OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,023 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

Holy Stone HS440 Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Max flight time:20 minVideo resolution:1080p/20 fpsMax transmission distance:0.1 km

Holy Stone HS440 Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 13 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.6

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

85%

5.2

Technical score

15%

7.9

Review score ( 0 · 13)

Review score 15% · 7.9 · based on 13 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 15%, technical score 85%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
▼Worse than 73% of drones
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

26%

4.0

Flight

24%

5.4

Camera

20%

5.6

Safety

16%

5.2

Connectivity

14%

6.5

Battery & Design

▼Worse than 76% of drones
7.9

Review score

Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Grades by review (13)
13 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 8

8.3%

10

Reviews Unscripted

8.3%

10

Hub City Drones & Gadgets

4.2%

10

DOUG and NIKI

8.3%

9.0

Open Circuit RC & Tech

8.3%

8.0

Run That RC

8.3%

8.0

Tommy Drone Tech

8.3%

8.0

PERTH WEST OZ RC

8.3%

7.0

Shane Craig

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 52% of drones
  • holy-stone-hs440
  • holy-stone-hs440
  • holy-stone-hs440
  • holy-stone-hs440
  • holy-stone-hs440
  • holy-stone-hs440
  • holy-stone-hs440
  • holy-stone-hs440
  • holy-stone-hs440
holy-stone-hs440
holy-stone-hs440
holy-stone-hs440
holy-stone-hs440
holy-stone-hs440
holy-stone-hs440
holy-stone-hs440
holy-stone-hs440
holy-stone-hs440

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone Holy Stone HS440

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

26%

4.0

Flight

24%

5.4

Camera

20%

5.6

Safety

16%

5.2

Connectivity

14%

6.5

Battery & Design

5.2
Review score
Review score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 15% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 4 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Grades by review (13)
13 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 15%, the same for every model in this category.
Video reviews 8

8.3%

10

Reviews Unscripted

8.3%

10

Hub City Drones & Gadgets

4.2%

10

DOUG and NIKI

8.3%

9.0

Open Circuit RC & Tech

8.3%

8.0

Run That RC

8.3%

8.0

Tommy Drone Tech

8.3%

8.0

PERTH WEST OZ RC

8.3%

7.0

Shane Craig

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
9.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Popularity:
Holy Stone HS440 has a popularity score of 9.9 points, which is higher than that of 87.6% of products in this category.
9.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

60%

5.6

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

6.9
Max flight time
20 min
Max flight time
20 min
▼ Worse than 50% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 20 min, longer than 45.5% of drones and equal to 4.5% of drones.
Max flight distance
0.1 km
Max flight distance
0.1 km
▼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a max flight distance of 0.1 km, shorter-range than 75.1% of drones and equal to 8.8% of drones.
Max flight speed
?
Max wind resistance
3.3 m/s
Max wind resistance
3.3 m/s
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
This drone has max wind resistance of 3.3 m/s, lower than 88.5% of drones and equal to 7.2% of drones.
Value may include conversion from Beaufort-scale rating to m/s.
Max service ceiling (ASL)
100 m
Max service ceiling (ASL)
100 m
▼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <120 m – >6k m
This drone has a max service ceiling of 100 m, lower than 91% of drones and equal to 6% of drones.
Show more
What reviewers say
Video resolution
1080p/20 fps
Video resolution
1080p/20 fps
▼ Worse than 71% of models
This drone records video at 1080p/20 fps, lower than 70.8% of drones and equal to 0.5% of drones.
4K camera
no
4K camera
no
▼ Worse than 55% of models
This drone does not support 4K video. 54.6% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
?
Main camera megapixels
2 MP
Main camera megapixels
2 MP
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
This drone has a main camera resolution of 2 MP, lower than 85.3% of drones and equal to 13.3% of drones.
Max movie bitrate
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Obstacle detection
no
Obstacle detection
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This drone does not support obstacle detection. 31% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
yes
Return to Home (RTH)
yes
▲ Better than 33% of models
This drone supports Return-to-Home (RTH). 33% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
no
GPS
no
▼ Worse than 65% of models
This drone does not support GPS. 65.2% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
none
GNSS systems supported
none
▼ Worse than 66% of models
This drone supports none GNSS systems, which are less comprehensive than those of 65.8% and the same as those of 34.2%.
Obstacle sensing directions
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Max transmission distance
0.1 km
Max transmission distance
0.1 km
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a max transmission distance of 0.1 km, shorter-range than 71.9% of drones and equal to 6.1% of drones.
Transmission latency
?
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
Video transmission system
Wi-Fi
▼ Worse than 44% of models
This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, which is more advanced than the system used by 8.2% and the same as that used by 47.7%.
Live view quality
720p@20 fps
Live view quality
720p@20 fps
▼ Worse than 83% of models
This drone offers live view quality of 720p@20 fps, lower-quality than 83.3% of drones and equal to 5.2% of drones.
Remote control
yes
Remote control
yes
▲ Better than 5% of models
This drone has a handheld remote controller. 5% of drones offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
1900 mAh
Battery capacity
1900 mAh
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 1900 mAh, smaller than 55.4% of drones.
Battery energy
7.22 Wh
Battery energy
7.22 Wh
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
This drone has battery energy of 7.22 Wh, lower than 71.8% of drones.
Charging time
180 min
Charging time
180 min
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <55 min – >180 min
This drone charges in 180 min, slower than 84.4% of drones and equal to 6.9% of drones.
Weight
166 g
Weight
166 g
▲ Better than 70% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 166 g, lighter than 69.6% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

Holy Stone HS440 vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    USB-C
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone uses USB-C for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    USB-C vs micro-USB
  • Supports waypoint flight
    Waypoint flight
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This drone supports waypoint flight, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports TapFly
    TapFly
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This drone supports TapFly, while the average drone does not.
  • 32.5% lower weight
    Weight
    166 g
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (166 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    166 g vs 246 g
  • 22 ° wider field of view
    Field of view
    112 °
    ▲ Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (112 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    112 ° vs 90 °
  • 46 mm narrower width
    Width
    195 mm
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is narrower than the average drone (195 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    195 mm vs 241 mm
  • 52.8% more popular
    Holy Stone HS440 is more popular than the average drone (9.89 vs 6.5).
    9.89 vs 6.47
  • 52.8% more popular
    Holy Stone HS440 is more popular than the average drone (9.89 vs 6.5).
    9.89 vs 6.47
  • 22 ° wider field of view
    Field of view
    112 °
    ▲ Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (112 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    112 ° vs 90 °
  • Supports waypoint flight
    Waypoint flight
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This drone supports waypoint flight, while the average drone does not.
  • Supports TapFly
    TapFly
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This drone supports TapFly, while the average drone does not.
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    USB-C
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drone uses USB-C for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    USB-C vs micro-USB
  • 32.5% lower weight
    Weight
    166 g
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (166 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    166 g vs 246 g
  • 46 mm narrower width
    Width
    195 mm
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <114 mm – >387.5 mm
    This drone is narrower than the average drone (195 mm vs 241 mm). The average drone width is 241 mm.
    195 mm vs 241 mm
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p/20 fps
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p/20 fps vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p/20 fps vs 4K/100 fps
  • 7.4 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    3.3 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (3.3 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    Value may include conversion from Beaufort-scale rating to m/s.
    3.3 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    ▼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • Lower live view quality
    Live view quality
    720p@20 fps
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This drone has worse live view quality than the average drone (720p@20 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
    720p@20 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
  • 90 min longer charging time
    Charging time
    180 min
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <55 min – >180 min
    This drone charges more slowly than the average drone (180 min vs 90 min). The average drone charges in 90 min.
    180 min vs 90 min
  • 7.4 m/s lower wind resistance
    Max wind resistance
    3.3 m/s
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.3 m/s – >12 m/s
    This drone handles weaker wind than the average drone (3.3 m/s vs 10.7 m/s). The average drone handles wind up to 10.7 m/s.
    Value may include conversion from Beaufort-scale rating to m/s.
    3.3 m/s vs 10.7 m/s
  • 3,400 m lower service ceiling
    Max service ceiling (ASL)
    100 m
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <120 m – >6k m
    This drone can fly at a lower max service ceiling than the average drone (100 m vs 3500 m). The average drone reaches 3500 m.
    100 m vs 3,500 m
  • 0.9 km shorter flight distance
    Max flight distance
    0.1 km
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a shorter max flight distance than the average drone (0.1 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    0.1 km vs 1 km
  • Simpler motor design
    Motor type
    coreless
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    This drone uses coreless motors, while the average drone uses brushless motors.
    coreless vs brushless
  • 2 years older release date
    Release date
    2021
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is older than the average drone (2021 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    July 2021
    2021 vs 2023
  • Lower video resolution
    Video resolution
    1080p/20 fps
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This drone offers lower video resolution than the average drone (1080p/20 fps vs 4K/100 fps). The average drone offers a video resolution of 4K/100 fps.
    1080p/20 fps vs 4K/100 fps
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    JPEG
    ▼ Worse than 41% of models
    This drone supports JPEG photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    JPEG vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • Lower photo resolution
    Photo resolution
    1920 x 1080 px
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone offers lower photo resolution than the average drone (1920x1080 px vs 4096x3072 px). The average drone offers a photo resolution of 4096x3072 px.
    1920x1080 px vs 4096x3072 px
  • More basic stabilization
    Image stabilization type
    None (Fixed)
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This drone uses None (Fixed) image stabilization, while the average drone uses EIS (Digital).
    None (Fixed) vs EIS (Digital)
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    -90 to 0 °
    ▼ Worse than 33% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (-90 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    -90 to 0 ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • 10 MP less camera resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    2 MP
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 MP – >48 MP
    This drone has fewer main camera megapixels than the average drone (2 MP vs 12 MP). The average drone has 12 MP on the main camera.
    2 MP vs 12 MP
  • No 4K video
    4K camera
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support 4K video, while the average drone does.
  • 96 GB lower memory card limit
    Max external memory supported
    32 GB
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >512 GB
    This drone supports less external storage than the average drone (32 GB vs 128 GB). The average drone supports up to 128 GB of external storage.
    32 GB vs 128 GB
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • No beginner mode
    Beginner mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This drone does not support beginner mode, while the average drone does.
  • 33.3% higher takeoff weight
    Max takeoff weight
    166 g
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >1.1k g
    This drone has a higher max takeoff weight than the average drone (166 g vs 249 g). The average drone has a max takeoff weight of 249 g.
    166 g vs 249 g
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Wi-Fi
    ▼ Worse than 44% of models
    This drone uses Wi-Fi for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Wi-Fi vs SkyLink 2.0
  • Lower live view quality
    Live view quality
    720p@20 fps
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This drone has worse live view quality than the average drone (720p@20 fps vs 1080p@25 fps). The average drone offers live view quality of 1080p@25 fps.
    720p@20 fps vs 1080p@25 fps
  • Fewer frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    2.4 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This drone supports 2.4 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • 0.9 km shorter transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    0.1 km
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a shorter max transmission distance than the average drone (0.1 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    0.1 km vs 1 km
  • 90 min longer charging time
    Charging time
    180 min
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <55 min – >180 min
    This drone charges more slowly than the average drone (180 min vs 90 min). The average drone charges in 90 min.
    180 min vs 90 min
  • 9.96 Wh less battery energy
    Battery energy
    7.22 Wh
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <3.7 Wh – >77 Wh
    This drone has lower battery energy than the average drone (7.2 Wh vs 17.18 Wh). The average drone battery has 17.18 Wh of energy.
    7.22 Wh vs 17.18 Wh
  • 300 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1900 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (1900 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    1,900 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • Plainer color finish
    Color
    black, white
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    This drone comes in black, white, while the average drone comes in gray.
    black, white vs gray

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

10
Reviews Unscripted
✓ explicit
21/05/2023
Hands-on review · flights, crash tests and wind handling
Verdict
Holy Stone HS440 is a simple, durable beginner drone that's fun to fly, though not for professional footage.
7.0
Shane Craig
≈ estimated
16/05/2023
Hands-on review · beginner flights, wind and camera tests
Verdict
Holy Stone HS440 is a decent starter drone at a low price, but wind and camera quality hold it back.
9.0
Open Circuit RC & Tech
≈ estimated
24/08/2022
Hands-on review · flight time, stability and camera check
Verdict
Holy Stone HS440 is a stable, enjoyable toy-class drone with long flights and a camera that is decent for what it is.
8.0
Run That RC
≈ estimated
21/04/2022
Hands-on review · flight test and camera check
Verdict
Holy Stone HS440 is recommended for learning to fly, though it is not a true beginner drone.
8.0
Tommy Drone Tech
≈ estimated
03/12/2021
Hands-on review · flights, app setup and camera features
Verdict
Holy Stone HS440 is a fun, smooth-flying budget foldable, though orientation at range, FPV latency and app permissions need attention.
8.0
PERTH WEST OZ RC
≈ estimated
24/09/2021
Hands-on review · outdoor flights, camera and app test
Verdict
Holy Stone HS440 is a decent beginner toy and good gift, but wind and recording glitches hold it back.
10
Hub City Drones & Gadgets
✓ explicit
07/09/2021
Hands-on review · unboxing, test flight and app controls
Verdict
Holy Stone HS440 is a compact foldable drone that handles well, with almost no controller lag.
10
Reviews Unscripted
✓ explicit
23/03/2023
First flight · unboxing and setup
Verdict
Holy Stone HS440 earns top marks as a beginner drone, with good value and long flight time from two batteries.
10
DOUG and NIKI
✓ explicit
16/01/2022
Unboxing and first flight · setup and quick verdict
Verdict
Holy Stone HS440 is a top-rated beginner drone with long flight time and an app that works first time.
Shop video

What reviewers agree on

Based on 2 · 15

Beginners like its easy handling and generous case and extras, but image quality, wind resistance and stabilization fall short.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Holy Stone HS440

  • Extremely beginner-friendly and easy to set up right out of the box.
  • Adjustable 1080P HD camera lens (90° tilt) provides good quality aerial photos and videos for its price point.
  • Comes with a high-quality carrying case and extra propellers, enhancing portability and value.
  • Impressive durability; some users reported the drone surviving crashes or extended periods outdoors.
  • Features like one-key takeoff/landing and altitude hold make it accessible for children and novices.
  • Responsive and efficient customer service helps resolve technical issues like drifting.

What we don't like about Holy Stone HS440

  • Highly susceptible to wind; even slight breezes can cause instability or make the drone fly away.
  • Lacks GPS and optical flow sensors, which can lead to significant drifting during hover.
  • Battery charging takes a long time (up to 3 hours) compared to the roughly 20-minute flight time.
  • Wi-Fi FPV range is limited to about 100 meters, with video feed becoming distorted or laggy at longer distances.
  • The absence of a mechanical gimbal or electronic image stabilization results in shaky video footage during flight.
  • Single-light design makes it difficult to maintain orientation during low-light or evening flights.

Verdict

The Holy Stone HS440 is a lightweight, beginner-friendly drone weighing 166g, featuring a foldable design and a 1080P HD camera with a 112° wide-angle lens and 90° remote adjustment. It offers a flight time of approximately 20 minutes per modular battery, a transmission range of up to 330 feet, and a 6-axis gyroscope for stability. Main pros include its portability, exemption from FAA registration, and intuitive controls like one-key takeoff, altitude hold, and gesture control. However, notable cons include its vulnerability to drifting in windy conditions due to its light weight and lack of brushless motors, a lengthy 180-minute battery charging time, and the absence of a motorized gimbal or electronic image stabilization for video.

Compare Holy Stone HS440 with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Holy Stone HS440 and other drones

No results found