Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

TCL NXTPAPER 4G (4GB + 64GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£150RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:?Chipset:MediaTek MT8768

TCL NXTPAPER 4G (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 2 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

6.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.7

Reviews score

10%

8.5

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 57% of tablets
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–²Better than 73%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

6.3

Display

16%

7.2

Camera

14%

5.5

Battery

12%

7.9

Connectivity

8%

8.2

Software

5%

8.3

Design

3%

8.3

Audio

â–²Better than 63%
6.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

6.7

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

5.8

Popularity

Grades by review (2)
1 review, with a printed score. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £150

What owners say about the TCL NXTPAPER 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Based on 162 owners sharing their experience in online comments

57%positive0%mixed43%negative

Owners praise the eye-friendly screen, smooth performance, and value, while battery life and software limitations frustrate many.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say the battery drains fast when the screen shows full color or is used normally, and some report it charges slowly.13
  • Owners say it lacks a gallery app, audio recorder, app lock, split screen, private folder and per-app data limits, plus handwriting-to-text in some languages.9
  • Owners report constant lag and stuttering, slow app response and trouble playing 1080p video smoothly.7
  • Owners say the camera often fails to focus unless the screen is tapped several times, and photos look poor in WhatsApp and at night.7
  • Owners sensitive to flicker say the temporal dithering causes eye strain and headaches, and on the 70 Pro it cannot be turned off.4
  • Owners say the phone gets warm during normal use like video calls or browsing, and some report heat while charging; one says an update helped.4
  • Owners say the speakers sound tinny, and calls are hard to hear unless on speakerphone.4
  • Owners report the screen scratches within days and that it cracked or broke after a single drop.4
  • Some buyers say the case and stylus were missing in their country, so they had to buy a case separately and wait for the pen.4
  • Owners say whites look too bright in normal mode even at low brightness, and text contrast looks blurry, especially when viewed head-on.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet TCL NXTPAPER 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

6.3

Display

16%

7.2

Camera

14%

5.5

Battery

12%

7.9

Connectivity

8%

8.2

Software

5%

8.3

Design

3%

8.3

Audio

6.7
Reviews score
6.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.9
RAM capacity
4 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process, which is smaller than 53.2% of tablets and equal to 13.9% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
This tablet has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 17% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
317 points
This tablet scores 317 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 84.1% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek MT8768
This tablet runs on MediaTek MT8768, which is less advanced than 85.5% of tablets and equal to 1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1440×1080
This tablet has a 1440×1080 screen, which is less sharp than 64.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
203 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 203 ppi, which is lower than 62.8% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 5 MP resolution, which is higher than 48.6% of tablets and equal to 19.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0, which is wider than 57.4% of tablets and equal to 24.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
8,000 mAh
This tablet has 8,000 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 70.2% of tablets and equal to 4% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
This tablet charges at 18 W, which is faster than 48% of tablets and equal to 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
?
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.7% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet supports app tracking protection. 71.6% of tablets offer this.
Show more
IP rating
?
Weight
316 g
This tablet weighs 316 g, which is lighter than 89.7% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.4% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
2
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
?
N. of speakers
4
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more

TCL NXTPAPER 4G (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    96% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports eSIM
    This tablet supports eSIM, the average tablet does not. 11.3% of tablets support eSIM.
  • 35.5% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (316 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    316 g vs 490 g
  • Supports manual shutter speed
    This tablet supports manual shutter speed, while the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets support manual shutter speed.
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 13.3% higher sentiment score
    8.5 vs 7.5
  • 73.3% cheaper
    TCL NXTPAPER 4G (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£150 vs £260).
    £150 vs £260
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 14.3% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (12 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    96% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • 99 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (500 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    500 nits vs 401 nits
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports manual shutter speed
    This tablet supports manual shutter speed, while the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets support manual shutter speed.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 21.2% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (8,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    8,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This tablet supports reverse wireless charging, while the average tablet does not. 4.1% of tablets support reverse wireless charging.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports eSIM
    This tablet supports eSIM, the average tablet does not. 11.3% of tablets support eSIM.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports app tracking protection
    This tablet supports app tracking protection, while the average tablet does not. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet supports extra dim mode, while the average tablet does not. 35.9% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 40.3% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
    paste warning
  • 35.5% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (316 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    316 g vs 490 g
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.6% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • 24.5 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (150.8 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    150.8 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • 56.5% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (317 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    317 points vs 729 points
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (PowerVR GE8320 vs Mali-G51).
    PowerVR GE8320 vs Mali-G51
  • 8.1% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (203 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    203 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1440×1080 vs 1920×1200).
    1,440×1,080 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 14.1% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 4.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    6.7

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    5.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (2)
    1 review, with a printed score. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.7 vs 7.0
  • 56.5% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (317 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    317 points vs 729 points
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (PowerVR GE8320 vs Mali-G51).
    PowerVR GE8320 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 14.1% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 8.1% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (203 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    203 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1440×1080 vs 1920×1200).
    1,440×1,080 vs 1,920×1,200
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
KLGadgetTV
≈ estimated
29/09/2023
Hands-on review · unboxing and two weeks of use
Verdict
TCL NXTPAPER 4G is a good overall pick, with a comfortable matte display that suits long reading sessions.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.5
helloexpress.net
✓ explicit
30/10/2023
Hands-on review · Ebook-focused budget phone
Verdict
The TCL 40 NXTPAPER 4G is a niche phone for e-book readers, with a matte, paper-like screen and a passive bundled stylus.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about TCL NXTPAPER 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Innovative matte display that effectively reduces glare and reflections
  • Significant reduction in eye strain during long reading or study sessions
  • Impressive 8,000mAh battery life, often lasting several days with moderate use
  • Premium build quality with a slim, lightweight aluminum chassis
  • Dedicated 'Reading' and 'Ink' modes that emulate the look of paper
  • Affordable price point compared to high-end tablets or dedicated large e-readers

What customers don't like about TCL NXTPAPER 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Sluggish performance and stuttering when multitasking or launching apps
  • Matte screen layer can mute colours and reduce sharpness for video content
  • Lacklustre camera quality, especially in low-light conditions
  • Outdated Wi-Fi 5 connectivity leads to slower download and browsing speeds
  • Slow 18W charging speeds, taking nearly 4 hours for a full charge
  • No biometric fingerprint sensor; relies on less secure face unlock or PIN
  • Outdoor visibility can be poor in direct sunlight compared to true E Ink

Verdict

The TCL NXTPAPER 10s 4G is a specialized 10.1-inch tablet featuring a unique multi-layer matte LCD with a 1920 x 1200 resolution designed to mimic the look and feel of paper while reducing blue light by over 60%. It is powered by a MediaTek MT8768 octa-core processor paired with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, which is expandable via microSD up to 256GB. Key advantages include its eye-friendly, anti-glare display that remains readable under bright light, cellular 4G LTE connectivity for on-the-go use, and a substantial 8,000mAh battery that supports 18W fast charging. However, users should note several drawbacks: the matte coating can decrease overall screen sharpness and vibrancy compared to traditional glossy tablets, the entry-level processor may lead to sluggish performance during intensive multitasking or gaming, and the camera quality is generally considered poor with hazy results in low light.

Compare TCL NXTPAPER 4G (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of TCL NXTPAPER 4G (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found