OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Casio EXILIM EX ZS150 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:181 gBattery life (CIPA):230 shots

Casio EXILIM EX ZS150 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.6

Overall score

Score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

90%

4.3

Technical score

10%

7.4

User score

â–¼Worse than 73% of cameras
4.3

Technical score

Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

28%

4.3

Sensor & Image

25%

6.0

Photo Features

18%

3.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.3

Display & Design

8%

2.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.2

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 78% of cameras
7.4

User score

User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

7.1

Number of reviews

Based on 101 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 90% of cameras
  • casio-exilim-ex-zs150
  • casio-exilim-ex-zs150
  • casio-exilim-ex-zs150
casio-exilim-ex-zs150
casio-exilim-ex-zs150
casio-exilim-ex-zs150

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Casio EXILIM EX ZS150

Technical score
Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

28%

4.3

Sensor & Image

25%

6.0

Photo Features

18%

3.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.3

Display & Design

8%

2.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.2

Connectivity & Storage

4.3
User score
User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

7.1

Number of reviews

Based on 101 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.4
Popularity
Popularity
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Popularity:
Casio EXILIM EX ZS150 has a popularity score of 7.1, which is higher than 69.1% of cameras.
7.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components:

60%

4.6

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

6.2
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.1 MP, which is lower than that of 53.3% of cameras and equal to that of 7.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.33 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.33 µm
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.33 µm, which are smaller than those in 88.2% of cameras and the same size as those in 3.6% of cameras.
Base ISO
64
Base ISO
64
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 64 which is lower than that of 95.8% of cameras and equal to that of 3.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 1600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 1,600
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 1,600, which is lower than that of 85.9% of cameras and equal to that of 13.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
?
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
â–² Better than 12% of models
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
30 Mbps
Video bitrate
30 Mbps
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 30 Mbps which is higher than that of 48.6% of cameras and equal to that of 3.9% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
â–² Better than 78% of models
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
181 g
Weight
181 g
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 181 g which is lighter than 83.8% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
100.5 mm
Width
100.5 mm
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera has a width of 100.5 mm which is narrower than 82.8% of cameras.
Height
58.9 mm
Height
58.9 mm
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 58.9 mm which is shorter than 83.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Thickness
28.7 mm
Thickness
28.7 mm
â–² Better than 79% of models
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera has a thickness of 28.7 mm which is thinner than 79.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
230 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
230 shots
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 230 shots, which is shorter than that of 79.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3% of cameras.
Battery capacity
700 mAh
Battery capacity
700 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 700 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 88.2% of cameras and equal to those in 3.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
â–¼ Worse than 15% of models
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Casio EXILIM EX ZS150 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • 214 g lighter
    Weight
    181 g
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (181 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    181 g vs 395 g
  • 0.05 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.0456 GB
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.0456 GB vs 0 GB
  • 19.4 mm narrower
    Width
    100.5 mm
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (100.5 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    100.5 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 15 mm shorter body
    Height
    58.9 mm
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (58.9 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    58.9 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 17.3 mm thinner
    Thickness
    28.7 mm
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (28.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    28.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • 2.42x cheaper
    Casio EXILIM EX ZS150 is cheaper than the average camera (£120 vs £290).
    £120 vs £290
  • 2.42x cheaper
    Casio EXILIM EX ZS150 is cheaper than the average camera (£120 vs £290).
    £120 vs £290
  • 214 g lighter
    Weight
    181 g
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (181 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    181 g vs 395 g
  • 19.4 mm narrower
    Width
    100.5 mm
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (100.5 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    100.5 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 15 mm shorter body
    Height
    58.9 mm
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (58.9 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    58.9 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 17.3 mm thinner
    Thickness
    28.7 mm
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (28.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    28.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • 0.05 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.0456 GB
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.0456 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2.01 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.33 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 7.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Casio EXILIM EX ZS150
    the average camera
    Casio EXILIM EX ZS150 has a lower user score than the average camera (7.44 vs 8.000).
    7.44 vs 8
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2.01 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.33 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 4,800 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    1,600 ISO
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.6k ISO – >40k ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (1600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16.1 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1 older
    Release date
    2012
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This camera is older than the average camera (2012 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    January 2012
    2,012 vs 2,013
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
    No true manual exposure mode.
  • 26 s shorter maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    4 s
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <4 s – >1.8k s
    This camera supports a shorter maximum exposure than the average camera (4 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    4 s vs 30 s
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 420 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    700 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (700 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    700 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 100 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    230 shots
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (230 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    230 shots vs 330 shots
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
m.alatest.fr
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZS150 | Reviews, Tests and Price - alaTest.co.uk
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 101 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Casio EXILIM EX ZS150

  • Powerful 12.5x optical zoom in a compact body
  • Versatile 24mm wide-angle lens for group and landscape shots
  • Equipped with mechanical (sensor-shift) image stabilization to reduce blur
  • User-friendly 'Premium Auto' and 'Best Shot' modes for beginners
  • Convenient USB charging directly in the camera
  • Dedicated buttons for easy capturing, reviewing, and deleting images

What we don't like about Casio EXILIM EX ZS150

  • Relatively low battery life compared to similar models (approx. 230 shots)
  • Slow continuous shooting speed at only 1.5 fps
  • Lacks advanced manual controls like aperture or shutter priority
  • Absence of a rubberized grip can make it feel less secure in hand
  • Video recording is limited to 720p HD rather than Full HD

Verdict

The Casio Exilim EX-ZS150 is a compact 16.1-megapixel digital camera featuring a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor and a versatile 24-300mm (35mm equivalent) lens with 12.5x optical zoom. Designed for ease of use, it includes Premium Auto mode for automatic scene optimization, a dedicated video button for 720p HD movie recording, and sensor-shift mechanical image stabilization to reduce blur. Main advantages include its ultra-wide 24mm starting focal length, portable 181g body, and convenient USB charging capabilities. However, its performance is limited by a slow 1.5 fps continuous shooting rate, the absence of high-speed video or a stereo microphone, and a relatively low-resolution 2.7-inch LCD screen.

Compare Casio EXILIM EX ZS150 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Casio EXILIM EX ZS150 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found