OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,023 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

Potensic T35 Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Max flight time:15 minVideo resolution:1080p/30 fpsMax transmission distance:0.3 km

Potensic T35 Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 8 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.5

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

85%

5.1

Technical score

15%

7.6

Review score ( 0 · 8)

Review score 15% · 7.6 · based on 8 videos
8 videos count as 3.5 of the 4 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 15%, technical score 85%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
▼Worse than 76% of drones
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

26%

3.4

Flight

24%

5.5

Camera

20%

6.8

Safety

16%

6.0

Connectivity

14%

4.1

Battery & Design

▼Worse than 79% of drones
7.6

Review score

Review score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Grades by review (8)
8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 5

12.5%

9.0

Michael Suarez

12.5%

8.0

DE TODO UN POCO TV

12.5%

7.0

Nick Cieslak 22

6.3%

9.0

Buscando Chollos y Ofertas

6.3%

8.0

Jay Drone

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 67% of drones
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £130

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone Potensic T35

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

26%

3.4

Flight

24%

5.5

Camera

20%

6.8

Safety

16%

6.0

Connectivity

14%

4.1

Battery & Design

5.1
Review score
Review score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Grades by review (8)
8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 5

12.5%

9.0

Michael Suarez

12.5%

8.0

DE TODO UN POCO TV

12.5%

7.0

Nick Cieslak 22

6.3%

9.0

Buscando Chollos y Ofertas

6.3%

8.0

Jay Drone

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Popularity:
Potensic T35 has a popularity score of 6.6 points, which is higher than that of 50.5% of products in this category.
6.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components:

60%

5.5

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

6.8
Max flight time
15 min
Max flight time
15 min
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 15 min, shorter than 64% of drones and equal to 8% of drones.
Max flight distance
0.3 km
Max flight distance
0.3 km
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a max flight distance of 0.3 km, shorter-range than 65.2% of drones and equal to 6.1% of drones.
Max flight speed
5 m/s
Max flight speed
5 m/s
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
This drone has a max flight speed of 5 m/s, slower than 77.9% of drones and equal to 10.1% of drones.
Max wind resistance
7.9 m/s
Max wind resistance
7.9 m/s
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
This drone has max wind resistance of 7.9 m/s, lower than 69.1% of drones and equal to 10.1% of drones.
Value is derived from the user manual’s Level 4 wind-force statement.
Max service ceiling (ASL)
150 m
Max service ceiling (ASL)
150 m
▼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <120 m – >6k m
This drone has a max service ceiling of 150 m, lower than 65.7% of drones and equal to 3% of drones.
Altitude limit set in the app.
Show more
What reviewers say
Video resolution
1080p/30 fps
Video resolution
1080p/30 fps
▼ Worse than 62% of models
This drone records video at 1080p/30 fps, lower than 61.9% of drones and equal to 5.9% of drones.
4K camera
no
4K camera
no
▼ Worse than 55% of models
This drone does not support 4K video. 54.6% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
?
Main camera megapixels
2.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
2.1 MP
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
This drone has a main camera resolution of 2.1 MP, lower than 79.3% of drones and equal to 1.3% of drones.
Max movie bitrate
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Obstacle detection
no
Obstacle detection
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This drone does not support obstacle detection. 31% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
yes
Return to Home (RTH)
yes
▲ Better than 33% of models
This drone supports Return-to-Home (RTH). 33% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 35% of models
This drone supports GPS. 35.3% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
GPS, GLONASS
GNSS systems supported
GPS, GLONASS
▲ Better than 50% of models
This drone supports GPS, GLONASS GNSS systems, which are more comprehensive than those of 49.8% and the same as those of 17.1%.
Obstacle sensing directions
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Max transmission distance
0.3 km
Max transmission distance
0.3 km
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a max transmission distance of 0.3 km, shorter-range than 62.2% of drones and equal to 6.1% of drones.
Value reflects maximum control/transmission range; FPV video range can be lower.
Transmission latency
?
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
▼ Worse than 44% of models
This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, which is more advanced than the system used by 8.2% and the same as that used by 47.7%.
Live view quality
720p@30 fps
Live view quality
720p@30 fps
▼ Worse than 57% of models
This drone offers live view quality of 720p@30 fps, lower-quality than 56.8% of drones and equal to 22.9% of drones.
Remote control
yes
Remote control
yes
▲ Better than 5% of models
This drone has a handheld remote controller. 5% of drones offer this.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,500 mAh
Battery capacity
2,500 mAh
▲ Better than 63% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 2,500 mAh, larger than 62.7% of drones and equal to 2.1% of drones.
Battery energy
18.5 Wh
Battery energy
18.5 Wh
▲ Better than 57% of models
Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
This drone has battery energy of 18.5 Wh, higher than 57.1% of drones.
Calculated Wh from explicit 7.4V and 2500mAh battery specs.
Charging time
300 min
Charging time
300 min
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <55 min – >180 min
This drone charges in 300 min, slower than 92.5% of drones and equal to 3.8% of drones.
Weight
1,390 g
Weight
1,390 g
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 1,390 g, heavier than 98.5% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

Potensic T35 vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • Supports waypoint flight
    Waypoint flight
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This drone supports waypoint flight, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • 30 ° wider field of view
    Field of view
    120 °
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (120 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    120 ° vs 90 °
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    proprietary
    ▼ Worse than 42% of models
    This drone uses proprietary for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    proprietary vs micro-USB
  • 300 mAh more battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,500 mAh
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a larger battery capacity than the average drone (2500 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    2,500 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • More polished companion app
    Companion app
    Potensic-GPS
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone uses the Potensic-GPS companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    Potensic-GPS vs HS FPV
  • 30 ° wider field of view
    Field of view
    120 °
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (120 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    120 ° vs 90 °
  • Supports waypoint flight
    Waypoint flight
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This drone supports waypoint flight, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports smartphone control
    Smartphone control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports smartphone control, while the average drone does not.
  • More polished companion app
    Companion app
    Potensic-GPS
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone uses the Potensic-GPS companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    Potensic-GPS vs HS FPV
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    proprietary
    ▼ Worse than 42% of models
    This drone uses proprietary for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    proprietary vs micro-USB
  • 300 mAh more battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,500 mAh
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a larger battery capacity than the average drone (2500 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    2,500 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p/30 fps
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p/30 fps vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p/30 fps vs 4K/100 fps
  • 2.8 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    7.9 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (7.9 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    Value is derived from the user manual’s Level 4 wind-force statement.
    7.9 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    ▼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • 10 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    5 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (5 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    5 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • 5.65x higher weight
    Weight
    1,390 g
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is heavier than the average drone (1390 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    1,390 g vs 246 g
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    GPS, GLONASS
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports GPS, GLONASS GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    GPS, GLONASS vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • 210 min longer charging time
    Charging time
    300 min
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <55 min – >180 min
    This drone charges more slowly than the average drone (300 min vs 90 min). The average drone charges in 90 min.
    300 min vs 90 min
  • 5 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    15 min
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (15 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    15 min vs 20 min
  • 3.8% worse value for money
    Potensic T35 has worse value for money than the average drone (6.8 vs 7.1).
    6.8 vs 7.06
  • 2.8 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    7.9 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (7.9 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    Value is derived from the user manual’s Level 4 wind-force statement.
    7.9 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • 10 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    5 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (5 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    5 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • 5 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    15 min
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (15 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    15 min vs 20 min
  • 5 years older release date
    Release date
    2018
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is older than the average drone (2018 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    April 2018
    2018 vs 2023
  • 3,350 m lower service ceiling
    Max service ceiling (ASL)
    150 m
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <120 m – >6k m
    This drone can fly at a lower max service ceiling than the average drone (150 m vs 3500 m). The average drone reaches 3500 m.
    Altitude limit set in the app.
    150 m vs 3,500 m
  • Simpler motor design
    Motor type
    brushed
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This drone uses brushed motors, while the average drone uses brushless motors.
    brushed vs brushless
  • Non-foldable design
    Foldable design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not have a foldable design, while the average drone does.
  • 0.7 km shorter flight distance
    Max flight distance
    0.3 km
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a shorter max flight distance than the average drone (0.3 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    0.3 km vs 1 km
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p/30 fps
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p/30 fps vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p/30 fps vs 4K/100 fps
  • Lower photo resolution
    Photo resolution
    1920 x 1080 px
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone offers lower photo resolution than the average drone (1920x1080 px vs 4096x3072 px). The average drone offers a photo resolution of 4096x3072 px.
    1920x1080 px vs 4096x3072 px
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    -90 to 0 °
    ▼ Worse than 33% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (-90 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    -90 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • 9.9 MP less camera resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    2.1 MP
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
    This drone has fewer main camera megapixels than the average drone (2.1 MP vs 12 MP). The average drone has 12 MP on the main camera.
    2.1 MP vs 12 MP
  • No 4K video
    4K camera
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support 4K video, while the average drone does.
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    GPS, GLONASS
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This drone supports GPS, GLONASS GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    GPS, GLONASS vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • 1 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    3
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (3 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    Follow Me, POI, Waypoint Flight
    3 vs 4
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    ▼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • Lower live view quality
    Live view quality
    720p@30 fps
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This drone has worse live view quality than the average drone (720p@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
    720p@30 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
  • 0.7 km shorter transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    0.3 km
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a shorter max transmission distance than the average drone (0.3 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    Value reflects maximum control/transmission range; FPV video range can be lower.
    0.3 km vs 1 km
  • More basic controller
    Controller model
    T35004
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    This drone uses the T35004 controller, while the average drone uses LiteRadio 4 SE.
    T35004 vs LiteRadio 4 SE
  • 5.65x higher weight
    Weight
    1,390 g
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is heavier than the average drone (1390 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    1,390 g vs 246 g
  • 210 min longer charging time
    Charging time
    300 min
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <55 min – >180 min
    This drone charges more slowly than the average drone (300 min vs 90 min). The average drone charges in 90 min.
    300 min vs 90 min
  • 179 mm wider width
    Width
    420 mm
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is wider than the average drone (420 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    420 mm vs 241 mm
  • 145 mm longer body length
    Length
    420 mm
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <117 mm – >385 mm
    This drone is longer than the average drone (420 mm vs 275 mm). The average drone is 275 mm long.
    420 mm vs 275 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Nick Cieslak 22
≈ estimated
25/04/2021
Hands-on flight test · tap-to-fly, follow-me and noise checks
Verdict
Potensic T35 is fine for a budget drone, but follow-me and tap-to-fly are limited.
9.0
Nick Cieslak 22
≈ estimated
09/12/2020
Hands-on review · flight demo and feature walkthrough
Verdict
Potensic T35 is high quality for the money, and the reviewer strongly recommends it.
8.0
DE TODO UN POCO TV
≈ estimated
25/12/2019
Hands-on review · outdoor flights and signal test
Verdict
Potensic T35 is affordable and well built, worth considering, though signal dropouts and short flight time were issues.
9.0
Michael Suarez
≈ estimated
04/11/2019
Hands-on review · unboxing and test flight
Verdict
Potensic T35 is fun and easy to fly, a good pick for beginners with reliable return-to-home.
7.0
Jay Drone
≈ estimated
22/07/2019
Hands-on review · flight test and GPS return
Verdict
Potensic T35 is fine for the price, but cheaper Chinese-site options may offer better value.
8.0
Jay Drone
≈ estimated
06/11/2022
Short clip · wind hold and night camera footage
Verdict
Potensic T35 holds steady in wind and left a very positive impression in this short clip.
9.0
Buscando Chollos y Ofertas
≈ estimated
01/07/2018
Unboxing · first impressions, no flight shown
Verdict
Potensic T35 is one of the best test drones received, and it looks very good at first sight.
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded

What reviewers agree on

Based on 1 · 10

Reviewers trust its return to home and stable flight, but flight time falls short and opinions on the camera are split.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Potensic T35

  • Excellent value for the price point, particularly compared to higher-end models
  • User-friendly and ideal for beginners, with a helpful 'Beginner Mode'
  • Robust and solid build quality that holds up well even after minor crashes
  • Stable flight performance assisted by dual GPS/GLONASS and a 9-axis gyro
  • Effective smart features like 'Follow Me,' 'Orbit,' and 'Automatic Return'
  • Helpful and responsive customer service for replacement parts

What we don't like about Potensic T35

  • Extremely long battery charging time (typically 4–5 hours)
  • Lack of hardware video stabilization or a gimbal, leading to shaky footage
  • Significant video lag when streaming live to a mobile device
  • Mobile app connectivity issues reported with certain phone models
  • Wi-Fi range for video streaming is shorter than the actual flight range
  • No built-in obstacle avoidance system

Verdict

The Potensic T35 is a beginner-oriented GPS drone with brushless motors, a 1080p camera, and dual GPS/GLONASS positioning for steadier outdoor flight. It is designed to offer easy control, automatic return features, and a more stable experience than basic toy drones, making it a logical step up for first-time buyers. Its main strengths are simple operation, stronger flight assistance, and a more robust feel than ultra-cheap entry models. Its compromises are a modest camera system, limited premium features, and a bulkier build than sub-250g travel drones.

Compare Potensic T35 with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Potensic T35 and other drones

No results found