Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£2,980VRAM:24 GBMemory bus width:384 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):450 W

MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid
9.1/10

Overall score

Score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

9.3

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

★Better than 92% of graphics cards
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 74%
9.3

Technical score

Technical score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

9.9

Performance

24%

9.3

Memory

12%

7.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

7.8

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 95%
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 91%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid

Technical score
Technical score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

9.9

Performance

24%

9.3

Memory

12%

7.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

7.8

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

9.3
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
1.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid has a popularity score of 1.9 points, which is lower than that of 55.9% of products in this category.
1.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

9.1

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

6.7
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
38,000 points
This graphics card scores 38,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
27,500 points
This graphics card scores 27,500 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 96.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
38,430 points
This graphics card scores 38,430 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 94.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
26,333 points
This graphics card scores 26,333 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 88.2% of graphics cards and equal to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
86.02 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 86.02 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 96.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
24 GB
This graphics card has 24 GB of VRAM, which is more than 91.1% of graphics cards and equal to 5.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
384 bit
This graphics card uses a 384 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 89.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.3% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
1,018 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 1,018 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 96.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
1.62 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 1.62 Gbps, which is slower than on 95.3% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
450 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 450 W, which is higher than that of 94.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
530 W
This graphics card draws 530 W under peak load, which is higher than 96.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
850 W
This graphics card recommends a 850 W PSU, which is higher than that of 83.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.2% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
530 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 530 W, which is higher than that of 96.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
480 W
Show more
Size
280x 140x 43 mm
Length
280 mm
This graphics card is 280 mm long, which is shorter than 52.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Height
140 mm
This graphics card is 140 mm tall, which is taller than 79.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
2,353 g
This graphics card weighs 2,353 g, which is heavier than 95.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 88 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (128 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    128 vs 40
  • 88 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (128 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    128 vs 40
  • 2.27x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1018 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,018 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 3.49x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1329 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,329 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 112 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (176 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    176 vs 64
  • 328 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (512 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    512 vs 184
  • 2.83x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (462 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    462 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 88 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (128 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    128 vs 40
  • 88 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (128 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    128 vs 40
  • 3.49x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (1329 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    1,329 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 112 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (176 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    176 vs 64
  • 328 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (512 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    512 vs 184
  • 2.83x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (462 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    462 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2625 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,625 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 368 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (512 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    512 vs 144
  • 3.66x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (82.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    82.58 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 2.59x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (38000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    38,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 3x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (27500 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    27,500 points vs 9,166 points
  • 16.4% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2235 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,235 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 69.6% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (38430 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    38,430 points vs 22,653 points
  • 9.31x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (330.4 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    330.4 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 12,032 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (16,384 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    16,384 vs 4,352
  • 3.74x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (86 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    86.02 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 2.69x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.3 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.29 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2.18x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (26333 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    26,333 points vs 12,074 points
  • 2.89x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (86 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    86 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 2.27x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (1018 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    1,018 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 3x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (72 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    72 MB vs 24 MB
  • 18x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (72 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    72 MB vs 4 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card has a lower process node than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • 3.33x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (76300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    76,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • Uses hybrid cooling
    This graphics card uses hybrid cooling, the average graphics card does not.
  • 8 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (59 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    59 °C vs 67 °C
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2.09x higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (450 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    450 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 2.36x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (530 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    530 W vs 225 W
  • 15 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (140 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    140 mm vs 125 mm
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 5.62x more expensive
    MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid is more expensive than the average graphics card (£2,980 vs £530).
    £2,980 vs £530
  • 2.3x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2353 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,353 g vs 1,021 g
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 5.62x more expensive
    MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid is more expensive than the average graphics card (£2,980 vs £530).
    £2,980 vs £530
  • 5.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.57 vs 8.000).
    7.57 vs 8
  • 7.5% worse value for money
    MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.69 vs 7.2).
    6.69 vs 7.2
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2.06x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (609 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    609 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    October 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • 91.9% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (1.6 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    1.62 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 2.09x higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (450 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    450 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 2.36x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (530 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    530 W vs 225 W
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 2.41x higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (530 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    530 W vs 220 W
  • 3.17x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (38 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    38 W vs 12 W
  • 26 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (26 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    26 dB vs 0 dB
  • 15 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (140 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    140 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2.3x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2353 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,353 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
thefpsreview.com
06/03/2023
Summary of the review
O
overclockers.com
12/10/2022
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
12/10/2022
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
21/11/2022
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
24/10/2022
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
21/10/2022
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
12/10/2022
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
12/10/2022
Summary of the review
M
mezha.ua
14/03/2023
Summary of the review
S
sea.ign.com
22/11/2022
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
21/10/2022
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
13/10/2022
Summary of the review
I
igorslab.de
01/11/2022
Summary of the review
O
overclocking.com
12/10/2022
Summary of the review
O
overclocking.com
12/10/2022
Summary of the review
T
techgaming.nl
02/12/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid

  • Exceptional cooling performance with GPU core temperatures significantly lower than air-cooled cards.
  • Extremely quiet operation, especially when using the 'Silent' BIOS mode.
  • Compact two-slot card design (excluding radiator) makes it easier to fit into smaller cases or multi-GPU setups.
  • High out-of-the-box performance with a factory overclock and a high power limit for further enthusiast tweaking.
  • Elegant, premium build quality with a brushed metal plate and customizable RGB zones.

What we don't like about MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid

  • High premium price compared to standard air-cooled RTX 4090 models.
  • Reported instances of coil whine, which can be a distraction in very quiet builds.
  • Potential long-term concerns regarding pump failure, which would render the card unusable.
  • VRAM/Memory temperatures can occasionally run slightly higher than on some air-cooled competitors.
  • Radiator tubing exits from the side of the card, which may cause clearance issues or pressure in narrower cases.

Verdict

The MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid X is a flagship graphics card featuring the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture with 16,384 CUDA cores, a boosted clock speed of up to 2640 MHz, and 24GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus. Its primary characteristic is a closed-loop hybrid cooling system that utilizes a 240mm radiator and a dedicated on-card Torx Fan 5.0, allowing it to maintain a svelte two-slot profile unlike its bulkier air-cooled rivals. Main pros include its exceptional 4K performance, significantly lower GPU core temperatures (often remaining under 60°C), and a quiet operational profile supported by dual BIOS modes. However, potential cons include the requirement for sufficient case space to mount the external radiator, reported instances of coil whine, and slightly higher memory temperatures compared to some premium air-cooled models.

Compare MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found