OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£820VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):300 W

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF
9.0/10

Overall score

Score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Score components

90%

9.1

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

▲Better than 86% of graphics cards
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

6.2

Price

★Better than 96%
9.1

Technical score

Technical score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 87% of models
Score components

44%

9.0

Performance

24%

9.4

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

7.3

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 87%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 72%
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
  • gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
gigabyte-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-eagle-oc-ice-sff
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF

Technical score
Technical score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 87% of models
Score components:

44%

9.0

Performance

24%

9.4

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

7.3

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.1
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 66% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF has a popularity score of 7 points, which is higher than that of 65.6% of products in this category.
7.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components:

70%

9.0

Overall score

30%

6.2

Price

8.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
27,384 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 27,384 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 81.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
19,443 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 19,443 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 86.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,326 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 31,326 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 73.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
18,058 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 18,058 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 69.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
45.56 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 45.56 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 78.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
896 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 896 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 82.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
?
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 300 W, which is higher than that of 71.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
300 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 300 W under peak load, which is higher than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
300 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 300 W, which is higher than that of 67.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
300 W
Show more
Size
304x 126x 50 mm
This graphics card measures 304x126x 50 mm, which is more compact than 48.2% of graphics cards and equal in size to 2% of graphics cards.
Length
304 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 304 mm long, which is longer than 62.3% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.8% of graphics cards.
Height
126 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 126 mm tall, which is taller than 50.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
670 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 670 g, which is lighter than 82% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 27.7% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2452 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,452 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 80.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 13.6% better value for money
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.18 vs 7.2).
    8.18 vs 7.2
  • 6.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.55 vs 8.000).
    8.55 vs 8
  • 27.7% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2452 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,452 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 80.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 136 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (280 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    280 vs 144
  • 49.5% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (244 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    244 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 94.5% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (43.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    43.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 2.12x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (19443 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    19,443 points vs 9,166 points
  • 86.6% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (27384 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    27,384 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 1.5% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2542 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,542 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 38.3% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31326 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    31,326 points vs 22,653 points
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 2.04x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (49 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    49 MB vs 24 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    February 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 33.3% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    300 W vs 225 W
  • 19 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    304 mm vs 285 mm
  • 13 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (50 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    50 °C vs 37 °C
  • 3.17x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (38 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    38 W vs 12 W
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 54.7% more expensive
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF is more expensive than the average graphics card (£820 vs £530).
    £820 vs £530
  • 54.7% more expensive
    GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF is more expensive than the average graphics card (£820 vs £530).
    £820 vs £530
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 33.3% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    300 W vs 225 W
  • 3.17x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (38 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    38 W vs 12 W
  • 13 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (50 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    50 °C vs 37 °C
  • 5.5 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (40.9 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    40.9 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 36.4% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (300 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    300 W vs 220 W
  • 19 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    304 mm vs 285 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techspot.com
03/04/2026
Summary of the review
Nvidia RTX 5070 TiGo to product viewer dialog for this item. Roundup: 9 Graphics Cards Tested
H
hardwareluxx.de
20/02/2025
Summary of the review
[Hardwareluxx] Drei (zu teure) Modelle der GeForce RTX 5070 Ti im Test
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF

  • Compact small form factor (SFF) design that fits in smaller ITX cases easily
  • Excellent gaming performance, particularly at 1440p and capable for 4K with DLSS 4 enabled
  • High VRAM capacity of 16GB GDDR7 provides significant future-proofing for demanding titles
  • Effective triple-fan WINDFORCE cooling system maintains temperatures comfortably below 70°C under load
  • Silent operation with fans that are barely noticeable during typical gaming sessions
  • Dual BIOS feature allows for easy switching between Performance and Silent modes
  • Aesthetically pleasing all-white design (ICE series) that complements white-themed builds

What we don't like about GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF

  • High price point, often exceeding the $750 MSRP and reaching up to $900 in retail markets
  • Slightly louder and warmer than full-length graphics card alternatives due to its compact heatsink
  • Occasional reports of coil whine or audible buzzing noise from the fans
  • Requires a high-quality 750W power supply and the new 16-pin power connector
  • Control of RGB lighting requires Gigabyte's Gaming Control Center software, which some users find difficult to use
  • Some users report a specific mechanical sound when the fans stop spinning

Verdict

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF is a high-performance, white-themed graphics card built on NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture, featuring 8,960 CUDA cores and 16GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. Designed to meet NVIDIA's 'SFF-Ready' specifications, it utilizes a compact triple-fan WINDFORCE cooling system with 'Hawk' fans and a 2.5-slot profile (304mm length) to fit smaller enclosures while maintaining a factory-overclocked boost clock of 2542 MHz. Main pros include its clean aesthetic for white builds, support for DLSS 4 with multi-frame generation, and impressive thermal efficiency that often keeps temperatures below 60°C under load. However, notable cons include its relatively high price point compared to previous-generation tiers, minimal RGB lighting that may not satisfy all enthusiasts, and a size that—while labeled SFF-ready—still requires careful case clearance verification due to its 126mm height and 50mm width.

Compare GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Eagle OC Ice SFF and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found