Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,110VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):360 W

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF
9.4/10

Overall score

Score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

9.5

Technical score

10%

8.7

User score

★Better than 98% of graphics cards
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

Overall score

30%

4.7

Price

â–²Better than 88%
9.5

Technical score

Technical score
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

10

Performance

24%

9.8

Memory

12%

7.7

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

7.0

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

★Better than 99%
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.5

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 77%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF

Technical score
Technical score
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

10

Performance

24%

9.8

Memory

12%

7.7

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

7.0

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.5
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.5

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF has a popularity score of 6.9 points, which is higher than that of 65% of products in this category.
6.9
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

9.4

Overall score

30%

4.7

Price

8.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
33,004 points
This graphics card scores 33,004 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 93% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
26,035 points
This graphics card scores 26,035 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 93.8% of graphics cards and equal to 1.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
35,843 points
This graphics card scores 35,843 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 89% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
19,391 points
This graphics card scores 19,391 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 78% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 57.42 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 90% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 960 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 88% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 360 W, which is higher than that of 88.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
360 W
This graphics card draws 360 W under peak load, which is higher than 85.7% of graphics cards and equal to 4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
850 W
This graphics card recommends a 850 W PSU, which is higher than that of 83.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.2% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
360 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 360 W, which is higher than that of 83.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
360 W
Show more
Size
304x 126x 50 mm
This graphics card measures 304x126x 50 mm, which is more compact than 48.2% of graphics cards and equal in size to 2% of graphics cards.
Length
304 mm
This graphics card is 304 mm long, which is longer than 62.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.8% of graphics cards.
Height
126 mm
This graphics card is 126 mm tall, which is taller than 50.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,240 g
This graphics card weighs 1,240 g, which is heavier than 62.4% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2.31x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (879.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    879.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 36.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2617 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,617 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 4.5% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2617 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,617 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 9% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.72 vs 8.000).
    8.72 vs 8
  • 11% better value for money
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.99 vs 7.2).
    7.99 vs 7.2
  • 44 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    84 vs 40
  • 44 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (84 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    84 vs 40
  • 2.31x higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (879.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    879.3 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 36.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2617 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,617 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 152 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (336 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    336 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 4.5% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2617 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,617 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 192 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (336 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    336 vs 144
  • 79.6% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (293.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    293.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 2.49x higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (56.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    56.28 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 2.25x higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (33004 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    33,004 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 2.84x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (26035 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    26,035 points vs 9,166 points
  • 58.2% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (35843 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    35,843 points vs 22,653 points
  • 7.44x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (1801 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    1,801 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 6,400 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,752 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,752 vs 4,352
  • 2.5x higher compute throughput
    This graphics card has a higher compute throughput than the average graphics card (57.4 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    57.42 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 2.14x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    960 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 57.9% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (30000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    30,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.67x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    64 MB vs 24 MB
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 7.1% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1875 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,875 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    January 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • 1 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    1 vs 0
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 67.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (360 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    360 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 60% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (360 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    360 W vs 225 W
  • 2.09x more expensive
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,110 vs £530).
    £1,110 vs £530
  • 19 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    304 mm vs 285 mm
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 63.6% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (360 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    360 W vs 220 W
  • 2.09x more expensive
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,110 vs £530).
    £1,110 vs £530
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 67.4% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (360 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    360 W vs 215 W
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 60% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (360 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    360 W vs 225 W
  • 63.6% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (360 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    360 W vs 220 W
  • 50% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (18 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    18 W vs 12 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 19 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    304 mm vs 285 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
thefpsreview.com
27/04/2026
Summary of the review
M
me.pcmag.com
28/04/2026
Summary of the review
T
thefpsreview.com
27/04/2026
Summary of the review
T
thefpsreview.com
27/04/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF

  • SFF-ready dimensions (304x126x50mm) ideal for compact PC builds.
  • Efficient Windforce cooling system keeps temperatures in the mid-60s to low-70s range even under load.
  • Operates quietly with high-quality Hawk fans and a semi-passive silent mode.
  • Strong 1440p and 4K performance consistent with other RTX 5080 models.
  • Solid build quality featuring a reinforced metal backplate and a large vapor chamber.
  • Includes a Dual BIOS switch for toggling between Performance and Silent modes.
  • Good overclocking headroom, with some users reaching significant clock and memory boosts.

What we don't like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF

  • High price point, often exceeding the MSRP significantly at retail.
  • 16GB VRAM capacity is viewed by some as not future-proof for high-end 4K gaming or LLM workloads.
  • Lackluster generational performance gains compared to the flagship RTX 5090.
  • No RGB lighting, which may not appeal to users looking for a flashy aesthetic.
  • Poor value proposition for content creators compared to more cost-effective alternatives like the RTX 5070 Ti.

Verdict

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5080 Windforce SFF is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture, featuring 10,752 CUDA cores and 16GB of 256-bit GDDR7 memory. Specifically designed for small form factor (SFF) builds, this card maintains a compact profile with a 304mm length and a dual-slot width while utilizing a triple-fan Windforce cooling system with a large vapor chamber and 3D Active fans for efficient heat dissipation. Its main advantages include SFF-ready dimensions, strong 4K performance supported by DLSS 4, and stable thermals in tight enclosures; however, it lacks RGB lighting and carries a high price tag typical of the RTX 50-series.

Compare GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5080 WINDFORCE SFF and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found