OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,030VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):201 W

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP
8.4/10

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Score components

90%

8.7

Technical score

10%

5.7

User score

â–²Better than 73% of graphics cards
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

5.1

Price

â–²Better than 57%
8.7

Technical score

Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Score components

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

6.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

9.0

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 76%
5.7

User score

User score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

User ratings

30%

2.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 99%
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super-ai-top
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP

Technical score
Technical score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Score components:

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

8.5

Memory

12%

6.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

9.0

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

8.7
User score
User score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

User ratings

30%

2.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
5.7
Popularity
Popularity
2.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP has a popularity score of 2.8 points, which is lower than that of 53.8% of products in this category.
2.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components:

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

5.1

Price

7.4
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
21,900 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 21,900 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 70.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
15,691 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 15,691 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 74.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,818 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 31,818 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 76.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
18,314 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 18,314 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 71.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
44.1 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 44.1 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 73.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
672.3 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 672.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 72.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
201 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 201 W, which is lower than that of 51.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
285 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 285 W under peak load, which is higher than 64.9% of graphics cards and equal to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
320 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 320 W, which is higher than that of 74.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
285 W
Show more
Size
260x 111x 37 mm
Length
260 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 260 mm long, which is shorter than 65.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
109 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 109 mm tall, which is shorter than 89.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,220 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,220 g, which is heavier than 61.6% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 21.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 4.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2610 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,610 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 26 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    66 vs 40
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    66 vs 40
  • 80.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 50.1% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 21.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2340 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,340 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 4.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2610 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,610 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 26 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    66 vs 40
  • 26 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (66 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    66 vs 40
  • 80.7% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    689 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 53.6% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (250.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    250.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 97.7% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (44.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    44.61 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 80 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (264 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    264 vs 184
  • 120 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (264 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    264 vs 144
  • 40.5% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31818 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    31,818 points vs 22,653 points
  • 71.2% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (15691 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    15,691 points vs 9,166 points
  • 49.2% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (21900 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    21,900 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 9.94x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (353 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    353 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 2.92x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (706 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    706 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 50.1% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    672.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 2x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (45900 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    45,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 16 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (109 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    109 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 25 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (260 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    260 mm vs 285 mm
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • 94.3% more expensive
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,030 vs £530).
    £1,030 vs £530
  • 39.4% lower user score
    User score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP has a lower user score than the average graphics card (5.74 vs 8.000).
    5.74 vs 8
  • 94.3% more expensive
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,030 vs £530).
    £1,030 vs £530
  • 39.4% lower user score
    User score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP has a lower user score than the average graphics card (5.74 vs 8.000).
    5.74 vs 8
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 42.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (320 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    320 W vs 225 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP

  • Specifically designed for AI computing with optimized simulation tests
  • Features a 16GB GDDR6X VRAM with a 256-bit memory interface for enhanced bandwidth
  • Turbo fan cooling system is ideal for dense multi-card setups where airflow is restricted
  • Excellent raw performance in rendering and AI applications compared to non-Super models
  • Premium PCB build quality and ultra-durable materials

What we don't like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP

  • Blower-style cooling fan can be loud under heavy load compared to multi-fan designs
  • High market price compared to standard gaming iterations and AMD competitors
  • Lack of a physical BIOS profile switch despite some marketing materials
  • Minimalist packaging and lack of standard 'gaming' features like RGB lighting

Verdict

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AI TOP is a specialized graphics card tailored for AI computing and professional workflows, featuring 8,448 CUDA cores, 264 fourth-gen Tensor cores, and 16GB of high-speed GDDR6X VRAM on a 256-bit memory bus. Built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, it delivers a base clock of 2.34 GHz and a boost clock of 2.61 GHz, offering a significant bandwidth increase to 672 GB/s compared to non-Super models. Its primary characteristics include a blower-style Turbo Fan cooling system with double ball bearings and a vapor chamber, specifically designed to optimize airflow in multi-GPU configurations and space-restricted chassis. Main pros include its suitability for large-scale AI model fine-tuning via the AI TOP utility, exceptional 4K gaming performance with DLSS 3.5, and a durable metal frame that exhausts heat directly out of the case. However, its main cons are the significantly higher noise levels typical of blower-style fans compared to triple-fan axial designs and the lack of a zero-RPM fan mode, making it less ideal for users prioritizing a silent build.

Compare GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super AI TOP and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found