OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£510RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:512 GBScreen size:13 inchesChipset:MediaTek Dimensity 9400+

Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

8.8/10

Overall score

Score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

90%

8.8

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 97% of tablets
8.5

Value for money

Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

★Better than 95%
8.8

Technical score

Technical score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

22%

9.4

Performance

20%

9.0

Display

16%

8.8

Camera

14%

9.5

Battery

12%

7.7

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software & Features

5%

6.5

Design

3%

8.0

Audio & Multimedia

★Better than 96%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £510
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
12GB + 256GBCheck price
Other versions:
16GB + 512GB8GB + 256GB12GB + 512GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components:

22%

9.4

Performance

20%

9.0

Display

16%

8.8

Camera

14%

9.5

Battery

12%

7.7

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software & Features

5%

6.5

Design

3%

8.0

Audio & Multimedia

8.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components:

70%

8.8

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

8.5
RAM capacity
16 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 96.2% of tablets and equal to that of 3.6% of tablets.
Process node
3 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 3 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 96.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 3.3% of tablets.
Internal storage
512 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 512 GB which is larger than the storage of 92.4% of tablets and equal to that of 5.3% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
2,738 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 2,738 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 95.5% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.2% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 88.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
3096×2064
This tablet has a screen resolution of 3096×2064 which is higher than that of 97.9% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz which is higher than in 91.2% of tablets and equal to that in 7.5% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
286 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 286 ppi which is higher than that of 88.1% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
This tablet uses Chemically Strengthened Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 65.1% of tablets and equal to that on 13% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
12,050 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 12,050 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 98.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
66 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 66 W which is faster than in 93.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 2.4% of tablets.
Battery life
16 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 16 hours, which is longer than that of 90% of tablets and equal to that of 2.2% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
635 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 635 g which is heavier than 81.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
10 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 10 ms, which is higher than that of 56.8% of tablets and equal to that of 7.8% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
?
N. of speakers
8
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 8 speakers, which is more than in 96.4% of tablets and equal to the number in 3.6% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3096×2064 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3096×2064 vs 1920×1200
  • 8x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (512 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 64 GB
  • 6 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (16 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    16 hours vs 10 hours
  • 12 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (16 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 4 GB
  • 799 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (1,200 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    1,200 nits vs 401 nits
  • 83.1% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (12,050 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    12,050 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 20% better value for money
    Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.52 vs 7.1).
    8.52 vs 7.1
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 8x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (512 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 64 GB
  • 12 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (16 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (7,567 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    7,567 points vs 1,891 points
  • 3.76x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (2,738 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    2,738 points vs 729 points
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 5.15x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (76.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    76.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3
  • 6,534 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (8,400 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    8,400 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 78.6% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (3 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    3 nm vs 14 nm
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Immortalis-G925 MC12 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3096×2064 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3096×2064 vs 1920×1200
  • 799 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (1,200 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    1,200 nits vs 401 nits
  • 2.9 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (13 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    13 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 200 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (600 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    600 nits vs 400 nits
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    97.6% sRGB coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • 27.7% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (286 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    286 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.7% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • 65 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (286 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    286 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 4x higher touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (480 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    480 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1366:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,366:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 6 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (16 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    16 hours vs 10 hours
  • 83.1% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (12,050 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    12,050 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 3.67x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (66 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    66 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This tablet supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • More Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports more Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.4 vs 5.0
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
    paste warning
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 1.9 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.1 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.1 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 6 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2025 vs 2019).
    May 2025
    2025 vs 2019
  • 6 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (8 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    8 vs 2
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports Bluetooth LE Audio
    This tablet supports Bluetooth LE Audio, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • 29.6% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (635 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    635 g vs 490 g
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • 4.81x less popular
    Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 89.6 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (289.6 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    289.6 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 96.2% more expensive
    Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£510 vs £260).
    £510 vs £260
  • 4.81x less popular
    Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 96.2% more expensive
    Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£510 vs £260).
    £510 vs £260
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • 29.6% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (635 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    635 g vs 490 g
  • 89.6 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (289.6 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    289.6 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 1 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (10 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    10 ms vs 9 ms
  • 23 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (198.3 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    198.3 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

N
notebookcheck.com
29/07/2025
Summary of the review
Vivo Pad 5 Pro - Notebookcheck.com Externe Tests
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
10/07/2025
Summary of the review
Test du Vivo Pad 5 Pro : l'« iPad Air » chinois met la pression sur Apple
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
13/07/2025
Summary of the review
Vivo Pad 5 Pro: Een solide tablet die het opneemt tegen de grote merken Model Note The iQOO Pad 5 Pro and the Vivo Pad 5 Pro released in mid-2025 shar...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB)

  • High-performance MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ processor suitable for intensive gaming and multitasking.
  • Large 13-inch IPS LCD display with a smooth 144Hz refresh rate and 1200 nits peak brightness.
  • Massive 12,050 mAh battery that provides long-lasting usage throughout the day.
  • Premium build with a slim (6.6mm) and sturdy aluminum alloy frame.
  • OriginOS 5 HD software includes productivity features like a desktop-style taskbar and multi-window support.
  • Fast charging support (66W) that can significantly recharge the large battery in about 96 minutes.
  • Comprehensive accessory ecosystem including a magnetic stylus and keyboard cover with a touchpad.

What customers don't like about Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB)

  • Currently only available as a Chinese import, which may lead to language and initial setup hurdles.
  • Lack of long-term software update promises, creating uncertainty for future security patches and OS versions.
  • Massive size (13 inches) can be inconvenient for single-handed operation compared to smaller tablets.
  • No microSD card slot for expandable storage, requiring users to pick the correct internal storage variant at purchase.
  • Keyboard case can experience slight wobbling when used on a lap rather than a flat surface.
  • Lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack and cellular connectivity (WiFi-only model).
  • Basic camera system (13MP rear) is functional for document scanning but lacks the quality of flagship smartphones.

Verdict

The Vivo iQOO Pad 5 Pro is a high-performance 13-inch tablet featuring a 3.1K LCD display with a 144Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 1200 nits. This 16GB RAM and 512GB UFS 4.1 storage configuration is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ chipset (3nm) and an Immortalis-G925 GPU, ensuring elite gaming and multitasking capabilities. Key strengths include its massive 12,050 mAh battery with 66W fast charging, an immersive eight-speaker system, and modern connectivity via Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4. However, notable drawbacks include the lack of cellular connectivity (WiFi-only), no microSD card slot for storage expansion, and the absence of a fingerprint sensor for biometric security.

Compare Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Vivo Iqoo Pad 5 Pro WiFi (16GB + 512GB) and other tablets

No results found