Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£530Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:383 gBattery life (CIPA):360 shots

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.5

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 80% of cameras
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

7.0

Sensor & Image

25%

6.6

Photo Features

18%

5.7

Video & Audio

14%

7.1

Display & Design

8%

5.4

Battery & Power

7%

5.9

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 81% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

7.0

Sensor & Image

25%

6.6

Photo Features

18%

5.7

Video & Audio

14%

7.1

Display & Design

8%

5.4

Battery & Power

7%

5.9

Connectivity & Storage

6.5
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

7.7

Price

6.9
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
20.3 MP
Main camera megapixels
20.3 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 20.3 MP, which is higher than that of 68.3% of cameras and equal to that of 3.4% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
3.34 µm
Main camera pixel size
3.34 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 3.34 µm, which are larger than those in 49.8% of cameras and the same size as those in 2% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 25600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 25,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 25,600, which is higher than that of 75.6% of cameras and equal to that of 12.5% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
121
N. of focus points
121
This camera has 121 focus points, more than the number offered by 80.6% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 1.3% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
3,840 px
Max video resolution
3,840 px
This camera supports 3,840 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 76% of cameras and equal to that of 19.2% of cameras.
Video bitrate
102 Mbps
Video bitrate
102 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 102 Mbps which is higher than that of 82.1% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
383 g
Weight
383 g
This camera weighs 383 g which is lighter than 51.9% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.3% of cameras.
Width
121.7 mm
Width
121.7 mm
This camera has a width of 121.7 mm which is wider than 53.9% of cameras.
Height
84.4 mm
Height
84.4 mm
This camera has a height of 84.4 mm which is taller than 61.6% of cameras.
Thickness
49 mm
Thickness
49 mm
This camera has a thickness of 49 mm which is thicker than 52.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
360 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
360 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 360 shots, which is longer than that of 59.6% of cameras and equal to that of 2.5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,175 mAh
Battery capacity
1,175 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,175 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 51.9% of cameras and equal to those in 0.3% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
802.11b/g/n and Bluetooth
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This camera has Bluetooth. 22.6% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
4.2
Bluetooth version
4.2
This camera supports Bluetooth version 4.2 which is newer than that supported by 86.3% of cameras and equal to that of 9.6% of cameras.
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • 98 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    121
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (121 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    121 vs 23
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Higher video resolution
    Max video resolution
    3,840 px
    This camera records higher-resolution video than the average camera (3840 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    3840 px vs 1920 px
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 10.7% better value for money
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV has a better value-for-money score than the average camera (6.86 vs 6.2).
    6.86 vs 6.2
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 3 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    3
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (3 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 7 newer
    Release date
    2020
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2020 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2020
    2,020 vs 2,013
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    20.3 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (20.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    20.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • 98 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    121
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (121 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    121 vs 23
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • 3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    8.7 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (8.7 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    8.7 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • 0.5 stops more CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    4.5 stops
    This camera offers more CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (4.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    4.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • Supports focus bracketing
    Focus bracketing
    yes
    This camera supports focus bracketing, the average camera does not.
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • Higher video resolution
    Max video resolution
    3,840 px
    This camera records higher-resolution video than the average camera (3840 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    3840 px vs 1920 px
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • 72 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    102 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (102 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    102 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
    Up to 999 shots
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 30 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    360 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (360 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    360 shots vs 330 shots
  • Has Bluetooth
    Bluetooth connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Bluetooth, the average camera does not. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
    802.11b/g/n and Bluetooth
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    supports Bluetooth remote control
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -2
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-2 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -2 vs -4
  • 0.16 x less viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.62 x
    This camera has a lower viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.6 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.62 x vs 0.78 x
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 82.8% more expensive
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is more expensive than the average camera (£530 vs £290).
    £530 vs £290
  • 2 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    71 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (71 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    71 points vs 73 points
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 82.8% more expensive
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is more expensive than the average camera (£530 vs £290).
    £530 vs £290
  • 0.16 x less viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    0.62 x
    This camera has a lower viewfinder magnification than the average camera (0.6 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    0.62 x vs 0.78 x
  • 10.5 mm taller body
    Height
    84.4 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (84.4 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    84.4 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • 2 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    71 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (71 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    71 points vs 73 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -2
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-2 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -2 vs -4
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
06/05/2021
Summary of the review
D
digitalcameraworld.com
19/11/2024
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
05/02/2024
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
02/02/2026
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
26/10/2020
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
20/08/2021
Summary of the review
R
rtings.com
28/09/2021
Summary of the review
P
photofocus.com
04/08/2020
Summary of the review
B
backscatter.com
04/08/2020
Summary of the review
P
packslight.com
10/08/2020
Summary of the review
D
divephotoguide.com
04/11/2023
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
28/11/2025
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
14/09/2020
Summary of the review
V
videolyser.de
13/02/2025
Summary of the review
F
fotomagazin.de
09/10/2021
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/10/2020
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
04/12/2024
Summary of the review
A
apprendre-la-photo.fr
17/03/2026
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
04/08/2020
Summary of the review
P
photographiesdelannee.com
25/06/2025
Summary of the review
Q
quecamaradefotos.com
01/08/2020
Summary of the review
M
micro43italia.it
21/09/2020
Summary of the review
R
reflex-mania.com
16/12/2020
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
04/08/2020
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
01/08/2022
Summary of the review
J
juzaphoto.com
Data non indicata
Summary of the review
D
digifotopro.nl
26/09/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

  • Extremely compact, lightweight, and portable design ideal for travel
  • Excellent 5-axis in-body image stabilization (IBIS) allows for sharp handheld shots at lower shutter speeds
  • 20-megapixel sensor delivers great image quality and colors
  • Solid, well-put-together build quality despite being primarily plastic
  • Snappy and accurate contrast-detection autofocus for general use
  • Useful flip-down screen for selfie shooting

What we don't like about Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV

  • Lacks microphone input, limiting its utility for serious videography
  • Autofocus system can struggle with fast-moving subjects compared to modern phase-detect systems
  • Smaller micro four-thirds sensor leads to lower performance in high ISO/low-light situations
  • Convoluted menu system
  • Lacks advanced features found in higher-end models, such as weather sealing or pro capture mode

Verdict

The Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV is a compact, retro-styled mirrorless camera featuring a 20.3MP Live MOS sensor and the TruePic VIII image processor. Its standout characteristics include a highly effective 5-axis in-body image stabilisation system providing up to 4.5 stops of compensation, 4K/30p video recording, and a 3-inch 180° flip-down touchscreen ideal for selfies. Key pros are its lightweight, portable design (approx. 383g), excellent JPEG colour reproduction, and beginner-friendly modes like Live Composite. Main cons include a contrast-detect autofocus system that can struggle with fast-moving subjects, the lack of an external microphone jack for video, and the absence of weather-sealing.

Compare Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV and other products in the Cameras category

No results found