OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:163 gBattery life (CIPA):310 shots

Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

3.9

Overall score

Score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

90%

3.4

Technical score

10%

7.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 96% of cameras
3.4

Technical score

Technical score
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

28%

3.7

Sensor & Image

25%

2.4

Photo Features

18%

3.9

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

3.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.1

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 98% of cameras
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 131 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 86% of cameras
  • panasonic-lumix-dmc-fh1
panasonic-lumix-dmc-fh1

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1

Technical score
Technical score
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

28%

3.7

Sensor & Image

25%

2.4

Photo Features

18%

3.9

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

3.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.1

Connectivity & Storage

3.4
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 131 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Popularity:
Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1 has a popularity score of 6.9, which is higher than 67.3% of cameras.
6.9
Value for money
Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

60%

3.9

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

5.7
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.1 MP, which is lower than that of 86.6% of cameras and equal to that of 6.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.53 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.53 µm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.53 µm, which are smaller than those in 64.5% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.4% of cameras.
Base ISO
80
Base ISO
80
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 80 which is lower than that of 80.3% of cameras and equal to that of 15.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 1600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 1,600
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 1,600, which is lower than that of 85.9% of cameras and equal to that of 13.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <9 – >399
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
?
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
â–² Better than 78% of models
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
163 g
Weight
163 g
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 163 g which is lighter than 86.4% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
98.3 mm
Width
98.3 mm
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera has a width of 98.3 mm which is narrower than 86.4% of cameras.
Height
55 mm
Height
55 mm
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 55 mm which is shorter than 95.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Thickness
23 mm
Thickness
23 mm
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera has a thickness of 23 mm which is thinner than 87.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
310 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
310 shots
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 310 shots, which is shorter than that of 55.2% of cameras and equal to that of 2.3% of cameras.
Battery capacity
740 mAh
Battery capacity
740 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 740 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 85.8% of cameras and equal to those in 2.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
â–¼ Worse than 15% of models
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • 232 g lighter
    Weight
    163 g
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (163 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    163 g vs 395 g
  • 18.9 mm shorter body
    Height
    55 mm
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (55 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    55 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 21.6 mm narrower
    Width
    98.3 mm
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (98.3 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    98.3 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 0.04 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.04 GB
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.04 GB vs 0 GB
  • 23 mm thinner
    Thickness
    23 mm
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (23 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    23 mm vs 46 mm
  • 2.64x cheaper
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1 is cheaper than the average camera (£110 vs £290).
    £110 vs £290
  • 2.64x cheaper
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1 is cheaper than the average camera (£110 vs £290).
    £110 vs £290
  • 232 g lighter
    Weight
    163 g
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (163 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    163 g vs 395 g
  • 18.9 mm shorter body
    Height
    55 mm
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (55 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    55 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 21.6 mm narrower
    Width
    98.3 mm
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (98.3 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    98.3 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 23 mm thinner
    Thickness
    23 mm
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (23 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    23 mm vs 46 mm
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • 0.04 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.04 GB
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.04 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • 3.9 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.8 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.8 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.8 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • 9.1% worse value for money
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.68 vs 6.2).
    5.68 vs 6.2
  • 4.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1
    the average camera
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1 has a lower user score than the average camera (7.68 vs 8.000).
    7.68 vs 8
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 42 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    31 points
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <52 points – >94 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (31 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    31 points vs 73 points
  • 1.81 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.53 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.5 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.53 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 4,800 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    1,600 ISO
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.6k ISO – >40k ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (1600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 18,900 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    6,400 ISO
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <3.2k ISO – >102.4k ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (6400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    6,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 3 older
    Release date
    2010
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This camera is older than the average camera (2010 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    January 2010
    2,010 vs 2,013
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 3.9 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.8 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.8 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.8 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <9 – >399
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
    No true manual exposure mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 15 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    15 min
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <25 min – >60 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (15 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    15 min vs 30 min
  • 380 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    740 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (740 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    740 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 20 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    310 shots
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (310 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    310 shots vs 330 shots
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
camerarace.com
06/01/2010
Summary of the review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 - Review and technical sheet
B
birdforum.net
01/08/2010
Summary of the review
Lumix FH1, Fantastic Digiscoping Little Camera, Check Image
C
camerarace.com
06/01/2010
Summary of the review
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 - Review and Specifications
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 131 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1

  • Ultra-compact and lightweight design, making it easy to carry in a pocket
  • Fast autofocus and minimal shutter lag for a point-and-shoot
  • Effective MEGA O.I.S. (Optical Image Stabilization) helps prevent blurry shots
  • Simple 'Intelligent Auto' mode is beginner-friendly and reliable
  • Good image quality with sharp details and natural colors in daylight
  • Decent battery life, typically yielding over 300 shots per charge

What we don't like about Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1

  • Noticeable image noise when shooting at ISO levels above 400
  • Lack of full manual controls (aperture or shutter priority)
  • Poor video compression format (Motion JPEG) results in large file sizes
  • Limited low-light performance, particularly when using the telephoto zoom
  • No built-in viewfinder or RAW format support for advanced editing
  • Charging requires a proprietary battery and external charger rather than standard USB

Verdict

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 is a slim, ultra-compact digital camera featuring a 12.1-megapixel CCD sensor and a 5x optical zoom lens with a versatile 28-140mm equivalent focal range. Its standout technical characteristics include MEGA Optical Image Stabilization to minimize blur, 720p HD video recording at 30 fps, and a 2.7-inch Intelligent LCD with a 230,000-dot resolution. Pros of this model include its pocket-friendly design, high-speed autofocus performance, and an Intelligent Auto mode that simplifies photography for beginners. However, it is limited by the lack of a manual exposure mode, no RAW file support, and a screen with relatively poor viewing angles.

Compare Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Panasonic LUMIX DMC FH1 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found