OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£530VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):220 W

PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070
8.4/10

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models
Score components

90%

8.4

Technical score

10%

8.2

User score

▲Better than 73% of graphics cards
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

★Better than 96%
8.4

Technical score

Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models
Score components

44%

7.8

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

8.5

Design

4%

9.8

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 73%
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

6.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 64%
  • powercolor-reaper-radeon-rx-9070
  • powercolor-reaper-radeon-rx-9070
  • powercolor-reaper-radeon-rx-9070
  • powercolor-reaper-radeon-rx-9070
  • powercolor-reaper-radeon-rx-9070
powercolor-reaper-radeon-rx-9070
powercolor-reaper-radeon-rx-9070
powercolor-reaper-radeon-rx-9070
powercolor-reaper-radeon-rx-9070
powercolor-reaper-radeon-rx-9070
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070

Technical score
Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models
Score components:

44%

7.8

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

8.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

8.5

Design

4%

9.8

Connectivity & Media

8.4
User score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

6.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 has a popularity score of 6.3 points, which is higher than that of 60.5% of products in this category.
6.3
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components:

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

8.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
24,000 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 24,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 74.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
16,261 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 16,261 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 76.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
24,678 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 24,678 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 56.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
14,814 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 14,814 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
36.13 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 36.13 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 66.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
640 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 640 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 65.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1a, which is more advanced than on 75.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
54 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 54 Gbps, which is faster than on 80.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 220 W, which is higher than that of 50.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
420 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 420 W under peak load, which is higher than 92.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
220 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W, which is lower than that of 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
220 W
Show more
Size
289x 111x 41 mm
Length
289 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 289 mm long, which is longer than 51.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,220 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,220 g, which is heavier than 61.6% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 97.7% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (322.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    322.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 43.9% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2518 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,518 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 42.9% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 48.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (564.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    564.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 13.6% better value for money
    PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.18 vs 7.2).
    8.18 vs 7.2
  • 2.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070
    the average graphics card
    PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.20 vs 8.000).
    8.2 vs 8
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 97.7% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (322.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    322.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 48.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (564.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    564.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 59.9% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (36.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    36.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 63.5% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (24000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    24,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 77.4% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (16261 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    16,261 points vs 9,166 points
  • 7.8% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2070 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,070 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 2.35x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.13 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2.43x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (72.3 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    72.3 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 43.9% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2518 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,518 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 42.9% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    March 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 2.35x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (53900 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    53,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 1.4a).
    2.1a vs 1.4a
  • 2.7x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    54 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 32 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (112 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    112 vs 144
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 75% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (32 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    32 vs 128
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 32 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (112 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    112 vs 144
  • 75% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (32 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    32 vs 128
  • 66.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (8 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    8 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 3).
    2.2 vs 3.0
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 6.67x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (80 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    80 W vs 12 W
  • 90.9% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (420 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    420 W vs 220 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tomshardware.com
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT and RX 9070 review: Excellent Performance
H
hothardware.com
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT And 9070 Review - Hot Hardware
C
computerbase.de
11/04/2025
Summary of the review
Radeon RX 9070 Reaper im Test: Fazit
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070

  • Compact two-slot design that is highly compatible with Small Form Factor (SFF) and ITX cases.
  • Excellent efficiency with high performance-per-watt, often staying cool (around 60°C) under load.
  • Impressive undervolting potential, allowing for significant power savings with minimal performance loss.
  • Minimalist all-black aesthetic without RGB, which appeals to users seeking a professional or clean look.
  • Quiet operation at stock settings, with fans often remaining off during idle or low usage.
  • Strong value proposition at MSRP compared to competing NVIDIA cards like the RTX 5070.

What we don't like about PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070

  • Reports of audible coil whine, especially during high frame rate scenarios or full power load.
  • Memory junction temperatures can run relatively high (approaching 90°C) compared to more premium models.
  • Lacks premium features found in higher-tier PowerColor cards, such as a dual BIOS or a vapor chamber.
  • Some users noted the simple design looks 'plain' or 'basic' compared to flashy RGB alternatives.
  • Initial driver instability and occasional stuttering reported in certain titles (e.g., Monster Hunter Wilds).
  • Availability issues at launch made it difficult for many users to find the card at the $549 MSRP.

Verdict

The PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 is a high-performance graphics card built on the AMD RDNA 4 architecture, featuring a 4nm Navi 48 GPU with 56 Compute Units and 3,584 stream processors. It is equipped with 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a 640 GB/s bandwidth and 20.1 Gbps effective speed. The card operates with a game clock of 2070 MHz and a boost clock up to 2520 MHz, supported by a 220W TDP and dual 8-pin power connectors. Main characteristics include a streamlined 289mm dual-slot design with a triple 90mm ring-fan cooling system, Honeywell PTM7950 thermal pads, and DisplayPort 2.1a support. Key pros are its exceptional power efficiency, quiet operation with a 0dB silent fan mode, and excellent value for 1440p and 4K gaming via AI-powered FSR 4. However, cons include its lack of RGB lighting for aesthetic-focused builds and performance that trails the more robust RX 9070 XT and competing high-end NVIDIA models in heavy ray-tracing tasks.

Compare PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found