OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v3.0
Cameras Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Cameras Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Cameras Methodology v3.0

Ricoh GR IIIx review: 112 specs compared

Avg. price:~£1,210Sensor size:APS-CWeight:262 gBattery life (CIPA):200 shots

Ricoh GR IIIx Review: Compare 112 technical specifications, 34 expert and video reviews and 9 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

Ricoh GR IIIx
7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Score components

35%

6.3

Technical score

30%

8.5

List score

25%

8.3

Reviews score

10%

8.5

Sentiment score

▲Better than 85% of cameras
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

4.1

Price

▼Worse than 71%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
Score components

28%

7.6

Sensor & Image

25%

6.6

Photo Features

18%

4.8

Video & Audio

14%

6.2

Display & Design

8%

4.1

Battery & Power

7%

6.6

Connectivity & Storage

▲Better than 78%
8.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

8.7

Popularity

Grades by review (34)
25 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 14 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 70%
8.5

List score

List score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (9)
List score: in 9 of 144 lists (6%)
★Better than 96%
  • ricoh-gr-iiix
  • ricoh-gr-iiix
  • ricoh-gr-iiix
  • ricoh-gr-iiix
  • ricoh-gr-iiix
  • ricoh-gr-iiix
  • ricoh-gr-iiix
  • ricoh-gr-iiix
  • ricoh-gr-iiix
  • ricoh-gr-iiix
  • ricoh-gr-iiix
ricoh-gr-iiix
ricoh-gr-iiix
ricoh-gr-iiix
ricoh-gr-iiix
ricoh-gr-iiix
ricoh-gr-iiix
ricoh-gr-iiix
ricoh-gr-iiix
ricoh-gr-iiix
ricoh-gr-iiix
ricoh-gr-iiix
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Ricoh GR IIIx

Based on 10 · 9

Reviewers love the film-like colors, discreet size and lens, but battery life, the screen and focusing reliability draw frequent complaints.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Ricoh GR IIIx

Based on 229 owners sharing their experience in online comments

66%positive16%mixed18%negative

Owners love the pocketable body and sharp photos, while dust, the missing viewfinder, and short battery life frustrate many.

What owners dislike

  • Dust collects on the sensor, especially when the camera is carried in a pocket, and cleaning it can cost around $50 to $150 or more.22
  • With no viewfinder and a screen that is hard to read in bright sunlight, framing and reviewing shots is difficult outdoors.20
  • Owners report the rear thumb wheel and controls failing or feeling loose, and the camera's menus are hard to use.15
  • Owners report the thumb wheel and lens retraction mechanism failing, and some say the camera broke after a drop.14
  • Battery life is short, so owners need spare batteries and frequent charging for a full day of shooting.12
  • Autofocus is slow and hunts in low light, which makes it hard to capture moving subjects like kids.10
  • The camera has no weather sealing, so owners avoid using it in rain or dusty conditions.9
  • Some owners find the 40mm view too tight for wider scenes, group shots or street photos.8
  • Owners say the very small body feels awkward in the hand without a grip.5
  • Owners say high ISO images are noisy and low-light performance is weak, with night shots looking poor.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Ricoh GR IIIx

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
Score components:

28%

7.6

Sensor & Image

25%

6.6

Photo Features

18%

4.8

Video & Audio

14%

6.2

Display & Design

8%

4.1

Battery & Power

7%

6.6

Connectivity & Storage

6.3
Reviews score
8.3
List score
8.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

4.1

Price

6.6
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera has a sensor size of APS-C, which is larger than 58.6% of cameras and the same as 24.8% of cameras.
Sensor resolution
24.2 MP
This camera captures images at 24.2 MP, which is higher than 77.9% of cameras and equal to 5.9% of cameras.
Sensor pixel size
3.9 µm
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 3.9 µm, which are larger than those in 64.2% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.1% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 100, which is lower than 26.7% of cameras and equal to 53.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 102400 ISO
This camera reaches ISO 102,400, which is higher than 97% of cameras and equal to 2% of cameras.
Show more
What reviewers say
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
N/A
N. of focus points
9
Market range: <9 – >399
This camera has a focus-point count of 9, which is lower than 66.3% of cameras and equal to 26.2% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 36.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 87.4% of cameras.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera records at 1920 px, which is higher than the resolution in 28.7% of cameras and the same as in 46.7% of cameras.
Video bitrate
?
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera records in 8 bit, which is higher than the colour depth in 8.2% of cameras and the same as in 79.8% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera records with 4:2:0, which is better than the chroma sampling in 8.2% of cameras and the same as in 70% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
What reviewers say
Type
compact
Weight
262 g
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 262 g, which is lighter than 66.1% of cameras and equal to 0.1% of cameras.
Width
109 mm
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera is 109 mm wide, which is narrower than 68% of cameras and equal to 0.2% of cameras.
Height
62 mm
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera is 62 mm tall, which is shorter than 72.3% of cameras and equal to 1.1% of cameras.
Thickness
35 mm
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera is 35 mm thick, which is thinner than 66.6% of cameras and equal to 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera lasts for 200 shots per charge, which is shorter than 89.6% of cameras and equal to 4.4% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,350 mAh
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has 1,350 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 69.8% of cameras and equal to 1.4% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 97.8% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.6% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
What reviewers say
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 48.1% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This camera uses Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), which is more advanced than the Wi-Fi in 54.8% of cameras and the same as in 34.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This camera has Bluetooth. 24% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
4.2
This camera has Bluetooth 4.2, which is newer than 85.1% of cameras and the same as 10.1% of cameras.
USB Type-C
yes
This camera features USB Type-C. 16.3% of cameras use USB-C ports.
Show more

Ricoh GR IIIx vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 96,000 ISO higher maximum sensitivity
    This camera reaches a higher maximum ISO than the average camera (102,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO). The average camera's maximum ISO is 6,400 ISO.
    102,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Human eye AF
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Has USB Type-C
    This camera has a USB Type-C port, the average camera does not. 16.4% of cameras use USB-C.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
  • More megapixels
    This camera has more megapixels than the average camera (24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera's sensor resolution is 16.2 MP.
    24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Larger image sensor
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (APS-C vs 2/3"). The average camera's sensor size is 2/3".
    APS-C vs 2/3"
  • 27.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.5 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 70% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (34)
    25 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 14 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 6.5
  • 18.1% higher list score
    List score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (9)
    List score: in 9 of 144 lists (6%)
    8.5 vs 7.2
  • 18.1% higher sentiment score
    8.5 vs 7.2
  • Has a touchscreen
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.7% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 4 more customisable buttons
    This camera has more customisable buttons than the average camera (4 vs 0). The average camera has 0 customisable buttons.
    4 vs 0
  • 127.5 g lighter
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (262 g vs 389.5 g). The average camera weighs 389.5 g.
    262 g vs 389.5 g
  • 11.7 mm shorter body
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (62 mm vs 73.7 mm). The average camera is 73.7 mm tall.
    62 mm vs 73.7 mm
  • 10 mm narrower
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (109 mm vs 119 mm). The average camera is 119 mm wide.
    109 mm vs 119 mm
  • 96,000 ISO higher maximum sensitivity
    This camera reaches a higher maximum ISO than the average camera (102,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO). The average camera's maximum ISO is 6,400 ISO.
    102,400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Sensor cleaning system
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
  • More megapixels
    This camera has more megapixels than the average camera (24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera's sensor resolution is 16.2 MP.
    24.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Larger image sensor
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (APS-C vs 2/3"). The average camera's sensor size is 2/3".
    APS-C vs 2/3"
  • 7 years newer
    This camera was released more recently than the average camera (2021 vs 2014). The average camera was released in 2014.
    2,021 vs 2,014
  • 0.86 µm larger sensor pixels
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (3.9 µm vs 3.04 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.04 µm.
    3.9 µm vs 3.04 µm
  • In-body stabilization
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Human eye AF
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.6% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 43.1% of cameras support this mode.
  • Built-in timelapse
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • 230 mAh more battery capacity
    This camera has a larger battery than the average camera (1,350 mAh vs 1,120 mAh). The average camera has 1,120 mAh battery capacity.
    1,350 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Has USB Type-C
    This camera has a USB Type-C port, the average camera does not. 16.4% of cameras use USB-C.
  • Has Bluetooth
    This camera supports Bluetooth, the average camera does not. 24.1% of cameras support Bluetooth.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 48.1% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
  • 2 GB more internal storage
    This camera has more internal storage than the average camera (2 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera has 0 GB internal storage.
    2 GB vs 0 GB
  • Faster USB connection
    This camera transfers data faster than the average camera (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average camera uses USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • 130 shots shorter battery life
    This camera lasts shorter per charge than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera lasts for 330 shots.
    200 shots vs 330 shots
  • 14 fewer focus points
    This camera has a lower focus-point count than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera has a count of 23.
    9 vs 23
  • 1.6 fps slower mechanical burst
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4 fps vs 5.6 fps). The average camera reaches 5.6 fps.
    4 fps vs 5.6 fps
  • No HDMI output
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 77.7% of cameras support HDMI output.
  • No flash
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.1% of cameras have a flash.
  • 4.17x more expensive
    Ricoh GR IIIx is more expensive than the average camera (£1,210 vs £290).
    £1,210 vs £290
  • 5 min shorter recording time
    This camera has a shorter recording time than the average camera (25 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    25 min vs 30 min
  • 4.2% worse value for money
    Ricoh GR IIIx has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (6.61 vs 6.9).
    6.61 vs 6.88
  • 4.17x more expensive
    Ricoh GR IIIx is more expensive than the average camera (£1,210 vs £290).
    £1,210 vs £290
  • 4.2% worse value for money
    Ricoh GR IIIx has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (6.61 vs 6.9).
    6.61 vs 6.88
  • No flash
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.1% of cameras have a flash.
  • 14 fewer focus points
    This camera has a lower focus-point count than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera has a count of 23.
    9 vs 23
  • 1.6 fps slower mechanical burst
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4 fps vs 5.6 fps). The average camera reaches 5.6 fps.
    4 fps vs 5.6 fps
  • 84.6% less optical zoom
    This camera offers less optical zoom than the average camera (1 x vs 6.5 x). The average camera offers 6.5 x.
    1 x vs 6.5 x
  • 5 min shorter recording time
    This camera has a shorter recording time than the average camera (25 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    25 min vs 30 min
  • 130 shots shorter battery life
    This camera lasts shorter per charge than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera lasts for 330 shots.
    200 shots vs 330 shots
  • No HDMI output
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 77.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.5
Myke Black
≈ estimated
09/03/2026
Long-term review · 2.5 years of use
Verdict
Ricoh GR IIIx is a pocket camera with excellent images, a sturdy build and good battery life, and it is strongly recommended.
8.0
Amaljpegs
≈ estimated
05/01/2026
Long-term review · 10,000 shots of daily use
Verdict
Ricoh GR IIIx is a sharp, pocketable everyday camera, but not the best choice if you want a viewfinder or weather sealing.
9.0
ZP Productions
≈ estimated
17/11/2025
Hands-on review · portrait use and HDF filter tests
Verdict
Ricoh GR IIIx is great for portraits and very compact, though battery life, focus and exposure preview are its main limits.
9.0
Aditya
≈ estimated
07/07/2025
Long-term review · 2 years of daily use
Verdict
Ricoh GR IIIx is not perfect, but it is the camera the creator reaches for most, especially for photography.
9.0
Aki
≈ estimated
01/05/2025
Long-term test · six months of daily carry
Verdict
Ricoh GR IIIx is not for everyone, but it is small, sharp and fun for everyday shooting after six months.
9.0
Brian Lackey
≈ estimated
16/06/2024
Hands-on review · daily carry alongside a full-frame camera
Verdict
Ricoh GR IIIx is almost perfect as a truly pocketable backup camera for photographers who already own a bigger camera.
8.0
Eren Sarigul
≈ estimated
10/06/2023
Long-term review · six months of street and travel use
Verdict
Ricoh GR IIIx is worth it for street shooters who want a pocket camera, but it is expensive and niche for everyone else.
8.0
Micro Four Nerds
≈ estimated
28/02/2023
Hands-on review · one month of use
Verdict
Ricoh GR IIIx does one thing very well, but the price is steep and it only suits people who love a 40mm lens.
9.0
Samuel Streetlife
≈ estimated
23/04/2022
Long-term test · two years of daily use, two models
Verdict
Ricoh GR IIIx is still his favourite camera after two years, despite glitches, a failed rear dial and some battery-related freezing.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
lensandshutter.com
≈ estimated
01/07/2026
Full review · Street camera
Verdict
The Ricoh GR IIIx is a tiny 40mm camera for street and detail photos, but its weak battery life, slow autofocus and lack of a viewfinder hold it back.
8.0
nerdycamera.com
≈ estimated
28/06/2025
Long-term review · Street camera
Verdict
The Ricoh GR IIIx is a quiet, pocket-sized street camera whose Snap Focus and soft shutter suit fast candid shooting, but weak autofocus and sensor dust limit it.
9.0
priamo-puschiasis.com
≈ estimated
23/08/2025
First impressions · Pocket camera
Verdict
The Ricoh GR IIIx is a pocket camera with sharp 40mm images, but it has no electronic viewfinder and hunts for focus in low light.
8.0
wesleystreetshots.com
≈ estimated
12/05/2025
Long-term review · Everyday carry
Verdict
The Ricoh GR IIIx suits photographers who want a discreet pocket camera with a strong 40mm lens, not fast action or varied focal lengths.
8.0
keithwee.com
≈ estimated
12/01/2025
Hands-on review · Street camera
Verdict
The Ricoh GR IIIx HDF is a sharp, unintrusive street camera whose soft HDF glow suits night scenes, but it lacks weather sealing and has short battery life.
8.0
myleskatherine.com
≈ estimated
09/03/2026
Hands-on comparison · Sony RX100 VII
Verdict
The Ricoh GR IIIx suits serious photographers who want fine-art, natural-color images from a pocket camera, but it has no flash and only 1080p video.
9.0
hungsupply.com
≈ estimated
13/03/2025
Road test · Street photography
Verdict
The Ricoh GR IIIx is a sharp, pocketable street camera with instant startup and Snap Focus, but its battery lasts only about 200 shots.
6.0
janamaenz.photography
≈ estimated
14/04/2026
Hands-on review · Nature photography
Verdict
The Ricoh GR IIIx HDF has a pleasing soft glow, but its slow shutter release makes it frustrating for nature photography.
8.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
16/12/2024
Hands-on test · Pocket street camera
Verdict
The Ricoh GR IIIx is a pocket camera with sharp optics and a 40mm lens, but it has no viewfinder, a fixed screen and limited battery life.
8.0
techvoyageur.fr
≈ estimated
16/06/2026
Travel review · Pocket street camera
Verdict
The Ricoh GR IIIx is a discreet pocket camera for street and travel shooters who want a 40mm lens, but short battery life and hesitant autofocus count against it.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Ricoh GR IIIx

  • Four stops of sensor-shift stabilization keep handheld shots steady.
  • At 262 g it fits in a coat pocket.
  • A maximum ISO of 102400 covers dim streets and indoor scenes.
  • Eye detection autofocus keeps faces sharp.
  • The USB-C port uses a cable most phones already share.
  • Bluetooth and Wi-Fi make it easy to link to a phone.

What customers don't like about Ricoh GR IIIx

  • Battery life is 200 shots, so a spare battery is needed for a day out.
  • Video is limited to 25 min at 1920 px.
  • There is no flash, which hurts indoor and night shots.
  • There is no HDMI output for an external monitor.
  • The body has no weather sealing and no waterproof rating.

Verdict

For someone who wants one fixed lens, a small body and fast handling, the Ricoh GR IIIx is a good fit. It is light at 262 g, and its 4 stops of sensor-shift stabilization keep handheld shots steady in dim streets. The 24.2 MP APS-C sensor copes with low light, though the highest ISO settings get grainy. Eye detection autofocus helps with portraits, and the touchscreen lets you tap where focus should land. Battery life is short at 200 shots, so carry a spare. Video runs to 25 min at 1920 px, there is no flash, and the body has no weather sealing for rainy days. It suits a street or travel shooter who wants a small camera with quick handling and does not need video or flash.

Compare Ricoh GR IIIx with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ricoh GR IIIx and other products in the Cameras category

No results found