Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£610VRAM:20 GBMemory bus width:320 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):300 W

XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT
8.8/10

Overall score

Score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.9

Technical score

10%

8.0

User score

â–²Better than 79% of graphics cards
8.3

Value for money

Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

Overall score

30%

7.3

Price

★Better than 99%
8.9

Technical score

Technical score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

9.2

Performance

24%

8.8

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.4

Platform & Features

5%

6.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 79%
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 60%
  • xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt
  • xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt
  • xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt
  • xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt
  • xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt
xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt
xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt
xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt
xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt
xfx-speedster-merc-310-radeon-rx-7900-xt
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT

Technical score
Technical score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

9.2

Performance

24%

8.8

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.4

Platform & Features

5%

6.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

8.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT has a popularity score of 6.3 points, which is higher than that of 60.5% of products in this category.
6.3
Value for money
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.8

Overall score

30%

7.3

Price

8.3
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
25,533 points
This graphics card scores 25,533 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 78.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,435 points
This graphics card scores 14,435 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 69.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
28,982 points
This graphics card scores 28,982 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 68.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
32,646 points
This graphics card scores 32,646 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 96.9% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
54.51 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 54.51 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 87.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
20 GB
This graphics card has 20 GB of VRAM, which is more than 90.1% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
320 bit
This graphics card uses a 320 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 85.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.1% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
800 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 800 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 81.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
54 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 54 Gbps, which is faster than on 80.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 300 W, which is higher than that of 71.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
385 W
This graphics card draws 385 W under peak load, which is higher than 91.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
315 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 315 W, which is higher than that of 74.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
300 W
Show more
Size
344x 128x 55 mm
Length
344 mm
This graphics card is 344 mm long, which is longer than 94.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
128 mm
This graphics card is 128 mm tall, which is taller than 55.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.7 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.7 slot/s, which is wider than 65% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
2,300 g
This graphics card weighs 2,300 g, which is heavier than 94.7% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more

XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 128 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (192 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    192 vs 64
  • 8 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (20 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    20 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.23x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (851.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    851.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 2.82x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (460 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    460 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 78.6% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (800 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    800 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 16% better value for money
    XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.35 vs 7.2).
    8.35 vs 7.2
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 128 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (192 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    192 vs 64
  • 2.23x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (851.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    851.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 2.82x higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (460 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    460 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 2.29x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (51.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    51.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 2.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2560 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,560 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 73.9% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (25533 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    25,533 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 3.58x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.7 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.72 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2.7x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (32646 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    32,646 points vs 12,074 points
  • 57.5% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14435 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    14,435 points vs 9,166 points
  • 27.9% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (28982 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    28,982 points vs 22,653 points
  • 3.47x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (103 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    103 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 2.37x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (54.5 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    54.51 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 8 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (20 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    20 GB vs 12 GB
  • 78.6% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (800 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    800 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (320 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    320 bit vs 256 bit
  • 20x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (80 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    80 MB vs 4 MB
  • 2.52x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (57700 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    57,700 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 2.7x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 9 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (28 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    28 °C vs 37 °C
  • 10 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (57 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    57 °C vs 67 °C
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 59 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (344 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    344 mm vs 285 mm
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 40% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (315 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    315 W vs 225 W
  • 7.6% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1775 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,775 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 7.6% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1775 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,775 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 75% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (6 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    6 MB vs 24 MB
  • 62.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    48 vs 128
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 79.3% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (529 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    529 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    December 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 40% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (315 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    315 W vs 225 W
  • 75% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (385 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    385 W vs 220 W
  • 6.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (42 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    42 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 59 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (344 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    344 mm vs 285 mm
  • 2.25x heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2300 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,300 g vs 1,021 g
  • 0.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
thefpsreview.com
23/01/2023
Summary of the review
O
overclockers.com
13/12/2022
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
13/12/2022
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
13/12/2022
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
13/12/2022
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
13/12/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT

  • Excellent 1440p and native 4K gaming performance without ray tracing
  • Highly effective cooling system that keeps temperatures well below reference models
  • Robust and premium build quality with a full-length aluminum backplate
  • Includes a functional Z Support Bar to prevent GPU sag
  • Silent operation at stock settings with a custom fan curve
  • Great rasterization value compared to competitors like the RTX 4080
  • Large 20GB VRAM capacity provides future-proofing for demanding titles

What we don't like about XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT

  • Extremely long card (344mm) that may not fit in many standard cases
  • Anti-sag bracket adds even more length, further complicating installation
  • Ray tracing performance lags significantly behind NVIDIA's 40-series cards
  • Default fan profile can be quite loud under heavy loads
  • Noticeable coil whine reported by some users during high framerates
  • Occasional driver stability issues or timeouts mentioned in user feedback
  • High power consumption, especially when overclocked

Verdict

The XFX Speedster MERC 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT is a high-end graphics card built on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture, featuring 5,376 stream processors and 20GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus. This custom model is equipped with a triple-fan cooling system that includes a copper vapor chamber, a rigid aluminum backplate, and factory-overclocked speeds reaching a boost clock of up to 2,560 MHz. Main pros include exceptional 4K and 1440p gaming performance, significantly cooler operation compared to reference designs, a sturdy build quality, and future-proof DisplayPort 2.1 support. However, users should consider cons such as its massive physical footprint (344mm in length), higher power draw requiring a minimum 750W PSU, and ray tracing performance that trails behind competitors.

Compare XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of XFX Speedster Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found