OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£860VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):300 W

ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Review: Compare 117 technical specifications, 17 expert and video reviews and 2 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
8.6/10

Overall score

Score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

40%

9.0

Technical score

25%

8.4

Reviews score

25%

8.1

List score

10%

8.7

Sentiment score

★Better than 99% of graphics cards
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

6.0

Price

▲Better than 86%
9.0

Technical score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Score components

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

9.4

Memory

12%

8.2

Power

11%

10

Features

5%

7.0

Design

4%

10

Connectivity

▲Better than 85%
8.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models

80%

8.3

Average grade

20%

8.9

Popularity

Grades by review (17)
13 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 85%
8.1

List score

List score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 83 lists (2%)
★Better than 97%
  • asus-prime-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
asus-prime-geforce-rtx-5070-ti
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Based on 13 · 4

Reviewers praise its cool, quiet running and AI upscaling, but many find gaming performance underwhelming and price and availability frustrating.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Based on 175 owners sharing their experience in online comments

78%positive11%mixed11%negative

Owners praise its speed and rendering features, while clock glitches, frame drops, and VRAM limits draw the clearest complaints.

What owners dislike

  • Unlocking voltage control in MSI Afterburner can cap boost clocks near 2500 MHz; owners fix it by turning that option off and rebooting.7
  • At native resolution or maxed settings, frame rates drop sharply, with Assassin's Creed Origins at 4K reported at only about 25 fps.5
  • Owners upgrading from a 4070 Ti say the gain is only about 10 percent, and the 9070 XT is sometimes faster in some titles.5
  • Some owners report a game showing 12 GB instead of the card's 16 GB, and heavy VRAM use in Indiana Jones until the texture pool is lowered.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Technical score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Score components:

44%

8.9

Performance

24%

9.4

Memory

12%

8.2

Power

11%

10

Features

5%

7.0

Design

4%

10

Connectivity

9.0
Reviews score
8.4
List score
8.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Score components:

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

6.0

Price

7.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
27,500 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 27,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 82.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
19,000 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 19,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
31,326 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 31,326 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 74.3% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
18,056 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 18,056 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 68.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
43.94 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 74.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 62% of graphics cards and equal to 28.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 50.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.5% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
896 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 896 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 82.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
28,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 28,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 78.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 16.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 73% of graphics cards and equal to 27% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 77.8% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
80 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 80 Gbps, which is faster than on 84.9% of graphics cards and equal to 14.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 300 W, which is higher than that of 72.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
350 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 350 W under peak load, which is higher than 84.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 16.8% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
350 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 350 W, which is higher than that of 82.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
300 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
304x 126x 50 mm
Length
304 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 304 mm long, which is longer than 63% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.8% of graphics cards.
Height
126 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 126 mm tall, which is taller than 51.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 35.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,179.3 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,179.3 g, which is heavier than 59.1% of Graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 19.8% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,300 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,300 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 81.6% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (686.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    686.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 16.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 85% of models

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (17)
    13 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.4 vs 7.2
  • 6.6% higher list score
    List score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (2)
    List score: in 2 of 83 lists (2%)
    8.1 vs 7.6
  • 5.4% better value for money
    ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has better value for money than the average graphics card (7.82 vs 7.4).
    7.82 vs 7.41
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 19.8% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,300 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,300 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 81.6% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (686.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    686.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 136 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (280 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    280 vs 144
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 94.4% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (43.9 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    43.94 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 48.6% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (239.7 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    239.7 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 2.08x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (19,000 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    19,000 points vs 9,148 points
  • 86.1% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (27,500 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    27,500 points vs 14,779 points
  • 2 years newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    February 2025
    2025 vs 2023
  • 38.4% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (31,326 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    31,326 points vs 22,638 points
  • 3.17x higher INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a higher INT8 performance than the average graphics card (766 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    766 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5 vs 4
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1a).
    2.1b vs 2.1a
  • 3.7x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (80 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 21.6 Gbps.
    80 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps
  • 3.5x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (42 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    42 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 59.1% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 21.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    304 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 65.4% more expensive
    ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is more expensive than the average graphics card (£860 vs £520).
    £860 vs £520
  • 11 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (48 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    48 °C vs 37 °C
  • 59.1% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 65.4% more expensive
    ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is more expensive than the average graphics card (£860 vs £520).
    £860 vs £520
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 59.1% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 11 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (48 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    48 °C vs 37 °C
  • 59.1% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 4.1 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (39.5 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    39.5 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 41.7% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (17 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    17 W vs 12 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 21.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (304 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    304 mm vs 282.2 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
DaPoets
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Hands-on review · benchmarks, thermals and noise tests
Verdict
ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a worthy upgrade from 3060 or 3070 Ti cards, if you can find it at MSRP.
Overview video
Overview video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
storagereview.com
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Benchmark review · AI workloads
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti suits gamers and entry-level AI users, with 16GB GDDR7 and DLSS 4 Multi-Frame Generation, but trails the RTX 5080 in AI tests.
6.0
pcper.com
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Review · Performance testing
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti is a decent card that trades blows with the RTX 4080 Super at 1440p, but falls behind it in 4K 3DMark tests.
8.0
babeltechreviews.com
≈ estimated
19/02/2025
Review · 1440p and 1080p tests
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti is a strong 1440p card, 42-60% faster than the RTX 4070, but limited stock makes it hard to recommend.
9.3
thefpsreview.com
✓ explicit
19/02/2025
Review · Overclocking and gaming
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti is a well-built card with strong overclocking potential, though its gaming lead over the RTX 4070 Ti Super is modest.
8.0
gamingnexus.com
✓ explicit
19/02/2025
Review · Build and 4K tests
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti performs close to the RTX 4080 Super in 4K games and fits smaller cases, but stock has been hard to find.
8.0
hothardware.com
✓ explicit
19/02/2025
Review · Overclocking and cooling
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti is a cool, quiet, power-friendly card that overclocks well, but it's only a small upgrade over the RTX 4070 Ti.
8.0
wired.com
✓ explicit
24/02/2025
Review · Mid-range 1440p card
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti suits 1440p gamers, is moderately compact and draws less power than the RTX 5080, but stock has been scarce.
9.0
gamerant.com
≈ estimated
03/03/2025
Hands-on test · Multi-Frame Generation
Verdict
The ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti stays cool and hits up to 110 FPS at 4K with Multi-Frame Generation, though its raw gain over the 40-series is modest.
mmorpg.com
19/02/2025
Not graded yet
storagereview.com
19/02/2025
Same outlet as a graded review (counted once)
9.0
s2pmag.ch
≈ estimated
17/09/2025
Review · 1440p gaming
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti suits 1440p gamers, nearly matching the RTX 4080 in many games, but it can be hard to find in stores.
9.0
overclocking.com
≈ estimated
09/04/2025
Lab test · Ultrawide gaming
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti is a well-built ultrawide card with a custom circuit board, though 3440x1440 needs about 30% more power than 1440p.
storagereview.com
19/02/2025
Same outlet as a graded review (counted once)
7.0
geeknetic.es
✓ explicit
19/02/2025
Hands-on review · Features and clocks
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti is a balanced 1440p card with 16GB GDDR7 and a Silent BIOS, though its clock speeds trail the RTX 4070 Ti.
9.0
masgamers.com
≈ estimated
29/05/2025
Hands-on review · Design and cooling
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti suits plain white builds and 1440p gaming, but it is large and needs a roomy case with good airflow.
8.0
xanxogaming.com
✓ explicit
19/02/2025
Lab test · Power and speed
Verdict
The ASUS Prime RTX 5070 Ti is a fast 1440p card, only slightly quicker than the RTX 4070 Ti Super, but shortages and inflated listings are the real problem.
storagereview.com
19/02/2025
Same outlet as a graded review (counted once)

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

  • Excellent 1440p and solid 4K gaming performance with 16GB GDDR7 VRAM
  • Compact 2.5-slot design is SFF-ready and fits easily into various cases
  • Extremely quiet operation with Axial-tech fans that often stay off during light tasks
  • Minimalist aesthetic with no RGB lighting, ideal for professional or blackout builds
  • Stays cool under load, rarely exceeding 68°C in high-usage scenarios
  • Significant efficiency and performance upgrade for users moving from 20 or 30-series GPUs

What customers don't like about ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

  • Historically inconsistent availability and high street prices compared to the $749 MSRP
  • Higher power consumption (300W) compared to previous 70-series Ti models
  • Lacks the premium first-party finish found on NVIDIA Founders Edition cards
  • Slight performance lag behind the older RTX 4080 in specific ray-traced titles
  • Included 12-pin power adapter is functional but considered bulky or difficult to route by some
  • Some users report isolated issues with computer sleep modes when connected to OLED monitors

Verdict

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Blackwell architecture, featuring 8,960 CUDA cores and a substantial 16GB of high-speed GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. Designed for versatility, this SFF-Ready card utilizes a 2.5-slot footprint and a triple-fan cooling system equipped with Axial-tech fans and dual-ball bearings for increased longevity and airflow. Main pros include its support for DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation for superior 4K and 1440p gaming, a dedicated physical Dual BIOS switch for toggling between Performance and Quiet modes, and the 0dB technology that allows for silent operation during light tasks. However, notable cons include its high power requirement with a 300W TGP necessitating a 16-pin power connector, the lack of integrated RGB lighting which may deter some enthusiasts, and a relatively high launch MSRP of $749 compared to non-Ti models.

Compare ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found