Scored using Cameras Methodology v3.0
Cameras Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Cameras Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Cameras Methodology v3.0

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 review: 112 specs compared

Avg. price:~£110Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:111 gBattery life (CIPA):200 shots

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 Review: Compare 112 technical specifications and 9 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810
4.8/10

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

3.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

3.7

Reviews score

10%

3.7

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 97% of cameras
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 81%
3.7

Technical score

Technical score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.6

Sensor & Image

25%

2.9

Photo Features

18%

4.2

Video & Audio

14%

3.9

Display & Design

8%

2.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.1

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 92%
3.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

3.7

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.8

Average grade

20%

7.3

Popularity

Grades by review (9)
2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 94%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet

What reviewers say about the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

Based on 2 · 7

Reviewers like its pocketable size, simple controls and handy shooting modes, but video quality is a consistent letdown.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

Technical score
Technical score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.6

Sensor & Image

25%

2.9

Photo Features

18%

4.2

Video & Audio

14%

3.9

Display & Design

8%

2.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.1

Connectivity & Storage

3.7
Reviews score
3.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

6.4
Sensor size
1/2.3"
This camera has a sensor size of 1/2.3", which is smaller than 59.1% of cameras and the same as 39.1% of cameras.
Sensor resolution
20.1 MP
This camera captures images at 20.1 MP, which is higher than 61.5% of cameras and equal to 4.4% of cameras.
Sensor pixel size
1.19 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.19 µm, which are smaller than those in 94.6% of cameras and the same size as those in 2.4% of cameras.
Base ISO
80
This camera has a base ISO of 80, which is lower than 80.2% of cameras and equal to 15.3% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
This camera reaches ISO 3,200, which is lower than 61.5% of cameras and equal to 23.8% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
N/A
N. of focus points
11
This camera has a focus-point count of 11, which is lower than 59.7% of cameras and equal to 6.4% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 36.6% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 87.4% of cameras.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max video resolution
1,280 px
This camera records at 1,280 px, which is lower than the resolution in 71.4% of cameras and the same as in 18.4% of cameras.
Video bitrate
?
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera records in 8 bit, which is higher than the colour depth in 8.2% of cameras and the same as in 79.8% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera records with 4:2:0, which is better than the chroma sampling in 8.2% of cameras and the same as in 70% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
What reviewers say
Type
compact
Weight
111 g
This camera weighs 111 g, which is lighter than 98% of cameras.
Width
97 mm
This camera is 97 mm wide, which is narrower than 87.6% of cameras and equal to 0.4% of cameras.
Height
56 mm
This camera is 56 mm tall, which is shorter than 94% of cameras and equal to 0.6% of cameras.
Thickness
21 mm
This camera is 21 mm thick, which is thinner than 91.3% of cameras and equal to 0.6% of cameras.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
This camera lasts for 200 shots per charge, which is shorter than 89.6% of cameras and equal to 4.4% of cameras.
Battery capacity
630 mAh
This camera has 630 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 96.6% of cameras and equal to 2.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 97.8% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.6% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 48.2% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 24.1% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 16.4% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 278.5 g lighter
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (111 g vs 389.5 g). The average camera weighs 389.5 g.
    111 g vs 389.5 g
  • 17.7 mm shorter body
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (56 mm vs 73.7 mm). The average camera is 73.7 mm tall.
    56 mm vs 73.7 mm
  • More megapixels
    This camera has more megapixels than the average camera (20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera's sensor resolution is 16.2 MP.
    20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 24.9 mm thinner
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (21 mm vs 45.9 mm). The average camera is 45.9 mm thick.
    21 mm vs 45.9 mm
  • 22 mm narrower
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (97 mm vs 119 mm). The average camera is 119 mm wide.
    97 mm vs 119 mm
  • 0.03 GB more internal storage
    This camera has more internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera has 0 GB internal storage.
    0.027 GB vs 0 GB
  • In-camera panorama mode
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 2.64x cheaper
    Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 is cheaper than the average camera (£110 vs £290).
    £110 vs £290
  • 2.64x cheaper
    Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 is cheaper than the average camera (£110 vs £290).
    £110 vs £290
  • 278.5 g lighter
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (111 g vs 389.5 g). The average camera weighs 389.5 g.
    111 g vs 389.5 g
  • 17.7 mm shorter body
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (56 mm vs 73.7 mm). The average camera is 73.7 mm tall.
    56 mm vs 73.7 mm
  • 22 mm narrower
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (97 mm vs 119 mm). The average camera is 119 mm wide.
    97 mm vs 119 mm
  • 24.9 mm thinner
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (21 mm vs 45.9 mm). The average camera is 45.9 mm thick.
    21 mm vs 45.9 mm
  • More megapixels
    This camera has more megapixels than the average camera (20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera's sensor resolution is 16.2 MP.
    20.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • In-camera panorama mode
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 0.03 GB more internal storage
    This camera has more internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera has 0 GB internal storage.
    0.027 GB vs 0 GB
  • More advanced card slot
    This camera has a more advanced card slot than the average camera (Memory Stick Duo + microSD vs SD). The average camera's card slot is SD.
    Memory Stick Duo + microSD vs SD
  • 43.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    3.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    3.7

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.8

    Average grade

    20%

    7.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (9)
    2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    3.7 vs 6.5
  • Smaller image sensor
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs 2/3"). The average camera's sensor size is 2/3".
    1/2.3" vs 2/3"
  • 1.85 µm smaller sensor pixels
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.2 µm vs 3.04 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.04 µm.
    1.19 µm vs 3.04 µm
  • 4.6 fps slower mechanical burst
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1 fps vs 5.6 fps). The average camera reaches 5.6 fps.
    1 fps vs 5.6 fps
  • Lacks HDR mode
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 0.3 in smaller screen
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • Lower video resolution
    This camera records at lower resolution than the average camera (1,280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No hot shoe
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 43.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    3.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    3.7

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.8

    Average grade

    20%

    7.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (9)
    2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    3.7 vs 6.5
  • 48.6% lower sentiment score
    3.7 vs 7.2
  • 8.3% worse value for money
    Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (6.35 vs 6.9).
    6.35 vs 6.88
  • 0.3 in smaller screen
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller image sensor
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs 2/3"). The average camera's sensor size is 2/3".
    1/2.3" vs 2/3"
  • 1.85 µm smaller sensor pixels
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.2 µm vs 3.04 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.04 µm.
    1.19 µm vs 3.04 µm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity
    This camera reaches a lower maximum ISO than the average camera (3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO). The average camera's maximum ISO is 6,400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 4.6 fps slower mechanical burst
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1 fps vs 5.6 fps). The average camera reaches 5.6 fps.
    1 fps vs 5.6 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 61% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No manual focus mode
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.4% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 71.5% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • 12 fewer focus points
    This camera has a lower focus-point count than the average camera (11 vs 23). The average camera has a count of 23.
    11 vs 23
  • 28 s shorter exposure
    This camera allows shorter exposures than the average camera (2 s vs 30 s). The average camera allows exposures up to 30 s.
    2 s vs 30 s
  • Lower video resolution
    This camera records at lower resolution than the average camera (1,280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has a microphone count of 2.
    1 vs 2
  • 130 shots shorter battery life
    This camera lasts shorter per charge than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera lasts for 330 shots.
    200 shots vs 330 shots
  • 490 mAh less battery capacity
    This camera has a smaller battery than the average camera (630 mAh vs 1,120 mAh). The average camera has 1,120 mAh battery capacity.
    630 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • No HDMI output
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 77.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Leisurely Paice
≈ estimated
09/07/2023
Hands-on festival use · photo and video impressions
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 is a compact, fun camera to shoot with, but image quality lags behind a phone.
9.0
Unbox📱Stimulant ☕
≈ estimated
05/03/2020
Hands-on review · zoom tests and sample photos
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 is generally very good, though video tops out at 720p and has no optical stabilization.
8.0
kaikye
≈ estimated
04/01/2020
Hands-on review · image quality and video test
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 offers good value for the money, but sharpness and color let it down.
4.0
Small Town Picker
≈ estimated
14/04/2016
Hands-on review · image quality and software tests
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 has a sturdy build, but purple light artifacts and required import software make it a poor choice.
9.0
Jonhobbycollection
≈ estimated
28/03/2025
Unboxing and feature walkthrough · controls and menus
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 is a good, lightweight camera that is easy to recommend to beginners.
8.0
Stizy Ella
≈ estimated
03/02/2025
Personal vlog · everyday use and vlogging
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 is a good buy for everyday shooting, and buyers value its nostalgic appeal.
7.0
Shan A.
≈ estimated
28/04/2018
Short user review · one year of personal use
Verdict
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 is a basic entry-level camera that gets the job done, suitable for beginners making YouTube videos.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.5
reviewsxp.com
✓ explicit
22/04/2018
Hands-on review · Pocket compact
Verdict
The Sony DSC-W810 is a pocket compact with a 6x zoom and easy party and smile modes for casual shooters, though its small screen struggles in strong sun.
8.0
camaras.uno
≈ estimated
18/10/2014
Review · Entry-level compact
Verdict
The Sony DSC-W810 suits occasional photographers and children, with sharp 20MP stills and a small, light body, but it lacks Wi-Fi and 1080p video.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

  • At 111 g it barely adds weight to a bag.
  • The body is 21 mm thick, so it slips into a jacket.
  • A removable battery lets you carry a spare.
  • Eleven focus points and tracking help hold a moving subject.
  • A base ISO of 80 suits bright daylight.
  • A top ISO of 3200 gives some room in dim indoor light.

What customers don't like about Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810

  • No manual focus or manual exposure leaves the settings to the camera.
  • Continuous shooting at 1 fps misses fast action.
  • Battery life of 200 shots is short for a full day out.
  • The 2.7 in screen is small for framing and checking shots.
  • No HDMI output means it cannot connect straight to a TV.

Verdict

Family days out and holiday snaps are where the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 makes the most sense. It weighs 111 g and is only 21 mm thick, so it goes in a pocket without fuss. Eleven focus points and tracking help it hold on to a moving subject. The battery can be removed and swapped, which helps on long days. The base ISO of 80 suits bright daylight shots. The trade-off is control. There is no manual focus or manual exposure, and continuous shooting of 1 fps is too slow for children running around. Battery life is 200 shots and the screen is 2.7 in, so a spare battery is worth carrying. It suits a parent or casual photographer who wants a light camera and does not want to fiddle with settings.

Compare Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found