ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£870VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):300 W

ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

8.0

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

8.0

Technical Score

10%

7.8

User score

â–²Better than 67% of graphics-cards
8.0

Technical Score

Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

8.1

Performance

24%

8.0

Memory

12%

6.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.1

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

8.4

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 68% of graphics-cards
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

Based on 19 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 87% of graphics-cards
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC is a high-performance graphics card built on the AMD RDNA 2 architecture with 4,608 stream processors and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit interface. It features a unique closed-loop liquid cooling system with a 240mm radiator and two 120mm ARGB fans, which supports its aggressive factory overclock of up to 2360 MHz boost and 2110 MHz game clocks. Main pros include exceptional thermal management that keeps the GPU and VRAM significantly cooler than air-cooled models, massive overclocking headroom due to its premium power delivery, and a sleek dual-slot design that fits easily into many cases. Main cons include a high premium price compared to reference models, the added complexity and space required for radiator installation, and ray tracing performance that generally lags behind its direct NVIDIA competitors.

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC

Technical Score
Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

8.1

Performance

24%

8.0

Memory

12%

6.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.1

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

8.4

Connectivity & Media

8.0
ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC has a technical score of 8 points, which is higher than that of 68.4% of products in this category.
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

Based on 19 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.8
ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC has a user score of 7.76 points, which is lower than that of 86.7% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC has a popularity score of 4.9 points, which is higher than that of 52.9% of products in this category.
4.9
ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC has a popularity score of 4.9 points, which is higher than that of 52.9% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.0

Overall score

40%

5.9

Price

7.4
ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC has a value-for-money score of 7.4 points, which is higher than that of 57.4% of products in this category.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
19,000 points
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
19,000 points
This graphics card scores 19,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 62.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
9,561 points
3DMark Port Royal score
9,561 points
This graphics card scores 9,561 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 51.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
24,985 points
PassMark (G3D) result
24,985 points
This graphics card scores 24,985 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
13,165 points
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
13,165 points
This graphics card scores 13,165 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 52.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
21.75 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance
21.75 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 21.75 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 55% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
VRAM
16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
512 GB/s
Maximum memory bandwidth
512 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 512 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 60.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
DisplayPort outputs
2
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 300 W, which is higher than that of 71.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
330 W
Power consumption while under peak load
330 W
This graphics card draws 330 W under peak load, which is higher than 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
300 W
Board power limit
300 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 300 W, which is higher than that of 67.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
300 W
Show more
Size
277x 130.8x 43.6 mm
Length
277 mm
Length
277 mm
This graphics card is 277 mm long, which is shorter than 55.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Height
130.8 mm
Height
130.8 mm
This graphics card is 130.8 mm tall, which is taller than 61.8% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
2,223 g
Weight
2,223 g
This graphics card weighs 2,223 g, which is heavier than 94.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 64 more ROPs
    Render output units (ROPs)
    128
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 32 more compute units
    SM count / Compute Units
    72
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (72 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    72 vs 40
  • 32 more ray tracing cores
    Ray tracing cores / units
    72
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (72 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    72 vs 40
  • 85.1% higher pixel rate
    Pixel rate
    302.1 GPixel/s
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (302.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    302.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 104 more TMUs
    Texture mapping units (TMUs)
    288
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (288 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    288 vs 184
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    VRAM
    16 GB
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 78.3% higher texture rate
    Texture rate
    679.7 GTexel/s
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (679.7 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    679.7 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • Supports ECC memory
    ECC memory
    yes
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 64 more ROPs
    Render output units (ROPs)
    128
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 32 more compute units
    SM count / Compute Units
    72
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (72 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    72 vs 40
  • 32 more ray tracing cores
    Ray tracing cores / units
    72
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (72 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    72 vs 40
  • 85.1% higher pixel rate
    Pixel rate
    302.1 GPixel/s
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (302.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    302.1 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 104 more TMUs
    Texture mapping units (TMUs)
    288
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (288 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    288 vs 184
  • 78.3% higher texture rate
    Texture rate
    679.7 GTexel/s
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (679.7 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    679.7 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • Better FP64 ratio
    FP64 ratio
    1:16
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 2.83x higher FP64 performance
    FP64 performance
    1.36 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.4 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.36 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    VRAM
    16 GB
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    ECC memory
    yes
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 32x more Infinity Cache
    L3 / Infinity Cache size
    128 MB
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (128 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    128 MB vs 4 MB
  • 14.3% higher memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    512 GB/s
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (512 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    512 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    GPU memory speed
    2000 MHz
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    Multi-GPU max
    2
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    SLI/CrossFire
    yes
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Uses hybrid cooling
    Has air-water cooling
    yes
    This graphics card uses hybrid cooling, the average graphics card does not.
  • 15 °C lower load temperature
    Load GPU temperature
    52 °C
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (52 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    52 °C vs 67 °C
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    Slot width
    2 slot/s
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2 fewer fans
    Fan count
    1
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    vendor-name contamination removed; fan count unresolved.
    1 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    CUDA
    no
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    DLSS
    no
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    Tensor/AI cores
    0
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 5.8% lower boost clock speed
    Boost GPU clock
    2,360 MHz
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2360 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,360 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40% larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    7 nm
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    300 W
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • No AV1 encoding
    AV1 encode
    No
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 64.2% more expensive
    ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC is more expensive than the average graphics card (£870 vs £530).
    £870 vs £530
  • 3.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC
    the average graphics card
    ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.76 vs 8.000).
    7.76 vs 8
  • No CUDA support
    CUDA
    no
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    Tensor/AI cores
    0
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 5.8% lower boost clock speed
    Boost GPU clock
    2,360 MHz
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2360 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,360 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 15.8% slower memory speed
    Effective memory speed
    16,000 MHz
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (16000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    16,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    L2 cache size
    4 MB
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    DLSS
    no
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    7 nm
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    Encoder generation
    3
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3 vs 8
  • 3 older
    Release date
    2020
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    November 2020
    2,020 vs 2,023
  • Older OpenCL version
    OpenCL version
    2.1
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3.0
  • 76.3% larger GPU die
    Die size
    520 mm²
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (520 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    520 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    AV1 encode
    No
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    DisplayPort outputs
    2
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    Max monitors per output type
    1
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    HW encode codecs
    H.264/H.265/AV1
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 2 fewer fans
    Fan count
    1
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    vendor-name contamination removed; fan count unresolved.
    1 vs 3
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    300 W
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    Recommended PSU wattage
    750 W
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    Max junction temperature (Tjmax)
    110 °C
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 33.3% higher board power limit
    Board power limit
    300 W
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    300 W vs 225 W
  • 50% higher peak power draw
    Power consumption while under peak load
    330 W
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (330 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    330 W vs 220 W
  • 2.18x heavier card weight
    Weight
    2,223 g
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (2223 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    2,223 g vs 1,021 g
  • 5.8 mm higher card profile
    Height
    130.8 mm
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (130.8 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    130.8 mm vs 125 mm

Graphic comparison of ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 19 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC?

  • Exceptional thermal performance due to the 240mm AIO liquid cooling system, maintaining significantly lower temperatures than reference air-cooled models
  • High overclocking potential with stable boost clocks reaching up to 2800 MHz in some tests
  • Quiet operation under load, especially when using the 'Quiet' dual-BIOS mode
  • Stunning aesthetics with extensive ARGB lighting on the shroud and radiator fans, ideal for vertical mounting
  • Includes premium features like dual BIOS and additional PWM fan headers for synchronised case cooling
  • Top-tier rasterisation performance, occasionally rivaling higher-tier cards like the RTX 3090 in specific 4K scenarios

What customers dislike about ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC?

  • Significant price premium over the reference RX 6800 XT and many competing air-cooled models
  • Large physical footprint requires a case with enough clearance for both the card and the 240mm radiator
  • Complex cable management due to the various fan and RGB wires extending from the radiator and card
  • Lackluster ray tracing performance compared to NVIDIA's RTX 30-series counterparts
  • Occasional driver-related stability issues noted in older DirectX 11 titles or specific benchmarks
  • Polarising design that some users find 'cheap' or 'plastic-heavy' despite the high price

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
au.pcmag.com
13/07/2021
Summary of the review
M
me.pcmag.com
12/07/2021
Summary of the review
V
vortez.net
25/01/2021
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
26/11/2020
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
26/11/2020
Summary of the review
E
eteknix.com
25/11/2020
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
16/07/2021
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
12/07/2021
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
18/12/2020
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
25/11/2020
Summary of the review
V
vortez.net
25/01/2021
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
18/12/2020
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
03/04/2021
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
14/12/2020
Summary of the review

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)