OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,110 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Max flight time:10.5 minVideo resolution:N/AMax transmission distance:?

BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and 12 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

75%

5.8

Technical Score

25%

7.5

Review score ( 0 · 12)

Based on 12 video reviews
Experts count the full 25% of the overall score, because this model has at least 3 full tests. The technical score makes up the other 75%. A video review counts half as much as a written full test.
â–¼Worse than 52% of drones
5.8

Technical Score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

26%

6.3

Flight

24%

5.6

Camera

20%

4.1

Safety

16%

6.1

Connectivity

14%

7.1

Battery & Design

â–¼Worse than 58% of drones
7.5

Review score

Review score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, first looks half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: The review score is 25% of the overall score with 3+ full tests, less with fewer.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Grades by review (12)
12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in this model’s overall score: 25%.
Video reviews 9

9.5%

8.0

MultiBuild

9.5%

8.0

Mark Arbitrario

9.5%

8.0

Colibri FPV

9.5%

8.0

Squadding Quads

9.5%

8.0

Flying Pudding

9.5%

7.0

Greg North

9.5%

4.0

Infinity Loops

4.8%

8.0

Frank Builds

4.8%

8.0

Half Chrome

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 56% of drones
  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II

Technical Score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

26%

6.3

Flight

24%

5.6

Camera

20%

4.1

Safety

16%

6.1

Connectivity

14%

7.1

Battery & Design

5.8
Review score
Review score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, first looks half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: The review score is 25% of the overall score with 3+ full tests, less with fewer.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Grades by review (12)
12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in this model’s overall score: 25%.
Video reviews 9

9.5%

8.0

MultiBuild

9.5%

8.0

Mark Arbitrario

9.5%

8.0

Colibri FPV

9.5%

8.0

Squadding Quads

9.5%

8.0

Flying Pudding

9.5%

7.0

Greg North

9.5%

4.0

Infinity Loops

4.8%

8.0

Frank Builds

4.8%

8.0

Half Chrome

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.5
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 74.3% of products in this category.
1.0
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.3
Max flight time
10.5 min
Max flight time
10.5 min
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 10.5 min, shorter than 80.5% of drones.
Max flight distance
?
Max flight speed
?
Max wind resistance
?
Max service ceiling (ASL)
?
Show more
Video resolution
N/A
4K camera
no
4K camera
no
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
This drone does not support 4K video. 54.6% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
?
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Max movie bitrate
?
Show more
Obstacle detection
no
Obstacle detection
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This drone does not support obstacle detection. 31% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
no
Return to Home (RTH)
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This drone does not support Return-to-Home (RTH). 67.5% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This drone does not support GPS. 65.2% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
none
GNSS systems supported
none
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
This drone supports none GNSS systems, which are less comprehensive than those of 65.8% and the same as those of 34.2%.
Obstacle sensing directions
N/A
Show more
Max transmission distance
?
Transmission latency
?
Video transmission system
Analog
Video transmission system
Analog
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
This drone uses Analog for video transmission, which is less advanced than the system used by 92.3% and the same as that used by 3.1%.
Live view quality
?
Remote control
no
Remote control
no
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
This drone does not have a handheld remote controller. 95.5% of drones offer this.
Show more
Battery capacity
580 mAh
Battery capacity
580 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 580 mAh, smaller than 89.6% of drones.
Battery energy
?
Charging time
?
Weight
27.98 g
Weight
27.98 g
★ Better than 98% of models
Market range: <80 g – >920 g
This drone weighs 27.98 g, lighter than 97.9% of drones.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • 88.6% lower weight
    Weight
    27.98 g
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (28 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    27.98 g vs 246 g
  • Includes propeller guards
    Propeller guards
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This drone has propeller guards, while the average drone does not. 33.3% of drones offer them.
  • 83 ° wider field of view
    Field of view
    173 °
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (173 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    173 ° vs 90 °
  • FPV camera
    FPV camera
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This drone has an FPV camera, while the average drone does not.
  • 3 years newer release date
    Release date
    2026
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is newer than the average drone (2026 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    2026 vs 2023
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    proprietary
    â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
    This drone uses proprietary for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    proprietary vs micro-USB
  • 3 years newer release date
    Release date
    2026
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is newer than the average drone (2026 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    2026 vs 2023
  • 83 ° wider field of view
    Field of view
    173 °
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <79 ° – >130 °
    This drone has a wider field of view than the average drone (173 ° vs 90 °). The average drone has a field of view of 90 °.
    173 ° vs 90 °
  • FPV camera
    FPV camera
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This drone has an FPV camera, while the average drone does not.
  • Includes propeller guards
    Propeller guards
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This drone has propeller guards, while the average drone does not. 33.3% of drones offer them.
  • 88.6% lower weight
    Weight
    27.98 g
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <80 g – >920 g
    This drone is lighter than the average drone (28 g vs 246 g). The average drone weighs 246 g.
    27.98 g vs 246 g
  • More modern charging port
    Charging interface
    proprietary
    â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
    This drone uses proprietary for charging, while the average drone uses micro-USB.
    proprietary vs micro-USB
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Analog
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    This drone uses Analog for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Analog vs SkyLink 2.0
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • 9.5 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    10.5 min
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (10.5 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    10.5 min vs 20 min
  • 1,620 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    580 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (580 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    580 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This drone supports none photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    none vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • 6.47x less popular
    BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II is less popular than the average drone (1 vs 6.5).
    1 vs 6.47
  • 9.5 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    10.5 min
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (10.5 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    10.5 min vs 20 min
  • Non-foldable design
    Foldable design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not have a foldable design, while the average drone does.
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This drone supports none photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    none vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • Narrower tilt range
    Camera tilt range
    manual only °
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This drone has a narrower tilt range than the average drone (manual only ° vs -90 to 20 °).
    manual only ° vs -90 to 20 °
  • Fewer video codec options
    Video codecs supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This drone supports none video codecs, while the average drone supports H.264/AVC.
    none vs H.264/AVC
  • No memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This drone does not have a memory card slot, while the average drone does.
  • Fewer video format options
    Video formats
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This drone supports none video formats, while the average drone supports MP4.
    none vs MP4
  • 3 x lower digital zoom
    Digital zoom
    0 x
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >16 x
    This drone offers less digital zoom than the average drone (0 x vs 3 x). The average drone offers 3 x of digital zoom.
    0 x vs 3 x
  • No 4K video
    4K camera
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support 4K video, while the average drone does.
  • 128 GB lower memory card limit
    Max external memory supported
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >512 GB
    This drone supports less external storage than the average drone (0 GB vs 128 GB). The average drone supports up to 128 GB of external storage.
    0 GB vs 128 GB
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • No POI mode
    POI mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone does not support POI mode, while the average drone does.
  • 4 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (0 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    0 vs 4
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This drone does not have a compass, while the average drone does.
  • No headless mode
    Headless mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support headless mode, while the average drone does.
  • No beginner mode
    Beginner mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This drone does not support beginner mode, while the average drone does.
  • No altitude hold
    Altitude hold
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This drone does not support altitude hold, while the average drone does.
  • More basic transmission system
    Video transmission system
    Analog
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    This drone uses Analog for video transmission, while the average drone uses SkyLink 2.0.
    Analog vs SkyLink 2.0
  • No handheld remote
    Remote control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This drone does not have a handheld remote controller, while the average drone does. 95.1% of drones offer one.
  • Basic companion app
    Companion app
    None
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This drone uses the None companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    None vs HS FPV
  • No wireless file transfer
    Wireless file transfer
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This drone does not support wireless file transfer, while the average drone does.
  • 1,620 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    580 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (580 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    580 mAh vs 2,200 mAh

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
MultiBuild
≈ estimated
06/10/2026
Hands-on review · speed, power and freestyle flights
Verdict
BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II is a clear upgrade on the previous generation; tuning and power draw hold it back, but it is still worth buying.
8.0
Mark Arbitrario
≈ estimated
03/10/2026
Hands-on review · wind, cliff dive and city flight tests
Verdict
BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II holds up in wind and steep dives, making it a good pick for travel as a tiny 1S cinewhoop.
8.0
Colibri FPV
≈ estimated
30/09/2026
Hands-on review · setup, flight tests and comparison
Verdict
BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II is a strong first FPV drone for the money, with a much better camera than the original.
8.0
Squadding Quads
≈ estimated
28/09/2026
Hands-on review · flight testing and Betaflight setup
Verdict
BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II is a lot of fun to fly and close to the Champion version, though flight time falls short of the claim.
8.0
MultiBuild
≈ estimated
21/09/2026
Speed and handling tests · tips, tweaks and mods
Verdict
BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II is faster and more capable than the original, a standout 1S digital whoop for cinematic flying.
8.0
Flying Pudding
≈ estimated
19/09/2026
Hands-on review · wind, dive, indoor and noise tests
Verdict
BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II is a clear step up from v1 and a family-friendly all-round whoop.
7.0
Greg North
≈ estimated
13/09/2026
Beginner review · first flights, crashes and setup
Verdict
BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II is a good first FPV drone for learners who accept some setup and crashes, not a plug-and-fly toy.
4.0
Infinity Loops
≈ estimated
28/08/2026
Hands-on review · build, flight and battery tests
Verdict
BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II is quiet and smooth, but loose tuning and weak freestyle and fast-flying performance make it a poor first choice.
8.0
Frank Builds
≈ estimated
26/08/2026
Setup video · O4 Wide install, filters and PID tune
Verdict
BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II flies well, even in wind, and the stock tune is already good.
8.0
Half Chrome
≈ estimated
21/07/2026
First impressions · comparison with the original model
Verdict
BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II is the best DJI-powered tiny whoop so far, with a clear upgrade in camera and vibration isolation.

Third-party reviews

What we like about BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II

  • About 10.5 minutes per 580 mAh battery, long for a whoop
  • ELRS receiver for a fast, reliable control link
  • Brushless motors with crisp response
  • Ducted frame protects props indoors
  • Low-latency analog FPV video

What we don't like about BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II

  • No remote included, ELRS radio and goggles needed
  • No altitude hold or GPS, not for beginners
  • No user reviews yet
  • Analog video is less sharp than digital

Verdict

The BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II is a 75 mm brushless whoop built for FPV freestyle and racing, with an ELRS receiver for a fast, reliable control link. A 580 mAh battery is rated for about 10.5 minutes, which is generous for a whoop and means more laps per pack. The ducted frame protects the props during tight indoor lines, and brushless motors give crisp throttle response. Video comes over an analog system with the low latency that racers rely on. It is strictly a hobbyist machine: there is no altitude hold, GPS or obstacle sensing, and no remote is included, so you need a compatible ELRS radio and goggles. As a new model it has no user reviews yet. For FPV pilots who already own the gear and want a long-flying, punchy whoop, it is a strong upgrade.

Compare BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of BETAFPV Meteor75 Pro II and other drones

No results found