Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Olympus PEN E-PL1 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:344 gBattery life (CIPA):290 shots

Olympus PEN E-PL1 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.5

Overall score

Score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.5

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 78% of cameras
4.5

Technical score

Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.6

Sensor & Image

25%

4.5

Photo Features

18%

4.6

Video & Audio

14%

4.7

Display & Design

8%

4.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 71% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Olympus PEN E-PL1

Technical score
Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.6

Sensor & Image

25%

4.5

Photo Features

18%

4.6

Video & Audio

14%

4.7

Display & Design

8%

4.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.5
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Olympus PEN E-PL1 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.1
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.3 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.3 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.3 MP, which is lower than that of 83.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1.7% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.29 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.29 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.29 µm, which are larger than those in 69.7% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
11
N. of focus points
11
This camera has 11 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 60.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 6.5% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
35 Mbps
Video bitrate
35 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 35 Mbps which is higher than that of 53.8% of cameras and equal to that of 3.4% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:2
This camera supports 4:2:2 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 77.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.1% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
344 g
Weight
344 g
This camera weighs 344 g which is lighter than 56.6% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
114.6 mm
Width
114.6 mm
This camera has a width of 114.6 mm which is narrower than 57.7% of cameras.
Height
72 mm
Height
72 mm
This camera has a height of 72 mm which is shorter than 51.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
42 mm
Thickness
42 mm
This camera has a thickness of 42 mm which is thinner than 54.3% of cameras and equal to that of 1.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
290 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
290 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 290 shots, which is shorter than that of 65% of cameras and equal to that of 1.5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,150 mAh
Battery capacity
1,150 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,150 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 50.6% of cameras and equal to those in 1.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Olympus PEN E-PL1 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    3-axis in-body stabilization.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    Accessory port via SEMA-1 or EMA-1 adapter.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • 0.95 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.29 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.29 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • 4.14x cheaper
    Olympus PEN E-PL1 is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • 4.14x cheaper
    Olympus PEN E-PL1 is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 0.95 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.29 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.29 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    3-axis in-body stabilization.
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    Accessory port via SEMA-1 or EMA-1 adapter.
  • More complete chroma subsampling
    Video chroma subsampling
    4:2:2
    This camera supports better video chroma subsampling than the average camera (4:2:2 vs 4:2:0). The average camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling.
    4:2:2 vs 4:2:0
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.3 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 2.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 2.4 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    20.6 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (20.6 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    20.6 points vs 23.0 points
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus PEN E-PL1 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.3 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 2.3 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.1 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.1 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.1 points vs 12.4 points
  • 2.4 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    20.6 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (20.6 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    20.6 points vs 23.0 points
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 19 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    54 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (54 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    54 points vs 73 points
  • 356 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    487 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (487 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    487 points vs 843 points
  • 18,900 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    6,400 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (6400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    6,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 3 older
    Release date
    2010
    This camera is older than the average camera (2010 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    February 2010
    2,010 vs 2,013
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • 2.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 1 stops less CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    3 stops
    This camera offers less CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (3 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    3 stops vs 4 stops
  • 12 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    11
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (11 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    11 vs 23
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 16 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    14 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (14 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    14 min vs 30 min
  • 40 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    290 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (290 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    290 shots vs 330 shots
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
24/03/2010
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
05/04/2010
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
07/04/2010
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
17/05/2010
Summary of the review
D
dpinterface.com
11/06/2010
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
15/08/2010
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
No Date Provided
Summary of the review
S
sansmirror.com
No Date Provided
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
28/08/2010
Summary of the review
U
uwphotographyguide.com
05/06/2010
Summary of the review
B
biofos.com
15/07/2010
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
20/05/2010
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
29/07/2010
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
T
tauchen.de
14/07/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
06/04/2010
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
18/02/2010
Summary of the review
M
maximejohnson.com
27/04/2010
Summary of the review
P
plongeur.com
06/09/2010
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
17/05/2010
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
21/05/2010
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
24/03/2010
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
25/03/2010
Summary of the review
L
luipermom.wordpress.com
30/10/2011
Summary of the review
N
nexthardware.com
09/09/2010
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
14/06/2010
Summary of the review
F
focus.it
11/05/2010
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
N
nexthardware.com
09/09/2010
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
18/10/2010
Summary of the review
P
photofacts.nl
08/08/2010
Summary of the review
F
fotografie.nl
01/04/2010
Summary of the review
D
duikeninbeeld.tv
19/12/2010
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Olympus PEN E-PL1

  • Excellent image quality, made possible by the large Micro Four Thirds sensor
  • Image stabilizer integrated into the camera body
  • Integrated and very practical pop-up flash
  • Compact and lightweight body, ideal for easy transition from compact cameras
  • Intuitive 'Live Guide' function that simplifies adjustments in automatic mode
  • Presence of a dedicated button for recording videos

What we don't like about Olympus PEN E-PL1

  • The body construction makes extensive use of plastic and seems less 'premium' than previous models
  • Lack of dedicated dials and physical controls, which makes use in fully manual mode a bit cumbersome
  • Slightly smaller LCD screen and lower resolution than the more expensive versions of the PEN series
  • Slower autofocus in low light than today's standards

Verdict

The Olympus PEN E-PL1 is a compact Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera featuring a 12.3-megapixel Live MOS sensor and the TruePic V image processor. Key characteristics include in-body sensor-shift image stabilization, a built-in pop-up flash with wireless control, and 720p HD video recording at 30 fps. Main pros include its lightweight 334g body, excellent JPEG image quality with six creative Art Filters, and the beginner-friendly 'Live Guide' interface for real-time setting adjustments. However, notable cons include a relatively low-resolution 2.7-inch (230k-dot) fixed LCD, a maximum shutter speed limited to 1/2000 sec, and the absence of physical control dials, which necessitates menu-based adjustments for manual exposure settings.

Compare Olympus PEN E-PL1 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus PEN E-PL1 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found