Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:428 gBattery life (CIPA):360 shots

Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.0

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.7

Technical score

10%

7.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 56% of cameras
4.7

Technical score

Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

3.6

Photo Features

18%

4.4

Video & Audio

14%

7.4

Display & Design

8%

5.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 60% of cameras
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

6.7

Number of reviews

Based on 120 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 86% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2

Technical score
Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

3.6

Photo Features

18%

4.4

Video & Audio

14%

7.4

Display & Design

8%

5.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.7
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

6.7

Number of reviews

Based on 120 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2 has a popularity score of 6.7, which is higher than 66.1% of cameras.
6.7
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.5
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.1 MP, which is lower than that of 86.6% of cameras and equal to that of 6.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.33 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.33 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.33 µm, which are larger than those in 73.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.4% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
23
N. of focus points
23
This camera has 23 focus points, more than the number offered by 44.6% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 5.7% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
17 Mbps
Video bitrate
17 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 17 Mbps which is lower than that of 77.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3.6% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
428 g
Weight
428 g
This camera weighs 428 g which is heavier than 54% of cameras.
Width
124 mm
Width
124 mm
This camera has a width of 124 mm which is wider than 58.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1.9% of cameras.
Height
84 mm
Height
84 mm
This camera has a height of 84 mm which is taller than 61% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Thickness
74 mm
Thickness
74 mm
This camera has a thickness of 74 mm which is thicker than 67.5% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
360 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
360 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 360 shots, which is longer than that of 59.6% of cameras and equal to that of 2.5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,250 mAh
Battery capacity
1,250 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,250 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 60.4% of cameras and equal to those in 3.9% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    2.5 mm mic input; adapter required for 3.5 mm mics.
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 0.99 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.33 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 210 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    240 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (240 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    240 s vs 30 s
  • 3.05x cheaper
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2 is cheaper than the average camera (£95 vs £290).
    £95 vs £290
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 0.99 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.33 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 210 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    240 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (240 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    240 s vs 30 s
  • Has anti-flicker mode
    Anti-flicker mode
    yes
    This camera includes an anti-flicker mode, the average camera does not. 20% of cameras include it.
    video mode; firmware update required
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    2.5 mm mic input; adapter required for 3.5 mm mics.
  • 30 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    360 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (360 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    360 shots vs 330 shots
  • 130 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,250 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1250 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,250 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 20 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    53 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (53 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    53 points vs 73 points
  • 4% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2
    the average camera
    Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2 has a lower user score than the average camera (7.69 vs 8.000).
    7.69 vs 8
  • 920000 dots lower EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    1,440,000 dots
    This camera has a lower EVF resolution than the average camera (1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • 28 mm thicker
    Thickness
    74 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (74 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    74 mm vs 46 mm
  • 10.1 mm taller body
    Height
    84 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (84 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    84 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 20 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    53 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (53 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    53 points vs 73 points
  • 2.1 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.3 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.3 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.3 points vs 12.4 points
  • 2 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    21.0 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (21 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    21.0 points vs 23.0 points
  • 350 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    493 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (493 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    493 points vs 843 points
  • 3 older
    Release date
    2010
    This camera is older than the average camera (2010 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    March 2010
    2,010 vs 2,013
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    0
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (0 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    0 vs -4
  • 2.5 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 13 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    17 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
12/07/2010
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
26/04/2010
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
07/10/2010
Summary of the review
P
photographybay.com
13/10/2010
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
11/12/2023
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
01/07/2011
Summary of the review
H
hikinginfinland.com
31/03/2011
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
12/07/2010
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
20/07/2010
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
20/05/2010
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
21/06/2010
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
12/07/2010
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.com
01/03/2010
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
29/06/2010
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
27/04/2010
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
01/07/2010
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
08/08/2010
Summary of the review
F
focus.de
22/06/2010
Summary of the review
M
macwelt.de
15/07/2010
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
25/05/2010
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
07/10/2010
Summary of the review
F
forumlumix.com
27/03/2010
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
12/07/2010
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
26/07/2010
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
27/07/2010
Summary of the review
M
muycomputer.com
10/03/2010
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
25/11/2010
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
19/06/2011
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
17/03/2010
Summary of the review
I
id.nl
17/11/2010
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
19/10/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 120 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2

  • Intuitive touch-screen interface for focus and shutter control
  • High-quality, fully articulated 3-inch LCD screen
  • Excellent, large electronic viewfinder (EVF) with eye-sensor
  • Fast and responsive autofocus tracking and face detection
  • Compact and lightweight build with good ergonomics and dedicated external controls
  • Reliable image quality at lower ISO settings (up to ISO 800)
  • Includes HD video recording (720p) with an external microphone jack

What we don't like about Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2

  • Sub-par image quality and high noise at ISO 1600 and above
  • Out-of-camera JPEG colors and processing can look less appealing than competitors
  • Dynamic range is limited compared to contemporary APS-C sensor cameras
  • SD card slot is located at the bottom, making it inaccessible when tripod-mounted
  • Lack of 1080p Full HD video (limited to 720p)
  • Small sensor size compared to standard DSLRs can limit background blur

Verdict

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 is a versatile Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera featuring a 12.1-megapixel Live MOS sensor and the Venus Engine HD II processor. It is notable for being the first interchangeable lens camera to feature a 3.0-inch fully articulated touchscreen LCD (460,000 dots), which enables intuitive touch-to-focus and shutter release. Key specifications include 720p HD video recording in AVCHD Lite format, a high-resolution electronic viewfinder (1.44 million dots), an ISO range of 100–6400, and a contrast-detection autofocus system. Main pros include its compact and lightweight DSLR-style design, excellent ergonomics with extensive physical controls, a responsive touchscreen, and a dedicated external microphone jack. However, it faces some drawbacks, such as mono-only audio recording from the built-in mic, a lack of 1080p video support, limited dynamic range compared to APS-C competitors, and noticeable image noise at higher ISO settings (1600 and above).

Compare Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Panasonic LUMIX DMC G2 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found