which is lower than that of 99% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
3.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Popularity:
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO has a popularity score of 3.1 points, which is lower than that of 53.4% of products in this category.
3.1
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO has a popularity score of 3.1 points, which is lower than that of 53.4% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

9.0

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

6.6
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO has a value-for-money score of 6.6 points, which is lower than that of 73.9% of products in this category.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
51,380 points
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
51,380 points
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 51,380 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 99.9% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
36,000 points
3DMark Port Royal score
36,000 points
★ Better than 98% of models
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 36,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 97.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
38,842 points
PassMark (G3D) result
38,842 points
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 38,842 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 95.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
24,677 points
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
24,677 points
▲ Better than 87% of models
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 24,677 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 87% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
106.11 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance
106.11 TFLOPS
★ Better than 98% of models
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 106.11 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 97.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
32 GB
VRAM
32 GB
★ Better than 97% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 32 GB of VRAM, which is more than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal to 3% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
▲ Better than 79% of models
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
512 bit
Memory bus width
512 bit
★ Better than 97% of models
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 512 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 96.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
1,792 GB/s
Maximum memory bandwidth
1,792 GB/s
★ Better than 98% of models
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 1,792 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 97.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
▲ Better than 74% of models
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
PCIe lanes
x16
▲ Better than 23% of models
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
▲ Better than 23% of models
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
Vulkan version
1.4
▲ Better than 21% of models
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
OpenGL version
4.6
▲ Better than 2% of models
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Max displays supported
4
▲ Better than 8% of models
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
▲ Better than 9% of models
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
DisplayPort outputs
3
▲ Better than 21% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
DisplayPort version
2.1b
▲ Better than 79% of models
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
77.76 Gbps
DisplayPort link rates
77.76 Gbps
▲ Better than 85% of models
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 77.76 Gbps, which is faster than on 85.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
575 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
575 W
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 575 W, which is higher than that of 97.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.5% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
575 W
Power consumption while under peak load
575 W
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 575 W under peak load, which is higher than 96.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
1,000 W
Recommended PSU wattage
1,000 W
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 1,000 W PSU, which is higher than that of 95.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
575 W
Board power limit
575 W
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 575 W, which is higher than that of 96.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
575 W
Show more
Size
251.6x 160.1x 49 mm
Length
251.6 mm
Length
251.6 mm
▲ Better than 68% of models
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 251.6 mm long, which is shorter than 67.6% of graphics cards.
Height
160.1 mm
Height
160.1 mm
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 160.1 mm tall, which is taller than 99.3% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
▼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
3,000 g
Weight
3,000 g
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 3,000 g, which is heavier than 99.1% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 130 more compute units
    SM count / Compute Units
    170
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <15 – >84
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    170 vs 40
  • 130 more ray tracing cores
    Ray tracing cores / units
    170
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <0 – >84
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    170 vs 40
  • 4x higher memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    1,792 GB/s
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    VRAM
    32 GB
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 4.35x higher texture rate
    Texture rate
    1,657.2 GTexel/s
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <107.4 GTexel/s – >879.3 GTexel/s
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1657.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,657.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 496 more TMUs
    Texture mapping units (TMUs)
    680
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <72 – >336
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (680 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    680 vs 184
  • 112 more ROPs
    Render output units (ROPs)
    176
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <32 – >128
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (176 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    176 vs 64
  • 536 more AI cores
    Tensor/AI cores
    680
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <0 – >336
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (680 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    680 vs 144
  • 130 more compute units
    SM count / Compute Units
    170
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <15 – >84
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    170 vs 40
  • 130 more ray tracing cores
    Ray tracing cores / units
    170
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <0 – >84
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (170 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    170 vs 40
  • 4.35x higher texture rate
    Texture rate
    1,657.2 GTexel/s
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <107.4 GTexel/s – >879.3 GTexel/s
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1657.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,657.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 496 more TMUs
    Texture mapping units (TMUs)
    680
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <72 – >336
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (680 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    680 vs 184
  • 112 more ROPs
    Render output units (ROPs)
    176
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <32 – >128
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (176 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    176 vs 64
  • 536 more AI cores
    Tensor/AI cores
    680
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <0 – >336
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (680 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    680 vs 144
  • 2.63x higher pixel rate
    Pixel rate
    428.9 GPixel/s
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <43.71 GPixel/s – >366.9 GPixel/s
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (428.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    428.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4.7x higher FP32 performance
    FP32 performance
    106.06 TFLOPS
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (106.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    106.06 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 3.5x higher gaming score
    3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
    51,380 points
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <4k points – >34k points
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (51380 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    51,380 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 3.93x higher ray tracing score
    3DMark Port Royal score
    36,000 points
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <0 points – >25k points
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (36000 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    36,000 points vs 9,166 points
  • 71.5% higher PassMark score
    PassMark (G3D) result
    38,842 points
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (38842 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    38,842 points vs 22,653 points
  • 3.46x higher FP64 performance
    FP64 performance
    1.66 TFLOPS
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <0.14 TFLOPS – >1.3 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.7 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.66 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 17,408 more FP32 units
    FP32 ALUs (count)
    21,760
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <1.3k – >10.8k
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (21,760 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    21,760 vs 4,352
  • 7.05x higher FP16 performance
    FP16 performance
    209.5 TFLOPS
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <5.97 TFLOPS – >83.56 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (209.5 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    209.5 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 5.9x higher BF16 performance
    BF16 performance
    209.5 TFLOPS
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <0 TFLOPS – >209 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (209.5 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    209.5 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 4.62x higher compute throughput
    FP32 performance
    106.11 TFLOPS
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (106.1 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    106.11 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 5.1% higher base clock speed
    Base GPU clock
    2017 MHz
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1.1k MHz – >2.3k MHz
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2017 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,017 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 2.04x higher compute score
    PassMark (DirectCompute) result
    24,677 points
    ▲ Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (24677 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    24,677 points vs 12,074 points
  • 4x higher memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    1,792 GB/s
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,792 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 20 GB more VRAM
    VRAM
    32 GB
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (32 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    Effective memory speed
    28,000 MHz
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 256 bit wider memory bus
    Memory bus width
    512 bit
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (512 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    512 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4x larger L2 cache
    L2 cache size
    96 MB
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <2 MB – >64 MB
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    96 MB vs 24 MB
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    L3 / Infinity Cache size
    96 MB
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <0 MB – >64 MB
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 26.2% faster VRAM clock
    GPU memory speed
    2,209 MHz
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <1.3k MHz – >2.4k MHz
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2209 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,209 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Newer GDDR version
    GDDR version
    GDDR7
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    PCI Express (PCIe) version
    5.0
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    Release date
    2025
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    July 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    Multi-GPU max
    2
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <0 – >2
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 4.03x more transistors
    Number of transistors
    92,200 million
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <5k million – >53.9k million
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (92200 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    92,200 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer encoder generation
    Encoder generation
    9
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <6 – >8.5
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    DisplayPort version
    2.1b
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    HDMI version
    2.1b
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 3.89x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    DisplayPort link rates
    77.76 Gbps
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (77.8 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    77.76 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • Uses hybrid cooling
    Has air-water cooling
    yes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This graphics card uses hybrid cooling, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7 °C lower load temperature
    Load GPU temperature
    60 °C
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <59 °C – >77 °C
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (60 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    60 °C vs 67 °C
  • 33.4 mm shorter card length
    Length
    251.6 mm
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (251.6 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    251.6 mm vs 285 mm
  • 2.67x higher TDP
    Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    575 W
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <60 W – >360 W
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (575 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    575 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% higher PSU requirement
    Recommended PSU wattage
    1,000 W
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <450 W – >850 W
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (1000 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    1,000 W vs 650 W
  • 35.1 mm higher card profile
    Height
    160.1 mm
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (160.1 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    160.1 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2.7% lower boost clock speed
    Boost GPU clock
    2,437 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <1.4k MHz – >2.9k MHz
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2437 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,437 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2.56x higher board power limit
    Board power limit
    575 W
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <100 W – >400 W
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (575 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    575 W vs 225 W
  • 5.23x more expensive
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO is more expensive than the average graphics card (£2,770 vs £530).
    £2,770 vs £530
  • 2.94x heavier card weight
    Weight
    3,000 g
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <500 g – >2k g
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (3000 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    3,000 g vs 1,021 g
  • 31% lower user score
    User score
    6.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO
    the average graphics card
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO has a lower user score than the average graphics card (6.10 vs 8.000).
    6.1 vs 8
  • 5.23x more expensive
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO is more expensive than the average graphics card (£2,770 vs £530).
    £2,770 vs £530
  • 31% lower user score
    User score
    6.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO
    the average graphics card
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO has a lower user score than the average graphics card (6.10 vs 8.000).
    6.1 vs 8
  • 9% worse value for money
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 7.2).
    6.6 vs 7.2
  • 2.7% lower boost clock speed
    Boost GPU clock
    2,437 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <1.4k MHz – >2.9k MHz
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2437 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,437 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2.54x larger GPU die
    Die size
    750 mm²
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <159 mm² – >601 mm²
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (750 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    750 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Narrower decode codec support
    HW decode codecs
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2.67x higher TDP
    Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    575 W
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <60 W – >360 W
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (575 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    575 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% higher PSU requirement
    Recommended PSU wattage
    1,000 W
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <450 W – >850 W
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (1000 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    1,000 W vs 650 W
  • 2.56x higher board power limit
    Board power limit
    575 W
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <100 W – >400 W
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (575 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    575 W vs 225 W
  • 2.61x higher peak power draw
    Power consumption while under peak load
    575 W
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <100 W – >400 W
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (575 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    575 W vs 220 W
  • 30 dB noisier at idle
    Idle noise level
    30 dB
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <0 dB – >26 dB
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (30 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    30 dB vs 0 dB
  • 2.5x higher idle power draw
    Idle power consumption
    30 W
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <5 W – >25 W
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (30 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    30 W vs 12 W
  • 35.1 mm higher card profile
    Height
    160.1 mm
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (160.1 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    160.1 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2.94x heavier card weight
    Weight
    3,000 g
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <500 g – >2k g
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (3000 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    3,000 g vs 1,021 g

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 7 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO?

  • Impressive thermal performance, with GPU temperatures often staying between 50°C and 60°C under load.
  • Significantly quieter than high-performance air-cooled models, with barely noticeable pump noise.
  • Elite 4K and ray tracing performance powered by the Blackwell architecture.
  • First ZOTAC model to feature an integrated 360mm radiator, avoiding the need for a custom cooling loop.
  • Sleek and premium design featuring a large infinity mirror and customizable Spectra 2.0 ARGB lighting.

What customers dislike about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO?

  • Extremely high power consumption, often drawing between 550W and 650W.
  • Requires a large PC case to accommodate the 360mm radiator, which can be difficult to fit alongside existing CPU AIOs.
  • Memory (VRAM) temperatures can run high, with some users reporting peaks near 90°C.
  • Potential for coil whine, which varies by individual unit.
  • The AIO pump acts as an additional potential point of failure that is typically irreplaceable compared to standard fans.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tech-critter.com
28/11/2025
Summary of the review
ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 5090 ArcticStorm AIO Review Review the specific Zotac ArcticStorm RTX 5090 model in the linked articles above.
L
lowyat.net
19/01/2026
Summary of the review
Zotac Gaming Arcticstorm AIO RTX 5090 Review - Lowyat.NET
H
hardwareluxx.de
22/08/2025
Summary of the review
Fazit - Seite 18 - Hardwareluxx
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 Arcticstorm AIO with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)