Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ560VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):200 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
7.5/10

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.4

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

â–˛Better than 57% of graphics cards
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

â–˛Better than 64%
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

6.7

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

7.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

9.3

Design

4%

9.5

Connectivity & Media

â–˛Better than 56%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–˛Better than 70%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

6.7

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

7.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

9.3

Design

4%

9.5

Connectivity & Media

7.4
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has a popularity score of 7.2 points, which is higher than that of 67.1% of products in this category.
7.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

7.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
17,000 points
This graphics card scores 17,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 54.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.8% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
14,000 points
This graphics card scores 14,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 65.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
26,916 points
This graphics card scores 26,916 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 62.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
14,609 points
This graphics card scores 14,609 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 56.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
29.15 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 29.15 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 56.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 55.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
200 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 200 W, which is lower than that of 51.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.9% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
200 W
This graphics card draws 200 W under peak load, which is lower than 54% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
215 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 215 W, which is lower than that of 54.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.7% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
200 W
Show more
Size
240x 110x 40 mm
This graphics card measures 240x110x 40 mm, which is more compact than 90.3% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Length
240 mm
This graphics card is 240 mm long, which is shorter than 76.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Height
110 mm
This graphics card is 110 mm tall, which is shorter than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,021 g
This graphics card weighs 1,021 g, which is lighter than 49.9% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 15 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (110 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    110 mm vs 125 mm
  • 45 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (240 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    240 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (240x110 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    240x110 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 9x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (36 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    36 MB vs 4 MB
  • 6.57x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (233.2 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    233.2 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 5.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.47 vs 8.000).
    8.47 vs 8
  • 6.57x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (233.2 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    233.2 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 52.7% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (14000 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    14,000 points vs 9,166 points
  • 40 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (184 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    184 vs 144
  • 29.2% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (29.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    29.15 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 6 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (46 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    46 vs 40
  • 19.5% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (455.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    455.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 9x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (36 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    36 MB vs 4 MB
  • 50% larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (36 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    36 MB vs 24 MB
  • 15 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (110 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    110 mm vs 125 mm
  • 45 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (240 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    240 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (240x110 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    240x110 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 1.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2475 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,475 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 1.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2475 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,475 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tomshardware.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
13/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
G
gamingnexus.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
techgage.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
22/12/2023
Summary of the review
A
arstechnica.com
20/04/2023
Summary of the review
C
cgmagonline.com
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
13/04/2023
Summary of the review
C
club386.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
13/04/2023
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
E
elchapuzasinformatico.com
12/04/2023
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
15/05/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

  • Excellent 1440p performance with high refresh rates
  • Extreme power efficiency (often under 200W)
  • Small form factor fits into most standard and SFF cases
  • Support for DLSS 3 and Frame Generation
  • High ray tracing efficiency for its class
  • Quiet operation and cool temperatures
  • Includes AV1 encoding for streamers

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

  • High price for a mid-range card ($599 MSRP)
  • 12GB VRAM is viewed as borderline for long-term 4K gaming
  • 192-bit memory bus limits 4K bandwidth
  • Stagnant raw performance leap from previous generation (similar to RTX 3080)
  • Limited display connectivity (DisplayPort 1.4 instead of 2.0)
  • Minimal performance boost for current RTX 30-series owners

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 is a high-performance graphics card built on the 5nm Ada Lovelace architecture, specifically designed to excel at 1440p gaming. Key technical specifications include 5,888 CUDA cores, a boost clock of 2,475 MHz, and 12GB of high-speed GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit interface, delivering 504 GB/s of bandwidth. Its primary advantages are exceptional power efficiency with a 200W TDP, class-leading ray tracing performance, and support for DLSS 3 Frame Generation, which significantly boosts frame rates in compatible titles. However, notable drawbacks include its relatively high launch price compared to previous 70-class generations and a 192-bit bus that can limit performance in intensive 4K workloads compared to cards with wider memory interfaces.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found