Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£970Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:425 gBattery life (CIPA):360 shots

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.7

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▲Better than 65% of cameras
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.2

Sensor & Image

25%

6.1

Photo Features

18%

4.7

Video & Audio

14%

7.2

Display & Design

8%

5.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

▲Better than 68% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £970

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Olympus OM-D E-M5

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.2

Sensor & Image

25%

6.1

Photo Features

18%

4.7

Video & Audio

14%

7.2

Display & Design

8%

5.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

5.7
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Olympus OM-D E-M5 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.7

Overall score

40%

5.4

Price

5.6
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16 MP
Main camera megapixels
16 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16 MP, which is lower than that of 61.9% of cameras and equal to that of 10.1% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
3.76 µm
Main camera pixel size
3.76 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 3.76 µm, which are larger than those in 55.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 5.3% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 25600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 25,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 25,600, which is higher than that of 75.6% of cameras and equal to that of 12.5% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
35
N. of focus points
35
This camera has 35 focus points, more than the number offered by 57.2% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 1.4% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
20 Mbps
Video bitrate
20 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 20 Mbps which is lower than that of 70.7% of cameras and equal to that of 3.9% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264, Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
425 g
Weight
425 g
This camera weighs 425 g which is heavier than 53.4% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
121 mm
Width
121 mm
This camera has a width of 121 mm which is wider than 52.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.6% of cameras.
Height
89.6 mm
Height
89.6 mm
This camera has a height of 89.6 mm which is taller than 66.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
41.9 mm
Thickness
41.9 mm
This camera has a thickness of 41.9 mm which is thinner than 55.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
360 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
360 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 360 shots, which is longer than that of 59.6% of cameras and equal to that of 2.5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,220 mAh
Battery capacity
1,220 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,220 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 55.9% of cameras and equal to those in 0.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Olympus OM-D E-M5 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    Accessory port via SEMA-1 adapter.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 60 Hz higher EVF refresh rate
    Max EVF refresh rate
    120 Hz
    This camera has a higher EVF refresh rate than the average camera (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average camera has an EVF refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 60 Hz higher EVF refresh rate
    Max EVF refresh rate
    120 Hz
    This camera has a higher EVF refresh rate than the average camera (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average camera has an EVF refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 0.37 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1.15 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1.2 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1.15 x vs 0.78 x
  • 3 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    3
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (3 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • 0.42 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    3.76 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (3.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    3.76 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • 3.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    9 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (9 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    9 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 12 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    35
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (35 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    35 vs 23
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    Accessory port via SEMA-1 adapter.
  • 30 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    360 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (360 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    360 shots vs 330 shots
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -2
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-2 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -2 vs -4
  • 920000 dots lower EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    1,440,000 dots
    This camera has a lower EVF resolution than the average camera (1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 10 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    20 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (20 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    20 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 10.1% worse value for money
    Olympus OM-D E-M5 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.63 vs 6.2).
    5.63 vs 6.2
  • 3.34x more expensive
    Olympus OM-D E-M5 is more expensive than the average camera (£970 vs £290).
    £970 vs £290
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus OM-D E-M5 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 920000 dots lower EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    1,440,000 dots
    This camera has a lower EVF resolution than the average camera (1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 15.7 mm taller body
    Height
    89.6 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (89.6 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    89.6 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1 older
    Release date
    2012
    This camera is older than the average camera (2012 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    February 2012
    2,012 vs 2,013
  • 2 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    71 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (71 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    71 points vs 73 points
  • 0.2 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.8 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.8 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.8 points vs 23.0 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -2
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-2 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -2 vs -4
  • 10 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    20 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (20 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    20 Mbps vs 30 Mbps

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

B
biofos.com
15/10/2012
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
02/06/2012
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
30/04/2012
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
07/04/2012
Summary of the review
P
photographylife.com
11/04/2020
Summary of the review
M
mirrorlessons.com
07/03/2013
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
30/04/2012
Summary of the review
L
luminous-landscape.com
17/06/2012
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
06/05/2012
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
22/02/2012
Summary of the review
S
sansmirror.com
No Date
Summary of the review
E
eoshd.com
19/07/2012
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
21/06/2012
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
12/04/2012
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
14/03/2012
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
14/08/2013
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
15/03/2012
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
undatiert
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
23/06/2012
Summary of the review
J
journaldugeek.com
30/04/2012
Summary of the review
F
fisheyemagazine.fr
05/07/2013
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
01/06/2016
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
No exact date
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
N/A
Summary of the review
M
mamanvoyage.com
15/09/2015
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
21/06/2012
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
21/06/2012
Summary of the review
C
coolframe.wordpress.com
19/12/2012
Summary of the review
D
digitalcamaralens.com
08/02/2012
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
13/01/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
01/09/2012
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
01/09/2012
Summary of the review
F
fotocomefare.com
26/09/2013
Summary of the review
M
marcellosavoia.weebly.com
01/10/2012
Summary of the review
F
fotografiastore.it
15/05/2012
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
10/06/2012
Summary of the review
D
digifotopro.nl
04/07/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Olympus OM-D E-M5

  • Compact, lightweight and extremely portable camera body.
  • Exceptional 5-axis image stabilization, allowing for sharp handheld shots.
  • Excellent tropicalization (resistance to dust, splashes of water and frost).
  • Iconic vintage design combined with well-positioned and customizable ergonomic controls.
  • World-class color quality and dynamic range, comparable to or better than some APS-C cameras.

What we don't like about Olympus OM-D E-M5

  • Limited battery life, requiring purchase and carrying of spare batteries.
  • Awkward positioning of the play button, which is sometimes difficult to reach.
  • Grip not optimal when using heavier telephoto lenses.
  • Autofocus performance and video capabilities may be outdated by modern standards in older models in the series.

Verdict

The Olympus OM-D E-M5 is a seminal Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera featuring a 16.1MP Live MOS sensor, a 5-axis in-body image stabilisation system, and a weather-sealed magnesium alloy body. It offers a 1.44M-dot electronic viewfinder, a 3.0-inch tilting OLED touchscreen, and rapid continuous shooting at up to 9fps. Its main strengths include a compact retro design, exceptional image stabilisation that assists in low-light handheld shooting, and high-quality colour reproduction. However, its contrast-detection autofocus can be slow in low light or when tracking fast-moving subjects, and the lack of a built-in flash or external microphone jack limits some users.

Compare Olympus OM-D E-M5 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus OM-D E-M5 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found