OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£820VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:384 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):350 W

GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB Review: Compare 117 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB
7.6/10

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 58% of models
Score components

40%

7.7

Technical score

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.6, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

7.7

Sentiment score

▲Better than 58% of graphics cards
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

6.2

Price

▼Worse than 68%
7.7

Technical score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components

44%

7.3

Performance

24%

7.8

Memory

12%

7.6

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

6.5

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity

▲Better than 62%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.6.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • galax-geforce-rtx-3080-ex-gamer-1-click-oc-lhr-12gb
galax-geforce-rtx-3080-ex-gamer-1-click-oc-lhr-12gb
Where to buy
    N/A~ £820
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What owners say about the GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB

Based on 238 owners sharing their experience in online comments

68%positive13%mixed19%negative

Owners praise strong, lasting gaming performance, while limited VRAM, high power use, and heat cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Several owners say the card runs very hot and heats up small rooms, with some models hitting over 100 C in the VRM or hotspot without new pads or paste.7
  • Owners say 10GB of VRAM runs out in newer games at 1440p and 4K, causing stutters or forcing lower texture settings.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB

Technical score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components:

44%

7.3

Performance

24%

7.8

Memory

12%

7.6

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

6.5

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity

7.7
Reviews score
7.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components:

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

6.2

Price

7.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
17,956 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 17,956 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 60.4% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
13,044 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 13,044 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 64.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
28,000 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 28,000 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
15,070 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 15,070 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 61.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
31.45 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 31.45 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 64.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 46% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 57.1% of graphics cards and equal to 22.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
384 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 384 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 89.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
912 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 912 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 86.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.6% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
19,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 48.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 56.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
350 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 350 W, which is higher than that of 86.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
350 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 350 W under peak load, which is higher than 84.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 16.8% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
350 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 350 W, which is higher than that of 82.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
350 W
Show more
Size
330x 142x 58 mm
Length
316 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 316 mm long, which is longer than 70.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Height
124 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 124 mm tall, which is shorter than 51.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.8% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 70.7% of graphics cards and equal in width to 16.8% of graphics cards.
Weight
?
Show more

GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 192 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    384 bit vs 192 bit
  • 2.04x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (912 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    912 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 30% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (491.4 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    491.4 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 39.2% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (31.5 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    31.45 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 21.9% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (196.6 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    196.6 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 23.7% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (28,000 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    28,000 points vs 22,638 points
  • 42.6% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (13,044 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    13,044 points vs 9,148 points
  • 192 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    384 bit vs 192 bit
  • 2.04x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (912 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    912 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports LHR limiting
    This graphics card supports an LHR limiter, while the average graphics card does not. 7.5% of Graphics cards support one.
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (12 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    12 vs 8
  • 29.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,755 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,755 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 34.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,260 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,260 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 62.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (350 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    350 W vs 215 W
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 57.7% more expensive
    GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB is more expensive than the average graphics card (£820 vs £520).
    £820 vs £520
  • 3.1% worse value for money
    GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB has worse value for money than the average graphics card (7.19 vs 7.4).
    7.19 vs 7.41
  • 29.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,755 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,755 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 34.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,260 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,260 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 1 years older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    January 2022
    2022 vs 2023
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 75% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (6 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    6 MB vs 24 MB
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2.14x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (628 mm² vs 294 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 294 mm².
    628 mm² vs 294 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 2.1a).
    2.1 vs 2.1a
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 62.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (350 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    350 W vs 215 W
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 59.1% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 59.1% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 33.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (316 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    316 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Third-party reviews

What customers like about GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB

  • High VRAM capacity: The 12GB of GDDR6X memory provides better future-proofing and performance for texture-heavy games compared to the original 10GB model.
  • Superior 4K performance: Capable of maintaining over 60 FPS in most modern titles at 4K resolution with high settings.
  • Efficient cooling: The triple-fan design (two 92mm and one 102mm) generally keeps load temperatures stable, often around 65-70°C.
  • 1-Click OC utility: Users appreciate the ease of the Xtreme Tuner software for a simple performance boost without manual tuning.
  • Enhanced memory bandwidth: Features a wider 384-bit memory bus compared to the 320-bit bus on the 10GB version, significantly increasing data transfer rates.
  • RGB Aesthetics: Includes customizable ARGB lighting and a distinctive 'What's Your Game?' illuminated logo on the side.

What customers don't like about GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB

  • Large physical footprint: The card is over 31cm long and occupies three slots, which may not fit in smaller or even some mid-sized cases.
  • High power requirements: With a 350W TDP, it often necessitates a high-quality 750W+ power supply and can generate significant heat within the chassis.
  • Audible fan noise: Under heavy load or manual overclocking, the fans can become quite audible to maintain thermal targets.
  • Limited overclocking headroom: Like many factory-overclocked Ampere cards, there is very little additional performance to be gained beyond the '1-Click OC' settings.
  • Annoying fan profiles: Some users report that the 0dB technology cycles fans on and off frequently during desktop use, which can be distracting.

Verdict

The Galax GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB is a high-performance graphics card built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture, featuring 8,960 CUDA cores and a significant upgrade to 12GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus with 912 GB/s bandwidth. It operates with a boost clock of 1,755 MHz and supports a '1-Click OC' feature via specialized software to maximize its 350W TDP potential. Key pros include its superior 4K gaming performance—landing between the standard 3080 and the 3080 Ti—and an effective triple-fan cooling system that supports HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a. However, the card is physically massive at 330mm in length, which can lead to case compatibility issues, and it is an LHR (Lite Hash Rate) model, making it less desirable for cryptocurrency mining.

Compare GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 EX Gamer 1-Click OC LHR 12GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found