Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£570VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):220 W

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.7

Technical score

10%

9.2

User score

▲Better than 64% of graphics cards
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

7.5

Price

▲Better than 80%
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

7.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

7.2

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 61%
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 88%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

7.7

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

7.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

7.2

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

7.7
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

9.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.2
Popularity
Popularity
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition has a popularity score of 9.7 points, which is higher than that of 89.7% of products in this category.
9.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

7.5

Price

7.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
20,995 points
This graphics card scores 20,995 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 68.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
13,059 points
This graphics card scores 13,059 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 64.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
33,400 points
This graphics card scores 33,400 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 82.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
17,019 points
This graphics card scores 17,019 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 66.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
36.13 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 36.13 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 66.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 55.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 220 W, which is higher than that of 50.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
220 W
This graphics card draws 220 W under peak load, which is lower than 48.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
220 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W, which is lower than that of 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
220 W
Show more
Size
267x 134x 51 mm
Length
267.01 mm
This graphics card is 267.01 mm long, which is shorter than 59.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Height
134 mm
This graphics card is 134 mm tall, which is taller than 67.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.56 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.56 slot/s, which is wider than 64.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
945 g
This graphics card weighs 945 g, which is lighter than 60.1% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 48.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (564.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    564.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 60.1% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (36.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    36.13 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 80 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (224 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    224 vs 144
  • 1.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2550 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,550 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 47.4% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (33400 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    33,400 points vs 22,653 points
  • 14.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition
    the average graphics card
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.20 vs 8.000).
    9.2 vs 8
  • 2.29x more popular
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition is more popular than the average graphics card (9.65 vs 4.2).
    9.65 vs 4.22
  • 7.8% better value for money
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.76 vs 7.2).
    7.76 vs 7.2
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 48.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (564.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    564.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 1.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2550 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,550 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 80 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (224 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    224 vs 144
  • 60.1% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (36.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    36.13 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 47.4% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (33400 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    33,400 points vs 22,653 points
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 23.5% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (201.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    201.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 16.28x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (578 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    578 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 43% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (20995 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    20,995 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 11 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (84 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    84 °C vs 95 °C
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 9 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (134 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    134 mm vs 125 mm
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 9 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (134 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    134 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
en.overclocking.com
20/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
T
techporn.ph
19/01/2024
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
16/01/2024
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition

  • Excellent 1440p gaming performance, often compared to an RTX 3080 but with much higher power efficiency.
  • Very quiet operation thanks to the Axial-tech fan design and 0dB technology for light tasks.
  • Compact 2.56-slot design makes it highly compatible with smaller PC cases and SFF builds.
  • Great value for money at its price point, offering a significant upgrade over previous generations like the RTX 3070 or 2080.
  • Solid build quality featuring a protective aluminum backplate and stainless steel bracket.

What we don't like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition

  • The 12GB VRAM capacity may be a limiting factor for long-term future-proofing in extremely demanding upcoming titles.
  • Not ideal for native 4K gaming on max settings; users often need DLSS 3 to maintain high frame rates at this resolution.
  • Some users reported higher temperatures (75-80°C) and louder fan noise in poorly ventilated or small cases under 100% load.
  • The 192-bit memory interface is noted as a potential bottleneck for higher resolution performance compared to top-tier cards.
  • The power status LED can be confusing, as a red light during boot can look like an error even when the card is functioning normally.

Verdict

The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER OC Edition is a compact, 2.56-slot graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 7,168 CUDA cores and 12GB of GDDR6X VRAM on a 192-bit interface. This factory-overclocked model delivers a boost clock of up to 2,550 MHz in OC mode and features dual Axial-tech fans with 0dB technology for silent operation under light loads. Its primary strengths include exceptional 1440p gaming performance, full support for DLSS 3.5 with frame generation, and high power efficiency with a 220W TGP. However, some users have noted potential for higher fan noise under extreme 100% loads in small-form-factor builds and the use of the potentially controversial 16-pin 12VHPWR power connector.

Compare ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 Super OC Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found