Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,140VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):360 W

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF
9.3/10

Overall score

Score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

9.4

Technical score

10%

8.6

User score

★Better than 97% of graphics cards
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.3

Overall score

30%

4.5

Price

▲Better than 84%
9.4

Technical score

Technical score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

9.7

Performance

24%

9.9

Memory

12%

7.6

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

7.9

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 98%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 74%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF

Technical score
Technical score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

9.7

Performance

24%

9.9

Memory

12%

7.6

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

7.9

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.4
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF has a popularity score of 7.8 points, which is higher than that of 73.1% of products in this category.
7.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

9.3

Overall score

30%

4.5

Price

7.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
27,789 points
This graphics card scores 27,789 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 82.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
26,000 points
This graphics card scores 26,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 93.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
35,900 points
This graphics card scores 35,900 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 89.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
20,404 points
This graphics card scores 20,404 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 80.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
58.71 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 58.71 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 91.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 960 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 88% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
20 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 20 Gbps, which is faster than on 42.9% of graphics cards and equal to 7.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 360 W, which is higher than that of 88.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
474 W
This graphics card draws 474 W under peak load, which is higher than 96% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
850 W
This graphics card recommends a 850 W PSU, which is higher than that of 83.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.2% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
474 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 474 W, which is higher than that of 95% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
360 W
Show more
Size
304x 126x 50 mm
This graphics card measures 304x126x 50 mm, which is more compact than 48.2% of graphics cards and equal in size to 2% of graphics cards.
Length
304 mm
This graphics card is 304 mm long, which is longer than 62.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.8% of graphics cards.
Height
50 mm
This graphics card is 50 mm tall, which is shorter than 96.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,277 g
This graphics card weighs 1,277 g, which is heavier than 63.8% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 9% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2730 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,730 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2.41x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (917.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    917.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 36.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2617 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,617 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 8.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.65 vs 8.000).
    8.65 vs 8
  • 9.7% better value for money
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.89 vs 7.2).
    7.89 vs 7.2
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 9% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2730 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,730 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 2.41x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (917.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    917.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 36.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2617 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,617 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 87.4% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (305.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    305.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 2.49x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (56.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    56.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 2.84x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (26000 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    26,000 points vs 9,166 points
  • 58.5% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (35900 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    35,900 points vs 22,653 points
  • 89.3% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (27789 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    27,789 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 6,400 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,752 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,752 vs 4,352
  • 2.55x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (58.7 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    58.71 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 3.17x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (766 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    766 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 57.9% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (30000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    30,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2.67x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    64 MB vs 24 MB
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 7.1% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1875 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,875 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 75 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (50 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    50 mm vs 125 mm
  • 67.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (360 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    360 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 2.11x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (474 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    474 W vs 225 W
  • 60 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    84 vs 144
  • 2.15x more expensive
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,140 vs £530).
    £1,140 vs £530
  • 2.15x higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (474 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    474 W vs 220 W
  • 19 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    304 mm vs 285 mm
  • 8.75x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (105 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    105 W vs 12 W
  • 2.15x more expensive
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,140 vs £530).
    £1,140 vs £530
  • 60 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    84 vs 144
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • No 3D output
    This graphics card does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
  • 67.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (360 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    360 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 2.11x higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (474 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    474 W vs 225 W
  • 2.15x higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (474 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    474 W vs 220 W
  • 8.75x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (105 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    105 W vs 12 W
  • 5.9 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41.3 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    41.3 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 19 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    304 mm vs 285 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
club386.com
25/02/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF

  • Stunning minimalist white aesthetic, highly popular for themed builds.
  • Compact 2-slot / 2.2-slot design (SFF-ready) makes it one of the few high-end cards compatible with smaller cases.
  • Exceptional cooling performance, often staying below 65°C-70°C even in compact setups.
  • Very quiet operation, especially when using the integrated 'Quiet' BIOS profile.
  • Significant generational performance leap in 4K gaming and AI workloads over the 40-series predecessors.
  • Includes a Dual BIOS switch (Performance/Silent) and a reinforced metal backplate for structural integrity.

What we don't like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF

  • Premium pricing well above the NVIDIA Founders Edition MSRP, often making it hard to justify for performance alone.
  • Limited VRAM (16GB) compared to the RTX 5090 or high-end competitor cards, which some users feel is a bottleneck for future-proofing.
  • Minimalist RGB might disappoint users looking for flashy lighting effects common in high-end partner cards.
  • Included GPU support bracket is sometimes described as flimsy or unnecessary for this specific model.
  • Reports of a slight mechanical 'clicking' or motor noise when the fans first start spinning from a stopped state.

Verdict

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5080 Aero OC SFF is an enthusiast-grade graphics card built on NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture, featuring 10,752 CUDA cores and 16GB of high-speed GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with a 960 GB/s bandwidth. This factory-overclocked model reaches a boost clock of 2730 MHz and utilizes a triple-fan Windforce cooling system with a large vapor chamber and 'Hawk' fan blades to maintain efficiency in its compact 304mm, 2.5-slot 'SFF-ready' design. Main pros include its sleek white aesthetic, a dual BIOS for silent or performance modes, and advanced support for DLSS 4 and DisplayPort 2.1b; however, some users have noted potential for audible coil whine under heavy loads and a high MSRP compared to previous generations.

Compare GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 AERO OC SFF and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found