OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£810VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):300 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Review: Compare 117 technical specifications, 27 expert and video reviews and 15 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
8.6/10

Overall score

Score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

40%

9.0

Technical score

25%

7.8

Reviews score

25%

8.7

List score

10%

8.7

Sentiment score

★Better than 99% of graphics cards
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

6.2

Price

★Better than 94%
9.0

Technical score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Score components

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

9.6

Memory

12%

7.5

Power

11%

10

Features

5%

7.5

Design

4%

10

Connectivity

▲Better than 83%
7.8

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models

80%

7.5

Average grade

20%

9.2

Popularity

Grades by review (27)
11 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 16 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 55%
8.7

List score

List score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (15)
List score: in 15 of 85 lists (18%)
★Better than 99%
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
nvidia-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Based on 11 · 17

Reviewers like its strong gaming performance and cool, quiet running, but find the generational upgrade small and availability poor.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Based on 175 owners sharing their experience in online comments

78%positive11%mixed11%negative

Owners praise its speed and rendering features, while clock glitches, frame drops, and VRAM limits draw the clearest complaints.

What owners dislike

  • Unlocking voltage control in MSI Afterburner can cap boost clocks near 2500 MHz; owners fix it by turning that option off and rebooting.7
  • At native resolution or maxed settings, frame rates drop sharply, with Assassin's Creed Origins at 4K reported at only about 25 fps.5
  • Owners upgrading from a 4070 Ti say the gain is only about 10 percent, and the 9070 XT is sometimes faster in some titles.5
  • Some owners report a game showing 12 GB instead of the card's 16 GB, and heavy VRAM use in Indiana Jones until the texture pool is lowered.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Technical score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Score components:

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

9.6

Memory

12%

7.5

Power

11%

10

Features

5%

7.5

Design

4%

10

Connectivity

9.0
Reviews score
7.8
List score
8.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components:

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

6.2

Price

7.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
26,000 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 26,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 79.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
19,000 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 19,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
32,485 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 32,485 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 81.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
32,659 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 32,659 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
43.9 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 43.9 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 73.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 62% of graphics cards and equal to 28.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 50.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.5% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
896 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 896 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 82.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
28,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 28,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 78.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 16.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 73% of graphics cards and equal to 27% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 77.8% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
80 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 80 Gbps, which is faster than on 84.9% of graphics cards and equal to 14.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 300 W, which is higher than that of 72.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
300 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 300 W under peak load, which is higher than 70.3% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 16.8% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
300 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 300 W, which is higher than that of 68.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
300 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
304x 137x 48 mm
Length
304 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 304 mm long, which is longer than 63% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.8% of graphics cards.
Height
137 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 137 mm tall, which is taller than 74.1% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.8% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 52.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 43.4% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,175 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,175 g, which is heavier than 58.9% of Graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 81.6% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (686.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    686.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 14.5% higher list score
    List score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (15)
    List score: in 15 of 85 lists (18%)
    8.7 vs 7.6
  • 8.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models

    80%

    7.5

    Average grade

    20%

    9.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (27)
    11 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 5 estimated from the review. 16 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    7.8 vs 7.2
  • 6.5% better value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.9 vs 7.4).
    7.9 vs 7.41
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 81.6% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (686.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    686.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 136 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (280 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    280 vs 144
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 19.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,295 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,295 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 94.2% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (43.9 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    43.9 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 45.8% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (235.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    235.2 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 2.08x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (19,000 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    19,000 points vs 9,148 points
  • 43.5% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (32,485 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    32,485 points vs 22,638 points
  • 75.9% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (26,000 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    26,000 points vs 14,779 points
  • 2 years newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    February 2025
    2025 vs 2023
  • 2.71x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (32,659 points vs 12,70.5 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,070.5 points.
    32,659 points vs 12,070.5 points
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5 vs 4
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1a).
    2.1b vs 2.1a
  • 3.7x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (80 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 21.6 Gbps.
    80 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 2.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,452 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,452 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 12 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (137 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    137 mm vs 125 mm
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 36.4% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    300 W vs 220 W
  • 21.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    304 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 55.8% more expensive
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is more expensive than the average graphics card (£810 vs £520).
    £810 vs £520
  • 55.8% more expensive
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is more expensive than the average graphics card (£810 vs £520).
    £810 vs £520
  • 2.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,452 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    2,452 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 36.4% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    300 W vs 220 W
  • 45.8% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (17.5 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    17.5 W vs 12 W
  • 36.4% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (300 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    300 W vs 220 W
  • 12 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (137 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    137 mm vs 125 mm
  • 21.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    304 mm vs 282.2 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
PC Crazy
≈ estimated
14/01/2026
Hands-on review · gaming and rendering in a daily-use PC
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti brings large gains in games and rendering, enough to make an upgrade worthwhile.
9.0
iVadim
≈ estimated
21/11/2025
Hands-on review · 1440p gaming tests with native and DLSS
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is an easy recommendation for 1440p, running modern games at high frame rates.
7.0
DannyzReviews
≈ estimated
28/02/2025
Hands-on review · testing, troubleshooting, overclocking
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti itself is not defective; the main problems came from a motherboard pairing, though Afterburner conflicts persisted.
9.0
Techtesters
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Hands-on review · 45 games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti offers RTX 4080-level performance for less, but avoid overpaying and set realistic expectations.
7.0
Linus Tech Tips
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Full review · thermals, power draw, productivity and pricing
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a good buy against the RTX 5080 at MSRP, but scarce stock and poor generational value complicate the buying decision.
8.0
CrazyTechLab
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Review · benchmarks with and without DLSS and frame generation
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is recommended if the price stays close to launch, with DLSS 4 features as the main draw.
5.0
Hardware Unboxed
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Full review · benchmarks, cost per frame and pricing
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is decent at its launch list price, but at real street prices it's a buy you'll regret.
4.0
Gamers Nexus
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Benchmark review · price and market analysis
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is not worth buying at current prices; wait for the market to calm down first.
9.0
Dan Does PC
≈ estimated
31/12/2025
First look · setup and lighting
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti gets a recommendation mainly for its lighting, though this short video shows no test results.
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
digitalfoundry.net
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Benchmark review · Overclocking test
Verdict
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti sits just ahead of the RTX 4080 Super and overclocks well, but its power limit is locked at 100 percent for now.
8.0
tomshardware.com
✓ explicit
19/02/2025
Lab test · Blackwell, upper mid-range
Verdict
The Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti is a good 1440p card that handles 4K with upscaling, but it is only a small step up from the RTX 4070 Ti Super.
4.0
gamersnexus.net
≈ estimated
21/02/2025
Lab test · Gaming benchmarks
Verdict
The Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti performs like an RTX 4080 at 4K, but it is only about 13 percent faster than the RTX 4070 Ti Super.
9.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
20/02/2025
Hands-on review · Performance and design
Verdict
The Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti matches the RTX 4080 Super across the board and pulls about 30 percent ahead at high resolutions, but it is too big for small cases.
8.0
pcgamesn.com
✓ explicit
23/08/2025
Benchmark review · 1440p gaming
Verdict
The RTX 5070 Ti is a good 1440p card with better path tracing than the Radeon RX 9070 XT, which is faster in some standard games.
7.0
computerbase.de
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Lab test · Compact MSRP model
Verdict
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has 16GB of memory and runs 1440p games well, but it is only a small upgrade over the last generation.
8.0
hardwareluxx.de
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Lab test · Gaming performance
Verdict
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti reaches RTX 4080 level with 16GB of fast memory, but it has only 6 percent more shader units than its predecessor.
10
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
25/02/2019
Lab test · 1440p and 4K gaming
Verdict
The Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti is a good 1440p card that reaches 4K with DLSS, but it mostly matches the RTX 4080 rather than beating it.
8.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
20/02/2025
Lab test · Gaming and creative
Verdict
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti nearly matches the RTX 4080 and handles 4K gaming with DLSS, but its gains over the previous generation are modest.
8.8
profesionalreview.com
✓ explicit
19/02/2025
Lab test · Overclocking and power
Verdict
The Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti is a good all-round card, close to the RTX 4080 Super at 1440p and 4K, but it draws more power than its predecessor.
9.0
smartworld.it
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Lab test · Multi frame generation
Verdict
The Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti matches an RTX 4080 in traditional rendering, but its Multi Frame Generation gives large frame gains in supported games.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

  • Excellent 1440p and competitive 4K gaming performance
  • Features 16GB of high-speed GDDR7 VRAM, a significant upgrade for high-resolution textures
  • Improved power efficiency and generally runs cool and quiet under load
  • Support for DLSS 4 and advanced Ray Tracing features like Multi Frame Generation
  • MSRP of $749 is technically lower than the launch price of its predecessor, the 4070 Ti

What customers don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

  • Modest generational performance uplift (roughly 10-15%) over the RTX 4070 Ti Super
  • Actual retail prices often exceed the $749 MSRP, reaching $900 or more in some markets
  • Performance in pure rasterization is sometimes matched or beaten by older, high-end 40-series or AMD cards
  • Limited performance gains in certain titles like Cyberpunk 2077 at lower resolutions
  • No Founders Edition model available, leaving users dependent on partner designs

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a high-end graphics card built on the Blackwell architecture and the 4N (5nm) process, officially launching in February 2025. It features 8,960 CUDA cores, a base clock of 2.3 GHz, and a boost clock of 2.45 GHz, paired with 16GB of advanced GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus for a significant bandwidth of 896 GB/s. Main characteristics include support for PCIe 5.0, fifth-generation Tensor cores enabling DLSS 4.5, and dual ninth-generation NVENC encoders for 8K video work. Pros include exceptional 1440p gaming performance that can reach up to 4K with AI upscaling, a 78% bandwidth increase over the previous generation, and a relatively manageable 300W TGP. Notable cons include its high $749 MSRP—which often exceeds $900 at retail—the lack of a Founders Edition model, and a modest performance uplift of roughly 16% over the 4070 Ti Super despite the new architecture.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found