OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£590VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):250 W

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 66% of models
Score components

90%

7.8

Technical score

10%

9.2

User score

▲Better than 66% of graphics cards
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

7.4

Price

▲Better than 80%
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 63% of models
Score components

44%

7.4

Performance

24%

7.2

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

5.5

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 63%
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 88%
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-aero-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 63% of models
Score components:

44%

7.4

Performance

24%

7.2

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

5.5

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

7.8
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.2
Popularity
Popularity
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC has a popularity score of 8.6 points, which is higher than that of 79.9% of products in this category.
8.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

7.4

Price

7.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
?
3DMark Port Royal score
19,236 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 19,236 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 85.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
28,926 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 28,926 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 68.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
14,948 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 14,948 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 60.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
32.26 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 32.26 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 63.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
672 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 672 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 67.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
20 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 20 Gbps, which is faster than on 42.9% of graphics cards and equal to 7.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
250 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 250 W, which is higher than that of 58.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
250 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 250 W under peak load, which is higher than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
250 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 250 W, which is higher than that of 55.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
250 W
Show more
Size
324x 130x 56 mm
This graphics card measures 324x130x 56 mm, which is larger than 62.2% of graphics cards.
Length
324 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 324 mm long, which is longer than 76.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Height
130 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 130 mm tall, which is taller than 58.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3.5 slot/s, which is wider than 90.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 5.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
2000 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 2000 g, which is heavier than 88.8% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 2.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 4.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2625 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,625 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.1% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2325 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,325 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 50% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • 2.1x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (19236 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    19,236 points vs 9,166 points
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 14.6% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.17 vs 8.000).
    9.17 vs 8
  • 8% better value for money
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.78 vs 7.2).
    7.78 vs 7.2
  • 4.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2625 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,625 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.1% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2325 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,325 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 2.1x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (19236 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    19,236 points vs 9,166 points
  • 28.7% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (210 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    210 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 8 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    48 vs 40
  • 8 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    48 vs 40
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • 36.9% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (30.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    30.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 27.7% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (28926 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    28,926 points vs 22,653 points
  • 4.08x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (988 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    988 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 50% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    March 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 10 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (85 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    85 °C vs 95 °C
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 39 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (324 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    324 mm vs 285 mm
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 95.9% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2000 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,000 g vs 1,021 g
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 5.9 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41.3 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    41.3 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 1 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3.5 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 39 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (324 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    324 mm vs 285 mm
  • 95.9% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2000 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,000 g vs 1,021 g
  • 5 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (130 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    130 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cowcotland.com
05/03/2025
Summary of the review
Test GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC 12G : page 6
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC

  • Aesthetic appeal: Highly praised for its clean, all-white design with silver accents, making it a top choice for themed PC builds.
  • Excellent cooling: The Windforce triple-fan system keeps the card notably cool, often staying below 60°C during intensive gaming.
  • Quiet operation: Users frequently mention that the fans are nearly inaudible, even when running at higher speeds.
  • Software features: Support for DLSS 4 provides a significant performance boost in supported titles, often viewed as 'black magic' for frame rate improvement.
  • Build quality: Features a robust metal backplate and includes an anti-sag bracket to support its weight.

What we don't like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC

  • Physical size: The card is exceptionally large (approx. 324mm–340mm), requiring careful case measurements and potentially obstructing other components.
  • VRAM limitations: Many users find the 12GB of VRAM to be stagnant for its price point, which may limit longevity in future 4K or high-texture gaming.
  • Marginal raw performance gains: Without DLSS 4, the native rasterisation performance increase over the RTX 4070 Super is seen as underwhelming by some.
  • Minimal RGB: Lighting is limited primarily to the side 'AERO' logo, which may disappoint users looking for more vibrant illumination.
  • Price premium: As an 'OC' and 'AERO' model, it often sells at a markup compared to the base MSRP of the RTX 5070.

Verdict

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5070 Aero OC is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture, featuring 6,144 CUDA cores and a factory-overclocked boost clock of 2,625 MHz. It is equipped with 12GB of cutting-edge GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit interface, delivering a massive 672 GB/s bandwidth for smooth 1440p and 4K gaming. Main characteristics include the Windforce cooling system with three 'Hawk' fans, a reinforced metal backplate, and a clean all-white aesthetic with subtle RGB lighting. Key pros include exceptional thermal management using server-grade conductive gel, DLSS 4 support for AI-enhanced frame rates, and a dual BIOS switch for performance or silent operation. However, potential cons include its large physical footprint (324mm length) which may not fit in smaller cases, and a price premium over standard MSRP models.

Compare GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 AERO OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found