Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Panasonic DMC GF2 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£80Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:310 gBattery life (CIPA):300 shots

Panasonic DMC GF2 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.0

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.7

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 58% of cameras
4.7

Technical score

Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.8

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

4.9

Video & Audio

14%

7.2

Display & Design

8%

4.4

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 62% of cameras
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 85 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 88% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Panasonic DMC GF2

Technical score
Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.8

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

4.9

Video & Audio

14%

7.2

Display & Design

8%

4.4

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.7
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 85 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Panasonic DMC GF2 has a popularity score of 6.9, which is higher than 67.3% of cameras.
6.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.5
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.1 MP, which is lower than that of 86.6% of cameras and equal to that of 6.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.33 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.33 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.33 µm, which are larger than those in 73.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.4% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
23
N. of focus points
23
This camera has 23 focus points, more than the number offered by 44.6% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 5.7% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
17 Mbps
Video bitrate
17 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 17 Mbps which is lower than that of 77.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3.6% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264, Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
310 g
Weight
310 g
This camera weighs 310 g which is lighter than 60.4% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
113 mm
Width
113 mm
This camera has a width of 113 mm which is narrower than 59.7% of cameras and equal to that of 0.7% of cameras.
Height
68 mm
Height
68 mm
This camera has a height of 68 mm which is shorter than 57.4% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Thickness
32.8 mm
Thickness
32.8 mm
This camera has a thickness of 32.8 mm which is thinner than 72.3% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
300 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
300 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 300 shots, which is shorter than that of 57.8% of cameras and equal to that of 6.7% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,010 mAh
Battery capacity
1,010 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,010 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 68.8% of cameras and equal to those in 0.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Panasonic DMC GF2 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    2.5 mm mic input; adapter required for 3.5 mm mics.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    LUMIX streaming software.
  • 0.99 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.33 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 210 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    240 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (240 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    240 s vs 30 s
  • 3.63x cheaper
    Panasonic DMC GF2 is cheaper than the average camera (£80 vs £290).
    £80 vs £290
  • 3.63x cheaper
    Panasonic DMC GF2 is cheaper than the average camera (£80 vs £290).
    £80 vs £290
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 85 g lighter
    Weight
    310 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (310 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    310 g vs 395 g
  • 13.2 mm thinner
    Thickness
    32.8 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (32.8 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    32.8 mm vs 46 mm
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 0.99 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.33 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 210 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    240 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (240 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    240 s vs 30 s
  • Has anti-flicker mode
    Anti-flicker mode
    yes
    This camera includes an anti-flicker mode, the average camera does not. 20% of cameras include it.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    2.5 mm mic input; adapter required for 3.5 mm mics.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    LUMIX streaming software.
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 2.1 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.3 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.3 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.3 points vs 12.4 points
  • 19 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    54 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (54 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    54 points vs 73 points
  • 1.8 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    21.2 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (21.2 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    21.2 points vs 23.0 points
  • 2.5 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 5.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Panasonic DMC GF2
    the average camera
    Panasonic DMC GF2 has a lower user score than the average camera (7.56 vs 8.000).
    7.56 vs 8
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 2.1 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.3 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.3 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.3 points vs 12.4 points
  • 19 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    54 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (54 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    54 points vs 73 points
  • 1.8 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    21.2 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (21.2 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    21.2 points vs 23.0 points
  • 337 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    506 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (506 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    506 points vs 843 points
  • 18,900 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    6,400 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (6400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    6,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    January 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • 2.5 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 13 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    17 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 110 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,010 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (1010 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,010 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 30 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    300 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (300 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    300 shots vs 330 shots
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
24/02/2011
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
01/07/2011
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
27/05/2011
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
16/02/2011
Summary of the review
L
londonstreetphoto.org
18/09/2011
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
04/11/2010
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
20/05/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
11/02/2011
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
27/04/2011
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
25/02/2011
Summary of the review
U
ueberlicht.de
19/03/2011
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
24/02/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
01/02/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
01/02/2011
Summary of the review
L
lense.fr
07/11/2011
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
01/11/2010
Summary of the review
R
redusers.com
25/05/2011
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
07/02/2011
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
4 de noviembre de 2010
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
03/02/2011
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
04/03/2011
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 85 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Panasonic DMC GF2

  • Compact and lightweight design with high-quality metal build
  • Fast and responsive autofocus for most everyday situations
  • Excellent RAW image quality, particularly at ISO levels up to 800
  • Intuitive and customizable Quick Menu via the touchscreen
  • Built-in pop-up flash in a very slim body
  • Compatibility with a wide range of Micro Four Thirds lenses

What we don't like about Panasonic DMC GF2

  • Removal of the physical mode dial and other external controls compared to GF1
  • Resistive touchscreen requires significant pressure and can be less responsive
  • Lack of in-body image stabilization (IBIS)
  • Average JPEG processing with occasional over-sharpening or color issues
  • No dedicated external microphone port for video recording
  • Absence of a live exposure preview on the screen

Verdict

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 is a compact 12.1-megapixel Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera featuring a Venus Engine FHD processor and a 3-inch 460k-dot touchscreen LCD. It stands out for its significantly reduced body size compared to its predecessor, support for 1080i60 Full HD video in AVCHD format, and a dedicated hot shoe for external flashes or electronic viewfinders. Main pros include its highly portable form factor, intuitive touch-to-focus interface, and compatibility with a vast range of MFT lenses. However, it lacks a built-in viewfinder, lacks a physical mode dial for manual control, and exhibits noticeable image noise at higher ISO sensitivities.

Compare Panasonic DMC GF2 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Panasonic DMC GF2 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found