OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£840VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):300 W

INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3
8.9/10

Overall score

Score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

90%

9.0

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

â–²Better than 82% of graphics cards
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

Overall score

30%

6.1

Price

★Better than 92%
9.0

Technical score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

44%

8.8

Performance

24%

9.6

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

8.1

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 84%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

3.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 62%
  • inno3d-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-x3
  • inno3d-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-x3
  • inno3d-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-x3
inno3d-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-x3
inno3d-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-x3
inno3d-geforce-rtx-5070-ti-x3
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3

Technical score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components:

44%

8.8

Performance

24%

9.6

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

10

Platform & Features

5%

8.1

Design

4%

10

Connectivity & Media

9.0
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

3.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Popularity:
INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 has a popularity score of 3.7 points, which is lower than that of 51.3% of products in this category.
3.7
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components:

70%

8.9

Overall score

30%

6.1

Price

8.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
26,800 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 26,800 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 79.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
19,045 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 19,045 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 84% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
5,878 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 5,878 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 92.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
18,079 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 18,079 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 69.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
43.94 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 43.94 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 72.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR7
GDDR version
GDDR7
This graphics card uses GDDR7 memory, which is newer than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 20.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
896 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 896 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 82.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1b
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1b, which is more advanced than on 78.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
80 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 80 Gbps, which is faster than on 86.3% of graphics cards and equal to 13.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
300 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 300 W, which is higher than that of 71.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
300 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 300 W under peak load, which is higher than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
300 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 300 W, which is higher than that of 67.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
300 W
Show more
Size
300x 116x 41 mm
This graphics card measures 300x116x 41 mm, which is more compact than 70.9% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Length
300 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 300 mm long, which is longer than 56.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Height
116 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 116 mm tall, which is shorter than 70% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.4% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,200 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,200 g, which is heavier than 59.1% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Show more

INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 80.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 12.3% better value for money
    INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.08 vs 7.2).
    8.08 vs 7.2
  • 1.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3
    the average graphics card
    INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.11 vs 8.000).
    8.11 vs 8
  • 30 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    70 vs 40
  • 30 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (70 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    70 vs 40
  • 80.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    686.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 96 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (280 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    280 vs 184
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 19.5% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2295 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,295 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 136 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (280 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    280 vs 144
  • 97.1% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (44.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    44.48 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 44.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (235.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    235.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 2.08x higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (19045 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    19,045 points vs 9,166 points
  • 82.6% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (26800 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    26,800 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 19.8x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (703 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    703 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    896 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 47.4% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (28000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    28,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 2x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    48 MB vs 24 MB
  • 12x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (48 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    48 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer GDDR version
    This graphics card uses a newer GDDR version than the average graphics card (GDDR7 vs GDDR6).
    GDDR7 vs GDDR6
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • 2 newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    February 2025
    2,025 vs 2,023
  • Newer encoder generation
    This graphics card uses a newer encoder generation than the average graphics card (9 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    9 vs 8
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 1.4a).
    2.1b vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1).
    2.1b vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 4x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    80 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • More NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has more concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (12 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    12 vs 8
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 9 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (116 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    116 mm vs 125 mm
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (300x116 x 41 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    300x116 x 41 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 2.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2452 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,452 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 74.1% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (5878 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    5,878 points vs 22,653 points
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 33.3% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    300 W vs 225 W
  • 58.5% more expensive
    INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 is more expensive than the average graphics card (£840 vs £530).
    £840 vs £530
  • 58.5% more expensive
    INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 is more expensive than the average graphics card (£840 vs £530).
    £840 vs £530
  • 2.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2452 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,452 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 74.1% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (5878 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    5,878 points vs 22,653 points
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 39.5% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (300 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    300 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 33.3% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (300 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    300 W vs 225 W
  • 8 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (45 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    45 °C vs 37 °C
  • 36.4% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (300 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    300 W vs 220 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 15 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (300 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    300 mm vs 285 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
eteknix.com
25/03/2025
Summary of the review
INNO3D Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti X3 Graphics Card Review - Page 2
D
digit.in
07/04/2025
Summary of the review
INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 OC Edition Graphics Card Review - Digit
T
tweaktown.com
20/02/2025
Summary of the review
INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 Review - TweakTown

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3

  • Compact two-slot design makes it ideal for small form factor (SFF) builds
  • Strong 1440p and 4K gaming performance, roughly matching the previous-gen RTX 4080
  • Generally runs cool and quiet due to the triple-fan X3 cooling system
  • Efficient power usage with simple 2x8-pin connector requirements
  • Includes high-speed 16GB GDDR7 memory

What we don't like about INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3

  • Limited overclocking potential due to a locked power limit
  • Lack of advanced features like dual BIOS or RGB lighting
  • Plastic front shroud feel less premium than higher-end competitors
  • Fans may exhibit high minimum RPM (around 1400 RPM) causing noise at idle for some users
  • Thermal performance can degrade significantly in cases with poor airflow or high ambient temperatures

Verdict

The Inno3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 is a high-performance graphics card built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell architecture, featuring 8,960 CUDA cores and 16GB of ultra-fast GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896 GB/s bandwidth. It operates with a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, utilizing a triple-fan X3 cooling system with scythe blades and a large vapor chamber within a slim dual-slot (41mm) design that is NVIDIA SFF-Ready. Main pros include its exceptional 1440p and 4K gaming capabilities with DLSS 4 support, excellent power efficiency at a 300W TGP, and its compact form factor suitable for small builds. Notable cons include the lack of a dual BIOS switch, potentially higher noise levels under full load compared to premium models, and fixed power limits that may restrict aggressive manual overclocking.

Compare INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of INNO3D GeForce RTX 5070 Ti X3 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found