OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Electrolux EB61C4OG Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Suction power (AW):232 AWBattery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:3.5 LWeight:7.2 kg

Electrolux EB61C4OG Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

80%

6.7

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 58% of vacuum-cleaners
6.7

Technical Score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

28%

7.7

Performance

22%

4.9

Battery

18%

9.0

Filtration

14%

7.9

Attachments

10%

4.1

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

â–²Better than 56% of vacuum-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £130
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Electrolux EB61C4OG Clean 600 is a corded electric, bagged cylinder vacuum cleaner operating at 750W nominal power (850W maximum) with a 3.5-litre dust bag capacity and a 73 dB noise level. Key pros include its eco-friendly construction made of 50% recycled plastic, an expansive 12-metre operating radius with an automatic cord winder, convenient ergonomic foot controls, and a high-efficiency washable Hygiene E12 filter that captures up to 99.99% of microparticles. It delivers strong suction on multiple surfaces using its DustMagnet Silent nozzle, though some users report cons such as nozzles that can occasionally slip off during intense use, loose axis resistance that makes steering feel overly sensitive, and external plastics that scratch relatively easily.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Electrolux EB61C4OG

Technical Score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components:

28%

7.7

Performance

22%

4.9

Battery

18%

9.0

Filtration

14%

7.9

Attachments

10%

4.1

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

6.7
Electrolux EB61C4OG has a technical score of 6.7 points, which is higher than 55.7% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Electrolux EB61C4OG has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
1.0
Electrolux EB61C4OG has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

60%

6.7

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

7.6
Electrolux EB61C4OG has a value-for-money score of 7.6 points, which is higher than 39.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
232 AW
Suction power (AW)
232 AW
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
This vacuum cleaner has a suction power of 232 AW, which is higher than that of 85% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (kPa)
20.3 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
20.3 kPa
â–² Better than 58% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 20.3 kPa, which is higher than that of 57.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
33 L/s
Airflow
33 L/s
â–² Better than 72% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 33 L/s airflow, which is higher than that of 72% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
Universal motor
Power consumption
750 W
Power consumption
750 W
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 750 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 69.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
epa 12
Filter class
epa 12
â–² Better than 71% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class epa 12, which is more advanced than the class used by 70.6% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 3.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.5%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.5%
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.5% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 79.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 7.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
3.5 L
Capacity
3.5 L
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 3.5 L, which is larger than that of 85% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 4.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
no
Bagless
no
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
none
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
7.2 kg
Weight
7.2 kg
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 7.2 kg, which is greater than the weight of 90% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.3% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
â–² Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Electrolux EB61C4OG vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • 82 AW higher suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    232 AW
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (232 AW vs 150 AW).
    232 AW vs 150 AW
  • Includes parquet brush
    Parquet brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a parquet brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    epa 12
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (epa 12 vs hepa).
    epa 12 vs hepa
  • Includes full bin indicator
    Full bin indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a full bin indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 5.2 L/s higher airflow
    Airflow
    33 L/s
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers higher airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (33 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    33 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • 2.5 m longer power cord
    Power cord length
    9 m
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a longer power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (9 m vs 6.5 m).
    9 m vs 6.5 m
  • 2.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    3.5 L
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (3.5 L vs 1 L).
    3.5 L vs 1 L
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 82 AW higher suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    232 AW
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (232 AW vs 150 AW).
    232 AW vs 150 AW
  • 5.2 L/s higher airflow
    Airflow
    33 L/s
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers higher airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (33 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    33 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • Less operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    73-73 dB
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is quieter than the average vacuum cleaner (73-73 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    73-73 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 2.5 m longer power cord
    Power cord length
    9 m
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a longer power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (9 m vs 6.5 m).
    9 m vs 6.5 m
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    epa 12
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (epa 12 vs hepa).
    epa 12 vs hepa
  • Includes full bin indicator
    Full bin indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a full bin indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 2.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    3.5 L
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (3.5 L vs 1 L).
    3.5 L vs 1 L
  • Includes parquet brush
    Parquet brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a parquet brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 98.9% higher weight
    Weight
    7.2 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (7.2 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    7.2 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No bagless design
    Bagless
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 0.45 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.5 %
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.5 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.5 % vs 99.95 %
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 171.7 mm wider body
    Width
    436.7 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (436.7 mm vs 265 mm).
    436.7 mm vs 265 mm
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • 41.6 mm deeper body
    Depth
    306.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (306.6 mm vs 265 mm).
    306.6 mm vs 265 mm
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • No bagless design
    Bagless
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 0.45 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.5 %
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.5 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.5 % vs 99.95 %
  • 98.9% higher weight
    Weight
    7.2 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (7.2 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    7.2 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 171.7 mm wider body
    Width
    436.7 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (436.7 mm vs 265 mm).
    436.7 mm vs 265 mm
  • 41.6 mm deeper body
    Depth
    306.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (306.6 mm vs 265 mm).
    306.6 mm vs 265 mm

Graphic comparison of Electrolux EB61C4OG and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Electrolux EB61C4OG?

  • Powerful suction performance on both hard floors and carpets
  • Eco-friendly design utilizing 50% recycled plastic materials
  • Generous 12-meter operating radius reduces the need to switch outlets frequently
  • Convenient and ergonomic foot controls for adjusting power, power cord retraction, and turning the unit on/off
  • Efficient multi-layer filtration system that captures microparticles and allergens
  • Large, smooth-rolling wheels that offer easy maneuverability without scratching surfaces
  • Relatively quiet operation and lightweight body that makes it easy to carry up and down stairs

What customers dislike about Electrolux EB61C4OG?

  • Suction attachments and nozzles can occasionally slip or fall off during active use
  • Floor nozzle pivoting mechanism can feel too loose or unresistant, occasionally making it frustrating to guide in a precise direction
  • Included multi-surface attachments are sometimes prone to tangling long hair or pet fur

Compare Electrolux EB61C4OG with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)