OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£440RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:11.61 inchesChipset:MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB)
8.4/10

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components

90%

8.4

Technical score

10%

8.6

User score

★Better than 90% of tablets
8.4

Value for money

Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

★Better than 93%
8.4

Technical score

Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 89% of models
Score components

22%

8.6

Performance

20%

8.4

Display

16%

8.9

Camera

14%

9.0

Battery

12%

7.0

Connectivity

8%

9.0

Software & Features

5%

7.0

Design

3%

8.3

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 89%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 83%
  • oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
  • oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
  • oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
  • oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
  • oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
  • oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
  • oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
  • oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
  • oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
oneplus-pad-8gb-128gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
8GB + 128GB
Other versions:
12GB + 256GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 89% of models
Score components:

22%

8.6

Performance

20%

8.4

Display

16%

8.9

Camera

14%

9.0

Battery

12%

7.0

Connectivity

8%

9.0

Software & Features

5%

7.0

Design

3%

8.3

Audio & Multimedia

8.4
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Popularity:
Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 7.4 points, which is lower than 72.8% of Tablets.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

8.4
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
4 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 4 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 88.2% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,138 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 1,138 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 65.2% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Dimensity 9000
This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 85% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2800×2000
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2800×2000 which is higher than that of 95.4% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz which is higher than in 91.2% of tablets and equal to that in 7.5% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
296 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 296 ppi which is higher than that of 91.1% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
9,510 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 9,510 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 85.2% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
67 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 67 W which is faster than in 95.6% of tablets and equal to speeds in 1.9% of tablets.
Battery life
13.5 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 13.5 hours, which is longer than that of 81% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
552 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 552 g which is heavier than 65.6% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
2 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 2 ms, which is lower than that of 88.9% of tablets and equal to that of 11.1% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Dimensity 9,000 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2800×2000 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2800×2000 vs 1920×1200
  • 3.72x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (67 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    67 W vs 18 W
  • 52.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.05 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 3.5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    13.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 17.8% better value for money
    Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.36 vs 7.1).
    8.36 vs 7.1
  • 7.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Oneplus Pad
    the average tablet
    Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.62 vs 8.000).
    8.62 vs 8
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Dimensity 9,000 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 52.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.05 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4.03x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (60 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    60 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 4,534 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (6,400 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    6,400 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3
  • 71.4% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (4 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    4 nm vs 14 nm
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Mali-G710 MC10 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-G710 MC10 vs Mali-G51
  • 72.5% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (3,262 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    3,262 points vs 1,891 points
  • 2x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 56.1% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,138 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,138 points vs 729 points
  • 6 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (10 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    10 vs 4
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2800×2000 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2800×2000 vs 1920×1200
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 32.1% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (296 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    296 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 1.51 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.61 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • 99 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    500 nits vs 401 nits
  • 75 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (296 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    296 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This tablet supports HDR10+, the average tablet does not. 8% of tablets include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1400:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,400:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 3.72x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (67 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    67 W vs 18 W
  • 3.5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    13.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.5% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (9,510 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    9,510 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This tablet supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.3 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1.5 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.5 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.5 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 7 ms lower pen latency
    This tablet has lower pen latency than the average tablet (2 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    2 ms vs 9 ms
  • 4 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019).
    April 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports Bluetooth LE Audio
    This tablet supports Bluetooth LE Audio, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.3 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.3 vs f/2.2
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 69.2% more expensive
    Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£440 vs £260).
    £440 vs £260
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.3 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.3 vs f/2.2
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 12.7% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (552 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    552 g vs 490 g
  • 58.03 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (258 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    258.03 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Gadgets Sphere
≈ estimated
02/10/2024
Long-term review · performance, camera and battery tests
Verdict
OnePlus Pad is a good all-round tablet with strong speakers and games, but it is a bit heavy and dim.
9.0
Gadgets Sphere
≈ estimated
24/09/2024
Long-term review · display, audio and multitasking tests
Verdict
OnePlus Pad is a very good tablet for its price, with smooth performance and strong media use, despite poor text readability when scrolling.
9.0
Shaan Haider
≈ estimated
08/07/2023
Hardcore gaming test · FPS, heat and battery
Verdict
OnePlus Pad's gaming performance is impressive, though some games are capped at 30 or 60 FPS.
8.0
Pratima Adhikari
≈ estimated
01/07/2023
Long-term review · one month of daily use
Verdict
OnePlus Pad is a great media and video-call tablet for the price, but not a productivity machine.
9.0
The Tech Chap
≈ estimated
28/04/2023
Full review · two weeks of use and battery tests
Verdict
OnePlus Pad is an appealing, well-priced tablet with strong accessories, though it is not very powerful.
9.0
zollotech
≈ estimated
28/04/2023
Unboxing · setup · three weeks of use
Verdict
OnePlus Pad is good overall and a solid deal for the price, with the keyboard as its main weakness.
8.0
Gadgets Sphere
≈ estimated
03/01/2025
Long-term review · daily editing and movie use
Verdict
OnePlus Pad is strong for editing and movies, but weak for note-taking, and the stylus and case are costly.
9.0
Kevin The Tech Ninja
≈ estimated
29/06/2023
Gaming overview · chip, display and wireless
Verdict
OnePlus Pad's chip can do it all, especially for gaming.
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
theguardian.com
04/05/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad review: a new cheaper Android iPad challenger
P
pcmag.com
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad Review - PCMag
T
techradar.com
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad review: reinventing the flagship killer in tablet form
A
androidcentral.com
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad review: I really wanted to like this tablet, but it isn't quite there
9
9to5google.com
01/05/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad Review: Just another Android tablet
T
techadvisor.com
19/06/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad Review: A Fine First Attempt - Tech Advisor
W
wired.com
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad Review: Finally, a Great Android Tablet - WIRED
T
t3.com
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad review: Android's answer to Apple's iPad - T3
M
mirror.co.uk
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad Review: Versatile and responsive tablet challenger
E
expertreviews.co.uk
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad review: Halfway house
G
galaxus.fr
16/08/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad review – this tablet comes with special features and stamina Would you like to see a comparison of the technical specifications between th...
U
uk.pcmag.com
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad - Review 2023 - PCMag UK
T
trustedreviews.com
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad Review: Not Quite an iPad Replacement
N
notebookcheck.com
21/05/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad Test: Ein erstklassiges Android-Tablet-Erlebnis, das den Geldbeutel schont
(Translated)Show original
S
smartzone.de
29/06/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad im Test - Tablet - Smartzone
(Translated)Show original
R
revista-gadget.es
18/05/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad: tablet de muy alto rendimiento capaz de competir de tú a tú con el iPad – Sus 10 claves y review del Gadget Lab
(Translated)Show original
M
muycomputer.com
25/07/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad, análisis: potente y versátil
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
07/08/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad-tablet Review: Met het aloude flagshipkillergevoel
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
01/05/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad review: manusje van alles voor een redelijke prijs
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad Review: Een premium Android tablet ervaring die gemakkelijk op de portemonnee gaat(www.androidplanet.nl) | 21 April 2023 | OnePlus Pad rev...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB)

  • High-quality, bright 144Hz display with a unique 7:5 aspect ratio ideal for reading
  • Excellent battery life with exceptionally fast 67W charging support
  • Strong performance for gaming and multitasking via the Dimensity 9000 chipset
  • Immersive and loud quad-speaker system with good spatial separation
  • Premium build quality with a sleek, lightweight aluminum chassis
  • Competitive pricing that offers high-end specs at a lower cost than major rivals

What customers don't like about Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB)

  • LCD panel lacks the deep blacks and contrast found in OLED competitors
  • Android tablet ecosystem still lacks optimization for many third-party apps
  • No secure biometric authentication options like a fingerprint scanner
  • Keyboard and stylus accessories often must be purchased separately at a high cost
  • Software features and ecosystem integration are not as mature as iPadOS or Samsung's One UI
  • Large, centered rear camera module can be polarizing and causes wobbling on flat surfaces

Verdict

The OnePlus Pad (8GB + 128GB) is a premium Android tablet featuring a unique 11.61-inch LCD display with a 7:5 'ReadFit' aspect ratio and a smooth 144Hz refresh rate. It is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 chipset, 8GB of LPDDR5 RAM, and 128GB of UFS 3.1 storage, all housed in a sleek CNC aluminium unibody. Main pros include its exceptionally long-lasting 9,510mAh battery with 67W SuperVOOC fast charging, high-quality quad speakers with Dolby Atmos, and a lightweight 552g design. However, it lacks a fingerprint sensor, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and expandable microSD storage, while some users find the software optimization for productivity behind that of its main competitors.

Compare Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oneplus Pad (8GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found